Lect 29 2000

The Future of Scientific Computing : 

The Future of Scientific Computing Horst D. Simon NERSC, Division Director May 6, 2000

Slide2: 

"Technology does not drive change at all. Technology merely enables change. It's our collective cultural response to the options and opportunities presented by technology that drives change." Paul Saffo Institute for the Future Menlo Park, California

Slide3: 

”It’s hard to make predictions, especially about the future." Yogi Berra

Overview: 

Overview 4 Retrospective: changes in the 1990s Extrapolation to the near future up to 2010 The end of Moore’s Law in about 2020 Beyond 2025

Things that did not happen in the last five years: 

Things that did not happen in the last five years 1992 predictions (after Forest Baskett, SGI): TV and PC converge interactive TV video servers instead of video stores Apple/IBM/Motorola Intel makes a mistake MPPs go mainstream

1990s: Technology: 

1990s: Technology In the 1980’s there have been fundamental changes in the microprocessor development (“killer micros”) dramatic increase in number of transistors available per chip architectural advances including the use of RISC ideas, pipelining and caches as a result CPU performance has improved by a factor of 1.5 to 2.0 per year Maturation in the late 80s Full impact in the early 90s 6

Slide7: 

Moore’s Law

Slide8: 

Impact of Moore’s Law on HPC

TOP500 List: 

TOP500 List Published twice a year with the 500 most powerful supercomputers in actual use Ranked according to LINPACK R_max Data available since 1993 For details see http://www.top500.org/

Processor Design as Seen in the TOP500: 

Processor Design as Seen in the TOP500

NERSC-1Cray C90 installed in Dec. 1991: 

NERSC-1 Cray C90 installed in Dec. 1991 Cray C90 installed in December 1991 ended contract with CCC for a Cray-3 stable high end production platform for seven years until 12/31/98

NERSC- 2Cray T3E-900 installed in 1996: 

NERSC- 2 Cray T3E-900 installed in 1996 The 644 processor T3E-900 is one of the most powerful unclassified supercomputers in the U.S. eight out of twelve DOE Grand Challenge Projects compute at NERSC 50% of the resource dedicated to GC projects about 100 other projects allocated on the NERSC T3E-900 1997 GAO report judged NERSC to have the best MPP utilization (75%) -- 1999 utilization >90%

NERSC-3IBM SP3 installed in 6/99: 

NERSC-3 IBM SP3 installed in 6/99 New contract with IBM announced in April1999 IBM was clearly the best value for the primary award provides the best absolute performance has lowest absolute cost provides the best price performance provides acceptable functionality guarantees performance - low risk

NERSC-3 Supercomputer: 

NERSC-3 Supercomputer IBM selected to provide NERSC-3 (IBM SP3/RS 6000) Phase I: June 1999 installation 608 processors 410 gigaflop peak performance Provides one teraflop NERSC capability Phase II: December 2000 completion 2,432 processors 3.2 teraflop peak performance 4 teraflop total NERSC capability

HPC Systems at NERSC in the 90s: 

HPC Systems at NERSC in the 90s

Impact of Technology Transitions: 

Impact of Technology Transitions

Three Challenges: 

Three Challenges applications that can tolerate an increase in communication latency and parallelism as well as a distributed, hierarchical memory model need to be written system software for increasingly complex, more difficult to manage, one-of-a-kind systems will have to be developed anew center management will be forced to take creative new approaches to solve the space and power requirements for the new systems.

Performance Increases in the TOP500: 

Performance Increases in the TOP500

Analysis of TOP500 Data: 

Analysis of TOP500 Data Annual performance growth about a factor of 1.82 Two factors contribute almost equally to the annual total performance growth Processor number grows per year on the average by a factor of 1.30 and the Processor performance grows by 1.40 compared 1.58 of Moore's Law. For more details see paper by Dongarra, Meuer, Simon, and Strohmaier in Parallel Computing (to appear)

The Revolution of 1994 - Major HPC Market Realignment: 

