logging in or signing up Gender GH Silvia Ruschak Rachele Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 124 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: February 21, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Guest Lecture on „GENDER AND GLOBAL HISTORY“by Silvia Ruschak : Guest Lecture on „GENDER AND GLOBAL HISTORY“ by Silvia Ruschak Lecture Series: „Introduction to Global History“, January 10th 2006 OPENING QUESTIONS : OPENING QUESTIONS What is gender? What’s the difference between sex and gender? “one is not born a woman, one becomes one” Simone de Beauvoir’s The Second Sex (1949) Is gender a global category of classification? Can gender be used similarly in the different global contexts?STRUCTURE : STRUCTURE Discussing three major aspects of Mohanty’s criticism Alternative approaches - introducing the concept of “the politics of location” Putting the discussed theories into practice I. MOHANTY’S CRITICISM : I. MOHANTY’S CRITICISM Women as a single, powerless category Oppressor and oppressed powerful vs. powerless women as victims of men Colonialist move white middle class feminists vs. ‘Third World’ women’ oppressors => ‘First World’ feminists oppressed => ‘Third World’ women I. MOHANTY’S CRITICISM : I. MOHANTY’S CRITICISM Homogenisation of ‘Third World’ women ‘Western’ feminists discursively producing ‘Third World’ women as the ‘Other’ Stereotypical classification of women in ‘Third World’ as oppressed, ‘traditional’, sexually discriminated etc. African women = descriptive term ≠ a single group of women I. MOHANTY’S CRITICISM : I. MOHANTY’S CRITICISM Methodologies that support the two assumptions Arithmetic method – adding up ‘evidence’ Reproduction, sexual division of labour, marriage etc. as a proof for women’s subordination, assuming that these concepts are similar in all contexts II. ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES : II. ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES Alternative to the dual power model – Foucault’s model of power Power is not held by anyone but it is multidimensional – it is produced everywhere by everyone Power does not only work on people but it works through people Power always coexists with resistance – without resistance, there is no power II. ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES : II. ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES ‘Politics of location’ instead of homogenisation What is a location? Geographic place, historical time, racial, social, cultural, ethnic, religious, political, private etc. contexts ‘Politics of Location’ Adrienne, Rich (1984):‘Notes Toward a Politics of Location’. In: Adrienne, Rich: Blood, Bread and Poetry. London. Concrete accounts of the location of the researcher and the researched Relationship between different locations II. ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES : II. ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES Methodologies Particularised and in-depth analysis Linked with larger, global, economic and political frameworks Microhistories in relation to macrohistories III. PUTTING THEORY INTO PRACTICE : III. PUTTING THEORY INTO PRACTICE My Research Project: Travelling Beauty Ideals. Female Beauty Perception in Transition. An Oral History Project in South Ghana. Gender aspects in my research concepts of dressing, beauty, sexuality are gendered My ‘politics of location’ within the research PUTTING THEORY INTO PRACTICE: PUTTING THEORY INTO PRACTICE Analysis of the picture: Different concepts of feminine dressing mother = trousers masculine/male dressing daughter = trousers feminine dressing Different politics of location that led to a different socialisation as woman partially different ideas of female beauty Mutual communication III. PUTTING THEORY INTO PRACTICE: III. PUTTING THEORY INTO PRACTICE “Me I like all type [of dressing]. European, African. It depends on where I am going. […] You know that place is a typical village. They believe in tradition so much. So there I can’t go and wear trousers. Though I can wear it but I will not pick one because the people in the village will be looking at me. Some might think I don’t have Cloth. […] But when it comes to here and I am going to an engagement I won’t wear Cloth. I will just wear a dress or trousers and top or skirt and blouse. Nobody will question you, nobody will look at you.” (A, 04-03-25, 3).CONCLUSION : CONCLUSION Gender is not a globally identical category Gender is a historical category that is defined according to its context Gender is dynamic and constantly changing Gender is constituted through categories like race, class, ethnicity etc. You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
