logging in or signing up Sathaye Tarzen Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 51 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: November 24, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide1: F7 and FORCLIMIT PROJECTS: The Tropical Forestry and Global Climate Change Research Network Forestry Mitigation Carbon Potential and Costs: Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, the Philippines, and Tanzania Jayant Sathaye and Willy Makundi Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Ken Andrasko US Environmental Protection Agency October 2001Project Description: Project Description Estimate the carbon mitigation potential and costs of forestry options Data: National statistics on land use patterns, carbon benefits and costs of mitigation options, timber and non-timber prices, etc. Studies conducted by country-specific modeling teams LBNL provides technical support, training and outreach COMAP model – accounting approach Land use markets are often not part of the cash economyF7 and FORCLIMIT Participating Research Groups (F7 since 1990): F7 and FORCLIMIT Participating Research Groups (F7 since 1990) ASIA: CHINA -- Xu, Deying (IPCC Lead Author, LULUCF Report), Forest Ecology and Environment Institute, Beijing INDIA -- Dr. N.H. Ravindranath (IPCC Coordinator, LULUCF Report, CLA for Tech Transfer, and LA for WGIII Report, Consultant to UNFCCC), Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore INDONESIA -- Prof. Rizaldi Boer (UNFCCC Consultant), Bogor Agriculture University, Bogor (co-funding with EAP) MALAYSIA -- Dr. Roslan Ismail (ITTO Board, IPCC LA), SustechAsia.com Sdn Bhd., and Prof. Azman Abidin, UPM, Malaysia (via EAP funding) PHILIPPINES -- Prof. Rodel Lasco (IPCC Lead Author, LULUCF Report), University of the Philippines, Los Banos (via EAP funding) AFRICA: TANZANIA -- (Yonika Ngaga, CEEST, Dar es Salam, and Dr.Willy Makundi, LBNL, LULUCF and WGIII Lead Author) LATIN AMERICA: MEXICO -- Prof. Omar Masera, IPCC CLA LULUCF and LA Tech Transfer and WG III reports, National University of Mexico BRAZIL -- Dr. Philip Fearnside, IPCC, CLA LULUCF and LA WGII, National Institute for Research in the Amazon (INPA), ManausSlide4: Comprehensive Mitigation Analysis Process (COMAP)1. Selection and Characterization of Options : 1. Selection and Characterization of Options Mitigation Options Regeneration – Natural and Enhanced Short and Long-rotation Plantations Agroforestry Forest Protection Forest management Bioenergy 1.1 Forestry Mitigation Options In Study Countries: Key Assumptions: 1.1 Forestry Mitigation Options In Study Countries: Key Assumptions * Excludes opportunity costs of land, which vary substantially across countries. These are accounted for in the estimates for each study country.Slide7: 2. Historical land-use characteristics Slide8: 4.0 Land-use categories3. / 4. Land-use Scenarios: 3. / 4. Land-use Scenarios Brazil -- Scenarios based on potential identified in literature China -- Two scenarios based on government plans Forestation of 80% and 60% of suitable land area in 30 years in three regions -- South West, South East, and North East. India -- Sustainable and commercial forestry scenarios analyzed Indonesia -- Government plans scenario, and a mitigation scenario were analyzed. The latter meets all wood demand by 2010. Philippines -- Forestation rates of 100% and 50% of government plans in two scenarios. Mexico -- Baseline (likely trends) and mitigation scenario analyzed Mitigation consists of reduced deforestation rates, better forest management, and plantations meet commercial wood demand Tanzania - The Tropical Forest Action Plan (TFAP) scenario, assuming that 3.5 Mha and 1.7 Mha land area is converted are analyzed. Slide10: Comprehensive Mitigation Analysis Process (COMAP) 5. Carbon Accounting: 5. Carbon Accounting Four carbon pools are accounted for Above- and below-ground biomass, detritus, soils and products Carbon accounting is on an equilibrium value basis Annual balance is reported for vegetation carbon All accounting is with respect to a reference case or baseline carbon 5.1 Carbon Accounting: 5.1 Carbon Accounting Time Carbon Stock T 0.5 T Natural regeneration Plantation operated in rotation Forest Protection: Baseline Scenario Forest Protection: Mitigation ScenarioSlide13: 5.2 Vegetation Carbon Stock in Study Countries 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 2000 '12 '30 2000 '12 '30 2000 '12 '30 2000 '12 '30 2000 '12 '30 2000 '12 '30 Mexico Indonesia China India Philippines Tanzania Mt C Mitigation Scenario Baseline Scenario 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 2000 '12 '30 Philippines Mitigation Baseline 6. Benefit / Cost Accounting: 6. Benefit / Cost Accounting Costs include Establishment or first costs Recurring costs -- maintenance and monitoring Opportunity cost of land Benefits include Revenue from sale of timber and non-timber products -- fruits, honey, etc. Accounting is with respect to a reference case or baseline cost and benefits6.1 -- Regeneration Project: Accounting of Carbon and Costs: 6.1 -- Regeneration Project: Accounting of Carbon and Costs Time Carbon Stock G Time Annual Cost R R T T I V U O O6.2 -- Forest Conservation Project:Accounting of Carbon and Costs: 6.2 -- Forest Conservation Project: Accounting of Carbon and Costs Time Carbon Stock Baseline Scenario Mitigation Scenario Mitigation Scenario Baseline Scenario Annual Cost T A B C D O M O E F T Tp Tp Y X L Z V6.3 -- Plantation Project Harvested in Rotation:Accounting of Carbon and Costs : 6.3 -- Plantation Project Harvested in Rotation: Accounting of Carbon and Costs Time Carbon Stock G 0.5 G Time Annual Cost R R T K T M N A B O O6.4 Evaluation of Project Costs: 6.4 Evaluation of Project Costs Time Total Costs B: Discounted present value of cost series A C: Annualized cost of a LULUCF project Converging series A: Cost of a LULUCF project6.5 Discounting Carbon Revenue: 6.5 Discounting Carbon RevenueSlide20: 7./8. Forestry Mitigation Potential, Indonesia Forest Protection Bioenergy Reforestation - Short - Rotation Reduced Impact Logging Reforestation - Long - Rotation Enhanced Natural Regeneration Long - Rotation Plantation Short - Rotation Plantation - 150 - 100 - 50 0 50 100 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Cumulative Carbon Mitigation Potential (Mt C), 2000-2030 Cost ($/t C) DR = 10% Slide21: Negative cost potential about half the total 8.1 Forestry Mitigation Potential (Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Philippines and Tanzania) 35 36 10 9 7 8 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 6 5 4 3 2 1 ($1,000) ($800) ($600) ($400) ($200) $0 $200 $400 $600 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Cumulative Carbon Mitigation Potential (Mt C), 2000 - 2030 Slide22: Negative cost potential about half the total 8.2 Forestry Mitigation Potential (Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Philippines and Tanzania) 35 36 10 9 7 8 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 6 5 4 3 2 1 ($1,000) ($800) ($600) ($400) ($200) $0 $200 $400 $600 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Cumulative Carbon Mitigation Potential (Mt C), 2000 - 2030 Hypothetical Carbon Price9. Conceptual Figure: Impact of barriers on costs and carbon mitigation potential : 9. Conceptual Figure: Impact of barriers on costs and carbon mitigation potential Carbon sequestered or emissions avoided (t C) Cost of carbon ($/t C) F7 Estimate – Socioeconomic Potential Market or Achievable Potential Economic Potential Barriers: Examples Carbon leakage Class structure Gender Issues Attitudes and habits Market Failures: Examples Ill-defined property rights Lack of information Absence of markets Poor capital markets ?? ?? Technical PotentialSlide24: Carbon Benefits: Mitigation Options in F7 Studies Future Work: Future Work Estimating mitigation potential of projects taking barriers into consideration Land tenure, rural cultures, risk-averse behavior, lack of product markets, etc. Project-specific analysis of forestry mitigation options Establishing approaches to resolve issues of baselines, permanence, and leakage FORCLIMIT Project Evaluation of one case study to better understand key LULUCF issues about leakage and permanence Global COMAP Model developmentSlide27: F7 Carbon and Timber Cost Curves by Country Global Carbon and Timber Supply Curve New Timber Price Global COMAP Model Add transaction costs and consumer discount rates Iterate between global and country-specific curves using timber prices You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
