logging in or signing up SoilTesting FertRecommendations Renzo Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 221 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (1) Dislike it (0) Added: January 22, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Soil Testing, Fertilizer Recommendations and Wisconsin Nutrient Management PlanningKeith A. KellingDepartment of Soil ScienceUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison: Soil Testing, Fertilizer Recommendations and Wisconsin Nutrient Management Planning Keith A. Kelling Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin-MadisonTopics to consider: Topics to consider Soil sampling a. objectives b. requirements 2. Soil testing a. approaches b. requirements c. UW program features d. reading a report e. certified labsMinimum requirements: Minimum requirements Follow recommendations in UWEX Factsheet A2100 One recommendation per field * some exceptions * site specific is OK Field tested in last 4 years Each sample comprised of 10-20 cores Number of samples/field varies * sampling history * expected responsivenessNeeded intensity varies with:: Needed intensity varies with: Sampling history Expected Responsiveness - No samples in last 4 years, take 1 sample / 5 acres - Have samples – go to part 2 - If either P or K in high range or below, take 1 sample / 5 acres - If both P and K are VH or EH, use tableRecommended sample intensity for non-responsive fields tested within past 4 years: Recommended sample intensity for non-responsive fields tested within past 4 years * 10 cores/sample minimumMultiple samples give better recommendations:: Multiple samples give better recommendations:Small fields / contour strips with identical management / crop histories : Small fields / contour strips with identical management / crop histories Specific sampling details in A2100: - proper tool Specific sampling details in A2100 - depth - pattern / place - frequency - special situations (tillage, SSM)Slide11: Samples must be analyzed by a WDATCP certified lab - specified procedures - UW recommendations Analyzing samplesWDATCP certified labs, 2003: WDATCP certified labs, 2003 Ag Source – Bonduel A and L Great Lakes – Fort Wayne, IN Dairyland – Arcadia Rock River – Watertown UW Soil and Plant Analysis Lab – Madison UW Soil and Forage Lab – MarshfieldSlide13: Recommendations for nutrients must be consistent with UW recommendations Recommendations UW recommendations - Best estimate to optimize economic return - Not developed as environmental standard - Based on Wisconsin research on Wisconsin soils Wisconsin “sufficiency” philosophy: Wisconsin “sufficiency” philosophySlide15: Wisconsin “sufficiency” recommendations Soil Test Level Interpretation Response * Phosphate (P2O5) Probability Recommended * For 160 bu/aOther philosophies: Other philosophies Build-up / maintenance Cation balance / base saturation Crop fertilization Non-science basedUW Recommendations - Lime: UW Recommendations - Lime Examines target pH for each crop in rotation Recommends lime based on most acid-sensitive crop Lime recommended when pH more than 0.2 below target Indicate T/a of 60-69 and 80-89 lime needed to reach target pHUW Recommendations – Lime: UW Recommendations – Lime Rotation 1 Rotation 2UW Recommendations - Nitrogen: UW Recommendations - Nitrogen Optimum N rate similar for “Good” or “Bad” year. N use efficiency higher in “Good” year N need is a function of soil yield potential and environment Base N rate based on soil texture, OM, yield potential N in starter not counted (20 lb/a) Credits subtracted Assumes good management, small losses, little carryoverUW Recommendations – Nitrogen on Corn: UW Recommendations – Nitrogen on Corn Sands & loamy sands Other soils yield potential Organic Non- Very high matter Irrigated Irrigated Med/low /high -- % -- ------------------------- lb N/acre ------------------------UW Recommendations – Nitrogen adjustments: UW Recommendations – Nitrogen adjustments Legume & manure N Tillage Soil N test (if done)UW Recommendations – P and K: UW Recommendations – P and K Crop, soil and test specific P & K from soil and fertilizer feed the crop Recommendation considers - crop demand - soil test level present - soil type - yield goalUW Recommendations – P and K: UW Recommendations – P and K ------------- ppm ---------------- Subgroup D Subgroup EUW Recommendations – P and K: UW Recommendations – P and K 1. Consider crop – Determines demand level 2. Consider soil type – Determines subsoil fertilizer group 3. Consider soil test – Determines interp. range, chance of resp. 4. Consider yield goal – Determines relative nutrient needUW Recommendations – P and K: UW Recommendations – P and K If soil test is optimum - Apply nutrients about equal to amount in harvested part of crop If soil test is L or VL - Apply amount for optimum plus amount to increase yield and slowly build If soil test is H or VH - Apply ½ or ¼ of amount removed in harvested part of crop If soil test is EH - Apply 0Slide31: UW Soil Science Department You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
