logging in or signing up grade4and8math 2005 Reva Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 39 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: September 27, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Elementary and Middle School Math 1999-2005: Elementary and Middle School Math 1999-2005The Bottom Line: The Bottom Line Student achievement is improving overall. We see signs the achievement gap is closing. Fewer students have serious academic problems. Elementary math is up significantly this year. But middle school math is mixed. Percent meeting the standards is down, but mean score is flat. Middle-Level Mathematics 1999–2005 : Middle-Level Mathematics 1999–2005 2005 Middle-Level Math: Percent Meeting Standards Declines Slightly Statewide, the percentage of students meeting all the standards declined 2 points. However, a substantially larger percentage of students (55.5 versus 37.9) met all the standards in 2005 than in 1999.: 2005 Middle-Level Math: Percent Meeting Standards Declines Slightly Statewide, the percentage of students meeting all the standards declined 2 points. However, a substantially larger percentage of students (55.5 versus 37.9) met all the standards in 2005 than in 1999. Total Public Tested 1999: 194,083 2000: 198,512 2001: 199,330 2002: 207,940 2003: 216,709 2004: 223,193: 2005: 222,059 Percentage of students at Levels 3 and 42005 Middle-Level Mathematics After significant increases between 1999 and 2004, the percentage of both general education students and students with disabilities meeting all the standards fell in 2005.: 2005 Middle-Level Mathematics After significant increases between 1999 and 2004, the percentage of both general education students and students with disabilities meeting all the standards fell in 2005. Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 Number of Students Tested: General Education Students With Disabilities 1999: 171,050 1999: 23,033 2000: 172,857 2000: 25,655 2001: 173,252 2001: 26,078 2002: 179,927 2002: 28,013 2003: 187,539 2003: 29,170 2004: 188,014 2004: 35,179 2005: 190,792 2005: 31,267 Middle-Level Mathematics: Middle-Level Mathematics Results by Need/Resource Capacity Category2005 Middle-Level Mathematics In every Need/Resource Capacity category, the percentage of students achieving all the standards increased substantially between 1999 and 2004. In every category, the percentage fell in 2005.: 2005 Middle-Level Mathematics In every Need/Resource Capacity category, the percentage of students achieving all the standards increased substantially between 1999 and 2004. In every category, the percentage fell in 2005. Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4Slide8: Fewer Students Show Serious Academic Problems The percentage of students with serious academic problems declined in New York City and most districts, but increased slightly in the Big Four. Percentage of Students Scoring at Level 1Slide9: New York City and the Big Four Increase Mean Score Despite the decline in the percentage of students meeting all the standards, New York City and the Big Four improved slightly in mean score. The statewide mean score stayed the same. Districts in all need/resource capacity categories have increased their mean scores since 1999. New York City has achieved the largest overall increase. Slide10: 2005 Middle-Level Mathematics The mean score of students with disabilities in Low Need Districts was higher than the mean score for general education students in the Big Four. Mean Scale ScoresMiddle-Level Mathematics: Middle-Level Mathematics Results by Racial/Ethnic Group2005 Middle-Level Mathematics The percentage of students meeting all the standards declined in each racial/ethnic group in 2005. However, it increased overall between 1999 and 2004. Despite the decrease in 2005, Black and Hispanic students were more than twice as likely to meet the standards in 2005 as in 1999. However, their performance is still too low.: 2005 Middle-Level Mathematics The percentage of students meeting all the standards declined in each racial/ethnic group in 2005. However, it increased overall between 1999 and 2004. Despite the decrease in 2005, Black and Hispanic students were more than twice as likely to meet the standards in 2005 as in 1999. However, their performance is still too low. Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4Slide13: 2005 Middle-Level Mathematics In all racial/ethnic groups, the percentage of students scoring at Level 1 has decreased since 1999, including this year. The percentage of Black, Hispanic, Asian and White students scoring at Level 1 has been reduced by more than half. Percentage of Students Scoring at Level 12005 Middle-Level Math: Minority Students Improve Despite the decline in the percentage of students meeting all the standards, the mean score of Black, Hispanic and American Indian/Alaskan Native students increased this year.: 2005 Middle-Level Math: Minority Students Improve Despite the decline in the percentage of students meeting all the standards, the mean score of Black, Hispanic and American Indian/Alaskan Native students increased this year.Middle-Level Mathematics: Middle-Level Mathematics Results for the Big 5 Cities2005 Middle-Level Mathematics The percentage of students meeting all the standards declined in 2005 in all the Big 5 except Rochester. Significant variations in performance exist among the Big 5 districts in the percentage of students meeting all the standards.: Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 2005 Middle-Level Mathematics The percentage of students meeting all the standards declined in 2005 in all the Big 5 except Rochester. Significant