logging in or signing up nssashort Quintilliano Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 67 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: January 22, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide1: Andrew McGrath, Joss Hawthorn, Jeremy Bailey The Australian Centre for Space Photonics Presentation to the NSSA, October 2003Mars and the Anglo-Australian Observatory: Mars and the Anglo-Australian Observatory Andrew McGrath, Joss Hawthorn, Jeremy Bailey Presentation to the NSSA, October 2003The Australian Centre for Space Photonics: The Australian Centre for Space Photonics 2002 Proposal to the ARC for a Centre of Excellence Strong technical basis Strong reasons for an Australian involvement Withdrew from ARC proposal on applicability issues Continuing work – maintaining vision – following different route to involvement Mars: Mars Diameter: 6790 km Rotation period: 24.6229 hours Polar inclination: 23.98° Mass: 0.1074 Earth masses Escape velocity: 5030 ms-1 Surface gravity: 3.73 ms-2 Albedo: 0.16 Atmosphere: 95% CO2, 3% N2 Surface pressure: ~10 hPa Surface temperature: 130K – 300K Solar orbit diameter: 1.4 AU Distance from Earth: ~50Mkm to ~400Mkm History: History Long term interest Mythological Scientific Similarity to EarthHistory: History Percival Lowell, 1906History: HistoryHistory: HistoryMars: Mars Recent opposition: only ~55 million km Earth to Mars AAO observations using UKIRT in Hawaii, August 2003 obtained spectral ‘images’ in the NIR Long slit spectroscopy: Long slit spectroscopyLong slit spectroscopy: Long slit spectroscopyLong slit spectroscopy: Long slit spectroscopyLong slit spectroscopy: Long slit spectroscopySpectrographic analysis: Spectrographic analysis Spectrographic slit ensemble Viking imagery 2.2 to 2.3μm Spectrographic analysis: ‘Raw’ spectrum of part of the Martian disk Spectrographic analysisSpectrographic analysis: Spectrographic analysis Hellas spectral data – relative to dataset ‘centre’ - spectral features highlightedSpectrographic analysis: Spectrographic analysis CO2 absorption retrieved MOLA topography from AAO/UKIRT data Spectrographic analysis: Spectrographic analysis Atmosphere Geology Astrobiology But there’s a pretty hard limit to what can be done from Earth. We need to go there.Exploration of Mars: Exploration of Mars 1962 Two more Soviet flyby attempts, Mars 1 within 190,000 km 1964 Mariner 3, Zond 2 1965 Mariner 4 (first flyby images), Zond 3 1969 Mariners 6 and 7 1971 Mariners 8 and 9 1971 Kosmos 419, Mars 2 & 3 (first landers) 1973 Mars 4, 5, 6 & 7 1975 Viking 1, 1976 Viking 2 • 1960 Two Soviet flyby attemptsExploration of Mars: Exploration of Mars 1992 Mars Observer 1996 Mars 96 1997 Mars Pathfinder, Mars Global Surveyor 1998 Nozomi launch 1999 Climate Orbiter, Polar Lander and Deep Space 2 2001 Mars Odyssey • 1988 Phobos 1 and 2Exploration of Mars: Exploration of Mars 2003 Nozomi arrival 2004 Mars Exploration Rovers 1 & 2 2005 Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter 2005 Rosetta flyby 2007 Mobile Scientific Laboratory 2007 Netlanders-07 2007 Remote Sensing Orbiter • 2003 Mars Express (Beagle 2)Exploration of Mars: Exploration of Mars 2009 Smart Lander, Long Range Rover 2009 Mars 2009 Communications Satellite 2009 Netlanders-09 2009 ExoMars-09 2014 Mars 2014 (possible sample return) 2015 Possible ESA manned mission 2016 Mars 2016 (possible sample return) 2019 Possible NASA manned mission • 2007 Small Scout Missions (Phoenix)ExoMars-09: ExoMars-09 ESA exobiology mission scheduled to land a 220kg rover in 2009 ‘Pasteur’ instrument package Panoramic camera Drill for sample acquistion (depth 1.5m) Optical colour microscope Subsurface electromagnetic sounder Laser plasma spectrometer Gas chromatograph Mass spectrometer ExoMars-09: ExoMars-09 180-day lifetime on surface Search/sample/process cycle ~6 days ExoMars-09: ExoMars-09 Opportunity for Australian involvement ESA call to international community for interested parties to suggest instrumentation or other project support (due 14-May-03) Large