Presentation Transcript
Increasing Aid Effectiveness:Tanzania’s Joint Assistance StrategyNikki Jones: UNFPA Representative, Tanzania : Increasing Aid Effectiveness: Tanzania’s Joint Assistance Strategy Nikki Jones: UNFPA Representative, Tanzania
Africa Regional Planning Meeting, Dakar
Programme and Policy Implications of Emerging Modalities for Aid Delivery October 3, 2005
Tanzania JAS - Implementing Global Agreements : Tanzania JAS - Implementing Global Agreements One of first national efforts to implement:
Monterrey Consensus on Financing for Development 2002
Rome High-Level Forum on Harmonisation 2003
Marrakech Roundtable on Managing for Results 2004
Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness 2005
JAS - Building on Global Principles : JAS - Building on Global Principles National ownership, harmonization, alignment, managing for results, mutual accountability, partnership
Since mid-90s efforts to improve aid management and GoT/DP relationship
2005 JAS merges DP assistance strategies into one assistance strategy
JAS - Promoting Aid Effectiveness in Tanzania : JAS - Promoting Aid Effectiveness in Tanzania Reduce poverty by coordinating GoT DP efforts under one government-led framework
Strengthen national ownership and leadership
Align DP support to GoT priorities, systems, procedures, and processes
Promote mutual accountability
Contributing to GoT goals : Contributing to GoT goals National Vision 2025
Zanzibar Vision 2020
National Poverty Eradication Strategy
National Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty
Zanzibar Poverty Reduction Plan
JAS : JAS Addresses 5 main issues;
Strengthening National Capacity
Division of Labour
Financing Instruments & Arrangements
Sector Dialogue
Monitoring and Evaluation
Strengthening National Capacity : Strengthening National Capacity Ongoing Public Sector Reform
Strengthening NSA efforts
Untied, demand-driven technical assistance
Open procurement using national expertise and mechanisms
Division of Labour : Division of Labour By comparative and competitive advantage
Lead GoT agencies in sector/ cross cutting/ thematic areas
Limit number of active DPs: delegating partners
Lead DP partner in each sector/ area
Selection criteria not linked to funding capacity.
Financing instruments and arrangements (1) : Financing instruments and arrangements (1) National Budget and NSGRP heart of national development process
Implemented through PER and MTEF
GBS is GoT preferred aid modality
DPs to move to GBS: M/T target 50-70% aid
Financing instruments and arrangements (2) : Financing instruments and arrangements (2) Basket funding as transition measure
Projects limited to piloting, innovation, policy demonstration, skills transfer, large scale infrastructure within GoT budget processes
GoT accounting and audit procedures
CSOs to report on resources and activities
Dialogue Structure : Dialogue Structure Stakeholders exchange information and views to guide policy making
GoT leads, guides and co-ordinates
DPs provide information/ policy advice
CSOs “watchdogs” GoT/DP performance. Parliament?
Establish common vision on scope, objectives, function and monitoring
Monitoring and Evaluation : Monitoring and Evaluation Joint indicators and targets for:
National Ownership and GoT leadership
Alignment and Harmonization
Managing for NSGRP Outcomes
Effective Operational Functioning
Mutual accountability of GoT and DPs
DPs and the JAS process : DPs and the JAS process DP core group liaises with GoT
Consultations among DPs, including UN
Consultation with DP sectoral/thematic groups
Consultations within sectors
Support for GoT efforts to harmonize
DP views: what else is needed? : DP views: what else is needed?
Is JAS a complete aid strategy?
Roadmap, timeframe and targets
Transition period: improved domestic accountability
Clarify relationship with outcome-based NSGRP
Link mutual accountability to managing for results
Challenges and constraints for DPs : Challenges and constraints for DPs High proposed levels for GBS
Sector funding as only interim measure
Binding nature of multi-year financial commitments
Inconsistencies with agency rules and procedures: pooling v projects, front-loading, procurement, auditing
Challenges and Constraints for DPs : Challenges and Constraints for DPs Untying aid beyond delegated power of most agencies. GoT needs to lobby
Representation and lead agencies
Minimum 5 year assignment for DP staff
Specialized agency mandates
Improve quality of dialogue
Health DP Views : Health DP Views Strong sector budget support (basket)
Push to increase pooled sector funds while recognizing agency limitations
Can achieve health outcomes through mix of aid modalities?
Include and support non-state actors
Views OF DPs in Health : Views OF DPs in Health Team approach rather than lead and silent partners?
Priority to decreasing “off- budget” before shifting funds to GBS?
Challenge GHI to use existing systems and finance unmet needs
UN and the JAS : UN and the JAS UNDG Action Plan defines actions to follow up Paris Declaration
Put national development plans at center of UN programming
Strengthen national capacities
Use and strengthen national systems
UN and the JAS : UN and the JAS TCPR provides strong support for new UN positioning
“In Larger Freedom” endorses UN role in follow-up to Paris
Executive Boards support sector funding
UN Joint Strategic Review Tanzania provides actionable recommendations
Challenges for UN Tanzania in JAS : Challenges for UN Tanzania in JAS UN most projects and smallest budgets
Limited development impact of projects
“Competitive” advantage or a complementary role?
Is sector support as far as we can go?
Need to adapt UN rules and procedures
UNDG harmonized programming tools still project-based
Diversity among UN agencies
How can UN contribute to JAS? : How can UN contribute to JAS? New UNDAF designed around PRS
Delinking TA/ FA provides opportunity
Focus on capacity development
Strengthen human rights approach
Build on “trusted partner” role to provide policy advice in GBS
Strengthen joint UN approach
Does UNFPA have an advantage? : Does UNFPA have an advantage? Strong senior management support
SD/MYFF positioned us to focus on national outcomes
UNFPA CO spearheaded entry into sector funding. UN advocacy role
Only UN agency in health basket
CO role in policy dialogue/advocacy, harmonization, and partnership recognized by DPs (MOPAN)
What next for UNFPA? : What next for UNFPA? Implement Geneva recommendations based on CO experience
Build staff capacity in policy dialogue, analysis, networking and advocacy
Give CO greater flexibility and authority to decide on HR needs
Redeploy technical staff and resources to support field, driven by CO needs
Strengthen national expert teams
Results and Accountability : Results and Accountability
More enabling HQ role and support
Adapt financial and administrative rules and regulations to new aid environment
Move beyond project input monitoring
Focus more on strengthening GoT/DP accountability in achieving national outcomes
We are accountable for implementing ICPD and contributing to poverty reduction.
Catch the
buzz on authorSTREAM
Copyright © 2002-2008 authorSTREAM. All rights reserved.