FEED ANALYSIS : FEED ANALYSIS Chemical Biological Digestion trial Metabolism trial Growth or lactation performance trial Microbiological In vitro -- in tube In situ -- in site (organ) Economic evaluation


Chemical Evaluation: Chemical Evaluation Proximate analysis: the analysis of feed into its basic components.   Weende System – analyze for: dry matter (DM),or water, crude protein, crude fiber, ether extract, ash, nitrogen free extract (NFE)


Chemical Evaluation: Chemical Evaluation Van Soest Fiber Analysis -- replaces the Weende System of crude fiber analysis with neutral and acid detergent fiber (NDF and ADF) more accurate more precisely identify the fiber components


Chemical Evaluation: Chemical Evaluation Relative feed value (RFV); method of determining the value of hay (alfalfa) based on NDF and ADF content  RFV = (digestible DM % x DM intake %): Digestible DM % = 88.9 - (ADF% x .779), and DM intake % = 120 ÷ NDF% Other nutritional analyses: bomb calorimetry amino acid analysis minerals: atomic absorption vitamins: not commonly performed


Chemical Evaluation: Chemical Evaluation In addition to analyzing feeds, sometimes analysis of the drinking water when problems warrant: Nitrates Sulfates Alkali


Chemical Evaluation: Chemical Evaluation Understanding Feed Labels (tags) Labels on commercially prepared feeds are strictly regulated by each state – Department of Agriculture; all commercial products should have: Product name and brand name If a drug is used the label should include: the word “medicated” the purpose of the medication (claim statement) An active drug ingredient statement


Chemical Evaluation– Feed tags: Chemical Evaluation– Feed tags Directions for use and precautionary statements Guaranteed analysis of the feed: minimum percentage of crude protein maximum or minimum percentage of equivalent protein from non-protein nitrogen minimum percentage of crude fat maximum percentage of crude fiber moisture guarantees for canned pet foods


Chemical Evaluation– Feed tags, guaranteed analysis,continued: Chemical Evaluation– Feed tags, guaranteed analysis,continued for mineral feeds: minimum and maximum percentages of Ca minimum percentage of P minimum and maximum percentages of NaCl, and other minerals Name of feed ingredients in order of amount present Labels may not contain negative statements comparing the feed with other competitive products If NPN is in the feed a description of the level is required


Biological Evaluation: Biological Evaluation Digestibility: amount or % of a feed that is metabolically available to the animal = (amount consumed - amount in feces)/ amount consumed   Apparent digestibility: include all DM in the feces as undigested; however: some sloughed epithelial tissue some are secreted products some is microbial mass True digestibility: accounts for metabolic fecal end products equation: is always greater than apparent (greater numerator) ((Amt consumed-(amt feces-MFE))/amt consumed


Biological Evaluation - Digestibility: Biological Evaluation - Digestibility Digestibility Coefficient: example Amt of feed x conc of nutrient = amt of nutrient Over a period of 7 days a steer eats 50,800 g of a feed, 20.11% protein, total fecal excretion of 11,609 g, 22.04% protein   DM x CP conc = Amount of CP Intake 50,800 x .2011 = 10,216 Feces 11,609 x .2204 = 2,559   Apparent Digestibility Coefficients  DM = (50,800 - 11,609)/50,800 = .7715 or 77.15%  CP = (10,216 - 2,559)/10,216 = .75 or 75% Percent digestible CP = 20.11 x .75 = 15.08% or (10,216 - 2,559)/50,800 = .1508 or 15.08


Biological Evaluation - TDN: Biological Evaluation - TDN Total Digestible Nutrients (TDN): is one system for estimating the available energy content of the diet TDN = dig CP + dig CF + dig NFE + dig EE (2.25) water is not in the equation -- so is expressed on a DM basis digestibility of nutrient rather than just nutrient content of the feed ash is not in the equation


Biological Evaluation - TDN: Biological Evaluation - TDN TDN Example:  Feed analysis x Digest. Coefficient = Digestible nutrient CP 20.11 75.0 15.08  CF 16.25 73.9 12.01 NFE 40.99 80.6 33.04 EE 3.34 53.9 1.8 x 2.25 = 4.05 Total  100; not include and ash TOTAL (TDN) = 64.18    Rule of Thumb: Forage = 48 to 65% TDN   Grain = 75 to 90% TDN


Metabolism Evaluation: Metabolism Evaluation Measure urine and fecal loss (and any other metabolic loss) to determine amount of nutrient actually retained by the animal    apply principle to protein, energy, minerals Protein: biological value (BV)


Metabolic Evaluation - Protein: Metabolic Evaluation - Protein BV = [(N intake - (FN + UN))/(N intake - FN)] x 100 FN = fecal N loss, UN = urinary N loss Numerator is amount of N (CP) that was retained (must also account for metabolic losses)


Metabolic Evaluation - Protein: Metabolic Evaluation - Protein UN - the only difference between numerator and denominator; is a function of: AA profile (limiting AA) over feeding protein muscle turnover in the ruminant, passive diffusion of ammonia from the rumen