consortium with ACA and AAO as major partners submitted a proposal ExoMars-09: ExoMars-09 “Prospector” proposal Based on ACA expertise in most closely related search fields – detection of evidence of 3-4 Gyr old microbial life (Western Australia) Two-fold involvement Search strategy Instrument proposal ExoMars-09: ExoMars-09 Prospector instrument: A NIR spectrometer boresighted to the stereo PanCam Allows mineralogical assessment of potential drill/sample targets before the full investment of the expensive sample cycleExoMars-09: ExoMars-09ExoMars-09: ExoMars-09Communications -the bottleneck: Communications -the bottleneck Increasing number of missions Evolution towards more data-intensive instrumentation Increasing spacecraft data storage capacity Greater reliance on public support for funding – greater sense of ‘presence’ requires greater data ratesCommunications -the bottleneck: Communications -the bottleneck Radio (microwave) links, spacecraft to Earth Newer philosophy - communications relay (Mars Odyssey, MGS) Sensible network topology 25-W X-band (Ka-band experimental) <100 kbps downlinkCommunications Bottleneck: Communications Bottleneck Current missions capable of collecting much more data than downlink capabilities (2000%!) Currently planned missions make the problem 10x worse Future missions likely to collect ever-greater volumes of data Communications Bottleneck: Communications Bottleneck Increasing downlink rates critical to continued investment in planetary exploration Communications Energy Budget: Communications Energy Budget Theoretical ‘cost’ proportional to transmitting wavelength X-band transmitter ~ 40 mm Laser transmitter ~ 0.5-1.5 m Assuming similar aperture sizes and efficiencies, optical wins over microwave by > 3 orders of magnitudeLong-term Solution: Long-term Solution Optical communications networks Long-term Solution: Long-term Solution Optical communications networks Advantages over radio Higher modulation rates More directed energy Analagous to fibre optics vs. copper cables Lasers in Space: Lasers in Space Laser transmitter in Martian orbit with large aperture telescope Lasers in Space: Lasers in Space Laser transmitter in Martian orbit with large aperture telescope Receiving telescope on or near Earth Preliminary investigations suggest ~100Mbps achievable on 10 to 20 year timescale Enabling technologies require accelerated developmentLasers in Space - challenges: Lasers in Space - challenges Immature technology cf. radio Cloud and other weather Pointing and tracking Signal acquisition Reliability Lasers in Space - challenges: Lasers in Space - challenges Will not replace radio for all applications Fast-manoeuvring spacecraft Cheap, highly independent spacecraft Emergency operations Entry/descent/landing comms Dusty/thick atmosphere environments Key Technologies: Key Technologies Suitable lasers Telescope tracking and guiding Optical detectors Cost-effective large-aperture telescopes Atmospheric properties Space-borne telescopes NASA approach today: NASA approach today Pursuing two approaches Enhanced RF communications Optical communicationsOptical spacecraft comms: Optical spacecraft comms ESA have already run intersatellite test NASA/JPL and Japan presently researching the concept and expect space-ground communications tests in the near futureNASA optical comms plans: NASA optical comms plans Operational demonstration on Mars Telecom Orbiter (2009) 5W average power (300W peak) 1064μm wavelength (NIR) 300mm aperture transmitter 3 – 10 Mbps 3-9 х 8-10m receiving telescopesAAO input: AAO input Proposed NASA parameters near-identical to AAO suggestions AAO discussions with NASA to encourage change in wavelength (to 532nm) Go for Green!AAO input – 532 vs. 1064nm: AAO input – 532 vs. 1064nm Achieve change with frequency doubler cell (can conceivably switch in & out) Better pointing (so higher power density, less spill) Worse detector efficiency Visible (marginally by eye, certainly by amateur astronomers) – public relations coup comparable to USSR Sputnik