logging in or signing up global2 Sebastiana Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 522 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: April 24, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 2 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript GlobalizationLecture 2 - Dimensions: Globalization Lecture 2 - Dimensions What is it? Global capitalist economy & diminishing political power of nation-state governments (Marxists & Right-wingers) Social relations- “stretching” (Giddens) Culture – a sense of “global consciousness” (Robertson)Slide2: 1) Globalization of Politics - The end of the nation-state? 2) Globalization of Social Relations - The stretching of social relations 3) Globalization of Culture - Homogenization: Cultural imperialism - Culture clashes - HeterogenizationGlobalization of Politics: Globalization of Politics Nation-state has sovereign power: - Treaty of Westphalia (1648) - Draws up defined borders - Each state controls affairs in its own territory. SOVEREIGNTY - Other states cannot interfere in a state’s business Globalization undermines sovereignty of states i.e. undercuts power of a state to control things in its territory Martin Albrow: the nation-state is rapidly losing power Slide4: Nation-state IS losing power Economically: 1) power of TNCS 2) forces of world market Politically: 1) International bodies and law e.g. United Nations, European Union 2) Global protest movements e.g. Greens Culturally: 1) Cultural influences from all over world 2) Trans-national media – public opinionSlide5: Nation-state IS NOT losing power Hirst & Thompson: - TNCs do not have total control of national economies - States still have primary control over taxes & welfare spending - International bodies like UN made up of, and dependent on, nation-states - States developing increasing control of borders and migration e.g. passportsGlobalization of Social Relations: Globalization of Social Relations Giddens: “the disembedding of social relations” - social relations transformed from purely local or national to more “global” - communications technologies; travel technologies - dispersal of populations across globe: migrations and diasporasSlide7: Ulrich Beck: Trans-national social connections - public life: trans-national business relationships - private life: relatives & friends in different countries; inter-marriage between national groups, etc. Multiple, non-national affiliations and identities Cosmopolitanism: a person’s identity is decoupled from the nation-stateUndermining the idea of “Society”: Undermining the idea of “Society” John Urry, Ulrich Beck, Roland Robertson 1) Cannot use the idea of “society” any more 2) Invented in later 19th century: Durkheim 3) Society = bounded unit; a thing Society = nation-state e.g. “British society”, “German society”, etc 4) Reflects out-dated social conditions 5) Need new ideas to reflect global conditionsUndermining the idea of “Society”: Undermining the idea of “Society” Drop idea of “society” Use other ideas from classical sociology Max Weber: Sociality (social relations) Georg Simmel: Social networks (Norbert Elias: social chains) “Global networks” – facilitated through electronic communications networks Undermining the idea of “Society”: Undermining the idea of “Society” Ulrich Beck: Cosmopolitan sociology 1) The main focus is not “society” but the “whole world” 2) Examine multiple, intersecting world-spanning processes 3) Avoid West-centric outlooks John Urry: Sociology Beyond Societies 1) Global flows 2) Social processes like liquids 3) Liquids pouring rapidly across the world Flows unpredictable and uncontrollable 4) Unconstrained cross-border mobility of people and things Slide11: Zygmunt Bauman: Free & chosen mobility for wealthy - transnational business-people - global tourism Forced mobility for poor: - migrant workers, refugees - ever more controls on mobility of poor Information mobility: world divides into “information rich” and “information poor”Globalization of Culture: Globalization of Culture Emergence of a “global culture”? What might this look like? Positive: whole world shares same ideas and values? World Cup, Olympic Games Negative: local cultures destroyed? Cultural homogenization? Cultural heterogenization?Cultural Imperialism: Cultural Imperialism Westernisation / Americanisation of the world Domination of American consumer brands: McDonalds, Nike, Coca-Cola, Gap (“McWorld” - Benjamin Barber) Global cultural homogenisation Same consumer goods everywhere Same ways of thinking everywhere This is bad (left-wing critics e.g. Noam Chomsky) This is good (right-wing critics e.g. Francis Fukuyama)Cultural Imperialism: Cultural Imperialism Dominance of American mass media Oligopoly of big media companies: - Disney, Warner, Sony Imbalance of cultural flows: from ‘core’ to ‘periphery’, not vice versaCulture Clashes: Culture Clashes Benjamin Barber – Jihad vs. McWorld - Local identities, nationalisms, religious traditions - Develop in opposition to McWorld - McWorld creates Jihad Samuel Huntington – Clash of Civilizations - European-Christian, Russian-Christian, Arabic-Muslim, Chinese, etc. - All in conflict: symbolically & materiallyCultural heterogenization: Cultural heterogenization Roland Robertson 1) People in local cultures reinterpret global culture products in light of their own values & interests 2) Global culture is always limited by local cultures 3) Mixtures of global and local cultures: - process of glocalization - local becomes global; global becomes local 4) Perceived threats to local identity: - strong assertion of local identity Globalization reinforces local cultures Globalization produces new “local” culturesHybridization & Creolization: Hybridization & Creolization Anthropologists: Ulf Hannerz 1) No culture is ever ‘pure’ - Always a mixture of influences 2) Previously (relatively) separate cultures come into contact with each other 3) Globalization = Complex mixtures of cultures - ‘creole cultures’, ‘hybrids’Slide18: Globalization of religion: - other options than the “local” religion - religious syncretism: mixing and matching New Age religions: bits of Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism, Celtic paganism & witchcraft, etc. Globalization of food: - “fusion cuisine” e.g. French-Japanese, Anglo-Indian Globalization of music: - “World music” - Buddhist-techno, Spanish rap, Hungarian rock Relativization of one’s own cultural traditionsLimits of Hybridization Ideas: Limits of Hybridization Ideas 1) Local cultures commercialised: Sold to Westerners by media and big business; fashion trends 2) Enforced hybridization - Western culture imposed on non-West - Westerners choose non-Western cultures 3) Most people still primarily enmeshed in local culture? Global culture has superficial effects?Points to Consider: Points to Consider Economic Globalization: spread of global capitalism. Effects? Political Globalization: decline of nation-state’s power. True? Social Globalization: stretching of social relations across world. Everyone, equally? Cultural Globalization: homogenization, culture clashes, heterogenization. Which? Which is most important? How does each of these effect the others? You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
global2 Sebastiana Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 522 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: April 24, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 2 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript GlobalizationLecture 2 - Dimensions: Globalization Lecture 2 - Dimensions What is it? Global capitalist economy & diminishing political power of nation-state governments (Marxists & Right-wingers) Social relations- “stretching” (Giddens) Culture – a sense of “global consciousness” (Robertson)Slide2: 1) Globalization of Politics - The end of the nation-state? 2) Globalization of Social Relations - The stretching of social relations 3) Globalization of Culture - Homogenization: Cultural imperialism - Culture clashes - HeterogenizationGlobalization of Politics: Globalization of Politics Nation-state has sovereign power: - Treaty of Westphalia (1648) - Draws up defined borders - Each state controls affairs in its own territory. SOVEREIGNTY - Other states cannot interfere in a state’s business Globalization undermines sovereignty of states i.e. undercuts power of a state to control things in its territory Martin Albrow: the nation-state is rapidly losing power Slide4: Nation-state IS losing power Economically: 1) power of TNCS 2) forces of world market Politically: 1) International bodies and law e.g. United Nations, European Union 2) Global protest movements e.g. Greens Culturally: 1) Cultural influences from all over world 2) Trans-national media – public opinionSlide5: Nation-state IS NOT losing power Hirst & Thompson: - TNCs do not have total control of national economies - States still have primary control over taxes & welfare spending - International bodies like UN made up of, and dependent on, nation-states - States developing increasing control of borders and migration e.g. passportsGlobalization of Social Relations: Globalization of Social Relations Giddens: “the disembedding of social relations” - social relations transformed from purely local or national to more “global” - communications technologies; travel technologies - dispersal of populations across globe: migrations and diasporasSlide7: Ulrich Beck: Trans-national social connections - public life: trans-national business relationships - private life: relatives & friends in different countries; inter-marriage between national