logging in or signing up pireaux Soffia Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 34 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: January 11, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Relativity and Space Geodesy S. Pireaux UMR 6162 ARTEMIS, Obs. de la Côte d’Azur, Av. de Copernic, 06130 Grasse, Francesophie.pireaux@obs-azur.fr: Relativity and Space Geodesy S. Pireaux UMR 6162 ARTEMIS, Obs. de la Côte d’Azur, Av. de Copernic, 06130 Grasse, France sophie.pireaux@obs-azur.fr IAU Commission 31: TIME AND ASTRONOMY, IAU General Assembly, Prague, 21st August 2006Slide2: Outline of the speach I. Native relativistic approach wrt spacecraft trajectory : orbitography a. Needed in: precise planetary gravitational field modeling, orbitography b. Illustration: classical vs RMI prototype –Relativistic Motion Integrator- methodSlide3: I. Native relativistic approach wrt spacecraft trajectory : orbitography Ia. Needed in: - precise planetary gravitational field modeling - orbitography A good planetary gravitational field model? CHAMP GRACE STELLA or LAGEOS GOCESlide4: Ib. Illustration:Slide5: IIa. Need for relativistic laser links: II. Native relativistic approach wrt photon trajectory: laser-linksSlide6: LISA = space GW detector complementary to ground detectors LISA (Laser Interferometer Space Antenna) Slide7: 3 (drag-free) stations 3 test masses of stations ? Coordinates Interdistance (L ) ij relativistic modeling of orbitography/laser links required:Slide8: Laser link: IIb. General method for relativistic laser-linksSlide9: Motion in background metric gab = hab + hab in presence of gravitational sources (sce) : … with IAU2000 conventionsSlide10: Energy measured from spacecraft = = spacecraft 4-velocity = photon 4-wave vector whereSlide11: Contributions from gravitational sources (sce) to hab :Slide12: Orders of magnitude : IIc. Illustration: LISA, rotation around the SunSlide13: LISA Flight time solution:Slide14: Numerical estimates of geometric time delays in s over a year tAB order 0 : amplitude ~ 48 000 km/c « flexing » of triangle Slide17: Naive estimate: LISA Frequency shift solution:Slide18: Order 1:Slide19: LISACODE collaboration of ARTEMIS (Côte d’Azur) – APC (Paris), in LISA FRANCE aims at includes without planets relativistic laser links (time transfer + freq. shift) classical orbito. coordinate time only mission simulations Tests of TDI data pre-processing, TDI-ranging sensitivity curves relevant order of magnitude estimates … Time scales: careful with archives and coherence Ephemeris of stations : presence of planets necessary, to provide initial conditions for photon flight times Laser link : Sun alone sufficient, but relativistic description of its field necessarySlide20: III. Caution with relativistic time-scales IIIa. Time scalesSlide21: Numerical estimates over a one year mission… IIIb. Illustration: LISASlide22: Outline of the speach I. Native relativistic approach wrt spacecraft trajectory : orbitography a. Needed in: precise planetary gravitational field modeling, orbitography b. Illustration: classical vs RMI prototype –Relativistic Motion Integrator- methodOther transparencies: Other transparenciesSlide24: Geodesy: precise geophysics implies precise geodesySlide25: Laser GEOdymics Satellite 1 Aims: - calculate station positions (1-3cm) - monitor tectonic-plate motion - measure Earth gravitational field - measure Earth rotation Design: - spherical with laser reflectors - no onboard sensors/electronic - no attitude control Orbit: 5858x5958km, i = 52.6°, around Earth Mission: 1976, ~50 years (USA) CHAllenging Minisatellite Payload Aims: - precise gravity and magnetic field, their space and time variations Design: - laser reflector, GPS receiver - drift meter - magnetometer, star sensor, accelerometers Orbit: 454 km initial, near polar, around Earth Mission: ~5 years (Germany) Geodesy examples: a high-, or respectively low-altitude satellite…Slide26: Geodesy: orders of magnitude [m/s²]Slide27: a) Gravitational potential model for the EarthSlide28: with and b) Newtonian contributions from the Moon, Sun and Planets LAGEOS 1Slide29: c) Relativistic corrections LAGEOS 1Slide30: , LAGEOS 1Slide31: , LAGEOS 1Slide32: Advantages: - To easily take into account all relativistic effects with “metric” adapted to the precision of measurements and