logging in or signing up 36719132 Stentore Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 6 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: February 04, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Taking it forward: Summary of implications for donors raised to date: Taking it forward: Summary of implications for donors raised to date Kate Tench, MG Chair Joint evaluation of GBS: Policymakers Forum, May 10 2006, OECD, ParisStructure: Structure Need to take forward… Grouping the issues… What does PGBS achieve? Entry conditions / thresholds PAF / Indicators Civil society Complementarities Other issues Outstanding questions Wedding and familySlide3: Need to take forward… All agree: valuable report and joint nature valuable Value of PGBS – as an important instrument – need to increase share (<100%) Lessons and good practices for both partners and donors at national and international levels Recommendations to be acted on because of depth/breadthSlide4: What does PGBS achieve? PFM improvements central – capitalise? Basic services direct poverty effect (+proxy) PRS to reach growth and poverty – PRS2 expansion PRS quality and prioritisation central Engage all donors in prioritisation Need to show results domestically for sustainability (Rwanda)Entry conditions/thresholds: Entry conditions/thresholds No standard minimum thresholds Macro and fiscal stability important Political commitment to poverty important Direction of change in PFM So, broad relevance including to fragile states (?fiscal/macro?) Incremental, learning approach Joint diagnostics (pol, econ, capacity) Transparency of rationale Care and analysis in decision to enter, need to remain L-T: Exit costsPAF / Indicators: PAF / Indicators PAF as operational plan for PRS (all donors, diverse indicators) Transparent governance/political conditionality indicators Currently no agreed definitions / levels Ranking or prioritising indicators Indicators at all levels – tracking spend Outcome indicators/virtual earmarking useful to focus on results but all indicators as management tools not triggersGood practice in design: Good practice in design Context of local needs / flexibility Good practice in management of M/L-T predictability (?) Decentralisation a gap Long term approach: EC proposal for predictability in MDG financing / managing risks Graduated responses – diversity of: indicators / instruments / variable tranches (earmarking?) Avoid polarisation of partners - inclusive Permit use of forex reserves for management of predictability Risk appraisal and management : shared+diverseCivil Society: Civil Society Targeting basic services and empowerment require CS voice Opening space for CS – including donors with aid dependent partners But neutrality? Closing off other voices? Accountability not just S: CS (+Parlia) promotion of D to be part of PGBS package Engagement through PRS?Complementarities: Complementarities Aid instrument mix is key – what is the optimal mix/how decide? No proportions Country determined mix complement not compete ‘[PGBS is an] indispensable but not exclusive instrument’ (Switzerland) TA to be linked more strategically (levels) Growth – not necessarily programmatic aid But, don’t focus on complementarities to ignore PGBS recommendationsOther…: Other… Staffing: deconcentration and longer postings / skills in political analysis of commitment to poverty reduction / policy analysis / PGBS skills ‘P’ = mutual/joint accountability Evaluation framework – evidence (NOAM)By whom…: By whom… Evaluation role concludes dissemination incl summaries/in country/NOAM SPA – corruption DAC (beyond guidelines?) Mgt for Dev Results Govnet – shared pol econ analysis WP EFFOutstanding questions: Outstanding questions Confusion on indicators? Not no. but disbursement link and ownership Poverty impact: services proxy enough? Scaling up and critical values for rev effect GP on within year + M/L-T predictability (incl. mgt of trust breakdown) Relevance to other country categories Regional BS for infrastructure (to whom?) How achieve accountability/reporting to domestic constituents - honesty What role safeguards? PGBS Marriage…and family: PGBS Marriage…and family Courtship Wedding Family Trust of PGBS instruments Clear Prenup You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
36719132 Stentore Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 6 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: February 04, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Taking it forward: Summary of implications for donors raised to date: Taking it forward: Summary of implications for donors raised to date Kate Tench, MG Chair Joint evaluation of GBS: Policymakers Forum, May 10 2006, OECD, ParisStructure: Structure Need to take forward… Grouping the issues… What does PGBS achieve? Entry conditions / thresholds PAF / Indicators Civil society Complementarities Other issues Outstanding questions Wedding and familySlide3: Need to take forward… All agree: valuable report and joint nature valuable Value of PGBS – as an important instrument – need to increase share (<100%) Lessons and good practices for both partners and donors at national and international levels Recommendations to be acted on because of depth/breadthSlide4: What does PGBS achieve? PFM improvements central – capitalise? Basic services direct poverty effect (+proxy) PRS to reach growth and poverty – PRS2 expansion PRS quality and prioritisation central Engage all donors in prioritisation Need to show results domestically for sustainability (Rwanda)Entry conditions/thresholds: Entry conditions/thresholds No standard minimum thresholds Macro and fiscal stability important Political commitment to poverty important Direction of change in PFM So, broad relevance including to fragile states (?fiscal/macro?) Incremental, learning approach Joint diagnostics (pol, econ, capacity) Transparency of rationale Care and analysis in decision to enter, need to remain L-T: Exit costsPAF / Indicators: PAF / Indicators PAF as operational plan for PRS (all donors, diverse indicators) Transparent governance/political conditionality indicators Currently no agreed definitions / levels Ranking or prioritising indicators Indicators at all levels – tracking spend Outcome indicators/virtual earmarking useful to focus on results but all indicators as management tools not triggersGood practice in design: Good practice in design Context of local needs / flexibility Good practice in management of M/L-T predictability (?) Decentralisation a gap Long term approach: EC proposal for predictability in MDG financing / managing risks Graduated responses – diversity of: indicators / instruments / variable tranches (earmarking?) Avoid polarisation of partners - inclusive Permit use of forex reserves for management of predictability Risk appraisal and management : shared+diverseCivil Society: Civil Society Targeting basic services and empowerment require CS voice Opening space for CS – including donors with aid dependent partners But neutrality? Closing off other voices? Accountability not just S: CS (+Parlia) promotion of D to be part of PGBS package Engagement through PRS?Complementarities: Complementarities Aid instrument mix is key – what is the optimal mix/how decide? No proportions Country determined mix complement not compete ‘[PGBS is an] indispensable but not exclusive instrument’ (Switzerland) TA to be linked more strategically (levels) Growth – not necessarily programmatic aid But, don’t focus on complementarities to ignore PGBS recommendationsOther…: Other… Staffing: deconcentration and longer postings / skills in political analysis of commitment to poverty reduction / policy analysis / PGBS skills ‘P’ = mutual/joint accountability Evaluation framework – evidence (NOAM)By whom…: By whom… Evaluation role concludes dissemination incl summaries/in country/NOAM SPA – corruption DAC (beyond guidelines?) Mgt for Dev Results Govnet – shared pol econ analysis WP EFFOutstanding questions: Outstanding questions Confusion on indicators? Not no. but disbursement link and ownership Poverty impact: services proxy enough? Scaling up and critical values for rev effect GP on within year + M/L-T predictability (incl. mgt of trust breakdown) Relevance to other country categories Regional BS for infrastructure (to whom?) How achieve accountability/reporting to domestic constituents - honesty What role safeguards? PGBS Marriage…and family: PGBS Marriage…and family Courtship Wedding Family Trust of PGBS instruments Clear Prenup