logging in or signing up Parsons IDEXPO 2005 09 27 Sharck Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 44 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: August 20, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide1: Colorado Sheep ID Project Jay Parsons Cleon Kimberling Geri Parsons Wayne Cunningham Sheep RFID Trials 2004-2005 Thanks to funding from the Colorado Department of Agriculture and the National Scrapie Eradication Program Slide2: Colorado Sheep andamp; Goat Identification Pilot Project Phase I: Discovery phase Phase II: Implant and Tag phase Phase III: Tracking phase Phase IV: Evaluation phase Slide3: Preliminary Trial Jan. – Feb. 2004 Evaluation of the caudal fold of the tail as an FSIS approved site for RFID implants. 12mm Implant Single shot syringe Slide4: Phase II Implant and Tag USDA Scrapie Tag in right ear ----------------------------------------- Treatment 1: 12 MM Digital Angel RFID implant in tail Treatment 2: 12 MM Avid RFID implant in tail Treatment 3: 12 MM AllFlex RFID implant in tail Treatment 4: Digital Angel RFID button ear tag in left ear Treatment 5: AllFlex RFID button ear tag in left ear Treatment 6: Y-Tex RFID button ear tag in left ear 300 lambs x 3 producers = 900 head Slide5: 300 lambs with three different producers Slide6: Phase III: The Tracking Phase At lamb processing: 900 Head Implant dates: Apr. 12 – Jun. 10, 2004 Slide7: ID Performance EID Implants 344/359 = 95.8% EID Tags 343/367 = 93.5% Scrapie Tags 600/649 = 92.4% Slide8: ID Performance (by site) EID Implants 344/359 = 95.8% Site 1: 96.9% Site 2: 92.5% Site 3: 97.1% EID Tags 343/367 = 93.5% Site 1: 95.4% Site 2: 98.0% Site 3: 88.1% Scrapie Tags 600/649 = 92.4% Site 1: 97.7% Site 2: 95.8% Site 3: 86.1% Slide9: ID Performance (by type) Scrapie Tags 600/649 = 92.4% One-piece metal: 364/375 = 97.1% Two-piece plastic: 236/274 = 86.1% EID Tags 343/367 = 93.5% High: 117/122 = 95.9% Mid: 113/119 = 95.0% Low: 111/121 = 91.7% EID Implants 344/359 = 95.8% High: 110/112 = 98.2% Mid: 120/125 = 96.0% Low: 114/120 = 95.0% Slide10: ID Performance (over time) Tracking Movements: Tracking Movements Labeling Blood Samples: Labeling Blood Samples Slide13: Bar code label with 15-digit EID goes on the tube and is shipped to the lab Slide14: The lab enters the samples electronically. Results are returned electronically. Results are downloaded into the laptop The tag is read and results appear Slide15: Sorting Slide16: Using EID Ave. time to collect Samples = 200/hr. Ave. Lab. Time = 5days Ave. time to read Brand and sort = 420/hr. Concluding Comments: Concluding Comments There is more than one way to ID animals. Long-term retention will be an issue. On-farm value-added management tools will continue to grow with implementation. 'Moving at the speed of commerce' is easier said than done. You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
Parsons IDEXPO 2005 09 27 Sharck Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 44 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: August 20, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide1: Colorado Sheep ID Project Jay Parsons Cleon Kimberling Geri Parsons Wayne Cunningham Sheep RFID Trials 2004-2005 Thanks to funding from the Colorado Department of Agriculture and the National Scrapie Eradication Program Slide2: Colorado Sheep andamp; Goat Identification Pilot Project Phase I: Discovery phase Phase II: Implant and Tag phase Phase III: Tracking phase Phase IV: Evaluation phase Slide3: Preliminary Trial Jan. – Feb. 2004 Evaluation of the caudal fold of the tail as an FSIS approved site for RFID implants. 12mm Implant Single shot syringe Slide4: Phase II Implant and Tag USDA Scrapie Tag in right ear ----------------------------------------- Treatment 1: 12 MM Digital Angel RFID implant in tail Treatment 2: 12 MM Avid RFID implant in tail Treatment 3: 12 MM AllFlex RFID implant in tail Treatment 4: Digital Angel RFID button ear tag in left ear Treatment 5: AllFlex RFID button ear tag in left ear Treatment 6: Y-Tex RFID button ear tag in left ear 300 lambs x 3 producers = 900 head Slide5: 300 lambs with three different producers Slide6: Phase III: The Tracking Phase At lamb processing: 900 Head Implant dates: Apr. 12 – Jun. 10, 2004 Slide7: ID Performance EID Implants 344/359 = 95.8% EID Tags 343/367 = 93.5% Scrapie Tags 600/649 = 92.4% Slide8: ID Performance (by site) EID Implants 344/359 = 95.8% Site 1: 96.9% Site 2: 92.5% Site 3: 97.1% EID Tags 343/367 = 93.5% Site 1: 95.4% Site 2: 98.0% Site 3: 88.1% Scrapie Tags 600/649 = 92.4% Site 1: 97.7% Site 2: 95.8% Site 3: 86.1% Slide9: ID Performance (by type) Scrapie Tags 600/649 = 92.4% One-piece metal: 364/375 = 97.1% Two-piece plastic: 236/274 = 86.1% EID Tags 343/367 = 93.5% High: 117/122 = 95.9% Mid: 113/119 = 95.0% Low: 111/121 = 91.7% EID Implants 344/359 = 95.8% High: 110/112 = 98.2% Mid: 120/125 = 96.0% Low: 114/120 = 95.0% Slide10: ID Performance (over time) Tracking Movements: Tracking Movements Labeling Blood Samples: Labeling Blood Samples Slide13: Bar code label with 15-digit EID goes on the tube and is shipped to the lab Slide14: The lab enters the samples electronically. Results are returned electronically. Results are downloaded into the laptop The tag is read and results appear Slide15: Sorting Slide16: Using EID Ave. time to collect Samples = 200/hr. Ave. Lab. Time = 5days Ave. time to read Brand and sort = 420/hr. Concluding Comments: Concluding Comments There is more than one way to ID animals. Long-term retention will be an issue. On-farm value-added management tools will continue to grow with implementation. 'Moving at the speed of commerce' is easier said than done.