adopted conventions. - Same geodesic equation for photons (light signals) massive particles (satellites without non-grav forces) - Relativistically consistent approach Advantages: - Well-proven method. - Might be sufficient for current applications. Classical approach: “Newton” + relativistic corrections for precise satellite dynamics and time measurements. Alternative and pioneering effort: develop a satellite motion integrator in a pure relativistic framework. Drawbacks: - To be adapted to the adopted space-time transformations and to the level of precision of data Geodesy: a modern view…Slide33: a) Method: GINS provides template orbits to validate the RMI orbits - simulations with 1) Schwarzschild metric => validate Schwarzschild correction 2) (Schwarzschild + GRIM4-S4) metric => validate harmonic contributions 3) Kerr metric => validate Lens-Thirring correction 4) GCRS metric with(out) Sun, Moon, Planets => validate geodetic precession (other bodies contributions) (…)Slide34: Earth rotation model c) diagram: GINS with i=1,2,3 spatial indicesSlide35: Earth rotation model d) diagram: RMI with a=0,1,2,3 space-time indicesSlide36: Geodesy: principle of accelerometers…Slide37: [Bize et al 1999] Europhysics Letters C, 45, 558 [Chovitz 1988] Bulletin Géodésique, 62,359 [Fairhaid_Bretagnon 1990] Astronomy and Astrophysics, 229, 240-247 [Hirayama et al 1988] [IAU 1992] IAU 1991 resolutions. IAU Information Bulletin 67 [IAU 2001a] IAU 2000 resolutions. IAU Information Bulletin 88 [IAU 2001b] Erratum on resolution B1.3. Information Bulletin 89 [IAU 2003] IAU Division 1, ICRS Working Group Task 5: SOFA libraries. http://www.iau-sofa.rl.ac.uk/product.html [IERS 2003] IERS website. http://www.iers.org/map [Irwin-Fukushima 1999] Astronomy and Astrophysics, 348, 642-652 [Lemonde et al 2001] Ed. A.N.Luiten, Berlin (Springer) [Moyer 1981a] Celestial Mechanics, 23, 33-56 [Moyer 1981b] Celestial Mechanics, 23, 57-68 [Moyer 2000] Monograph 2: Deep Space Communication and Navigation series [Soffel et al 2003] prepared for the Astronomical Journal, asro-ph/0303376v1 [Standish 1998] Astronomy and Astrophysics, 336, 381-384 [Weyers et al 2001] Metrologia A, 38, 4, 343 Relativistic time transformations Geodesy: bibliographySlide38: [Damour et al 1991] Physical Review D, 43, 10, 3273-3307 [Damour et al 1992] Physical Review D, 45, 4, 1017-1044 [Damour et al 1993] Physical Review D, 47, 8, 3124-3135 [Damour et al 1994] Physical Review D, 49, 2, 618-635 [IAU 1992] IAU 1991 resolutions. IAU Information Bulletin 67 [IAU 2001a] IAU 2000 resolutions. IAU Information Bulletin 88 [IAU 2001b] Erratum on resolution B1.3. Information Bulletin 89 [IAU 2003] IAU Division 1, ICRS Working Group Task 5: SOFA libraries. http://www.iau-sofa.rl.ac.uk/product.html [IERS 2003] IERS website. http://www.iers.org/map [Klioner 1996] International Astronomical Union, 172, 39K, 309-320 [Klioner et al 1993] Physical Review D, 48, 4, 1451-1461 [Klioner et al 2003] astro-ph/0303377 v1 [Soffel et al 2003] prepared for the Astronomical Journal, asro-ph/0303376v1 [GRGS 2001] Descriptif modèle de forces: logiciel GINS [Moisson 2000] (thèse). Observatoire de Paris [McCarthy Petit 2003] IERS conventions 2003 http://maia.usno.navy.mil/conv2000.html. Metric prescriptions RMIPrinciple of ground-space time transfer:: Principle of ground-space time transfer: T2L2 (optical telemetry with 2 laser links) Follow evolution of time aboard wrt ground time: Rebuild triplets (TA, Tsat, TC) Compute ground-satellite delay: Date laser pulses: Departure from ground station: TA Arrival aboard: Tsat= TB Echo return on ground: TC Clock Retro-reflectors Detection Clock Laser telemetry stationSlide40: Common view On-board oscillator noise sx(0.1 s) Non-Common view On-board oscillator noise sx(t3) Principle of ground-ground time transfer:Method:: Mesure PPN parameter g (Shapiro effect) Planet Telemetry Asteroid masses Pioneer effect … TIPO Telescope TIPO (Télémétrie Interplanétaire Optique) Scientific objectives of TIPO: Method:Slide42: Orbital motion of sces during photon flight time:Slide43: ~ 10-15 ~ 10-12 T2L2, rotation around the Earth: ~ 10-9 Slide44: Collaborations in LISA FRANCE LISA France: - APC, Paris 7 - ARTEMIS, OCA - CNES - IAP Paris - LAPP Annecy - LUTH Observatoire de Paris-Meudon - ONERA - Service d'Astrophysique CEA You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