The Revolution of 1994 - Major HPC Market Realignment 1991 Newcomers with CMOS and MPP technology (Intel, TMC, KSR) gain mind share and market share 1993 Cray, IBM, Convex go CMOS (T3D, SP 1/2, SPP 1000) 1994 TMC, KSR go out of business; SGI’s SMP success 1995 HP buys Convex; Fujitsu, NEC introduce CMOS vector machines 1996 SGI buys Cray 1997 TOP500 take over by CMOS complete 2000 Tera buys Cray Division from SGI and renames itself Cray Inc. 10

The Dead Supercomputer Society: 

The Dead Supercomputer Society See http://www.paralogos.com/DeadSuper/ list of 42 dead companies or projects from 1975 - today

Slide22: 

Since 1997: The New HPC Marketplace All major US HPC companies are now vertically integrated (SGI, IBM, HP, Sun, Compaq), with exception of Cray. Almost all high-end procudcts are based onworkstation technology.

Slide23: 

1997: The New HPC Marketplace All these companies are in the computer business. HPC customers must get used to a new role: they are no longer the center of attention. Companies must have committment to technology, and understand the potential of technology leverage from the high-end, in order to remain in the HPC business. Fortunately for us, the HPC users, they all do understand that (for now).

1997: The HPC Business Model: 

1997: The HPC Business Model HPC commercial new technology enables better commercial products profitable commercial products enable HPC R&D

Overview: 

Overview 4 Retrospective: changes in the 1990s Extrapolation to the near future up to 2010 The end of Moore’s Law in about 2020 Beyond 2025

Moore’s Law - the traditional (linear) view: 

Moore’s Law - the traditional (linear) view

Moore’s Wall - the real (exponential) view: 

Moore’s Wall - the real (exponential) view

Reality Check on Real Applications: 

Reality Check on Real Applications First complete application to break the 1Tflop/s sustained barrier in 1998. Collaborators from DOE's Grand Challenge on Materials, Methods, Microstructure, and Magnetism. 1024-atom first-principles simulation of metallic magnetism in iron

Extrapolation to the Next Decade: 

Extrapolation to the Next Decade Blue Gene

Analysis of TOP500 Extrapolation: 

Analysis of TOP500 Extrapolation Based on the extrapolation from these fits we predict: First 100~TFlop/s system by 2005 About 1--2 years later than the ASCI path forward plans. No system smaller then 1~TFlop/s should be able to make the Top500 First Petaflop system available around 2009 Rapid changes in the technologies used in HPC systems, therefore a projection for the architecture/technology is difficult Continue to expect rapid cycles of re-definition.

2000 - 2005: Technology Options: 

2000 - 2005: Technology Options Clusters SMP nodes, with custom interconnet PCs, with commodity interconnect vector nodes (in Japan) Custom built supercomputers Cray SV-2 IBM Blue Gene HTMT Other technology to influence HPC IRAM/PIM Computational and Data Grids

What Will a 10 Tflop/s System Look Like?: 

What Will a 10 Tflop/s System Look Like? The first ones are already on order Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in US NERSC will have a 3 Tflop/s system in 2000 Systems are large clusters SMP nodes in US Vector nodes in Japan Programming model: OpenMP and/or vectors to maximize node speed MPI for global communication

ASCI: 

ASCI ASCI - Accelerated Strategic Computing Initiative http://www.llnl.gov/asci/ 1996 comprehensive testban on nuclear weapons signed; shift from nuclear test-based methods to computational-based methods of ensuring the safety, reliability, and performance of nuclear weapons stockpile create predictive simulation and virtual prototyping capabilities based on advanced weapon codes accelerate the development of high-performance computing far beyond what might be achieved in the absence of a focused initiative.

ASCI (cont.): 

ASCI (cont.)

