Regional Trade Liberalisation in East Asia and the Asia-Pacific: the Role of China: Regional Trade Liberalisation in East Asia and the Asia-Pacific: the Role of China Robert Scollay PECC Trade Forum and NZ APEC Study Centre University of Auckland


Background: Contrasting Periods1994-1999 v. 1999-2004 (1): Background: Contrasting Periods 1994-1999 v. 1999-2004 (1) 1994-99 No new PTAs in E Asia, only 2 among APEC members in the Americas Principal emphasis on WTO and APEC process in both E Asia and Asia-Pacific i.e. focus on non-discrimination and “open regionalism” Commitment to APEC’s Bogor goals unquestioned in both E Asia and Asia-Pacific NE Asia an “empty box” in regional/global map of PTAs E Asian regionalism overshadowed by APEC Trans-Pacific emphasis


Background: 1994-1999 v. 1999-2004 (2): Background: 1994-1999 v. 1999-2004 (2) 1999-2004 14 new PTAs concluded in Asia-Pacific, many more “on the way” 5 are intra-E.Asia, 7 link E Asian economies to other APEC economies PTAs the central focus of trade policy Doubts over outcome of WTO’s DDA, liberalisation no longer a key focus of activity in APEC Ability to reach Bogor goals increasingly questioned NE Asia a full player in the PTA “game” Rise of E Asian regionalism overshadowing APEC


Trends in Asia-Pacific PTAs (1): Trends in Asia-Pacific PTAs (1) Bilateral Agreements 14 PTAs since 1999 are all bilateral diverse regional linkages NE Asia-SE Asia (4) - includes China-Thailand Intra-NE Asia (1) - includes China-Hong Kong SE Asia-Australasia (4) Trans-Pacific: E Asia-Americas (3) Trans-Pacific: Australasia-Americas (1) Intra-American (1) Some between small/medium economies but most link a small/medium to a large economy  tendency to “hub and spoke” patterns reinforced by “domino effect”


Trends in Asia-Pacific PTAs (2): Trends in Asia-Pacific PTAs (2) “Hub and Spoke” patterns Based on US, Japan, China, some “secondary hubs” obvious disadvantages for “typical” spoke East Asian regionalism Boosted by reaction to East Asian crisis Initial emphasis on “ASEAN Plus Three” Competing ASEAN-China and ASEAN-Japan initiatives Series of bilaterals or blocs? ASEAN overtures to India and CER ABAC Proposal for FTAAP (a “preferential APEC)


Key Role of NE Asia: Key Role of NE Asia % of world GDP Northeast Asia 20 Japan 13.5 China 4.0 Korea 1.5 Southeast Asia 2 Australasia 1.5 North America 36 USA 32 APEC 61


Risks and Attractions of PTAs (1): Risks and Attractions of PTAs (1) Risks well-known Trade and investment diversion Tendency to restrictive rules of origin Disadvantages of “hub and spoke” agreements Dangers of a “three bloc world” “stumbling blocks” or “building blocks” for multilateral and APEC-wide liberalisation


Risks and Attractions of PTAs (2): Risks and Attractions of PTAs (2) “Revealed preference” of governments for PTAs Faster progress? Easier political economy Address economy-specific concerns Reciprocation of binding commitments (unlike APEC) “Training” for unilateral or multilateral liberalisation Vehicles for delivery of regional public goods Reinforcing economic reforms Linkages to foreign policy and security objectives


Responses to the Proliferation of PTAs (1): Responses to the Proliferation of PTAs (1) 1) Priority to WTO Emphasise importance of successful DDA outcome Substantial MFN tariff reductions More effective rules Multilateral liberalisation reduces the negative effects of PTAs on excluded economues


Responses to the Proliferation of PTAs (2): Responses to the Proliferation of PTAs (2) (2) Identify best practice – aim to minimise negative effects, maximise positive effects  contribute to APEC goals and more open multilateral trading system PECC “Common Understanding” 2003 APEC “Best Practice for RTAs/FTAs in APEC”


Responses to the Proliferation of PTAs (3): Responses to the Proliferation of PTAs (3) (3) Identify and promote the most economically beneficial PTA configurations General conclusion: larger more inclusive configurations deliver the largest economic gains to members ASEAN Plus Three in East Asia FTAAP in Asia-Pacific region Question: is the objective East Asian integration or Asia-Pacific integration?


Responses to the Proliferation of PTAs (4): Responses to the Proliferation of PTAs (4)


Responses to the Proliferation of PTAs (5): Responses to the Proliferation of PTAs (5)


Responses to the Proliferation of PTAs (6): Responses to the Proliferation of PTAs (6) East Asian v. Asia-Pacific Perspectives In East Asia, ASEAN Plus 3 FTA produces best economic outcome for members, worst economic outcome for other APEC members Move to FTAAP turns losses to gains for other APEC members and yields greater gains overall But not all ASEAN Plus Three economies gain more from FTAAP Asia-Pacific v. Global Perspective In Asia-Pacific, FTAAP produces best economic outcome for APEC members, worst for rest of world Move to global liberalisation benefits most groups and yields greatest gains overall  potential to catalyse global liberalisation via WTO? But not all APEC members gain more from global liberalisation


Responses to the Proliferation of PTAs (6): Responses to the Proliferation of PTAs (6) China v. NE Asian Perspectives Welfare gains from ASEAN Plus Three exceed those from ASEAN Plus One initiatives for all three NE Asian economies But gains for China from ASEAN Plus Three are modest Substantial gains for China materialise with FTAAP Gains from FTAAP substantially exceeds gains from ASEAN Plus Three for all 3 NE Asian economies Further gains for China and Japan from global liberalisation but not for Japan


Recent Steps in Evolution of China’s Prospective PTA Links (1): Recent Steps in Evolution of China’s Prospective PTA Links (1) Steps towards E. Asian free trade Pre-2004 China-ASEAN FTA negotiations commenced, China concluded bilateral PTA with Thailand China-Hong Kong CEPA concluded Japan-Singapore PTA concluded Japan commenced negotiations with Korea and Thailand 2004 China re-committed to plurilateral approach in China-ASEAN FTA Conclusion of Japan-Philippine and Korea-Singapore FTAs Japan also negotiating with Malaysia Confirmation of E Asian summit in 2005 Remaining gaps in PTAs concluded or under negotiation Japan/Korea link to China Completion of Japan/Korea links with SE Asia


Recent Steps in Evolution of China’s Prospective PTA Links (2): Recent Steps in Evolution of China’s Prospective PTA Links (2) Additional steps towards W. Pacific free trade Pre-2004 Singapore PTAs with Australia and New Zealand 2004 China announced FTA negotiations with NZ, foreshadowed negotiations with Australia Thailand PTAs concluded with Australia and New Zealand Negotiations announced for AFTA-CER FTA Additional remaining gaps in PTAs concluded or under negotiation Japan/Korea links with Australia and New Zealand


Recent Steps in Evolution of China’s Prospective PTA Links (3): Recent Steps in Evolution of China’s Prospective PTA Links (3) Steps towards trans-Pacific free trade Pre-2004 Conclusion of Singapore-US and Korea-Chile FTAs Singapore-Canada and Singapore-Chile-NZ negotiations under way 2004 Conclusion of Japan-Mexico and US-Australia FTAs Negotiations commenced for US-Thailand FTA Announcement of China-Chile and Japan-Chile negotiations, also Peru-Thailand? Principal remaining gaps in PTAs concluded or under negotiation Absence of proposals for NE Asia-N. America free trade (except recently concluded Japan-Mexico FTA)