Category: Education

Presentation Description

No description available.


By: preetwalia (108 month(s) ago)

Can i get a copy of this plz. mail it to

By: kishwar7 (114 month(s) ago)

hello my name is Kishwar, i m an engineering student from india i need this presentation for educational purpose so plz send it you.

By: massimo.zucchetti (126 month(s) ago)

My name is Massimo Zucchetti, i am a professor at the engieering university of torino, italy. i would like to use this presentation for educational purposes. Send to: Thnak you

Presentation Transcript

Nuclear Power: 

Nuclear Power Lindsey Garst Jay Nargundkar Jonah Richmond

Nuclear Power Today: 

Nuclear Power Today Provides almost 20% of world’s electricity (8% in U.S.) 69% of U.S. non-carbon electricity generation More than 100 plants in U.S. None built since the 1970s 200+ plants in the Europe Leader is France About 80% of its power from nuclear

Early History of Nuclear Power in the U.S.: 

Early History of Nuclear Power in the U.S.


Origins After World War II, development of civilian nuclear program Atlantic Energy Act of 1946 1954: first commercial nuclear power program

The Vision: 

The Vision “It is not too much to expect that our children will enjoy in their homes [nuclear generated] electrical energy too cheap to meter.” – Lewis Strauss, Chairman of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (1954)

Manhattan Project: 

Manhattan Project Secret government project to create atomic weapons during World War II After the war, the government encouraged “the development of nuclear energy for peaceful civilian purposes.” This led to the technology used in nuclear plants today

Early Beginnings: 

Early Beginnings Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) established by Congress in 1946 as part of the Atomic Energy Act AEC authorized the construction of Experimental Breeder Reactor I ( EBR-1) at a site in Idaho in 1949 in August of 1951, criticality (a controlled, self-sustained, chain reaction) was reached using uranium A football sized core was created and kept at low power for four months until December 20, 1951


power was gradually increased until the first usable amount of electricity was generated, lighting four light bulbs and introducing nuclear generated power for the first time In 1953, the EBR-1 was creating one new atom of nuclear fuel for every atom burned, thus the reactor could sustain its own operation With this creation of new cores, enough energy was created to fuel additional reactors A few years later, the town of Arco, Idaho became the world's first community to get its entire power supply from a nuclear reactor This was achieved by temporarily attaching the town’s power grid to the reactor’s turbines

Atoms for Peace: 

Atoms for Peace Began in 1953 and was designed by Eisenhower specifically to promote peaceful, commercial applications of atomic energy after the Manhattan Project and atomic bombings on Japan Public support for nuclear energy grew, federal nuclear energy programs shifted their focus to advancing reactor technologies With this came the support of utility companies, which saw nuclear energy as a cheap and environmentally safe alternative energy choice

Shippingport Atomic Power Station: 

Shippingport Atomic Power Station Department of Energy and the Duquesne Light Company broke ground in Shippingport, Pennsylvania in 1954 for the first commercial electric-generating station in the U.S. to use nuclear energy Opened on May 26, 1958, as part of Eisenhower’s “Atoms for Peace” program Three years later, it began supplying electricity for the Pittsburgh area It was by far the world’s largest commercial nuclear power plant, surpassing those already in place in the Soviet Union and Great Britain

Uranium Mining: 

Uranium Mining There are three main methods: Underground mining Open pit mining In Situ Leaching (ISL)

Underground Mining The Case of the Olympic Dam Mine: 

Underground Mining The Case of the Olympic Dam Mine


Olympic Dam mine is located in South Australia Most of the mine’s profit actually comes from the copper that they mine as well Tunnels are dug into the earth, where ore is extracted The ore is crushed into a powder, then soaked in a lake. The impurities precipitate and the rest is dried by heat.

Ya Got Trouble….: 

Ya Got Trouble…. Lake uses an intense amount of water Rabbit popluation has crashed as a result of drinking from the lake The Western Mining Corporation (WMC) is owned by BP

In Situ Leaching: 

In Situ Leaching Wells are drilled into aquifers, the water is removed, and a solvent, such as hydrogen peroxide, is pumped in The peroxide dissolves the uranium, and the solution is pumped back up An ion exchange system causes the uranium to precipitate in the form of UO42H2O (uranium peroxide)

In Situ Leaching: 

In Situ Leaching

ISL has its woes: 

ISL has its woes Ground water supply has radioactive residues There are ISL mines in Texas, Wyoming, and Nebraska that share the same aquifers as residents

From Where Does It Come?: 