pireaux Soffia Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 34 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: January 11, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Relativity and Space Geodesy S. Pireaux UMR 6162 ARTEMIS, Obs. de la Côte d’Azur, Av. de Copernic, 06130 Grasse, Francesophie.pireaux@obs-azur.fr: Relativity and Space Geodesy S. Pireaux UMR 6162 ARTEMIS, Obs. de la Côte d’Azur, Av. de Copernic, 06130 Grasse, France sophie.pireaux@obs-azur.fr IAU Commission 31: TIME AND ASTRONOMY, IAU General Assembly, Prague, 21st August 2006Slide2: Outline of the speach I. Native relativistic approach wrt spacecraft trajectory : orbitography a. Needed in: precise planetary gravitational field modeling, orbitography b. Illustration: classical vs RMI prototype –Relativistic Motion Integrator- methodSlide3: I. Native relativistic approach wrt spacecraft trajectory : orbitography Ia. Needed in: - precise planetary gravitational field modeling - orbitography A good planetary gravitational field model? CHAMP GRACE STELLA or LAGEOS GOCESlide4: Ib. Illustration:Slide5: IIa. Need for relativistic laser links: II. Native relativistic approach wrt photon trajectory: laser-linksSlide6: LISA = space GW detector complementary to ground detectors LISA (Laser Interferometer Space Antenna) Slide7: 3 (drag-free) stations 3 test masses of stations ? Coordinates Interdistance (L ) ij relativistic modeling of orbitography/laser links required:Slide8: Laser link: IIb. General method for relativistic laser-linksSlide9: Motion in background metric gab = hab + hab in presence of gravitational sources (sce) : … with IAU2000 conventionsSlide10: Energy measured from spacecraft = = spacecraft 4-velocity = photon 4-wave vector whereSlide11: Contributions from gravitational sources (sce) to hab :Slide12: Orders of magnitude : IIc. Illustration: LISA, rotation around the SunSlide13: LISA Flight time solution:Slide14: Numerical estimates of geometric time delays in s over a year tAB order 0 : amplitude ~ 48 000 km/c « flexing » of triangle Slide17: Naive estimate: LISA Frequency shift solution:Slide18: Order 1:Slide19: LISACODE collaboration of ARTEMIS (Côte d’Azur) – APC (Paris), in LISA FRANCE aims at includes without planets relativistic laser links (time transfer + freq. shift) classical orbito. coordinate time only mission simulations Tests of TDI data pre-processing, TDI-ranging sensitivity curves relevant order of magnitude estimates … Time scales: careful with archives and coherence Ephemeris of stations : presence of planets necessary, to provide initial conditions for photon flight times Laser link : Sun alone sufficient, but relativistic description of its field necessarySlide20: III. Caution with relativistic time-scales IIIa. Time scalesSlide21: Numerical estimates over a one year mission… IIIb. Illustration: LISASlide22: Outline of the speach I. Native relativistic approach wrt spacecraft trajectory : orbitography a. Needed in: precise planetary gravitational field modeling, orbitography b. Illustration: classical vs RMI prototype –Relativistic Motion Integrator- methodOther transparencies: Other transparenciesSlide24: Geodesy: precise geophysics implies precise geodesySlide25: Laser GEOdymics Satellite 1 Aims: - calculate station positions (1-3cm) - monitor tectonic-plate motion - measure Earth gravitational field - measure Earth rotation Design: - spherical with laser reflectors - no onboard sensors/electronic - no attitude control Orbit: 5858x5958km, i = 52.6°, around Earth Mission: 1976, ~50 years (USA) CHAllenging Minisatellite Payload Aims: - precise gravity and magnetic field, their space and time variations Design: - laser reflector, GPS receiver - drift meter - magnetometer, star sensor, accelerometers Orbit: 454 km initial, near polar, around Earth Mission: ~5 years (Germany) Geodesy examples: a high-, or respectively low-altitude satellite…Slide26: Geodesy: orders of magnitude [m/s²]Slide27: a) Gravitational potential model for the EarthSlide28: with and b) Newtonian contributions from the Moon, Sun and Planets LAGEOS 1Slide29: c) Relativistic corrections LAGEOS 1Slide30: , LAGEOS 1Slide31: , LAGEOS 1Slide32: Advantages: - To easily take into account all relativistic effects with “metric” adapted to the precision of