Global Consumer Awareness, Attitudes, and Opinions on Counterfeiting and Piracy: Global Consumer Awareness, Attitudes, and Opinions on Counterfeiting and Piracy Third Global Congress
Combating Counterfeiting and Piracy
31 January, 2007
Geneva, Switzerland
Background: Background Largest survey initiative ever to understand attitudes and behaviors of consumers on counterfeiting and piracy
To date, self-funded by Gallup
64,579 interviews across 51 countries in the past 18 months
National phone or in-home surveys (except Sri Lanka and Cuba - urban).
Represents the views of consumers whose economies account for 64% of the world’s GDP
1000 plus interviews in all but Luxembourg, Sri Lanka, Haiti, Jamaica, Trinidad/Tobago, and Puerto Rico.
Based on a sample size of 1000, the margin of error at a 95% confidence level is +/-3%
Efforts continuing in 2007 to track in select markets and interview in new markets not previously covered
Coverage: Coverage Argentina, Armenia, Austria, Belarus, Bolivia, Belgium, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Haiti, Ireland, Italy, Jamaica, Korea, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Moldova, Nepal, Netherlands, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Russia, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sweden, Thailand, Trinidad & Tobago, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States, Uruguay, Vietnam
Key Observations: Key Observations Consumers do not believe their governments are committed to find and prosecute counterfeiting
In markets studied, one quarter of consumers are purchasing counterfeit items. Vast differences by geography
The big three of Branded Apparel, Bags, and Footwear; Music; and Movies is highly correlated to GDP
Health and Safety threats abound in the developing world
The greatest deterrent in the U.S. is links to terrorism, organized crime and health and safety
Slide5: Perceived Government Commitment Austria +
Italy -
Portugal - Georgia +
Belarus +
Ukraine - Ecuador +
Dominican -
Republic Vietnam +
Nepal - N=28,992 N=10,220 N=7,431 N=16,161
Past 12 Month Purchase Incidence Former Soviet Union and Asia: Past 12 Month Purchase Incidence Former Soviet Union and Asia Q: In the past 12 months have you purchased any products that you know or suspect are not genuine or legitimate?
Past 12 Month Purchase Incidence Latin America: Past 12 Month Purchase Incidence Latin America Q: In the past 12 months have you purchased any products that you know or suspect are not genuine or legitimate?
Products Purchased by Category (Past 12 months among those that indicated purchase): Products Purchased by Category (Past 12 months among those that indicated purchase)
Purchase Patterns in the Developed Versus Developing World: Purchase Patterns in the Developed Versus Developing World Strong correlations to GDP per capita
The big three globally
Brand name fashion clothing, designer bags, footwear
Music
Movies
The Developing World Differences (Feel Good Items and Basics)
Perfume/cosmetics – Argentina, Dominican Republic, Cuba, Haiti, Paraguay, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Armenia, Belarus
Alcohol, soft drinks, mineral water – Armenia, Georgia, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Ukraine
Tobacco – Armenia, Georgia, Latvia
Brand name watches – Guatemala, Haiti, Nepal
Food – Cuba, Haiti, Georgia, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova
Groups Or Organizations Benefiting From Piracy Or Counterfeiting: Q: Which groups or organizations do you believe benefit from piracy or counterfeiting? Groups Or Organizations Benefiting From Piracy Or Counterfeiting
Purchase Deterrent Trends in the US(Asked Among Those Who Had Purchased Counterfeit Goods): Q: Would you have purchased the imitation you previously mentioned you bought if you knew the seller was (__)? Purchase Deterrent Trends in the US (Asked Among Those Who Had Purchased Counterfeit Goods) 2006 Sample Size: n=139
Conclusions: Conclusions While there are some patterns that exist globally in counterfeiting and piracy, every market is different and requires a tailored communication strategy
Health and safety should be the bedrock of any communications efforts. While links to terror may exist in a few markets, this should not be a universal message
Policy makers and executors need to find comfort in a constituency that believes more should be done