CMOS Petaflop/s Solution: 

CMOS Petaflop/s Solution IBM’s Blue Gene 64,000 32 Gflop/s PIM chips Sustain O(107) ops/cycle to avoid Amdahl bottleneck

An Alternate Technology?: 

An Alternate Technology? 1 THz HTS RSFQ (??) 100 GHz 30M JJ 3M JJ 0.4 um 300K JJ 0.8 um 10K JJ 1.5 um 3.5 um 10 GHz 0.05 um 0.07 um 0.10 um 0.12 um 0.14 um 0.20 um 1 GHz lithography? optical lithography 100 MHz 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 Year Single Flux Quantum (SFQ) Operates at 4 Kelvin

Hybrid Technology, Multithreaded Architecture: 

Hybrid Technology, Multithreaded Architecture

HTMT Machine Room: 

HTMT Machine Room

Slide39: 

4oK 50 W 77oK Fiber/Wire Interconnects 3 m 0.5 m 220Volts Nitrogen Helium Hard Disk Array (40 cabinets) 3 m Tape Silo Array (400 Silos) Front End Computer Server Console Cable Tray Assembly Generator WDM Source Optical Amplifiers 220Volts 980 nm Pumps (20 cabinets) Generator HTMT Cross-Section

2000 - 2005: Market Issues: 

2000 - 2005: Market Issues From vertical to horizontal companies - the Compaq model of High Performance Computing 14 SGI IBM HP Sun MIPS PowerPC PA-RISC SPARC Origin SP SPP HPC Irix AIX Solaris applications software with MPI sales Intel others SGI Compaq HP Sun IBM Linux Solaris applications software with MPI mail order retail

Until 2010: Market Issues: 

Until 2010: Market Issues Compaq’s acquisition of DEC was just the first step. DEC transformed from vertical to horizontal in less than one year. Business transition will be more fundamental than previous technology transition. Tremendous impact on HPC community - no more business as usual (e.g. how do we procure machines) Extremely difficult to pick winner Tumultous transition may make it difficult for boutique companies such as Cray, Inc. to survive

Contributions of Beowulf: 

Contributions of Beowulf An experiment in parallel computing systems Established vision low cost high end computing Demonstrated effectiveness of PC clusters for some (not all) classes of applications Provided networking software Provided cluster management tools Conveyed findings to broad community Tutorials and the book Provided design standard to rally community! Standards beget: books, trained people, software … virtuous cycle Adapted from Gordon Bell, presentation at Salishan 2000

Linus’s Law: Linux everywhere: 

Linus’s Law: Linux everywhere Software is or should be free All source code is “open” Everyone is a tester Everything proceeds a lot faster when everyone works on one code Anyone can support and market the code for any price Zero cost software attracts users! All the developers write lots of code

Open Source will change the rules!: 

Open Source will change the rules! Stage 1: (40s and 50s): every computer different, evert program unique Stage 2: (60s and 70s): software is unbundled from harware, commercial software companies arise Stage 3: (80s and 90s): mass market computers and mass market software, the notions of software copyright and privacy are born Stage 4: (2000 and beyond): software migrate to the WWW, OSS communities provide high quality software, OSS takes over generic software

Commercially Integrated Clusters are Already Happening: 

Commercially Integrated Clusters are Already Happening Forecast Systems Lab procurement (Prime contractor is High Performance Technologies Inc., subcontractor is Compaq) Los Lobos Cluster (IBM with University of New Mexico)

Linux super howls : 

Linux super howls

Until 2010: New Technology: 

Until 2010: New Technology The software challenge: overcoming the MPI barrier MPI created finally a standard for applications development in the HPC community standards are always a barrier to further development the MPI standard is a least common denominator building on mid 80ies technology

Enablers of pervasive technologies: 

Enablers of pervasive technologies General accessibility through intuitive interfaces A supporting infrastructure, perceived valuable, based on enduring standards MOSAIC browser and World Wide Web are enablers of global information infrastructure Source: Joel Birnbaum, HP, Lecture at APS Centennial, Atlanta, 1999

Information appliances: 

Information appliances Are characterized by what they do Hide their own complexity Conform to a mental model of usage Are consistent and predictable Can be tailored Need not be portable Source: Joel Birnbaum, HP, Lecture at APS Centennial, Atlanta, 1999

IP On Everything: 

IP On Everything

In the 2010s: Pervasive Computational Modeling: 

In the 2010s: Pervasive Computational Modeling Commodity consumer products Example: MOTOROLA, Pager Division, Boynton Beach, Florida Applications: Radioss/Parallel Solids ABAQUS Standard/Explicit Alias - Render Industrial Designs EFMASS, MDS, from H.P., MCSPICE System: 8 CPU POWER CHALLENGE 2 GB Memory, 40GB Disk Problem: Pager Case - Battery Containment - Electronics Integrity - Display Life 16