measurements and adopted conventions. - Same geodesic equation for photons (light signals) massive particles (satellites without non-grav forces) - Relativistically consistent approach Advantages: - Well-proven method. - Might be sufficient for current applications. Classical approach: “Newton” + relativistic corrections for precise satellite dynamics and time measurements. Alternative and pioneering effort: develop a satellite motion integrator in a pure relativistic framework. Drawbacks: - To be adapted to the adopted space-time transformations and to the level of precision of data Geodesy: a modern view…Slide33: a) Method: GINS provides template orbits to validate the RMI orbits - simulations with 1) Schwarzschild metric => validate Schwarzschild correction 2) (Schwarzschild + GRIM4-S4) metric => validate harmonic contributions 3) Kerr metric => validate Lens-Thirring correction 4) GCRS metric with(out) Sun, Moon, Planets => validate geodetic precession (other bodies contributions) (…)Slide34: Earth rotation model c) diagram: GINS with i=1,2,3 spatial indicesSlide35: Earth rotation model d) diagram: RMI with a=0,1,2,3 space-time indicesSlide36: Geodesy: principle of accelerometers…Slide37: [Bize et al 1999] Europhysics Letters C, 45, 558 [Chovitz 1988] Bulletin Géodésique, 62,359 [Fairhaid_Bretagnon 1990] Astronomy and Astrophysics, 229, 240-247 [Hirayama et al 1988] [IAU 1992] IAU 1991 resolutions. IAU Information Bulletin 67 [IAU 2001a] IAU 2000 resolutions. IAU Information Bulletin 88 [IAU 2001b] Erratum on resolution B1.3. Information Bulletin 89 [IAU 2003] IAU Division 1, ICRS Working Group Task 5: SOFA libraries. http://www.iau-sofa.rl.ac.uk/product.html [IERS 2003] IERS website. http://www.iers.org/map [Irwin-Fukushima 1999] Astronomy and Astrophysics, 348, 642-652 [Lemonde et al 2001] Ed. A.N.Luiten, Berlin (Springer) [Moyer 1981a] Celestial Mechanics, 23, 33-56 [Moyer 1981b] Celestial Mechanics, 23, 57-68 [Moyer 2000] Monograph 2: Deep Space Communication and Navigation series [Soffel et al 2003] prepared for the Astronomical Journal, asro-ph/0303376v1 [Standish 1998] Astronomy and Astrophysics, 336, 381-384 [Weyers et al 2001] Metrologia A, 38, 4, 343 Relativistic time transformations Geodesy: bibliographySlide38: [Damour et al 1991] Physical Review D, 43, 10, 3273-3307 [Damour et al 1992] Physical Review D, 45, 4, 1017-1044 [Damour et al 1993] Physical Review D, 47, 8, 3124-3135 [Damour et al 1994] Physical Review D, 49, 2, 618-635 [IAU 1992] IAU 1991 resolutions. IAU Information Bulletin 67 [IAU 2001a] IAU 2000 resolutions. IAU Information Bulletin 88 [IAU 2001b] Erratum on resolution B1.3. Information Bulletin 89 [IAU 2003] IAU Division 1, ICRS Working Group Task 5: SOFA libraries. http://www.iau-sofa.rl.ac.uk/product.html [IERS 2003] IERS website. http://www.iers.org/map [Klioner 1996] International Astronomical Union, 172, 39K, 309-320 [Klioner et al 1993] Physical Review D, 48, 4, 1451-1461 [Klioner et al 2003] astro-ph/0303377 v1 [Soffel et al 2003] prepared for the Astronomical Journal, asro-ph/0303376v1 [GRGS 2001] Descriptif modèle de forces: logiciel GINS [Moisson 2000] (thèse). Observatoire de Paris [McCarthy Petit 2003] IERS conventions 2003 http://maia.usno.navy.mil/conv2000.html. Metric prescriptions RMIPrinciple of ground-space time transfer:: Principle of ground-space time transfer: T2L2 (optical telemetry with 2 laser links) Follow evolution of time aboard wrt ground time: Rebuild triplets (TA, Tsat, TC) Compute ground-satellite delay: Date laser pulses: Departure from ground station: TA Arrival aboard: Tsat= TB Echo return on ground: TC Clock Retro-reflectors Detection Clock Laser telemetry stationSlide40: Common view On-board oscillator noise sx(0.1 s) Non-Common view On-board oscillator noise sx(t3) Principle of ground-ground time transfer:Method:: Mesure PPN parameter g (Shapiro effect) Planet Telemetry Asteroid masses Pioneer effect … TIPO Telescope TIPO (Télémétrie Interplanétaire Optique) Scientific objectives of TIPO: Method:Slide42: Orbital motion of sces during photon flight time:Slide43: ~ 10-15 ~ 10-12 T2L2, rotation around the Earth: ~ 10-9 Slide44: Collaborations in LISA FRANCE LISA France: - APC, Paris 7 - ARTEMIS, OCA - CNES - IAP Paris - LAPP Annecy - LUTH Observatoire de Paris-Meudon - ONERA - Service d'Astrophysique CEA