logging in or signing up Burkink Techy_Guy Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 298 Category: News & Reports.. License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: September 17, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript State Branding of Gift Shop and Restaurant Menu Items: Consumer Willingness to Pay for Local Products*: State Branding of Gift Shop and Restaurant Menu Items: Consumer Willingness to Pay for Local Products* Symposium 2003: ‘Branding, Labeling and Identify Preservation: What’s in it for Agribusiness?’ Department of Rural Economy / University of Alberta Tim J. Burkink Paul Patterson *Agribusiness: An International Journal (Forthcoming) State Branding Programs: State Branding Programs Arizona Grown, Jersey Fresh Effectiveness? Depends on successful differentiation Price premium - brand loyalty (inelastic demand) Previous studies - Grocery Products: New Jersey Study - Effective Differentiation Arizona Study - No shift in demand Branding Gift Shop & Restaurant Menu Items: Branding Gift Shop andamp; Restaurant Menu Items Potential for successful differentiation Tourists are less price sensitive (price inelastic) and more willing to spend additional increments of income (income elastic) Important part of state’s economy Important attribute for tourist/consumer? Arizona 'experience' Potential for licensing fees Study Objective: Study Objective Determine the value consumers (tourists) place on the state branding attribute First study on state branding to establish such a value Methodology:Conjoint Analysis: Methodology: Conjoint Analysis How consumers develop preferences Value is developed by combining separate amounts of utility provided by each attribute Products, attributes, levels Respondents provide overall evaluation The importance of each attribute and each attribute value is determined from overall ratings via the respondent’s preference structure Regress overall utility on product attributes, including price Marginal willingness to pay, or the implicit price for a certain attribute is obtained Methodology:Conjoint Analysis: Methodology: Conjoint Analysis Present consumers with depictions of products with attributes systematically varied - price, labeling information - Arizona Grown or Pride of Arizona Consumer provides rating on product Can determine consumer’s willingness to pay (implicit price) for Arizona Grown or information on product origin Experimental Products: Experimental Products Restaurant Menu Items Beef with vegetables Lamb with vegetables Ostrich with vegetables Gift Items Wine Salsa Candy Example Beef Card: Example Beef Card Example Lamb Card: Example Lamb Card Example Ostrich Card: Example Ostrich Card Example Wine Card: Example Wine Card Example Salsa Card: Example Salsa Card Example Candy Card: Example Candy Card Experimental DesignMenu Items: Experimental Design Menu Items Product - Beef, Lamb, Ostrich Logo + Origin Description Price - $13, $16, $19 Fractional factorial - subset of factor levels is orthogonal and balanced (each level in a factor appears the same number of times) Nearly orthogonal design - 18 cards Experimental DesignGift Items: Experimental Design Gift Items Wine Logo (Arizona Grown), origin description, organic, price - $13.95, $16.95, $19.95 Salsa Logo (Pride of Arizona), origin description, price - $5.50, $7.50, $9.50 Candy Logo (Pride of Arizona), origin description, price - $4.95, $6.95, $8.95 Orthogonal design - 6 cards each Methodology: Methodology Rating scaling - likelihood of purchase 1=Extremely unlikely,.., 10=Extremely likely Surveys Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport, Biltmore Fashion Square Incentive gift - Arizona Highways Gift survey - February-March, 2001 Menu survey - March-April, 2001 Survey Respondents: Survey Respondents Menu - 79 respondents Gift - 86 respondents 22 states, 6 foreign countries Nearly evenly divided between men and women Middle-aged Middle to upper income Menu Items:Willingness to Pay: Menu Items: Willingness to Pay Wine:Willingness to Pay: Wine: Willingness to Pay Salsa:Willingness to Pay: Salsa: Willingness to Pay Candy:Willingness to Pay: Candy: Willingness to Pay Summary of Results:Restaurant Survey: Summary of Results: Restaurant Survey Tourists do value origin New marketing opportunities Similar to existing restaurant promotions Challenges Must insure origin Menu changes for seasonal products Summary of Results:Gift Items: Summary of Results: Gift Items Consumers do value origin Logo more effective Challenge Logo for all production? You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
