logging in or signing up slides Sudiksha Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 41 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: October 15, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript The US-EU Race for Leadership of S&T: Qualitative and Quantitative Indicators: The US-EU Race for Leadership of S&T: Qualitative and Quantitative Indicators Duane Shelton and Geoff Holdridge WTEC, Inc. Baltimore, Maryland, USA To be presented at the Ninth International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Beijing, August 25, 2003Acknowledgements To:: Acknowledgements To: And 400-plus expert panelists, thousands of foreign hosts.Purpose of Paper: Purpose of Paper Both the US and the EU have goals for world leadership in S&T Methods of evaluating leadership Quantitative data on leadership -- from EU, OECD, NSF, ISI, Eurostat, et al. Qualitative data on leadership -- from our own WTEC studies Conclusions: Who is ahead, and what are the trends? I. US Goals for S&T Leadership: I. US Goals for S&T Leadership Top goal: “Maintaining world leadership in science, mathematics, and engineering...” (President Truman, 1950) “The United States is today the undisputed world leader in science and technology.” (U.S. National Academy of Sciences) But, when we sent American peer reviewers abroad, one could indeed dispute. Actually, Bush Administration has not yet made a global statement of S&T goalsEU Goals for S&T Leadership: EU Goals for S&T Leadership Make Europe the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world by 2010 (Lisbon Council 2000) Restructure R&D into a European Research Area (2000) Increase EU spending on R&D to 3% of GDP by 2010 Framework Program 6 provides 17.5 billion Euros for 2002-2006II. Quantitative Methods: II. Quantitative Methods Most input measures like total investments in R&D favor the U.S. Here the focus will be on output indicators, which are a better measure of S&T leadership: Papers Citations Patents New PhD production Nobel Prizes High-tech market share Overall trade balance Slide7: Output Indicator-1: Publications in the World’s Leading Journals Source: ISI 2002. China = PRC + HK + Taiwan.Slide8: Source: ISI, 2002 EU Surges Ahead of the US in PublicationsSlide9: Disciplines Led by the EU, U.S., and AP Region. Metric is papers in the world’s leading journals. Data from ISI, which retains copyright.Output Indicator-2: Relative Impacts: Output Indicator-2: Relative Impacts Technical papers usually have a dozen or more citations to other papers in their references or footnotes. This method, originated by Eugene Garfield at ISI, counts citations to a particular paper from others. Influential papers have lots of such citations. This parameter is often normalized by the average number of citations in a field or country to get the “relative impact” of: paper, researcher, institute, or whole countrySlide11: Switzerland leads the world; U. S. leads world in only 4 of 20 S&T fields on ISI CD US is Ahead of EU, Some Countries Are Gaining Slide12: But, Americans Tend to Cite Mostly American PapersSlide13: These are inventions patented all three offices: U.S., EU and Japan. Source: (OECD, 2002). The U. S. leads the EU, but not by much. Output Indicator-3: International PatentsSlide14: Source: NSB, 2002. EU (Part) includes only Germany, France, and the UK. With all EU countries, the European curve is far ahead at 39,021 in 1999. Output Indicator-4: Production of S&E PhDsSlide15: Output Indicator–5: Residence of Nobel Prize Winners in Science (Physics, Chemistry and Medicine) The U. S. is far ahead of the EU, but…Slide16: Birthplace of Nobel Prize Winners in Science The EU is becoming more competitive in this metric.Slide17: Output Indicator-6: High-Tech Trade Surplus and Market ShareSlide18: Output Indicator-6 High-Tech Market Share; Fields Where U.S. is StrongSlide19: Output Indicator-6 High-Tech Market Share Fields where EU is StrongSlide20: In 2002 the largest deficit was with China ($103 billion). It was $82 billion with the EU. Output Indicator-7 Overall International Trade Surplus, U.S. Trade Deficit in Goods was $470 Billion in 2002Slide21: US vs. EU in the International Market Place Slide22: A