Share PowerPoint. Anywhere!

pptAgroterrorism

Uploaded from authorPOINT Lite
Download as Download Not Available PPT
Presentation Description

No description available

Like authorSTREAM?


You can vote once a day till December
10th, Vote Now!
Views: 50
Like it  ( Likes) Dislike it  ( Dislikes)
Added: March 24, 2008 This presentation is Public
Presentation Category :Education
Presentation StatisticsNew!
Views on authorSTREAM: 48 | Views from Embeds: 2
Others - 2 views
Presentation Transcript

Agroterrorism Awareness: Safeguarding American Agriculture : Agroterrorism Awareness: Safeguarding American Agriculture


The Wisconsin Experience : The Wisconsin Experience 1996- anonymous call about contaminated rendered products Liquid fat contaminated with chlordane Supplied to large feed manufacturer and to ~4,000 farms in four states Milk and products from farms contaminated $4 million to dispose of products


Overview : Overview Define the goals of agroterrorism Understand the importance of agriculture to our nation Realize the impact of agroterrorism Know which agencies are involved in mitigation and response Identify agents of potential use Address public health concerns


Agroterrorism Issues : Agroterrorism Issues


What is Agroterrorism? : What is Agroterrorism? The use, or threatened use, of biological (to include toxins), chemical, or radiological agents against some component of agriculture in such a way as to adversely impact the agriculture industry or any component thereof, the economy, or the consuming public.


Slide6 : Biological agents targeting humans, animals, or plants Biological, chemical, or radiological agents targeting agriculture or its components Livestock Food supply Crops Industry Workers Terrorism Conventional, radiological, nuclear, chemical, cyber Typically direct human targeting


The Goals of Agroterrorism : The Goals of Agroterrorism Fear Economic and trade disruption Unlike human attack where high morbidity or mortality are goals Exports are our lifeblood 2000, $51 billion exported in agricultural commodities


Characteristics of Targeting Agriculture : Characteristics of Targeting Agriculture Attack on crops or animals not as emotional as human targets Less chance of retaliation Use of agent may go undetected for days, weeks Plausible deniability No one would suspect it would occur


Clues Suggesting an Attack : Clues Suggesting an Attack Traceback of animals yields dead-end No shared factor among animals History of the farm/facility Other concurrent outbreaks Unusual signs Overwhelming mortality Unusual season for disease


Introducing an Agent : Introducing an Agent Multiple methods of delivery/insertion Covert vs. overt Simultaneous introduction in multiple areas Accidental by tourists, products Natural vs. intentional Real vs. hoax Lack of consumer confidence


Historical Aspects of Biological Warfare Programs and Agroterrorism : Historical Aspects of Biological Warfare Programs and Agroterrorism


History : History WWII Germany Experimentation with Foot and Mouth Disease Germany and France Late blight, wheat rusts, corn beetle, rapeseed beetle, Colorado beetle (1944) 1940-50’s Soviet Union anti-agriculture weapons


The U.S. Program : The U.S. Program Began in 1941-42 Exam use of Newcastle, fowl plague, FMD, hog cholera, rice blast, cereal stem rust, wheat scab, late blight Expanded during Korean War (1950-53) 30,000 kilos of Puccinia graminia tritici spores (wheat stem rust), 1951-69 1 ton of Piricularia oryzae spores for rice, 1966 Other crop targets: soybeans, sugar beets, sweet potatoes, cotton


The U.S. Program : The U.S. Program 1969-70, shut down Total spent: $726 million BWC of 1972 finally ratified by U.S. in 1975 Reasons for discontinuing No guarantee they work Costly Aging research facilities


Importance of Agriculture : Importance of Agriculture


U.S. Data, 1999 : U.S. Data, 1999 Food and fiber accounts for ~16.4% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) 24 million Americans are employed in some aspect of agriculture Heavily tied to other industries and sectors


U.S. Animal Data, 2001 : U.S. Animal Data, 2001


Leading U.S. Crops, 2001 : Leading U.S. Crops, 2001


U.S. Exports, 2001 : U.S. Exports, 2001


Impact : Impact


Impact : Impact Potential for mass disruption Weaken workforce Destabilize government Shocking public images Loss of freedoms Loss of consumer confidence Higher prices? Food shortages?