Burkink Techy_Guy Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 298 Category: News & Reports.. License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: September 17, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript State Branding of Gift Shop and Restaurant Menu Items: Consumer Willingness to Pay for Local Products*: State Branding of Gift Shop and Restaurant Menu Items: Consumer Willingness to Pay for Local Products* Symposium 2003: ‘Branding, Labeling and Identify Preservation: What’s in it for Agribusiness?’ Department of Rural Economy / University of Alberta Tim J. Burkink Paul Patterson *Agribusiness: An International Journal (Forthcoming) State Branding Programs: State Branding Programs Arizona Grown, Jersey Fresh Effectiveness? Depends on successful differentiation Price premium - brand loyalty (inelastic demand) Previous studies - Grocery Products: New Jersey Study - Effective Differentiation Arizona Study - No shift in demand Branding Gift Shop & Restaurant Menu Items: Branding Gift Shop andamp; Restaurant Menu Items Potential for successful differentiation Tourists are less price sensitive (price inelastic) and more willing to spend additional increments of income (income elastic) Important part of state’s economy Important attribute for tourist/consumer? Arizona 'experience' Potential for licensing fees Study Objective: Study Objective Determine the value consumers (tourists) place on the state branding attribute First study on state branding to establish such a value Methodology:Conjoint Analysis: Methodology: Conjoint Analysis How consumers develop preferences Value is developed by combining separate amounts of utility provided by each attribute Products, attributes, levels Respondents provide overall evaluation The importance of each attribute and each attribute value is determined from overall ratings via the respondent’s preference structure Regress overall utility on product attributes, including price Marginal willingness to pay, or the implicit price for a certain attribute is obtained Methodology:Conjoint Analysis: Methodology: Conjoint Analysis Present consumers with depictions of products with attributes systematically varied - price, labeling information - Arizona Grown or Pride of Arizona Consumer provides rating on product Can determine consumer’s willingness to pay (implicit price) for Arizona Grown or information on product origin Experimental Products: Experimental Products Restaurant Menu Items Beef with vegetables Lamb with vegetables Ostrich with vegetables Gift Items Wine Salsa Candy Example Beef Card: Example Beef Card Example Lamb Card: Example Lamb Card Example Ostrich Card: Example Ostrich Card Example Wine Card: Example Wine Card Example Salsa Card: Example Salsa Card Example Candy Card: Example Candy Card Experimental DesignMenu Items: Experimental Design Menu Items Product - Beef, Lamb, Ostrich Logo + Origin Description Price - $13, $16, $19 Fractional factorial - subset of factor levels is orthogonal and balanced (each level in a factor appears the same number of times) Nearly orthogonal design - 18 cards Experimental DesignGift Items: Experimental Design Gift Items Wine Logo (Arizona Grown), origin description, organic, price - $13.95, $16.95, $19.95 Salsa Logo (Pride of Arizona), origin description, price - $5.50, $7.50, $9.50 Candy Logo (Pride of Arizona), origin description, price - $4.95, $6.95, $8.95 Orthogonal design - 6 cards each Methodology: Methodology Rating scaling - likelihood of purchase 1=Extremely unlikely,.., 10=Extremely likely Surveys Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport, Biltmore Fashion Square Incentive gift - Arizona Highways Gift survey - February-March, 2001 Menu survey - March-April, 2001 Survey Respondents: Survey Respondents Menu - 79 respondents Gift - 86 respondents 22 states, 6 foreign countries Nearly evenly divided between men and women Middle-aged Middle to upper income Menu Items:Willingness to Pay: Menu Items: Willingness to Pay Wine:Willingness to Pay: Wine: Willingness to Pay Salsa:Willingness to Pay: Salsa: Willingness to Pay Candy:Willingness to Pay: Candy: Willingness to Pay Summary of Results:Restaurant Survey: Summary of Results: Restaurant Survey Tourists do value origin New marketing opportunities Similar to existing restaurant promotions Challenges Must insure origin Menu changes for seasonal products Summary of Results:Gift Items: Summary of Results: Gift Items Consumers do value origin Logo more effective Challenge Logo for all production?