Context:
Context Population:
Youth up to age 18 with serious emotional disturbances (SED) and their families, with:
Qualifying DSM-IV diagnosis
Illness 6 months or more in duration
Demonstrated need for specialized services from at least one other human service system as result of illness
Youth age 18-21 continuing in high school toward graduation
Challenges:
80% of counties with frontier status
Need to increase family involvement at all levels
Lack of effective and timely response through early intervention
Overrepresentation of Native Americans and other distinct cultural groups in juvenile justice, mental health and out of home care
Lack of appropriate services
Lack of community based services
Lack of or inadequate quality services
Lack of providers
Inconsistency in service delivery
Lack of collaborative service delivery and funding, fragmentation
Services are inconsistent with population to be served
Lack of transition services from child to adult system
Need to increase co-occurring capability (mental health & substance abuse) and reduce service gaps
High poverty rates
Services need to be culturally appropriate
Transition from children to adult mental health system
Need for parity in insurance coverage
Need to reduce stigma of mental health issues
Agency barriers to coordinated service delivery
Gaps in services and lack of resources (human and fiscal)
Placement decisions based on resources rather than youth’s needs
Lack of a consistent, comprehensive assessment tool for youth
Funding Limitations
Medicaid is the only sustainable funding source
Categorical funding that limits flexibility
Lack of service funding for non-Medicaid youth and their families
Resources:
Legislative support
Legislative mandate for system of care
Legislature authorized SED waiver application
Existence of elements of System of Care (continuum of care) throughout Montana
Creative Funding Solutions
Creative funding solutions in local communities
Access to Medicaid
Braided public funding on a local and individual basis
HIFA [spell out] waiver for youth ineligible to transition to adult mental health system
Variety of community supports
Strong local collaborations
Culturally diverse communities
Efforts of parents and guardians Draft 06/28/05 TB
Slide3:
Strategies:
Establish System of Care- bring partners together
Establish Oversight Team
Hire Project Director
Assess Committee for Cultural Competence
Develop a logic model
Develop plan for population service priorities
Examine and adjust financing to reduce barriers
Examine language barriers and create common lexicon
Establish 5 SOC management regions and build SOC infrastructure and provide support and oversight to KMA’s
Provide development grants
Improve community understanding of KMA
Align policy, plans, procedures and protocols for smooth coordination and service delivery
Identify system links, gaps and barriers & policy conflicts.
Consensus building for system-building model
Train committee on best practices and develop plans for integration and coordination
Identify legislative adjustments to clarify SOC committee oversight
Examine methods for appropriate data-collection and sharing.
Develop 5 KMA’s including Apsaalooke (Crow Nation)
Choose sites and assist with recruitment and training
Identify family leadership and others to represent community in statewide committee
Ensure culturally competent policies, practices and workforce.
Develop mechanisms for youth and family involvement at system and treatment planning levels.
Involve AmeriCorp
Peer-to-peer support networks
System Level: Goals:
Short-term
Committee established
Assessments completed
Reduction of inequity
Maximize use of funds
Consistency among providers in “lingo”
Enhanced community understanding and buy-in
Enhanced policies, standards and procedures
Identify, plan for, develop and facilitate wraparound process enabling broad array of services
Long-term
Ability to provide coordinated services
Ability to collect and share meaningful, consistent data
Representation of local management authorities and families
Global needs met in non-traditional arenas
Clearly defined system needs
Sustainable system Draft 06/28/05 TB
Slide4:
Strategies:
Improve integration of services and funding among local child-serving agencies and providers
Formalize links among local agencies, programs and providers
Involve families in development of all aspects of system
“No wrong door” entry to assessment, coordinated planning and wraparound system of services
Enroll and serve youth and families
Implement care review procedures
Provide for technical transfer between sate [sic] and KMA’s
Practice continuous quality improvement
800 help line
Peer-to-peer mentoring
Individual Care Coordination- Parent is the key member and participant (unless parental rights modified) Team Members: Caregivers, Mentors, Neighbors, Clinical consultants, Legal advocates, Agency representatives, School personnel, Tribal representatives, First Health, and others. (May vary based on needs of child and family)
KMA Level: Goals:
Short-term
Improved services to youth and families
Reduced dependence on out-of-town & out-of-state services
Improved access to service
Improved co-occurring capability (mental health & substance abuse)
Reduced service gaps
Integrated youth & family-specific care plans
Increase in family driven plans
Increased case management services
Access to data that will help shape & improve programs
Improved cultural competence, evaluation skills, co-occurring capability and reduced service gaps
Increased access to data that will help shape & improve programs
Improved cultural competence & its measurement through evaluation
Reduced overrepresentation in Juvenile Justice, Mental Health & out of home for Native American & other distinct cultural groups [consider referral source as issue]
Increased family involvement at all levels
Reduced effect of stigma on access & utilization
Long-term
Better child and family outcomes Draft 06/28/05 TB
Slide5:
Governance: Guiding Principles State & Apsaalooke (Crow Nation) Governor
Brian Schweitzer DPHHS Director
JOAN MILES SOC’s Planning Committee
Role: Consultation and Grant oversight Children’s Mental Health Bureau
Pete Surdock Apsaalooke
Crow Nation KIDS fm
Karin Billings
Role: Field Unit Supervisor and Coordinator
“The KMA is the infrastructure upon which the State system of care will be built. The State, in partnership with the community, shares in the responsibility to ensure all KMA Community Team members are working together toward common goals and objectives.” Region I
KMA Project Region II
KMA Project Region III
Crow KMA Region IV
KMA Project Region V
KMA Project Role: Support Role: Grant submission and delegate managing authority Role: Principal Investigator design and implementation Role: Key Consultant and KMA Health Resources Division
MARY DALTON
Role: Support and Chair of Children’s Mental Health Services Planning Committee