logging in or signing up 05 Lanares Techy_Guy Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 47 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: October 15, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript QA at University of Lausanne Developing a Quality culture: QA at University of Lausanne Developing a Quality culture Jacques èsJjjJacques LANARESQuality at : Quality at Context and Intentions UNIL Quality Concept Evaluation and Perspectives Quality Culture: Quality Culture Quality Assurance A bottom up project...: A bottom up project... 1994 1999-2000 Quality Culture : Quality Culture Fitness for Purpose Responsibility Participation Reflexivity Balance between Autonomy and Accountability Fitness for Purpose: Fitness for Purpose 4 Basic questions Follow up of Action plans To try to avoid paternalism: To try to avoid paternalism Involving Faculty in definition of priorities Constructive feedback To Encourage Participation: To Encourage Participation COVER Faculty’s Committees Balance between Autonomy & Accountability: Balance between Autonomy & Accountability A process to regulate « tensions »: A process to regulate « tensions » A process to regulate « tensions »: A process to regulate « tensions » Quality at : Quality at Context and Intentions UNIL Quality Concept Evaluation and Perspectives Quality at : Quality at A committee to implement : Cover Self evaluation of faculties / 4ans Self evaluation report External point of view : Experts Articulation with global strategy Document a reflexive process COVER : COVER Develop and rules the process 23 members Professors Intermediate teachers (MER, assistants) Students PAT Vice Rector “Individual teachings”: “Individual teachings” Objectives and priorities of teaching Teaching methods Evaluation of teaching Assessment of students Integration of research in teaching 4 Levels - 4 questions: 4 Levels - 4 questions What are the objectives in the dimension? How do you know where you are ? What are the results ? What are the next steps to improve ? Report: Report Profile of the faculty Answers to questions Synthesis Action plan Expert’s profile: Expert’s profile Experience of governance Experience of evaluation Knowledge Swiss HE system Knowledge of the domain Expert’s role : meta-evaluation: Expert’s role : meta-evaluation “Plausibility” of the report Main questions addressed Coherence of Action Plan Open suggestions Quality at : Quality at Context and Intentions UNIL Quality Concept Evaluation and Perspectives Feedback from faculties: Feedback from faculties Stimulate global reflection, new discussions Helps to identify priorities & actions Difficult to get a large implication Requires a “significant” investment Global satisfaction AE: Global satisfaction AE Perspectives: Perspectives Improve tools & guidelines Complete Evaluation of all faculties Introduce simplifications Re-enforce the culture Slide26: “Pertinence is more important than conformity” You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
05 Lanares Techy_Guy Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 47 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: October 15, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript QA at University of Lausanne Developing a Quality culture: QA at University of Lausanne Developing a Quality culture Jacques èsJjjJacques LANARESQuality at : Quality at Context and Intentions UNIL Quality Concept Evaluation and Perspectives Quality Culture: Quality Culture Quality Assurance A bottom up project...: A bottom up project... 1994 1999-2000 Quality Culture : Quality Culture Fitness for Purpose Responsibility Participation Reflexivity Balance between Autonomy and Accountability Fitness for Purpose: Fitness for Purpose 4 Basic questions Follow up of Action plans To try to avoid paternalism: To try to avoid paternalism Involving Faculty in definition of priorities Constructive feedback To Encourage Participation: To Encourage Participation COVER Faculty’s Committees Balance between Autonomy & Accountability: Balance between Autonomy & Accountability A process to regulate « tensions »: A process to regulate « tensions » A process to regulate « tensions »: A process to regulate « tensions » Quality at : Quality at Context and Intentions UNIL Quality Concept Evaluation and Perspectives Quality at : Quality at A committee to implement : Cover Self evaluation of faculties / 4ans Self evaluation report External point of view : Experts Articulation with global strategy Document a reflexive process COVER : COVER Develop and rules the process 23 members Professors Intermediate teachers (MER, assistants) Students PAT Vice Rector “Individual teachings”: “Individual teachings” Objectives and priorities of teaching Teaching methods Evaluation of teaching Assessment of students Integration of research in teaching 4 Levels - 4 questions: 4 Levels - 4 questions What are the objectives in the dimension? How do you know where you are ? What are the results ? What are the next steps to improve ? Report: Report Profile of the faculty Answers to questions Synthesis Action plan Expert’s profile: Expert’s profile Experience of governance Experience of evaluation Knowledge Swiss HE system Knowledge of the domain Expert’s role : meta-evaluation: Expert’s role : meta-evaluation “Plausibility” of the report Main questions addressed Coherence of Action Plan Open suggestions Quality at : Quality at Context and Intentions UNIL Quality Concept Evaluation and Perspectives Feedback from faculties: Feedback from faculties Stimulate global reflection, new discussions Helps to identify priorities & actions Difficult to get a large implication Requires a “significant” investment Global satisfaction AE: Global satisfaction AE Perspectives: Perspectives Improve tools & guidelines Complete Evaluation of all faculties Introduce simplifications Re-enforce the culture Slide26: “Pertinence is more important than conformity”