Knowledge-Based Indicator: Internet Growth is Leveling Off Since the EU goals include leading in knowledge-based economy, Internet usage is a relevant indicatorSlide23: U.S. Is Far Ahead, But Its Growth Stopped in 2002, Rapid Increase Continues in EU Data: www.isc.orgIII. Qualitative Methods: ITRI International Technology Assessments: III. Qualitative Methods: ITRI International Technology Assessments ITRI conducts public studies of S&T abroad using study tours by experts for: Assessment of status and trends relative to US Technology transfer Finding opportunities for international cooperation Started by the US in 1983 when Japanese captured high-tech international markets and increased investments in R&DSlide25: Time Line for a WTEC Single-Area StudySlide26: An WTEC Delegation of American Engineers But the U.S. is a very diverse place.Sample WTEC Findings: Sample WTEC Findings Slide28: Fields Which US Does Not LeadSlide29: More Fields Not Led by the USSlide30: [1] Table II. Recent WTEC Assessments Covering EU CountriesSlide31: [ Table II. Recent WTEC Assessments Covering EU Countries--Continued Slide32: Table I S&T Output Indicators IV. Conclusions: Who is Leading Overall?Slide33: Table I S&T Output Indicators--Continued Slide34: Conclusion: Who leads the World, the U.S. or EU? Slide35: Does the U.S. or EU lead in S&T? (More Metrics). Thus, the results are mixed *The EU is not far behind either nation.For more information:: For more information: Sleeping Tiger? Japan's Continuing Advances in S&T, R. D. Shelton and G. M. Holdridge, Conference on Japanese Information in Science, Technology, and Commerce, Library of Congress, Washington, July, 1997. http://www.itri.loyola.edu/papers/jistc797/welcome.htm American Leadership of Science and Technology: Reality or Myth?, R. D. Shelton, J. B. Mooney and G. M. Holdridge, Science and Technology Indicators 2000, Leiden. http://justice.loyola.edu/~rds/myth.pdf WTEC Website http://www.wtec.org Shelton Website http://itri2.org/s/ Includes this paper in text form and slideshow.Slide37: For more info http://itri2.org/ITRInews/ You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
slides Sudiksha Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 41 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: October 15, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript The US-EU Race for Leadership of S&T: Qualitative and Quantitative Indicators: The US-EU Race for Leadership of S&T: Qualitative and Quantitative Indicators Duane Shelton and Geoff Holdridge WTEC, Inc. Baltimore, Maryland, USA To be presented at the Ninth International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Beijing, August 25, 2003Acknowledgements To:: Acknowledgements To: And 400-plus expert panelists, thousands of foreign hosts.Purpose of Paper: Purpose of Paper Both the US and the EU have goals for world leadership in S&T Methods of evaluating leadership Quantitative data on leadership -- from EU, OECD, NSF, ISI, Eurostat, et al. Qualitative data on leadership -- from our own WTEC studies Conclusions: Who is ahead, and what are the trends? I. US Goals for S&T Leadership: I. US Goals for S&T Leadership Top goal: “Maintaining world leadership in science, mathematics, and engineering...” (President Truman, 1950) “The United States is today the undisputed world leader in science and technology.” (U.S. National Academy of Sciences) But, when we sent American peer reviewers abroad, one could indeed dispute. Actually, Bush Administration has not yet made a global statement of S&T goalsEU Goals for S&T Leadership: EU Goals for S&T Leadership Make Europe the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world by 2010 (Lisbon Council 2000) Restructure R&D into a European Research Area (2000) Increase EU spending on R&D to 3% of GDP by 2010 Framework Program 6 provides 17.5 billion Euros for 2002-2006II. Quantitative Methods: II. Quantitative Methods Most input measures like total investments in R&D favor the U.S. Here the focus will be on output indicators, which are a better measure of S&T leadership: Papers Citations Patents New PhD production Nobel Prizes High-tech market share Overall trade balance Slide7: Output Indicator-1: Publications in the World’s Leading Journals Source: ISI 2002. China = PRC + HK + Taiwan.Slide8: Source: ISI, 2002 EU Surges Ahead of the US in PublicationsSlide9: Disciplines Led by the EU, U.S., and AP Region. Metric is papers in the world’s leading journals. Data from ISI, which retains copyright.Output Indicator-2: Relative Impacts: Output Indicator-2: Relative Impacts Technical papers usually have a dozen or more citations to other papers in their references or footnotes. This method, originated by Eugene Garfield at ISI, counts citations to a particular paper from others. Influential papers have lots of such citations. This parameter is often normalized by the average number of citations in a field or country to get the “relative impact” of: paper, researcher, institute, or whole countrySlide11: Switzerland leads the world; U. S. leads world in only 4 of 20 S&T fields on ISI CD US is Ahead of EU, Some Countries Are Gaining Slide12: But, Americans Tend to Cite Mostly American PapersSlide13: These are inventions patented all three offices: U.S., EU and Japan. Source: (OECD, 2002). The U. S. leads the EU, but not by much. Output Indicator-3: International PatentsSlide14: Source: NSB, 2002. EU (Part) includes only Germany, France, and the UK. With all EU countries, the European curve is far ahead at 39,021 in 1999. Output Indicator-4: Production of S&E PhDsSlide15: Output Indicator–5: Residence of Nobel Prize Winners in Science (Physics, Chemistry and Medicine) The U. S. is far ahead of the EU, but…Slide16: Birthplace of Nobel Prize Winners in Science The EU is becoming more competitive in this metric.Slide17: Output Indicator-6: High-Tech Trade Surplus and Market ShareSlide18: Output Indicator-6 High-Tech Market Share; Fields Where U.S. is StrongSlide19: Output Indicator-6 High-Tech Market Share Fields where EU is StrongSlide20: In 2002 the largest deficit was with China ($103 billion). It was $82 billion with the EU. Output Indicator-7 Overall International Trade Surplus, U.S. Trade Deficit in Goods was $470 Billion in 2002Slide21: US vs. EU in the International Market Place Slide22: A Knowledge-Based Indicator: Internet Growth is Leveling Off Since the EU goals include leading in knowledge-based economy, Internet usage is a relevant indicatorSlide23: U.S. Is Far Ahead, But Its Growth Stopped in 2002, Rapid Increase Continues in EU Data: www.isc.orgIII. Qualitative Methods: ITRI International Technology Assessments: III. Qualitative Methods: ITRI International Technology Assessments ITRI conducts public studies of S&T abroad using study tours by experts for: Assessment of status and trends relative to US Technology transfer Finding opportunities for international cooperation Started by the US in 1983 when Japanese captured high-tech international markets and increased investments in R&DSlide25: Time Line for a WTEC Single-Area StudySlide26: An WTEC Delegation of American Engineers But the U.S. is a very diverse place.Sample WTEC Findings: Sample WTEC Findings Slide28: Fields Which US Does Not LeadSlide29: More Fields Not Led by the USSlide30: [1] Table II. Recent WTEC Assessments Covering EU CountriesSlide31: [ Table II. Recent WTEC Assessments Covering EU Countries--Continued Slide32: Table I S&T Output Indicators IV. Conclusions: Who is Leading Overall?Slide33: Table I S&T Output Indicators--Continued Slide34: Conclusion: Who leads the World, the U.S. or EU? Slide35: Does the U.S. or EU lead in S&T? (More Metrics). Thus, the results are mixed *The EU is not far behind either nation.For more information:: For more information: Sleeping Tiger? Japan's Continuing Advances in S&T, R. D. Shelton and G. M. Holdridge, Conference on Japanese Information in Science, Technology, and Commerce, Library of Congress, Washington, July, 1997. http://www.itri.loyola.edu/papers/jistc797/welcome.htm American Leadership of Science and Technology: Reality or Myth?, R. D. Shelton, J. B. Mooney and G. M. Holdridge, Science and Technology Indicators 2000, Leiden. http://justice.loyola.edu/~rds/myth.pdf WTEC Website http://www.wtec.org Shelton Website http://itri2.org/s/ Includes this paper in text form and slideshow.Slide37: For more info http://itri2.org/ITRInews/