SCHOOL SPORT:: SCHOOL SPORT: JOINT PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE FOR SPORT AND RECREATION
DUAL PROCESSES: DUAL PROCESSES MTT DoE/
SRSA SCHOOL SPORT SASCOC DoE/
SRSA
MTT PROCESS: MTT PROCESS Ministerial Task Team (MTT) met and consulted for more than 1 year
REPORTED TO MINISTER
MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS:
Only 2 Macro Structures at national level: Government Department & a NGO
Will be formed from NOCSA, SACGA, DISSA, SASC, SRSA, SASSU & USSASA
MTT PROCESS: MTT PROCESS MTT RECOMMENDATIONS (Cont):
Need to prioritize sport that government fund
Need to establish a National Academy
CABINET
Cabinet endorsed the MTT report and recommendations
ALL PARTIES, INCLUDING USSASA, SIGNED AGREEMENT TO IMPLEMENT THE RECOMMENDATIONS
STEERING COMMITTEE: STEERING COMMITTEE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES:
Government: Mass Participation
SASCOC: High Performance Sport
GOVERNMENT RESPONSIBILITIES: GOVERNMENT RESPONSIBILITIES MASS PARTICIPATION INCLUDES:
All school sport except multi-coded national teams to ISF & COSASSA events
Community Mass Participation Programmes
Social Leagues
Indigenous Games
Student intra-campus sport
Recreation
Talent ID and further development (teachers, educators, etc)
SASCOC RESPONSIBILITIES: SASCOC RESPONSIBILITIES HIGH PERFORMANCE SPORT:
Team SA presentation and preparation for Olympic, Paralympic, Commonwealth, All Africa, World Games, (multi-coded games)
Academy System,
Education & Training
Bidding and hosting
National Colours
RATIONALISATION PROCESS: RATIONALISATION PROCESS ONLY TWO MACRO-STRUCTURES AT NATIONAL LEVEL
SASCOC
GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS – SRSA & DoE
NOCSA, DISSA, SASC, SACGA, USSASA & SASSU EXPECTED TO WIND DOWN AND CLOSE BY DECEMBER 2005
ALL STRUCTURES HAVE BEGUN TO WIND DOWN, EXCEPT USSASA
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SPORT & RECREATION SA PROCESS: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SPORT & RECREATION SA PROCESS
DoE/SRSA PROCESS: DoE/SRSA PROCESS 1998 DSR / DoE AGREEMENT
2001 CEPD REPORT
CEPD MODEL
Roles for SRSA/DoE/Prov DSR & DoE
Acknowledgement of the Role of USSASA in School Sport
SRSA / DoE FRAMEWORK
Governance structure within SASC
MTT REPORT
Agreed on minimum programme for 2004
Slide11: SRSA expected to deliver – Portfolio Committee
SRSA too dependent on Federations
National Treasury – Remove “facilitate”, “coordinate” and “ensure” – Move into delivery phase DoE/SRSA PROCESS (2)
Slide12: Govt has to take the lead role in delivering school sport programmes
Collaboration between Sport and Education departments
Integrate all school sport programmes DoE/SRSA PROCESS (3)
Slide13: FRAMEWORK FOR COLLABORATION SIGNED:
Minister Stofile
Minister Pandor
17 March 2005 DoE/SRSA PROCESS (4)
Slide14: Transformation of school sport embedded in the transformation of sport in SA
Acknowledges the impediments:
Limitations on participation
Backlogs in facilities and equipment
Lack of participation by Educators & Learners, especially in school located in nodal areas
Lack of capacity and financial resources THE FRAMEWORK
Slide15: Accepts that Government must play a central and interventionist role in the transformation of sport and recreation
SRSA and DoE are best placed to provide the leadership required to achieve the vision of equity, access, quality and mass participation, curricular and extracurricular activities, including Physical Education programmes
THE FRAMEWORK (2)
Slide16: To formalise Government’s responsibility for PE and School Sport
To foster a sense of pride and patriotism through properly managed school sport programmes
To ensure and increase access to facilities, school sport and PE
To ensure that Human Movement / PE is provided incrementally OBJECTIVES OF THE FRAMEWORK
Slide17: To facilitate the integration of PE courses as part of professional teacher development
To develop the capacity of learners to participate en masse
To organise inclusive and integrated school sport programmes
To strategically link school sport programmes to national interventions e.g. substance abuse, HIV & AIDS, crime, etc. OBJECTIVES OF THE FRAMEWORK (2)
MODEL FOR THE LEVELS OF RESPONSIBILITY & TARGET GROUPS: MODEL FOR THE LEVELS OF RESPONSIBILITY & TARGET GROUPS
Slide19: SRSA DoE NATIONAL COORDINATING COMMITTEE
(NACOC) COORDINATION AND MANAGEMENT S&R
MINISTRY EDUCATION
MINISTRY
COMPOSITION OF NACOC: COMPOSITION OF NACOC SRSA, DOE
TEACHER UNIONS (4)
NATIONAL SCHOOLS GOVERNING BODIES (2)
9 REPS - PROVINCIAL DoE
9 REPS – PROVINCIAL DSR
SASCOC
RESPONSIBILITIES OF NACOC: RESPONSIBILITIES OF NACOC Sanctioning, coordination, management and monitoring of all national school sport programmes
Ensuring access and mass participation in school sport programmes
Ensuring racial integration, gender equity, rural inclusion, etc.