Sathaye Tarzen Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 51 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: November 24, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide1: F7 and FORCLIMIT PROJECTS: The Tropical Forestry and Global Climate Change Research Network Forestry Mitigation Carbon Potential and Costs: Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, the Philippines, and Tanzania Jayant Sathaye and Willy Makundi Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Ken Andrasko US Environmental Protection Agency October 2001Project Description: Project Description Estimate the carbon mitigation potential and costs of forestry options Data: National statistics on land use patterns, carbon benefits and costs of mitigation options, timber and non-timber prices, etc. Studies conducted by country-specific modeling teams LBNL provides technical support, training and outreach COMAP model – accounting approach Land use markets are often not part of the cash economyF7 and FORCLIMIT Participating Research Groups (F7 since 1990): F7 and FORCLIMIT Participating Research Groups (F7 since 1990) ASIA: CHINA -- Xu, Deying (IPCC Lead Author, LULUCF Report), Forest Ecology and Environment Institute, Beijing INDIA -- Dr. N.H. Ravindranath (IPCC Coordinator, LULUCF Report, CLA for Tech Transfer, and LA for WGIII Report, Consultant to UNFCCC), Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore INDONESIA -- Prof. Rizaldi Boer (UNFCCC Consultant), Bogor Agriculture University, Bogor (co-funding with EAP) MALAYSIA -- Dr. Roslan Ismail (ITTO Board, IPCC LA), SustechAsia.com Sdn Bhd., and Prof. Azman Abidin, UPM, Malaysia (via EAP funding) PHILIPPINES -- Prof. Rodel Lasco (IPCC Lead Author, LULUCF Report), University of the Philippines, Los Banos (via EAP funding) AFRICA: TANZANIA -- (Yonika Ngaga, CEEST, Dar es Salam, and Dr.Willy Makundi, LBNL, LULUCF and WGIII Lead Author) LATIN AMERICA: MEXICO -- Prof. Omar Masera, IPCC CLA LULUCF and LA Tech Transfer and WG III reports, National University of Mexico BRAZIL -- Dr. Philip Fearnside, IPCC, CLA LULUCF and LA WGII, National Institute for Research in the Amazon (INPA), ManausSlide4: Comprehensive Mitigation Analysis Process (COMAP)1. Selection and Characterization of Options : 1. Selection and Characterization of Options Mitigation Options Regeneration – Natural and Enhanced Short and Long-rotation Plantations Agroforestry Forest Protection Forest management Bioenergy 1.1 Forestry Mitigation Options In Study Countries: Key Assumptions: 1.1 Forestry Mitigation Options In Study Countries: Key Assumptions * Excludes opportunity costs of land, which vary substantially across countries. These are accounted for in the estimates for each study country.Slide7: 2. Historical land-use characteristics Slide8: 4.0 Land-use categories3. / 4. Land-use Scenarios: 3. / 4. Land-use Scenarios Brazil -- Scenarios based on potential identified in literature China -- Two scenarios based on government plans Forestation of 80% and 60% of suitable land area in 30 years in three regions -- South West, South East, and North East. India -- Sustainable and commercial forestry scenarios analyzed Indonesia -- Government plans scenario, and a mitigation scenario were analyzed. The latter meets all wood demand by 2010. Philippines -- Forestation rates of 100% and 50% of government plans in two scenarios. Mexico -- Baseline (likely trends) and mitigation scenario analyzed Mitigation consists of reduced deforestation rates, better forest management, and plantations meet commercial wood demand Tanzania - The Tropical Forest Action Plan (TFAP) scenario, assuming that 3.5 Mha and 1.7 Mha land area is converted are analyzed. Slide10: Comprehensive Mitigation Analysis Process (COMAP) 5. Carbon Accounting: 5. Carbon Accounting Four carbon pools are accounted for Above- and below-ground biomass, detritus, soils and products Carbon accounting is on an equilibrium value basis Annual balance is reported for vegetation carbon All accounting is with respect to a reference case or baseline carbon 5.1 Carbon Accounting: 5.1 Carbon Accounting Time Carbon Stock T 0.5 T Natural regeneration Plantation operated in rotation Forest Protection: Baseline Scenario Forest