From Where Does It Come? Australia has 30% of the world’s uranium below its topsoil, and it is all for export Canada (mostly Saskatchewan) is the next largest source The True North, strong and free, has 20% of the world’s supply

Nuclear Governance in the U.S.: 

Nuclear Governance in the U.S. Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 Created NRC and DoE Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulates reactors; use of nuclear materials; movement, storage, and disposal of nuclear materials and waste Department of Energy Oversight of nuclear weapons; public relations side of nuclear energy

Int’l Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA): 

Int’l Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Part of U.N. Oversees global energy security, scientific concerns Origin Eisenhower’s “Atoms for Peace” Formed in 1957 Promote peaceful nuclear use

IAEA Today: 

IAEA Today Forum for scientific cooperation Institutes safety measures Promotes non-proliferation Featured prominently in recent news Iraq inspections Mohammed El Baradei Head of IAEA 2005 Nobel Peace Prize Winner

Major Problems of Nuclear Energy:: 

Major Problems of Nuclear Energy: Cost Safety Proliferation Waste Disposal


Cost More expensive than coal and natural gas, but could be made cheaper with carbon credits New nuclear plants could generate power at $31-$46/MWh It would take 3-4 new plants to absorb the the early costs of these new plants

Safety : 

Safety Public remains wary of nuclear power due to Chernobyl and three mile island accidents Nuclear plants vulnerable to terrorist attacks Safer, more efficient, and more secure plants planned for the future

Three Mile Isle: 

Three Mile Isle

March 28, 1979, 4:00 am: 

March 28, 1979, 4:00 am Secondary cooling loop stops pumping. Rising temperatures caused emergency valve to open to release pressure, but indicator light malfunctioned Due to loss of steam, water level drops, water overheats and burns out pump Reactor core overheats and begins to melt (a “meltdown”)

March 28, 1979, 6:30 am: 

March 28, 1979, 6:30 am Overheated water contains 350 times normal level of melted down radioactive matter A worker sees the open valve and closes it To prevent an explosion, he reopens it, releasing radioactive steam into the atmosphere

March 28, 1979, 8:00 am: 

March 28, 1979, 8:00 am Nuclear Regulatory commission is notified White House is notified TMI is evacuated All small children and pregnant women within a five mile radius are evacuated A fifteen-year clean up project awaits

Waste Disposal: 

Waste Disposal Yucca mountain Use breeder reactors instead Alternative storage site

Yucca Mountain: 

Yucca Mountain The Future of Nuclear Waste Storage

Current Waste Disposal : 

Current Waste Disposal At this time, radioactive wastes are being stored at the Department of Energy’s facilities around the country High level wastes are stored in underground carbon or stainless steel tanks Spent nuclear fuel is put in above-ground dry storage facilities and in water-filled pools

Yucca Mountain: 

Yucca Mountain Storage sites becoming full, waste may be transported to Yucca Mountain Located on government land, about 100 miles northwest of Las Vegas in the Nevada desert It is a 6 mile long, 1,200-foot high flat-topped volcanic ridge Will be able to house 70,000 tons of radioactive material

Problems with Yucca Mountain: 

Problems with Yucca Mountain The nuclear waste currently sitting around is enough to fill the repository At the earliest, the repository will be open in 2010, which seems unlikely NRC has found 293 technical issues with the repository that must be fixed Danger to the public with the transportation of the waste to yucca mountain


Possible health risks to those living near Yucca Mountain Eventual corrosion of the metal barrels which the waste is stored in Located in an earthquake region and contains many interconnected faults and fractures These could move groundwater and any escaping radioactive material through the repository to the aquifer below and then to the outside environment Still More Problems


Oops! At right is a map of the Yucca Mountain site The area within the dotted line is the burial site Two faults run directly through the site

Current Situation: 

Current Situation The Government maintains that Yucca Mountain will open on time, in 2010 Those in the nuclear energy industry put that date closer to 2015 or not at all It has been suggested that the construction of concrete and steel cask fields will add additional waste storage space to nuclear plants This would allow several additional decades for the government to put together a permanent nuclear waste storage facility

Proliferation : 

Proliferation Fuel cycles that involve the chemical reprocessing of spent fuel to separate weapons-usable plutonium and uranium enrichment technologies are of obvious concern Once-through cycle sends discharged fuel directly to disposal, thus allowing the used fuels to be broken down, leaving no options for proliferation

Nuclear Power Countries: 

Nuclear Power Countries

Threat of Proliferation: 