Towards Ubiquitous Computational Modeling: 

Towards Ubiquitous Computational Modeling 1985 1990 1995 specialized hardware specialized hardware commodity hardware Cray X-MP Cray Y-MP POWER CHALLENGE XL nuclear weapons lab. industrial company industrial company unique control resource decentralized divisonal resource unique multimillion $ expensive consumer mass consumer product product product $1.99 (weapons impact) $10K (pager/cellular phone) (car crash) 17

Overview: 

Overview 4 Retrospective: changes in the 1990s Extrapolation to the near future up to 2010 The end of Moore’s Law in about 2020 Beyond 2025

Slide54: 

Moore’s Law ? Source: Joel Birnbaum, HP, Lecture at APS Centennial, Atlanta, 1999

Slide55: 

Cost of Fab Moore’s Second Law $60B $50B $40B 360B $20B $10B $0B 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 Year

Slide56: 

Scaling of electronic devices Classical Age Historical Trend SIA Roadmap CMOS

Slide57: 

1985 Vanishing electrons (Transistors per chip)

Slide58: 

Classical Age Historical Trend SIA Roadmap CMOS Scaling of electronic devices Quantum Age Quantum State Switch

Computation limit for nonreversible logic: 

How many bit operation/second can be performed by a nonreversible computer executing Boolean logic? Assume a power dissipation of 1W at room temperature n = P/kT ln(2) = 3.5 x 1020 bit ops/sec Computation limit for nonreversible logic

Slide60: 

Power cost of information transfer? P = nkBT n2 P kB T d c n n = power = Boltzman constant = temperature = transmission distance = speed of light = operating frequency = number of parallel operations

Rate of nonreversible information transfer: 

Rate of nonreversible information transfer How many bits/second can be transferred? Assume a power dissipation of 1W and a volume of 1cm3 n = = 1018 ops/sec

Other possibilities?: 

Other possibilities? Molecular nanomechanics: DNA, mechanical, chemical, biological Quantum cellular automata: Arrays of quantum dots Molecular nanoelectronics: Chemically-synthesized circuits

Slide63: 

Will history repeat itself? 1939 1999 Technology engine Disruptive technology Fundamental research Impact CMOS FET Quantum state switch? Solid state switch Purity of materials Demise of vacuum tubes Demise of semiconductors Vacuum tube Size & shape of materials

Thinking about 2025: 

Thinking about 2025 Extrapolation “Reading the Clearing” (Denning) Scenario planning Science Fiction and Wishful Thinking

Extrapolation: The Long Boom: 

Extrapolation: The Long Boom Peter Schwartz and Peter Leyden, Wired, July 1997 global economic boom of unprecedented scale continued sustained economic growth managing ecological problems globalization and openness five waves of technology (computers, telecommunication, biotech, nanotech -nology, alternative energy)

Reading the Clearing: J. Coates,The Highly Probable Future c2025 : 

Reading the Clearing: J. Coates,The Highly Probable Future c2025 8.4 B, English speaking, personally tagged & identified, prosthetic assisted and/or mutant, tense people who have access & control of their medical records Everything will be smart, responsive to environment. Sensing of everything… challenge for science & engineering! Fast broadband network Smart appliances & AI Tele-all: shop, vote, meet, work, etc. Robots do everything, but there may be conflict with labor… A “managed”, physical and man-made world Reliable weather reports “Many natural disasters e.g. floods, earthquakes, will be mitigated, controlled or prevented” No surprises. We can see 10 years, but not 20! Source: Gordon Bell and J. Coates, Futurist, Vol. 84, 1994

Scenario Planning: Air Force 2025: 

Scenario Planning: Air Force 2025

Science Fiction and Wishful Thinking: 

Science Fiction and Wishful Thinking R. Kurzweil, The Art of Spiritual Machines Bill Joy, Why the Future Does Not Need Us, Wired March 2000

Science Fiction and Wishful Thinking: 

Science Fiction and Wishful Thinking R. Kurzweil, The Art of Spiritual Machines Bill Joy, Why the Future Does Not Need Us, Wired March 2000