Suggestion favourably received by NASA and under serious considerationAn Australian Role: An Australian Role Australian organisations have unique capabilities in the key technologies required for deep space optical communications links Existing DSN involvement High-power, high beam quality lasers Holographic correction of large telescopes Telescope-based instrumentation Telescope tracking and guiding Australian involvement in missions to Mars: Take advantage of unique Australian capabilities Australian technology critical to deep space missions Continued important role in space FOR MORE INFO... http://www.aao.gov.au/lasers Australian involvement in missions to Mars You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
nssashort Quintilliano Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 67 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: January 22, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide1: Andrew McGrath, Joss Hawthorn, Jeremy Bailey The Australian Centre for Space Photonics Presentation to the NSSA, October 2003Mars and the Anglo-Australian Observatory: Mars and the Anglo-Australian Observatory Andrew McGrath, Joss Hawthorn, Jeremy Bailey Presentation to the NSSA, October 2003The Australian Centre for Space Photonics: The Australian Centre for Space Photonics 2002 Proposal to the ARC for a Centre of Excellence Strong technical basis Strong reasons for an Australian involvement Withdrew from ARC proposal on applicability issues Continuing work – maintaining vision – following different route to involvement Mars: Mars Diameter: 6790 km Rotation period: 24.6229 hours Polar inclination: 23.98° Mass: 0.1074 Earth masses Escape velocity: 5030 ms-1 Surface gravity: 3.73 ms-2 Albedo: 0.16 Atmosphere: 95% CO2, 3% N2 Surface pressure: ~10 hPa Surface temperature: 130K – 300K Solar orbit diameter: 1.4 AU Distance from Earth: ~50Mkm to ~400Mkm History: History Long term interest Mythological Scientific Similarity to EarthHistory: History Percival Lowell, 1906History: HistoryHistory: HistoryMars: Mars Recent opposition: only ~55 million km Earth to Mars AAO observations using UKIRT in Hawaii, August 2003 obtained spectral ‘images’ in the NIR Long slit spectroscopy: Long slit spectroscopyLong slit spectroscopy: Long slit spectroscopyLong slit spectroscopy: Long slit spectroscopyLong slit spectroscopy: Long slit spectroscopySpectrographic analysis: Spectrographic analysis Spectrographic slit ensemble Viking imagery 2.2 to 2.3μm Spectrographic analysis: ‘Raw’ spectrum of part of the Martian disk Spectrographic analysisSpectrographic analysis: Spectrographic analysis Hellas spectral data – relative to dataset ‘centre’ - spectral features highlightedSpectrographic analysis: Spectrographic analysis CO2 absorption retrieved MOLA topography from AAO/UKIRT data Spectrographic analysis: Spectrographic analysis Atmosphere Geology Astrobiology But there’s a pretty hard limit to what can be done from Earth. We need to go there.Exploration of Mars: Exploration of Mars 1962 Two more Soviet flyby attempts, Mars 1 within 190,000 km 1964 Mariner 3, Zond 2 1965 Mariner 4 (first flyby images), Zond 3 1969 Mariners 6 and 7 1971 Mariners 8 and 9 1971 Kosmos 419, Mars 2 & 3 (first landers) 1973 Mars 4, 5, 6 & 7 1975 Viking 1, 1976 Viking 2 • 1960 Two Soviet flyby attemptsExploration of Mars: Exploration of Mars 1992 Mars Observer 1996 Mars 96 1997 Mars Pathfinder, Mars Global Surveyor 1998 Nozomi launch 1999 Climate Orbiter, Polar Lander and Deep Space 2 2001 Mars Odyssey • 1988 Phobos 1 and 2Exploration of Mars: Exploration of Mars 2003 Nozomi arrival 2004 Mars Exploration Rovers 1 & 2 2005 Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter 2005 Rosetta flyby 2007 Mobile Scientific Laboratory 2007 Netlanders-07 2007 Remote Sensing Orbiter • 2003 Mars Express (Beagle 2)Exploration of Mars: Exploration of Mars 2009 Smart Lander, Long Range Rover 2009 Mars 2009 Communications Satellite 2009 Netlanders-09 2009 ExoMars-09 2014 Mars 2014 (possible sample return) 2015 Possible ESA manned