Metabolic Evaluation - Protein: Metabolic Evaluation - Protein Egg albumin = 100; Soybean meal protein = 85 Other measurements of protein metabolic value: Net protein value (NPV) NPV = Body N gain/N fed; NPV is a crude measurement of quality of protein fed Protein Efficiency Ratio (PER) PER = Weight gain/protein fed


Metabolic Evaluation - Energy: Metabolic Evaluation - Energy Net Energy System: is a new system to more accurately measure the energy value of a feed chemical analysis of feeds for energy (bomb calorimetry) is of no value; most feeds have nearly the same gross energy -- only differences due to the amount of fat and ash but we know there are other differences which exist in feeds; digestibility and available for ATP formation


Metabolic Evaluation - Energy: Metabolic Evaluation - Energy Less energy from forage (fibrous CHO) than concentrate (starch) less digestible - mostly because of lignin more gaseous and HI loss Ruminant less energy efficient than nonruminant: methane production (whether fermenting fiber or starch) heat of fermentation When send a feed sample to a commercial lab, an energy estimate (DE, ME, or NE) is given based on the fiber content of the feed: higher fiber yields less energy


Metabolic Evaluation - Energy:   NEm NEg NEl TDN, %   Alfalfa hay, early bloom 1.24 .59 1.30 62   Brome hay, late veg 1.33 .73 1.40 58   Corn 2.16 1.48 2.05 89 Metabolic Evaluation - Energy   Net Energy Values Mcal/kg


Metabolic Evaluation - Energy: Metabolic Evaluation - Energy NEm ≈ NEl ˆ dairy formulations use just an NEl value NEm > NEg heat increment and heat of fermentation may be used for body heat maintenance; also more efficient use of energy for maintenance than growth NEm values for animal requirement based on body weight; more specifically, metabolic body weight (Kg.75) NEm = 77 kcal per Kg.75  


Net Energy – Maintenance Example: Net Energy – Maintenance Example 300 kg steer = 72.08 kg metabolic body weight   x .077 = 5.55 Mcal of NEm   600 kg steer = 121.23 kg metabolic body weight   x .077 = 9.33 Mcal NEm (not twice the 300 kg steer)


Net Energy: Net Energy Most feeds have an established TDN value; derive the NE values from these by equation DE Y 1 kg TDN = 4.409 Mcal of DE Example: feed which is 60% TDN (60 kg TDN/100 kg feed) x (4.409 Mcal DE/1 kg TDN) = 264.5 Mcal DE/100 kg = 2.64 Mcal/kg ME Y ME Mcal/kg = -.45 + 1.01 (DE Mcal/kg)


TDN system overestimates energy value of forage because a greater percentage of its GE is gaseous loss and HI; ** the NE system adjusts for this : TDN system overestimates energy value of forage because a greater percentage of its GE is gaseous loss and HI; ** the NE system adjusts for this Example: Forage which is 50% TDN 50% TDN = 2.2045 Mcal DE/kg ME = -.45 + 1.01(2.2045) = 1.776 Mcal ME/kg (1.776/2.2045) x 100 = 80.56% of DE is ME Example: Grain which is 80% TDN 80% TDN = 3.527 Mcal/kg ME = -.45 + 1.01 (3.527) = 3.112 Mcal ME/kg (3.112/3.527) x 100 = 88.25% of DE is ME


Growth/ Lactation Evaluation – Variables to measure:: Growth/ Lactation Evaluation – Variables to measure: Intake: voluntary feed intake is very important in the "quality" of a feed for forages greater intake indicates faster digestion rate for grain greater intake may indicate less energy dense another factor of intake is palatability: blood meal: best protein source but unpalatable Crested wheatgrass: high yield but low consumption


Growth/ Lactation Evaluation – Variables to measure:: Growth/ Lactation Evaluation – Variables to measure: Intake, continued: total nutrient supply to the animal is a function of intake and digestibility the greater the intake, the greater the nutrient supply above maintenance Amount of growth/milk Calculate: rate of gain/daily milk efficiency of gain or of milk production


Growth/ Lactation Evaluation – Regulation of Feed Intake:: Growth/ Lactation Evaluation – Regulation of Feed Intake: Physical fill: distention of the gut tells the animal to stop eating Chemostatic: absorbed nutrient in blood is monitor by receptors in brain - tells animal to stop eating glucose (and insulin) concentration in blood; brain and duodenal receptors oleic acid - fatty acid, potent satiety factor acetic acid in the ruminant is important; receptors on the rumen wall; also, pH is a factor


Slide31: INTAKE Distension Chemostatic Thermostatic Nutritive Value


Growth/ Lactation Evaluation – Regulation of Feed Intake:: Growth/ Lactation Evaluation – Regulation of Feed Intake: Other factors: Osmoreceptors Thermoreceptors Liporeceptors Hormones: gut peptide such as cholecystokinin and bombesin, are satiety hormones; also, opiods and endorphins (and insulin) concentration in blood; brain and duodenal receptors