Synergizing annual planning
Mediating contractual arrangements with sponsors
RESPONSIBILITIES OF NACOC (2): RESPONSIBILITIES OF NACOC (2) Reports to DoE, SRSA, donors and sponsors
Monitoring the provision and development of infrastructure
Advising the departments on policy and legislative issues
Sharing best practices
PROGRESS WITH THE ESTABLISHMENT OF NACOC: PROGRESS WITH THE ESTABLISHMENT OF NACOC Framework document tabled at the Council of Education Ministers (CEM), S&R MinMEC, Heads of Education Departments Committee (HEDCOM), S&R TIC; and circulated among strategic partners, including teacher unions, national associations of SGBs
Stakeholders have been invited to nominate representatives
Nominations received from most stakeholders, including
Provincial Sport & Recreation and Education Departments;
Teacher unions, National SGB associations
Code-specific NACOC subcommittees will be established by December 2005
PROGRESS WITH THE ESTABLISHMENT OF NACOC: PROGRESS WITH THE ESTABLISHMENT OF NACOC NACOC HAD FIRST WORKING MEETING ON 29 & 30 JULY
UNIONS, SCHOOL GOVERNING BODIES AND PROVINCIAL DEPARTMENTS WELCOMED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF NACOC
SET OUT A TIME TABLE FOR THE ROLLING OUT OF STRUCTURES
PROVINCES EXPRESSED THEIR STATE OF READINESS
PROPOSE THAT NACOC BE LAUNCHED DEC ’05 DURING THE SUMMER GAMES IN PE.
PROVINCIAL ROLES: PROVINCIAL ROLES PROVINCIAL DEPARTMENTS TO SIGN AGREEMENTS
REPLICATE NACOC AT PROVINCIAL LEVEL (PROCOCS)
SET UP STRUCTURES AT REGIONAL AND DISTRICT LEVEL
RELAUNCH CODE STRUCTURES FROM SCHOOL TO PROVINCIAL LEVEL
PROGRAMMES FOR 2005/06: PROGRAMMES FOR 2005/06 NATIONAL ATHLETICS: Primary School in Rustenburg on 18-19 March; & Secondary Schools in Cape Town on 20-21 March
WINTER GAMES: DURBAN, 27-30 June
Approx 3 732 learners and educators
Netball, soccer, volleyball, rugby, chess, basketball, Table tennis & hockey
Government covered all costs
GIRLS GAMES: 05-08 August (Johannesburg)
CROSS COUNTRY, KIMBERLEY, 30 September
RURAL & FARM SCHOOL PROJECT, JHB, 19-21 August (Supported by Transnet)
NODAL SCHOOLS SPORT DEVELOPMENT: JBN, 08-09 December (funded by Transnet)
INDIGENOUS GAMES: NELSPRUIT, 23-26 September
SUMMER GAMES: PORT ELIZABETH, 2 - 6 December
PROGRAMMES FOR 2005/06 (2): PROGRAMMES FOR 2005/06 (2)
NATIONAL ATHLETICS CHAMPS
Secondary schools: Durban in March/April 2006
Primary schools: Bloemfontein in March/April 2006
CAPACITY BUILDING PROGRAMMES
DELIVERY OF THE 2005/06 PROGRAMME: DELIVERY OF THE 2005/06 PROGRAMME DOE & SRSA WILL REQUEST USSASA’S SUPPORT FOR THE 2005 PROGRAMMES
THE DEPARTMENTS (NATIONAL AND PROVINCIAL) WILL FUND THE PROGRAMMES
NO LEARNER WILL BE EXPECTED TO PAY
MEETING WITH USSASA: MEETING WITH USSASA DEPUTY MINISTER MET WITH USSASA
INFORMED THEM OF GOVERNMENT’S PLAN TO ORGANISE SCHOOL SPORT
REMINDED THEM TO WIND DOWN BY 15 DECEMBER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MTT PROCESS
REQUESTED USSASA TO ASSIST WITH A SMOOTH TRANSITION
MINISTER STOFILE’S VIEWS: MINISTER STOFILE’S VIEWS THE NEED FOR A STRUCTURE LIKE USSASA HAS EXPIRED
GOVERNMENT WILL NOW TAKE FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR SCHOOL SPORT WITH THE EDUCATORS PLAYING A PIVOTAL ROLE
EXPECT USSASA TO WIND DOWN AS AGREED
CANNOT FORCE USSASA TO CLOSE BUT GOVERNMENT WILL IMPLEMENT ITS PLANS FOR SCHOOL SPORT