variations in performance exist among the Big 5 districts in the percentage of students meeting all the standards.Slide17: 2005 Middle-Level Mathematics In New York City, Rochester, and Syracuse, the percentage of students with serious academic problems declined in 2005. In each Big 5 District, the percentage of students scoring at Level 1 has decreased substantially since 1999. New York City and Yonkers had fewer than half as many students scoring at Level 1 in 2005 as in 1999. Percentage of Students Scoring at Level 1 Slide18: 2005 Middle-Level Mathematics Rochester, Syracuse, Yonkers, and New York City improved in mean score this year. Elementary-Level Mathematics 1999–2005 : Elementary-Level Mathematics 1999–2005 Elementary-Level Math Improves Again Statewide, the percentage of students meeting all the standards increased by almost 6 percent in 2005. A significantly larger percentage of students (84.9 versus 66.7) met all the standards in 2005 than in 1999. : Elementary-Level Math Improves Again Statewide, the percentage of students meeting all the standards increased by almost 6 percent in 2005. A significantly larger percentage of students (84.9 versus 66.7) met all the standards in 2005 than in 1999. Total Public Tested 1999: 215,817 2000: 221,152 2001: 220,101 2002: 216,991 2003: 218,882 2004: 214,511 2005: 207,680 Percentage of students at Levels 3 and 4Elementary-Level Mathematics The percentage of students with disabilities achieving all the standards increased by 6.5 percentage points between 2004 and 2005.: Elementary-Level Mathematics The percentage of students with disabilities achieving all the standards increased by 6.5 percentage points between 2004 and 2005. Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 Number of Students Tested: General Education Students With Disabilities 1999: 187,156 1999: 28,661 2000: 192,471 2000: 28,681 2001: 191,650 2001: 28,451 2002: 189,839 2002: 27,152 2003: 192,307 2003: 26,575 2004: 186,908 2004: 27,788 2005: 179,874 2005: 27,806Elementary-Level Mathematics: Elementary-Level Mathematics Results by Need/Resource Capacity CategoryElementary-Level Mathematics The percentage of students achieving all the standards increased in every need/resource capacity category. Since 1999, New York City and the Big Four have achieved increases of about 25 percentage points.: Elementary-Level Mathematics The percentage of students achieving all the standards increased in every need/resource capacity category. Since 1999, New York City and the Big Four have achieved increases of about 25 percentage points. Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4Slide24: Elementary-Level Mathematics The percentage of students with serious academic problems has declined every year. The biggest declines have been in the Big Five. Percentage of Students Scoring at Level 1Slide25: Elementary-Level Mathematics Students in all need/resource capacity categories have increased their mean scores since 1999. Statewide, the increase was 9 points. Cut point for Level 3 is 637.Elementary-Level Mathematics: Elementary-Level Mathematics Results by Racial/Ethnic GroupElementary Math: Achievement Gap is Closing The percentage of Black and Hispanic students meeting all the standards improved significantly this year. The percent doing so has increased by over 30 percentage points since 1999.: Elementary Math: Achievement Gap is Closing The percentage of Black and Hispanic students meeting all the standards improved significantly this year. The percent doing so has increased by over 30 percentage points since 1999. Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4Slide28: Elementary-Level Mathematics The percentage of Black and Hispanic students with serious academic problems has declined substantially since 1999. Percentage of Students Scoring at Level 1Elementary-Level Mathematics: Elementary-Level Mathematics Results for the Big 5 CitiesSlide30: Elementary-Level Mathematics Among the Big 5 Districts, New York City had the biggest gains this year. Yonkers had the largest percentage of students meeting all the standards. In all Big 5 Districts, two-thirds or more of fourth-graders met all the standards. Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4Slide31: Elementary-Level Mathematics In each Big 5 District, the percentage of students with serious academic problems has declined substantially since 1999. Percentage of Students Scoring at Level 1 Slide32: Elementary-Level Mathematics All Big 5 Districts increased their mean scores between 1999 and 2005. What is the State doing to improve achievement?: What is the State doing to improve achievement? Providing revised math performance indicators for grades K - 12. Developing new assessments in English and math in grades 3 through 8. Developing online instructional information (Virtual Learning Space and the Public Broadcasting System) to help educators of grades 3 through 8 English and math. The new data system will allow us to track the performance of students as they move from grade 3 through 8. The State will provide to all districts individual, school, and district summary reports on test results, with detailed analysis that can be used to improve student performance. What Are Schools Doing to Improve?: What Are Schools Doing to Improve? Hiring math instruction specialists Using intensive staff development focusing on math instruction Improving curriculum, in line with the standards Teaching math every day in the classroom Setting targets for improvement Using achievement data to help individual students Grouping students flexibly by achievement level to give them extra help Providing before- or after-school help. You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
