MFOM SEA 05 Brf 113005

Ship Material Condition MetricsModel: 

Ship Material Condition Metrics Model Maintenance Figure of Merit (mFOM) 2.0 30 November 2005 SEA 05

Why Change Metrics Reporting Systems: 

Why Change Metrics Reporting Systems SORTS (Ship Operational Readiness & Training System) has been in place for years During the last Gulf War ship reported readiness did not reflect actual experienced readiness Data was time late Data was stale JCS desired a common reliable and accurate reporting system SORTS will be retired 1 October 2006 Navy wanted to minimize change to input systems Some supporting maintenance systems are aging and need to be replaced or updated

New Metrics Reporting Systems: 

New Metrics Reporting Systems High Level Defense Readiness Reporting System (DRRS) Each service will have own system Navy System (DRRS-N) Mid Level Total Force Integrated Readiness Model (TFIRM) Will have inputs from 5 pillars (Personnel, Equipment, Supply, Training, Ordnance) Supplies input to DRRS-N Rolls all pillars into a single metric Low Level Maintenance Figure of Merit (MFOM) Equipment Pillar Provides equipment list for other pillars

Agenda: 

Agenda Where Do We Stand Material Condition Metrics Resources to Readiness How Surface Models Were Built How Do We Map to TFIRM

Where We Are Today: 

Where We Are Today Surface ship models redesigned to roll up from system level through Mission Essential Tasks (METs) Class models complete for DDG, CG, FFG, LHA, LHD, LSD-41, LSD-49, LPD-4, and MCM Beginning roll out for surface ship class hulls in November by class and region Plan to roll out all surface ship hulls by March 2006 All models will provide input to TFIRM and DRRS-N for equipment material condition value

Submarine / Carrier Status: 

Submarine / Carrier Status Work begun for both submarine and carrier models Plan to have a working submarine model by 31 March 2006 for Fleet validation Carrier models on a similar schedule Both carrier and submarine models to be fully implemented prior to 30 September 2006 All models will provide input to TFIRM and DRRS-N for equipment material condition value

Agenda: 

Agenda Where Do We Stand Material Condition Metrics Resources to Readiness How Surface Models Were Built How Do We Map to TFIRM

MFOM 2.0 Tool: 

MFOM 2.0 Tool MFOM 2.0 Provides 3 Significant Tools in the Same Application Material Readiness Reporting Tool for Ship Systems Ready for hull specific deployment Pull down hull CDM file Pull down current CSMP Run through model and use Screening Tool for Maintenance Actions Notional screens developed Need to program Best of Breed Must train maintenance team and get buy-in Material Readiness – Resources Tool Ready for initial population Pulls data from MRS Averages in each new estimate by maintenance team to continue refining initial estimate in system

MFOM Defined: 

MFOM Defined MFOM takes input from Automated Work Requests (i.e., 2 Kilos) from ICAVs, Alterations, Repair work, CASREPs, etc Machinery Monitoring Systems (e.g., ICAS) Class Maintenance Plans Other Technical Documentation (DFS, UROs, IMMPs, Master Spec Catalog, MRCs) Ship’s configuration data All records for each hull from CDMD-OA

Shipboard Metrics: 

NIAPS UNCLAS Distance Support 2.0 MRAS Etc. Inputs ICAS SKED 2Ks Other Assessments UNCLAS CLASSIFIED CDMD-OA UNCLAS MFOM UNCLAS MFOM Algorithm SIPRNET PEs Using Single Tool CSMP 3M UNCLAS RADWEB DRRS-N Classified TFIRM Classified MFOM Classified CAS Classified TFIRMMRAS & Others Shipboard Metrics DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT

Slide12: 

Service Items Hidden 2K Items

Agenda: 

Agenda Where Do We Stand Material Condition Metrics Resources to Readiness How Surface Models Were Built How Do We Map to TFIRM

The End in MindLink Material Condition to Readiness: 

DDG “CLASS” Baseline (Foundation) DDG Class Integrated Lifecycle Assessment Program DDG Class Long Term Modernization Program DDG Class “High-Level” Maintenance Routines The End in Mind Link Material Condition to Readiness Enables ‘what if’ drill to determine most efficient & effective mix of repairs and/or mods to meet objective readiness requirements Tycoms establish the short term requirements, maintenance community can state what work is required to get there and how much it will cost Short term requirements link to specific equipment and numbers of equipment availability based on upcoming mission type (i.e. 3 of 4 main engines etc. for drug ops) x x x x x x x x SHORT TERM (x) Requirements based on upcoming mission Current Status LONG TERM Requirements

Slide17: 

Add columns as desired to compare different ships, different mission, or different avails Different work packages impact material condition mission readiness levels RMC Level Tool