Monetary Impact : Monetary Impact Quickly felt by state/federal economy Loss in trade Other industries damaged Restaurants, suppliers, tourism, zoos, hunting, etc. Direct costs Diagnostics, surveillance, depopulation, cleaning, disinfection, indemnity, overtime


Losses to Crops/Plants : Losses to Crops/Plants $33 billion/year in losses due to plant diseases $21 billion due to nonindigenous pathogens $7 billion/year in forest products $2.1 billion due to nonindigenous pathogens


U.S. Agencies : U.S. Agencies


U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) : U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) Veterinary Services (VS) Livestock, poultry emergencies Emergency Programs (EP) Prepares and trains veterinarians and personnel to respond to outbreaks Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ) Crop, plant emergencies


USDA-APHIS-VS : USDA-APHIS-VS National Veterinary Services Laboratories (NVSL) Ames, IA and Plum Island, NY Four labs Provide diagnostic services and training Foreign animal disease diagnosticians All suspect FAD’s investigated within 24 hours of notification


U.S. Department of Homeland Security : U.S. Department of Homeland Security 3,000 USDA inspectors Airports, borders, seaports Beagle Brigade 1,800 USDA inspectors 2 million interceptions annually 130 dog teams trained to sniff out meat and produce at airports


Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) : Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) 1999, over 41,000 U.S. maritime trading vessels 48% increase in trade entries 2001, Customs processed 472 million persons 5.7 million containers 2002, imported 1.5 million cattle, 5.8 million pigs


Quarantine Stations : Quarantine Stations Import quarantine of livestock and poultry 4 facilities Personally owned birds 6 quarantine facilities Plants 14 quarantine facilities


First Responders : First Responders Local and state veterinarians Recognize outbreak of foreign animal disease USDA-APHIS personnel University extension personnel Local, state, federal health agencies Law enforcement Emergency management division


Agencies Involved in Wisconsin Case : Agencies Involved in Wisconsin Case City police County sheriff State crime lab Wisconsin Ag, Trade, Consumer Protection Environmental inspectors Dairy inspectors State veterinarian Dept. of Natural Resources in WI, MN, MI Dept. of Agriculture in MN, MI, IL, IA, IN Dept. of Health in WI EPA FDA Office of Criminal Investigation


Livestock : Livestock


Vulnerabilities : Vulnerabilities High density husbandry Auction markets, transport of animals Limited immunity to foreign animal diseases Centralized feed supply and distribution


Vulnerabilities : Vulnerabilities Poor traceability of animals Expanded international trade and travel Infectious agents are widespread in other countries Porous borders Lack of on-farm biosecurity Lack of foreign animal disease awareness


Biosecurity : Biosecurity Efforts to keep out unwanted microbial agents Minimizing spread, risk of disease Multiple levels at which it can be applied Regulate visitors Restricting movement is essential Quarantine new animals


Animal Movement : Animal Movement Mixing of animals at auction markets More than 5 million cattle pass through every year Transported via trucks Dissemination of pathogens to other animals or fomites 1950-60- U.S. military secret testing


Potential Agents : Potential Agents Livestock and Plant Pathogens


USDA High Consequence Livestock Pathogens and Toxins : USDA High Consequence Livestock Pathogens and Toxins


Public Health Implications : Public Health Implications Several zoonotic diseases Many diseases listed on the previous slide have human health consequences Mechanical (negligible threat) Newcastle disease, swine vesicular disease Biological Avian influenza, FMD


Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) : Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) Virus Considered to be the most important livestock disease in the world Not in U.S. since 1929 Vesicular disease of cloven- hoofed animals Spread by aerosol & fomites


OIE Early Warning System : OIE Early Warning System Disease reported within 24 hours to OIE Informs countries at risk Trade shut down until further notice