groups, etc. Multiple, non-national affiliations and identities Cosmopolitanism: a person’s identity is decoupled from the nation-stateUndermining the idea of “Society”: Undermining the idea of “Society” John Urry, Ulrich Beck, Roland Robertson 1) Cannot use the idea of “society” any more 2) Invented in later 19th century: Durkheim 3) Society = bounded unit; a thing Society = nation-state e.g. “British society”, “German society”, etc 4) Reflects out-dated social conditions 5) Need new ideas to reflect global conditionsUndermining the idea of “Society”: Undermining the idea of “Society” Drop idea of “society” Use other ideas from classical sociology Max Weber: Sociality (social relations) Georg Simmel: Social networks (Norbert Elias: social chains) “Global networks” – facilitated through electronic communications networks Undermining the idea of “Society”: Undermining the idea of “Society” Ulrich Beck: Cosmopolitan sociology 1) The main focus is not “society” but the “whole world” 2) Examine multiple, intersecting world-spanning processes 3) Avoid West-centric outlooks John Urry: Sociology Beyond Societies 1) Global flows 2) Social processes like liquids 3) Liquids pouring rapidly across the world Flows unpredictable and uncontrollable 4) Unconstrained cross-border mobility of people and things Slide11: Zygmunt Bauman: Free & chosen mobility for wealthy - transnational business-people - global tourism Forced mobility for poor: - migrant workers, refugees - ever more controls on mobility of poor Information mobility: world divides into “information rich” and “information poor”Globalization of Culture: Globalization of Culture Emergence of a “global culture”? What might this look like? Positive: whole world shares same ideas and values? World Cup, Olympic Games Negative: local cultures destroyed? Cultural homogenization? Cultural heterogenization?Cultural Imperialism: Cultural Imperialism Westernisation / Americanisation of the world Domination of American consumer brands: McDonalds, Nike, Coca-Cola, Gap (“McWorld” - Benjamin Barber) Global cultural homogenisation Same consumer goods everywhere Same ways of thinking everywhere This is bad (left-wing critics e.g. Noam Chomsky) This is good (right-wing critics e.g. Francis Fukuyama)Cultural Imperialism: Cultural Imperialism Dominance of American mass media Oligopoly of big media companies: - Disney, Warner, Sony Imbalance of cultural flows: from ‘core’ to ‘periphery’, not vice versaCulture Clashes: Culture Clashes Benjamin Barber – Jihad vs. McWorld - Local identities, nationalisms, religious traditions - Develop in opposition to McWorld - McWorld creates Jihad Samuel Huntington – Clash of Civilizations - European-Christian, Russian-Christian, Arabic-Muslim, Chinese, etc. - All in conflict: symbolically & materiallyCultural heterogenization: Cultural heterogenization Roland Robertson 1) People in local cultures reinterpret global culture products in light of their own values & interests 2) Global culture is always limited by local cultures 3) Mixtures of global and local cultures: - process of glocalization - local becomes global; global becomes local 4) Perceived threats to local identity: - strong assertion of local identity Globalization reinforces local cultures Globalization produces new “local” culturesHybridization & Creolization: Hybridization & Creolization Anthropologists: Ulf Hannerz 1) No culture is ever ‘pure’ - Always a mixture of influences 2) Previously (relatively) separate cultures come into contact with each other 3) Globalization = Complex mixtures of cultures - ‘creole cultures’, ‘hybrids’Slide18: Globalization of religion: - other options than the “local” religion - religious syncretism: mixing and matching New Age religions: bits of Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism, Celtic paganism & witchcraft, etc. Globalization of food: - “fusion cuisine” e.g. French-Japanese, Anglo-Indian Globalization of music: - “World music” - Buddhist-techno, Spanish rap, Hungarian rock Relativization of one’s own cultural traditionsLimits of Hybridization Ideas: Limits of Hybridization Ideas 1) Local cultures commercialised: Sold to Westerners by media and big business; fashion trends 2) Enforced hybridization - Western culture imposed on non-West - Westerners choose non-Western cultures 3) Most people still primarily enmeshed in local culture? Global culture has superficial effects?Points to Consider: Points to Consider Economic Globalization: spread of global capitalism. Effects? Political Globalization: decline of nation-state’s power. True? Social Globalization: stretching of social relations across world. Everyone, equally? Cultural Globalization: homogenization, culture clashes, heterogenization. Which? Which is most important? How does each of these effect the others?