Agenda: 

Agenda Where Do We Stand Material Condition Metrics Resources to Readiness How Surface Models Were Built How Do We Map to TFIRM

Material Condition Model: 

Material Condition Model Level of Indenture “Warfare” mFOM Warfare Area “Functional” Index Value L1(Function) (A) (B) (C) (D) “System” Index Value L2(System) (AA) (AA) “Equipment” Index Value L3(Subsystem) “Component” Index Value “Sub-Component” Index Value 2 K (or ICAS data, CASREP)

Building the ModelEquipment Levels and Below: 

Building the Model Equipment Levels and Below L3(Subsystem) Trained and worked with ISEs to develop equipment models ISEs first built structure, then determined boundary conditions and redundancy and other special conditions Models sent to Corona for determining weights Models sent back to ISE for QA Worked with NSWC Senior PAD and ISEAs at: Philadelphia Corona Port Hueneme Panama City Crane Indian Head Dahlgren Lakehurst SPAWAR NAVSEA PEOs

Building the ModelFunctional Areas and Systems : 

Building the Model Functional Areas and Systems L1(Function) (A) (B) (C) (D) L2(System) (AA) (AA) L3(Subsystem) ISEA Work Trained and worked with Planning Yards to develop system models PYs used ISE structures to build systems and interconnections to other systems, then determined boundary conditions and redundancy and other special conditions Models sent to Corona to determine weights Worked with Planning Yards Norfolk Naval Shipyard (LHA/LHD) Puget Sound Naval Shipyard (MCM) Boston Detachment (FFG, LSD, LPD) Northrop Grumman Pascagoula (CG) Bath Iron Works (DDG)

Building the ModelWarfare Areas: 

Building the Model Warfare Areas Warfare Area L1(Function) (A) (B) (C) (D) L2(System) (AA) (AA) L3(Subsystem) ISEA Work PY Work Trained and worked with Fleet to develop system connection to Mission Areas Fleet used PY and ISE structures to build relationships and connections for each mission area then established boundary conditions Fleet Work Locations San Diego (CG, DDG, FFG) Norfolk (LHA, LHD, LPD, LSD-41, LSD-49) Ingleside (MCM) Sailor Qualifications CoS, COs, XOs, DH and Senior Enlisted Fleet Work

Building the ModelPutting It All Together: 

Building the Model Putting It All Together Pulled CDMD-OA files for each class Arranged in same structure as PYs and then matched HSCs to structure Model contains significantly more detail than HSCs in CDMD-OA Verified impacts, redundancy and weights all assigned to each item Programmed each model – Corona Who did you work with? How do you handle redundancy?

Building Propulsion PlantsOptions: 

Building Propulsion Plants Options Three primary methods Full modeling Provides greatest detail and view into shipboard issues Modeling of secondary systems with a single input for primary systems Need to determine who will put in single value for primary systems Options include Ship Engineer or Commanding Officer; Operational Commander; TYCOM Need to determine scale Need to determine what is displayed on higher level systems if a primary system has a deficiency Modeling only outside “the boxes” Same input issues as above

Agenda: 

Agenda Where Do We Stand Material Condition Metrics Resources to Readiness How Surface Models Were Built How Do We Map to TFIRM

Slide27: 

Mapping Models to NMETs NTA NMET Capability Missions MFOM 2.0 originally mapped to 14 Functional Areas Model updated to meet DRRS reporting requirements – Functional Areas replaced by NMETS. Ensures consistent values for Warfare Area or Mission Area and improves MFOM 2.0 performance. NMET Functional Area Warfare Area ? √ NMET NMET NMET NMET Sub-Comp Component Equipment System NMETs Warfare Area Mission Area √ √ Model X NMETS Works for both and consistent When will this be ready?

Feeding Other Metric Systems: 

Feeding Other Metric Systems MFOM Defense Readiness Reporting System-Navy TFIRM NTAs

Possible CSG Capability Roll-up: 

Possible CSG Capability Roll-up CSG X P E S T O Staff/WC CVN CVW Ships/Subs - - + + STRIKE Warfare USS DDG USS SSN NTA 1.1.1 NTA 2.2.2 NTA 3.3.3 STW NTA 1.1.1 NTA 2.2.2 NTA 3.3.3 STW USS CG NTA 1.1.1 NTA 2.2.2 NTA 3.3.3 STW PER EQP SUP TRG ORD OVL CDR OVL CDR Roll up scheme: (Staff/WC)+CVN+CVW+(Ships/Subs) OVL and CDR both displayed OVL is average of Subgroups Subgroup OVL average of units Each Subgroup can be expanded Each unit can be expanded Percentage will be displayed in OVL Not shown due to scale here +