Share PowerPoint. Anywhere!
Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt.

Moon presentation

Uploaded from authorPOINT Lite
Download as Download Not Available PPT
Presentation Description

No description available

Like authorSTREAM?


You can vote once a day till December
10th, Vote Now!
Views: 47
Like it  ( Likes) Dislike it  ( Dislikes)
Added: January 11, 2008 This presentation is Public
Presentation Category :Education
Presentation StatisticsNew!
Views on authorSTREAM: 45 | Views from Embeds: 2
Others - 2 views
Presentation Transcript

Lunar SNAP Observatory : Lunar SNAP Observatory


Overview : Overview What trade studies and modifications required to place SNAP on the moon? Trade Studies Location Northern latitudes South Pole Aitken basin crater Detectors require cooling ~30W Deployable radiator Cryopump Nuclear –vs- solar power (batteries for 14-day hibernation) Observatory modifications Lander Moving outer baffle and dish Telescope (1/6g mirror mount) Hexapod and rotational mount Augers to dig into lunar surface Dust considerations (power, stray light, contamination) Mass and launch vehicle


Communications : Communications Distance 384,000km –vs- ~1,500,000km for L2 Better link margin than L2 Smaller dish Communications at poles not continuous (LOS to Earth) Increased memory (onboard storage for comm. Blackouts) Located in crater at pole No visibility to Earth Possibility of Communication Relay Satellite in polar orbit Antenna mounted above rim of crater (robotic or manned deployment) could have continuous view of Earth Maximum latitude for continuous view of Earth: 60º Recommendations Land on Earth-facing side of moon Do not land inside crater


Power : Power Assume no nearby colony with solar farm or nuclear power, design like a robotic space mission. Solar power, arrays currently sized for 5-600W mission at L2 Dust contamination? Huge (100,000WHr/week) batteries needed for shadow operations (Hibernation a better option) Hibernation (14-day) does not allow mission requirement of 4-day cadence without 2nd lander Nuclear RTG (radioisotope thermoelectric generators) Need two 300W RTGs of the Cassini/PNH/Galileo/Ulysses class (56kg each) Treaty issues? Conclusion: RTG Power necessary


Detector Cooling : Detector Cooling Detectors require cooling ~30W at 140K Cryopump Additional power required ~6W cryopumps available ~50W (at 140K) less common (Creare, flown to Hubble, requires 900W) Very large and massive Introduces vibration into optical system (would require isolation) Cryopumps are limited lifetime items Liquid helium dewar: limited lifetime item Deployable radiator (see next slide) Flexible cooling links Deployed thermal insulation to shield radiator from lunar thermal radiation Observatory body-mounted mirror to increase effective solid angle of cold sky Must orient radiator closely anti-sun to avoid sunlight (precludes “mowing the lawn”), could possibly increase size of body-mounted mirror Prefer deployable radiator


Lunar SNAP Observatory : Lunar SNAP Observatory


Location : Location Northern or Southern landing zones preclude opposite hemisphere survey Option to place observatory at lunar South Pole Aitken Basin crater Pros: Nearly continuous sunlight at crater rim Continuous darkness inside crater Cons: Power supply and communication dish (or relay satellite) external to crater Difficult to land observatory on sloped crater Options for Northern latitude placement Pros: Axial tilt of moon: 1.543º to Ecliptic, therefore >52º latitude allows continuous view of circular cap of radius 20º around North Ecliptic Pole, 30º lunar limb avoidance (stray light) RTG power unaffected Con: 14-day monthly shadow complicates thermal design Latitude <60 For continuous view of Earth (com-link) Recommendation: Locate on Earth-facing longitudes, in Northern hemisphere between latitudes 52º and 60º


Additional Considerations : Additional Considerations Augers required to dig into regolith Firm foundation for observatory May not be necessary with tip-tilt pointing control system Dust Photoelectric effect charges dust during day, suspended by Coulomb repulsion, reverse at night (bias voltage considered on mirror coatings) Prospector 3 camera cut off by Apollo 12 astronauts and returned to earth. It was found to be functional despite dust. Dust seen from orbit with unaided eye by Apollo astronauts Conclusion: Dust probably more of a stray light issue than functional Drift scan using fixed observatory and rotation of moon does not meet 4-day cadence requirements for SNe survey Prospector 3


Additional Equipment : Additional Equipment Rotating outer baffle sunshade: 100kg extra Telescope 18pt. wiffletree mount, good to 30º tilt relative to surface normal: 50kg Used on GBOs and SOFIA, where variable orientation mirror is required Gravity sag 6x smaller than on Earth to begin with Trade on “Mowing the Lawn” observation scheme: Eliminate entirely and use filter wheel: 20kg Larger mirror for radiator would allow observatory rotation similar to currently planned L2 “Mowing the Lawn” operations: 50kg Hexapod rotates telescope, rotation mount rotates baffle/radiator (long flexible links to radiator) Hexapod and rotational mount: 150kg 0.1-0.2um accuracy for hexapod mounts, roughly 30º pitch/yaw motion Inboard hexapod mounts, ±250mm stroke (very large) Would require hybrid long-stroke, precision legs Caged during trip to moon Hinged cover: 45kg Deployable radiator: 100kg 2x RTG (56kg*2=112kg) Descent stage equipment, structure and avionics (dry): 800kg Lunar mount/augers: 150kg Total extra dry mass for lunar observatory: 1427kg


Delta-V/Fuel Requirements : Delta-V/Fuel Requirements Observatory landing on moon mass: 3427kg Bi-prop fuel required to land: 2000kg Mass of Descent Module: 5400kg Orbital insertion delta-V=854m/s: 60% additional fuel/propulsion 3300kg system mass launched toward moon by launch vehicle 8700kg total Only one current LV option, see next slide…


Slide11 : Launch Vehicle Capacity to Moon 2860 kg 9600 kg 4240 kg 4765 kg 6550 kg


Conclusions : Conclusions Location Land on Earth side of moon, between 52º & 60º latitude Observatory modification Power: two 300W RTGs Lander, injection stage and fuel Rotating outer baffle Gimbaled dish Telescope modification: wiffletree Hexapod and rotational mount for telescope Detector cooling via deployable radiator Hinged door Open issues Dust (stray light from suspended dust, and mirror contamination) Stable mounting on surface requires study (are augers required?) Political implications of RTG use on lunar surface Implementation of “Mowing the Lawn” scheme (filter wheel, larger radiator mirror, flex links) Significant mass increase required for lunar orbit injection and descent to surface (2000kg observatory increases in mass to 8700kg) Mass requirements necessitate EELV (Delta-IV Heavy)