grade4and8math 2005 Reva Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 39 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: September 27, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Elementary and Middle School Math 1999-2005: Elementary and Middle School Math 1999-2005The Bottom Line: The Bottom Line Student achievement is improving overall. We see signs the achievement gap is closing. Fewer students have serious academic problems. Elementary math is up significantly this year. But middle school math is mixed. Percent meeting the standards is down, but mean score is flat. Middle-Level Mathematics 1999–2005 : Middle-Level Mathematics 1999–2005 2005 Middle-Level Math: Percent Meeting Standards Declines Slightly Statewide, the percentage of students meeting all the standards declined 2 points. However, a substantially larger percentage of students (55.5 versus 37.9) met all the standards in 2005 than in 1999.: 2005 Middle-Level Math: Percent Meeting Standards Declines Slightly Statewide, the percentage of students meeting all the standards declined 2 points. However, a substantially larger percentage of students (55.5 versus 37.9) met all the standards in 2005 than in 1999. Total Public Tested 1999: 194,083 2000: 198,512 2001: 199,330 2002: 207,940 2003: 216,709 2004: 223,193: 2005: 222,059 Percentage of students at Levels 3 and 42005 Middle-Level Mathematics After significant increases between 1999 and 2004, the percentage of both general education students and students with disabilities meeting all the standards fell in 2005.: 2005 Middle-Level Mathematics After significant increases between 1999 and 2004, the percentage of both general education students and students with disabilities meeting all the standards fell in 2005. Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 Number of Students Tested: General Education Students With Disabilities 1999: 171,050 1999: 23,033 2000: 172,857 2000: 25,655 2001: 173,252 2001: 26,078 2002: 179,927 2002: 28,013 2003: 187,539 2003: 29,170 2004: 188,014 2004: 35,179 2005: 190,792 2005: 31,267 Middle-Level Mathematics: Middle-Level Mathematics Results by Need/Resource Capacity Category2005 Middle-Level Mathematics In every Need/Resource Capacity category, the percentage of students achieving all the standards increased substantially between 1999 and 2004. In every category, the percentage fell in 2005.: 2005 Middle-Level Mathematics In every Need/Resource Capacity category, the percentage of students achieving all the standards increased substantially between 1999 and 2004. In every category, the percentage fell in 2005. Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4Slide8: Fewer Students Show Serious Academic Problems The percentage of students with serious academic problems declined in New York City and most districts, but increased slightly in the Big Four. Percentage of Students Scoring at Level 1Slide9: New York City and the Big Four Increase Mean Score Despite the decline in the percentage of students meeting all the standards, New York City and the Big Four improved slightly in mean score. The statewide mean score stayed the same. Districts in all need/resource capacity categories have increased their mean scores since 1999. New York City has achieved the largest overall increase. Slide10: 2005 Middle-Level Mathematics The mean score of students with disabilities in Low Need Districts was higher than the mean score for general education students in the Big Four. Mean Scale ScoresMiddle-Level Mathematics: Middle-Level Mathematics Results by Racial/Ethnic Group2005 Middle-Level Mathematics The percentage of students meeting all the standards declined in each racial/ethnic group in 2005. However, it increased overall between 1999 and 2004. Despite the decrease in 2005, Black and Hispanic students were more than twice as likely to meet the standards in 2005 as in 1999. However, their performance is still too low.: 2005 Middle-Level Mathematics The percentage of students meeting all the standards declined in each racial/ethnic group in 2005. However, it increased overall between 1999 and 2004. Despite the decrease in 2005, Black and Hispanic students were more than twice as likely to meet the standards in 2005 as in 1999. However, their performance is still too low. Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4Slide13: 2005 Middle-Level Mathematics In all racial/ethnic groups, the percentage of students scoring at Level 1 has decreased since 1999, including this year. The percentage of Black, Hispanic, Asian and White students scoring at Level 1 has been reduced by more than half. Percentage of Students Scoring at Level 12005 Middle-Level Math: Minority Students Improve Despite the decline in the percentage of students meeting all the standards, the mean score of Black, Hispanic and American Indian/Alaskan Native students increased this year.: 2005 Middle-Level Math: Minority Students Improve Despite the decline in the percentage of students meeting all the standards, the mean score of Black, Hispanic and American Indian/Alaskan Native students increased this year.Middle-Level Mathematics: Middle-Level Mathematics Results for the Big 5 Cities2005 Middle-Level Mathematics The percentage of students meeting all the standards declined in 2005 in all the Big 5 except Rochester. Significant variations in performance exist among the Big 5 districts in the percentage of students meeting all the standards.: Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 2005 Middle-Level Mathematics The percentage of students meeting all the standards declined in 2005 in all the Big 5 except