Threat of Proliferation North Korea (DPRK) part of “Axis of Evil” 2003 admission of nuclear weapons Kim Jong-Il* justifies nukes as defense against the U.S. Other potential threats? Kimmy Neutron *Not to be confused with Jeong Kim, namesake of the beautiful new Engineering building at UMD

Decline of Nuclear Power: 

Decline of Nuclear Power The public began growing fearful of possible meltdowns, especially after the disaster at Three Mile Island Nearly 2/3 of all orders for new plants were cancelled in the late 1970’s No new plants having been built in the past twenty-five years

The Anti-Nuclear Movement: 

The Anti-Nuclear Movement Rachel Carson started it all in Silent Spring She was the first to bring to light the harmful externalities of nuclear energy, including the risks of genetic mutations

November 1974: Silkwood: 

November 1974: Silkwood Karen Silkwood was a worker at the Kerr-McGee plant in Cimarron, Oklahoma, where the workers were not being protected from the radioactive materials When she raised a stink about this problem, she was mysteriously struck by a car As a result, NOW (National Organization of Women) and OCAW (Oil, Coal, and Atom Workers) joined the struggle against the corruption in the nuclear industry

July 16, 1979: Church Rock: 

July 16, 1979: Church Rock One hundred million gallons of nuclear waste were accidentally spilled on the Navajo Indian reservation in Church Rock, New Mexico The waste ran into the Rio Puerco The towns of Gallup, Lupton, and Saunders had to truck in drinking water, and all of the grazing livestock were slaughtered Very little media coverage due to Three Mile Island

The Seabrook Occupation: 

The Seabrook Occupation

Seabrook: Sunday, April 30, 1977: 

Seabrook: Sunday, April 30, 1977 18,000 people protested the building of a nuclear reactor in Seabrook, New Hampshire National Guard and State Troopers called in by Gov. Meldrim Thomson 1,414 of them were arrested and denied due process They refused to pay bail, and were incarcerated for a week This was a struggle between the people and the corporate/government structure

No Nukes Words: Pat DeCou, Music: Tex LaMountain, ©1977, ASCAP: 

No Nukes Words: Pat DeCou, Music: Tex LaMountain, ©1977, ASCAP Look across the sky from your home, Can you see the tower blinking while you sit a spell at home? Can you see the branches growing? Can you feel the awesome power? Can you sense its evil purpose and its doom? It grows in ways we all can understand, And its limbs are spreading all across the land. The leaves they look like dollars and the sap it ain’t so sweet. It rests upon the profits hungry people cannot eat. With promises of quiet, comfort, and peace, The hanging tree can lure to its side. But the darkness of its shadow gives us warning of the greed That tries to sell us more electric power than we need. No nukes for me, ‘cause I want my air to be Free from radiation poison falling over me. These reactors that they’re building are a giant hanging tree. Don’t you build a hanging tree over me. People soon will stop this money tree, And we’ll stop its hangin’ people, you and me. And as we struggle all together all the powers that be will go down with their own hanging tree. And out of this struggle we can plant a seedling tree, A tree that lets the sunlight share its space. A tree in tune with living, whose branches lift the soul, When you’re watching from a distance and you’re sitting all alone.

Case Study: Different Attitudes on Nuclear Power: 

Case Study: Different Attitudes on Nuclear Power United States: Stigma of “unsafe” after Three Mile Island NIMBY attitude toward siting France: Impact of “oil shock” during 1970s Advantage of strong centralized gov’t Huge lobbying campaign Trust in technology Today, France is energy exporter!

The Future of Nuclear Power : 

The Future of Nuclear Power

Nuclear Power 2010 Program: 

Nuclear Power 2010 Program A joint government-industry cost-shared effort that will be used to identify new nuclear power plant sites, develop advanced nuclear plant technologies, and to evaluate the business case for building new nuclear plants In early 2005, it was announced that two sites and Mississippi and Alabama have been selected as locations for these advanced power plants

Energy Policy Act of 2005 : 

Energy Policy Act of 2005 Signed by the president in August 2005 Government would cover cost overruns due to delays, up to $500 million each for the first two new nuclear reactors, and up to $250 million for the next four reactors Delays in construction due to vastly increased regulations were a primary cause of the high cost of some earlier plants.


A production tax credit of 1.8 cents per kilowatt-hour for the first 6,000 megawatt-hours from new nuclear power plants for the first eight years of their operation Would put nuclear energy on par with other sources of emission-free power, including wind and closed-loop biomass

authorStream Live Help