Protection: Mitigation ScenarioSlide13: 5.2 Vegetation Carbon Stock in Study Countries 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 2000 '12 '30 2000 '12 '30 2000 '12 '30 2000 '12 '30 2000 '12 '30 2000 '12 '30 Mexico Indonesia China India Philippines Tanzania Mt C Mitigation Scenario Baseline Scenario 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 2000 '12 '30 Philippines Mitigation Baseline 6. Benefit / Cost Accounting: 6. Benefit / Cost Accounting Costs include Establishment or first costs Recurring costs -- maintenance and monitoring Opportunity cost of land Benefits include Revenue from sale of timber and non-timber products -- fruits, honey, etc. Accounting is with respect to a reference case or baseline cost and benefits6.1 -- Regeneration Project: Accounting of Carbon and Costs: 6.1 -- Regeneration Project: Accounting of Carbon and Costs Time Carbon Stock G Time Annual Cost R R T T I V U O O6.2 -- Forest Conservation Project:Accounting of Carbon and Costs: 6.2 -- Forest Conservation Project: Accounting of Carbon and Costs Time Carbon Stock Baseline Scenario Mitigation Scenario Mitigation Scenario Baseline Scenario Annual Cost T A B C D O M O E F T Tp Tp Y X L Z V6.3 -- Plantation Project Harvested in Rotation:Accounting of Carbon and Costs : 6.3 -- Plantation Project Harvested in Rotation: Accounting of Carbon and Costs Time Carbon Stock G 0.5 G Time Annual Cost R R T K T M N A B O O6.4 Evaluation of Project Costs: 6.4 Evaluation of Project Costs Time Total Costs B: Discounted present value of cost series A C: Annualized cost of a LULUCF project Converging series A: Cost of a LULUCF project6.5 Discounting Carbon Revenue: 6.5 Discounting Carbon RevenueSlide20: 7./8. Forestry Mitigation Potential, Indonesia Forest Protection Bioenergy Reforestation - Short - Rotation Reduced Impact Logging Reforestation - Long - Rotation Enhanced Natural Regeneration Long - Rotation Plantation Short - Rotation Plantation - 150 - 100 - 50 0 50 100 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Cumulative Carbon Mitigation Potential (Mt C), 2000-2030 Cost ($/t C) DR = 10% Slide21: Negative cost potential about half the total 8.1 Forestry Mitigation Potential (Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Philippines and Tanzania) 35 36 10 9 7 8 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 6 5 4 3 2 1 ($1,000) ($800) ($600) ($400) ($200) $0 $200 $400 $600 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Cumulative Carbon Mitigation Potential (Mt C), 2000 - 2030 Slide22: Negative cost potential about half the total 8.2 Forestry Mitigation Potential (Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Philippines and Tanzania) 35 36 10 9 7 8 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 6 5 4 3 2 1 ($1,000) ($800) ($600) ($400) ($200) $0 $200 $400 $600 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Cumulative Carbon Mitigation Potential (Mt C), 2000 - 2030 Hypothetical Carbon Price9. Conceptual Figure: Impact of barriers on costs and carbon mitigation potential : 9. Conceptual Figure: Impact of barriers on costs and carbon mitigation potential Carbon sequestered or emissions avoided (t C) Cost of carbon ($/t C) F7 Estimate – Socioeconomic Potential Market or Achievable Potential Economic Potential Barriers: Examples Carbon leakage Class structure Gender Issues Attitudes and habits Market Failures: Examples Ill-defined property rights Lack of information Absence of markets Poor capital markets ?? ?? Technical PotentialSlide24: Carbon Benefits: Mitigation Options in F7 Studies Future Work: Future Work Estimating mitigation potential of projects taking barriers into consideration Land tenure, rural cultures, risk-averse behavior, lack of product markets, etc. Project-specific analysis of forestry mitigation options Establishing approaches to resolve issues of baselines, permanence, and leakage FORCLIMIT Project Evaluation of one case study to better understand key LULUCF issues about leakage and permanence Global COMAP Model developmentSlide27: F7 Carbon and Timber Cost Curves by Country Global Carbon and Timber Supply Curve New Timber Price Global COMAP Model Add transaction costs and consumer discount rates Iterate between global and country-specific curves using timber prices