Foot-and-Mouth Disease Distribution and Recent Activity : Present Recent Activity Free (Rev. 3-25-01) Foot-and-Mouth Disease Distribution and Recent Activity


Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) : Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) Animals at risk in the U.S. 100 million cattle 60 million swine 7 million sheep 40 million wildlife Not horses Humans rarely infected Huge economic impact


U.K. FMD Outbreak, 2001 : U.K. FMD Outbreak, 2001 Total costs over £10 billion Ag industry, compensation, tourism, sports 6 million animals slaughtered FMD free in less than 1 year Public perception Animal welfare Smoke pollution


Wildlife : Wildlife Risk of enzootic wildlife infection Permanent trade embargoes possible Risk to zoos and endangered species 1985 Israel FMD infection in gazelles 1,500 deaths, spread to neighboring livestock $100 billion spent in the U.S. Hunting, fishing, camping, skiing, other outdoor activities


Newcastle Disease (ND) : Newcastle Disease (ND) Virus affecting poultry Four pathotypes Asymptomatic, lentogenic, mesogenic, velogenic vND endemic in Asia, Middle East, Africa, Central/ South America Causes drop in egg production, neurological damage, and death


Newcastle Disease (ND) : Newcastle Disease (ND) 1950: First U.S. case 1972: Eradication campaign began 12 million birds destroyed $56 million dollar cost to tax payers Outbreaks continue due to illegal importation of exotic birds and poultry Humans can acquire eye infections


Newcastle Disease : Newcastle Disease 2002-2003: California outbreak 2,662 premises depopulated 4 million birds destroyed $160 million impact Developing countries Effects quality and quantity of dietary protein Significant effect on human health


Crops and Plants : Crops and Plants


Plant Targets : Plant Targets Food crops Wheat: #1 grain export in 2002 Corn: #2 grain export in 2002 Soybean: U.S. produced ~46% of world’s crops in 1999-2000 Citrus, sugarcane Fiber Cotton Timber Northwest U.S.


Economically Damaging Plant Pathogens in U.S. : Economically Damaging Plant Pathogens in U.S.


Plant Pathogens with Trade Issues : Plant Pathogens with Trade Issues Karnal Bunt Wheat Maize Streak virus Wheat, grass, maize Bacterial Wilt Potatoes, tomatoes, peppers, eggplant Curcurbit Yellow Stunt Disorder virus Cantaloupe, watermelon


Fungal Plant Agent : Fungal Plant Agent Karnal Bunt Tilletia indica Mitra Wheat Affects taste not yield 1996 discovered in AZ, CA, TX Clean up cost $45 million Remain viable in soil 5 years


Factors Influencing Effectiveness of Crop Pathogens : Factors Influencing Effectiveness of Crop Pathogens Meteorological conditions Susceptibility of crop Planting times, season, irrigation Geographic terrain Ability of agent to survive and thrive Dependence of agent upon insect vector, mechanical, or wind transmission


Conclusion : Conclusion


What Have We Learned? : What Have We Learned? Threats need to be taken seriously Framework for response and coordination Adequate resources and expertise Determine extent of attack Prevent disease spread and associated losses Prevent any public health implications Finding the perpetrator


Improving Biosecurity : Improving Biosecurity Tailored to each farm Cost-benefit considerations Must consider state/federal concerns Universal precautions Role of USDA-APHIS Involvement of industry groups


Summary : Summary Agroterrorism is a real threat Economic consequences could be severe Awareness education imperative Working plans in place Minimal direct human illness Continued vigilance essential


Additional Resources : Additional Resources


Slide64 : Davis RG. Agroterrorism: Need for awareness. In: Scanes C, ed. Perspectives in world food and agriculture: 2003. Ames, IA: ISU Press. In press., 2003 USDA-APHIS website www.aphis.usda.gov OIE website www.oie.int


Acknowledgments : Acknowledgments Development of this presentation was funded by a grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to the Center for Food Security and Public Health at Iowa State University.


Acknowledgments : Acknowledgments Author: Radford G. Davis, DVM, MPH Co-author: Danelle Bickett-Weddle, DVM