Gender GH Silvia Ruschak Rachele Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 124 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: February 21, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Guest Lecture on „GENDER AND GLOBAL HISTORY“by Silvia Ruschak : Guest Lecture on „GENDER AND GLOBAL HISTORY“ by Silvia Ruschak Lecture Series: „Introduction to Global History“, January 10th 2006 OPENING QUESTIONS : OPENING QUESTIONS What is gender? What’s the difference between sex and gender? “one is not born a woman, one becomes one” Simone de Beauvoir’s The Second Sex (1949) Is gender a global category of classification? Can gender be used similarly in the different global contexts?STRUCTURE : STRUCTURE Discussing three major aspects of Mohanty’s criticism Alternative approaches - introducing the concept of “the politics of location” Putting the discussed theories into practice I. MOHANTY’S CRITICISM : I. MOHANTY’S CRITICISM Women as a single, powerless category Oppressor and oppressed powerful vs. powerless women as victims of men Colonialist move white middle class feminists vs. ‘Third World’ women’ oppressors => ‘First World’ feminists oppressed => ‘Third World’ women I. MOHANTY’S CRITICISM : I. MOHANTY’S CRITICISM Homogenisation of ‘Third World’ women ‘Western’ feminists discursively producing ‘Third World’ women as the ‘Other’ Stereotypical classification of women in ‘Third World’ as oppressed, ‘traditional’, sexually discriminated etc. African women = descriptive term ≠ a single group of women I. MOHANTY’S CRITICISM : I. MOHANTY’S CRITICISM Methodologies that support the two assumptions Arithmetic method – adding up ‘evidence’ Reproduction, sexual division of labour, marriage etc. as a proof for women’s subordination, assuming that these concepts are similar in all contexts II. ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES : II. ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES Alternative to the dual power model – Foucault’s model of power Power is not held by anyone but it is multidimensional – it is produced everywhere by everyone Power does not only work on people but it works through people Power always coexists with resistance – without resistance, there is no power II. ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES : II. ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES ‘Politics of location’ instead of homogenisation What is a location? Geographic place, historical time, racial, social, cultural, ethnic, religious, political, private etc. contexts ‘Politics of Location’ Adrienne, Rich (1984):‘Notes Toward a Politics of Location’. In: Adrienne, Rich: Blood, Bread and Poetry. London. Concrete accounts of the location of the researcher and the researched Relationship between different locations II. ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES : II. ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES Methodologies Particularised and in-depth analysis Linked with larger, global, economic and political frameworks Microhistories in relation to macrohistories III. PUTTING THEORY INTO PRACTICE : III. PUTTING THEORY INTO PRACTICE My Research Project: Travelling Beauty Ideals. Female Beauty Perception in Transition. An Oral History Project in South Ghana. Gender aspects in my research concepts of dressing, beauty, sexuality are gendered My ‘politics of location’ within the research PUTTING THEORY INTO PRACTICE: PUTTING THEORY INTO PRACTICE Analysis of the picture: Different concepts of feminine dressing mother = trousers masculine/male dressing daughter = trousers feminine dressing Different politics of location that led to a different socialisation as woman partially different ideas of female beauty Mutual communication III. PUTTING THEORY INTO PRACTICE: III. PUTTING THEORY INTO PRACTICE “Me I like all type [of dressing]. European, African. It depends on where I am going. […] You know that place is a typical village. They believe in tradition so much. So there I can’t go and wear trousers. Though I can wear it but I will not pick one because the people in the village will be looking at me. Some might think I don’t have Cloth. […] But when it comes to here and I am going to an engagement I won’t wear Cloth. I will just wear a dress or trousers and top or skirt and blouse. Nobody will question you, nobody will look at you.” (A, 04-03-25, 3).CONCLUSION : CONCLUSION Gender is not a globally identical category Gender is a historical category that is defined according to its context Gender is dynamic and constantly changing Gender is constituted through categories like race, class, ethnicity etc.