SoilTesting FertRecommendations Renzo Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 221 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (1) Dislike it (0) Added: January 22, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Soil Testing, Fertilizer Recommendations and Wisconsin Nutrient Management PlanningKeith A. KellingDepartment of Soil ScienceUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison: Soil Testing, Fertilizer Recommendations and Wisconsin Nutrient Management Planning Keith A. Kelling Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin-MadisonTopics to consider: Topics to consider Soil sampling a. objectives b. requirements 2. Soil testing a. approaches b. requirements c. UW program features d. reading a report e. certified labsMinimum requirements: Minimum requirements Follow recommendations in UWEX Factsheet A2100 One recommendation per field * some exceptions * site specific is OK Field tested in last 4 years Each sample comprised of 10-20 cores Number of samples/field varies * sampling history * expected responsivenessNeeded intensity varies with:: Needed intensity varies with: Sampling history Expected Responsiveness - No samples in last 4 years, take 1 sample / 5 acres - Have samples – go to part 2 - If either P or K in high range or below, take 1 sample / 5 acres - If both P and K are VH or EH, use tableRecommended sample intensity for non-responsive fields tested within past 4 years: Recommended sample intensity for non-responsive fields tested within past 4 years * 10 cores/sample minimumMultiple samples give better recommendations:: Multiple samples give better recommendations:Small fields / contour strips with identical management / crop histories : Small fields / contour strips with identical management / crop histories Specific sampling details in A2100: - proper tool Specific sampling details in A2100 - depth - pattern / place - frequency - special situations (tillage, SSM)Slide11: Samples must be analyzed by a WDATCP certified lab - specified procedures - UW recommendations Analyzing samplesWDATCP certified labs, 2003: WDATCP certified labs, 2003 Ag Source – Bonduel A and L Great Lakes – Fort Wayne, IN Dairyland – Arcadia Rock River – Watertown UW Soil and Plant Analysis Lab – Madison UW Soil and Forage Lab – MarshfieldSlide13: Recommendations for nutrients must be consistent with UW recommendations Recommendations UW recommendations - Best estimate to optimize economic return - Not developed as environmental standard - Based on Wisconsin research on Wisconsin soils Wisconsin “sufficiency” philosophy: Wisconsin “sufficiency” philosophySlide15: Wisconsin “sufficiency” recommendations Soil Test Level Interpretation Response * Phosphate (P2O5) Probability Recommended * For 160 bu/aOther philosophies: Other philosophies Build-up / maintenance Cation balance / base saturation Crop fertilization Non-science basedUW Recommendations - Lime: UW Recommendations - Lime Examines target pH for each crop in rotation Recommends lime based on most acid-sensitive crop Lime recommended when pH more than 0.2 below target Indicate T/a of 60-69 and 80-89 lime needed to reach target pHUW Recommendations – Lime: UW Recommendations – Lime Rotation 1 Rotation 2UW Recommendations - Nitrogen: UW Recommendations - Nitrogen Optimum N rate similar for “Good” or “Bad” year. N use efficiency higher in “Good” year N need is a function of soil yield potential and environment Base N rate based on soil texture, OM, yield potential N in starter not counted (20 lb/a) Credits subtracted Assumes good management, small losses, little carryoverUW Recommendations – Nitrogen on Corn: UW Recommendations – Nitrogen on Corn Sands & loamy sands Other soils yield potential Organic Non- Very high matter Irrigated Irrigated Med/low /high -- % -- ------------------------- lb N/acre ------------------------UW Recommendations – Nitrogen adjustments: UW Recommendations – Nitrogen adjustments Legume & manure N Tillage Soil N test (if done)UW Recommendations – P and K: UW Recommendations – P and K Crop, soil and test specific P & K from soil and fertilizer feed the crop Recommendation considers - crop demand - soil test level present - soil type - yield goalUW Recommendations – P and K: UW Recommendations – P and K ------------- ppm ---------------- Subgroup D Subgroup EUW Recommendations – P and K: UW Recommendations – P and K 1. Consider crop – Determines demand level 2. Consider soil type – Determines subsoil fertilizer group 3. Consider soil test – Determines interp. range, chance of resp. 4. Consider yield goal – Determines relative nutrient needUW Recommendations – P and K: UW Recommendations – P and K If soil test is optimum - Apply nutrients about equal to amount in harvested part of crop If soil test is L or VL - Apply amount for optimum plus amount to increase yield and slowly build If soil test is H or VH - Apply ½ or ¼ of amount removed in harvested part of crop If soil test is EH - Apply 0Slide31: UW Soil Science Department