Rochester. Significant variations in performance exist among the Big 5 districts in the percentage of students meeting all the standards.Slide17: 2005 Middle-Level Mathematics In New York City, Rochester, and Syracuse, the percentage of students with serious academic problems declined in 2005. In each Big 5 District, the percentage of students scoring at Level 1 has decreased substantially since 1999. New York City and Yonkers had fewer than half as many students scoring at Level 1 in 2005 as in 1999. Percentage of Students Scoring at Level 1 Slide18: 2005 Middle-Level Mathematics Rochester, Syracuse, Yonkers, and New York City improved in mean score this year. Elementary-Level Mathematics 1999–2005 : Elementary-Level Mathematics 1999–2005 Elementary-Level Math Improves Again Statewide, the percentage of students meeting all the standards increased by almost 6 percent in 2005. A significantly larger percentage of students (84.9 versus 66.7) met all the standards in 2005 than in 1999. : Elementary-Level Math Improves Again Statewide, the percentage of students meeting all the standards increased by almost 6 percent in 2005. A significantly larger percentage of students (84.9 versus 66.7) met all the standards in 2005 than in 1999. Total Public Tested 1999: 215,817 2000: 221,152 2001: 220,101 2002: 216,991 2003: 218,882 2004: 214,511 2005: 207,680 Percentage of students at Levels 3 and 4Elementary-Level Mathematics The percentage of students with disabilities achieving all the standards increased by 6.5 percentage points between 2004 and 2005.: Elementary-Level Mathematics The percentage of students with disabilities achieving all the standards increased by 6.5 percentage points between 2004 and 2005. Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4 Number of Students Tested: General Education Students With Disabilities 1999: 187,156 1999: 28,661 2000: 192,471 2000: 28,681 2001: 191,650 2001: 28,451 2002: 189,839 2002: 27,152 2003: 192,307 2003: 26,575 2004: 186,908 2004: 27,788 2005: 179,874 2005: 27,806Elementary-Level Mathematics: Elementary-Level Mathematics Results by Need/Resource Capacity CategoryElementary-Level Mathematics The percentage of students achieving all the standards increased in every need/resource capacity category. Since 1999, New York City and the Big Four have achieved increases of about 25 percentage points.: Elementary-Level Mathematics The percentage of students achieving all the standards increased in every need/resource capacity category. Since 1999, New York City and the Big Four have achieved increases of about 25 percentage points. Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4Slide24: Elementary-Level Mathematics The percentage of students with serious academic problems has declined every year. The biggest declines have been in the Big Five. Percentage of Students Scoring at Level 1Slide25: Elementary-Level Mathematics Students in all need/resource capacity categories have increased their mean scores since 1999. Statewide, the increase was 9 points. Cut point for Level 3 is 637.Elementary-Level Mathematics: Elementary-Level Mathematics Results by Racial/Ethnic GroupElementary Math: Achievement Gap is Closing The percentage of Black and Hispanic students meeting all the standards improved significantly this year. The percent doing so has increased by over 30 percentage points since 1999.: Elementary Math: Achievement Gap is Closing The percentage of Black and Hispanic students meeting all the standards improved significantly this year. The percent doing so has increased by over 30 percentage points since 1999. Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4Slide28: Elementary-Level Mathematics The percentage of Black and Hispanic students with serious academic problems has declined substantially since 1999. Percentage of Students Scoring at Level 1Elementary-Level Mathematics: Elementary-Level Mathematics Results for the Big 5 CitiesSlide30: Elementary-Level Mathematics Among the Big 5 Districts, New York City had the biggest gains this year. Yonkers had the largest percentage of students meeting all the standards. In all Big 5 Districts, two-thirds or more of fourth-graders met all the standards. Percentage of Students Scoring at Levels 3 and 4Slide31: Elementary-Level Mathematics In each Big 5 District, the percentage of students with serious academic problems has declined substantially since 1999. Percentage of Students Scoring at Level 1 Slide32: Elementary-Level Mathematics All Big 5 Districts increased their mean scores between 1999 and 2005. What is the State doing to improve achievement?: What is the State doing to improve achievement? Providing revised math performance indicators for grades K - 12. Developing new assessments in English and math in grades 3 through 8. Developing online instructional information (Virtual Learning Space and the Public Broadcasting System) to help educators of grades 3 through 8 English and math. The new data system will allow us to track the performance of students as they move from grade 3 through 8. The State will provide to all districts individual, school, and district summary reports on test results, with detailed analysis that can be used to improve student performance. What Are Schools Doing to Improve?: What Are Schools Doing to Improve? Hiring math instruction specialists Using intensive staff development focusing on math instruction Improving curriculum, in line with the standards Teaching math every day in the classroom Setting targets for improvement Using achievement data to help individual students Grouping students flexibly by achievement level to give them extra help Providing before- or after-school help.