logging in or signing up herrera Parallel 4 1 Talya Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 20 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: November 28, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Moving out of Poverty: Moving out of Poverty stylized facts from recent research Seventh Annual Global Development Conference St. Petersburg, Russia January 14-23 Javier Herrera IRD-DIAL herrera@dial.prd.fr http://www.dial.prd.frOutline: Outline I.- Shortcomings of the static approach II. Poverty Dynamics: new issues III.- Stylized facts from developing countries IV Agenda for future researchI.- Shortcomings of the static approach : I.- Shortcomings of the static approach Only net poverty flows are considered Pro-poor growth as well as poverty and inequality are misestimated II.- Poverty Dynamics: new issues Different policies may be needed to deal with chronic and transient poor Targeting implications III.- Stylized facts from developing countries: III.- Stylized facts from developing countries Poverty flows are higher than the evolution of static poverty Varying proportions of chronic and transient poor coexists in each country Spatial poverty traps specially in rural areas (geography, public services, etc.) Econometric modeling not yet successful for identifying specific factors associated to transient poverty III.- Stylized facts from developing countries: III.- Stylized facts from developing countries Labor market improvements are associated from escaping poverty (job quality in urban areas, job diversification outside agriculture in rural areas) are the major events behind escaping poverty Demographic shocks and covariant shocks (droughts) are factors associated to entries into poverty IV.- Agenda for future research: IV.- Agenda for future research More national (urban & rural) panel household surveys are needed Combined Qualitative & Quantitative approaches are necessary for better understanding Short run and long run income mobility has to be consideredIV.- Agenda for future research: IV.- Agenda for future research Implementing a multidimensional poverty approach Demographic composition and labor market decisions are endogenous and inter-related Policies must target also vulnerable (not yet) poorIV.- Agenda for future research: IV.- Agenda for future research Policies should focus on households’ own (successful) strategies for moving out poverty Policies improving household assets (human and physical capital) as well as safety nets & insurance are to be considered together Covariant and idiosyncratic shocks has to be taken into account More comparative research is needed You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
herrera Parallel 4 1 Talya Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 20 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: November 28, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Moving out of Poverty: Moving out of Poverty stylized facts from recent research Seventh Annual Global Development Conference St. Petersburg, Russia January 14-23 Javier Herrera IRD-DIAL herrera@dial.prd.fr http://www.dial.prd.frOutline: Outline I.- Shortcomings of the static approach II. Poverty Dynamics: new issues III.- Stylized facts from developing countries IV Agenda for future researchI.- Shortcomings of the static approach : I.- Shortcomings of the static approach Only net poverty flows are considered Pro-poor growth as well as poverty and inequality are misestimated II.- Poverty Dynamics: new issues Different policies may be needed to deal with chronic and transient poor Targeting implications III.- Stylized facts from developing countries: III.- Stylized facts from developing countries Poverty flows are higher than the evolution of static poverty Varying proportions of chronic and transient poor coexists in each country Spatial poverty traps specially in rural areas (geography, public services, etc.) Econometric modeling not yet successful for identifying specific factors associated to transient poverty III.- Stylized facts from developing countries: III.- Stylized facts from developing countries Labor market improvements are associated from escaping poverty (job quality in urban areas, job diversification outside agriculture in rural areas) are the major events behind escaping poverty Demographic shocks and covariant shocks (droughts) are factors associated to entries into poverty IV.- Agenda for future research: IV.- Agenda for future research More national (urban & rural) panel household surveys are needed Combined Qualitative & Quantitative approaches are necessary for better understanding Short run and long run income mobility has to be consideredIV.- Agenda for future research: IV.- Agenda for future research Implementing a multidimensional poverty approach Demographic composition and labor market decisions are endogenous and inter-related Policies must target also vulnerable (not yet) poorIV.- Agenda for future research: IV.- Agenda for future research Policies should focus on households’ own (successful) strategies for moving out poverty Policies improving household assets (human and physical capital) as well as safety nets & insurance are to be considered together Covariant and idiosyncratic shocks has to be taken into account More comparative research is needed