mission 2016 Mars 2016 (possible sample return) 2019 Possible NASA manned mission • 2007 Small Scout Missions (Phoenix)ExoMars-09: ExoMars-09 ESA exobiology mission scheduled to land a 220kg rover in 2009 ‘Pasteur’ instrument package Panoramic camera Drill for sample acquistion (depth 1.5m) Optical colour microscope Subsurface electromagnetic sounder Laser plasma spectrometer Gas chromatograph Mass spectrometer ExoMars-09: ExoMars-09 180-day lifetime on surface Search/sample/process cycle ~6 days ExoMars-09: ExoMars-09 Opportunity for Australian involvement ESA call to international community for interested parties to suggest instrumentation or other project support (due 14-May-03) Large consortium with ACA and AAO as major partners submitted a proposal ExoMars-09: ExoMars-09 “Prospector” proposal Based on ACA expertise in most closely related search fields – detection of evidence of 3-4 Gyr old microbial life (Western Australia) Two-fold involvement Search strategy Instrument proposal ExoMars-09: ExoMars-09 Prospector instrument: A NIR spectrometer boresighted to the stereo PanCam Allows mineralogical assessment of potential drill/sample targets before the full investment of the expensive sample cycleExoMars-09: ExoMars-09ExoMars-09: ExoMars-09Communications -the bottleneck: Communications -the bottleneck Increasing number of missions Evolution towards more data-intensive instrumentation Increasing spacecraft data storage capacity Greater reliance on public support for funding – greater sense of ‘presence’ requires greater data ratesCommunications -the bottleneck: Communications -the bottleneck Radio (microwave) links, spacecraft to Earth Newer philosophy - communications relay (Mars Odyssey, MGS) Sensible network topology 25-W X-band (Ka-band experimental) <100 kbps downlinkCommunications Bottleneck: Communications Bottleneck Current missions capable of collecting much more data than downlink capabilities (2000%!) Currently planned missions make the problem 10x worse Future missions likely to collect ever-greater volumes of data Communications Bottleneck: Communications Bottleneck Increasing downlink rates critical to continued investment in planetary exploration Communications Energy Budget: Communications Energy Budget Theoretical ‘cost’ proportional to transmitting wavelength X-band transmitter ~ 40 mm Laser transmitter ~ 0.5-1.5 m Assuming similar aperture sizes and efficiencies, optical wins over microwave by > 3 orders of magnitudeLong-term Solution: Long-term Solution Optical communications networks Long-term Solution: Long-term Solution Optical communications networks Advantages over radio Higher modulation rates More directed energy Analagous to fibre optics vs. copper cables Lasers in Space: Lasers in Space Laser transmitter in Martian orbit with large aperture telescope Lasers in Space: Lasers in Space Laser transmitter in Martian orbit with large aperture telescope Receiving telescope on or near Earth Preliminary investigations suggest ~100Mbps achievable on 10 to 20 year timescale Enabling technologies require accelerated developmentLasers in Space - challenges: Lasers in Space - challenges Immature technology cf. radio Cloud and other weather Pointing and tracking Signal acquisition Reliability Lasers in Space - challenges: Lasers in Space - challenges Will not replace radio for all applications Fast-manoeuvring spacecraft Cheap, highly independent spacecraft Emergency operations Entry/descent/landing comms Dusty/thick atmosphere environments Key Technologies: Key Technologies Suitable lasers Telescope tracking and guiding Optical detectors Cost-effective large-aperture telescopes Atmospheric properties Space-borne telescopes NASA approach today: NASA approach today Pursuing two approaches Enhanced RF communications Optical communicationsOptical spacecraft comms: Optical spacecraft comms ESA have already run intersatellite test NASA/JPL and Japan presently researching the concept and expect space-ground communications tests in the near futureNASA optical comms plans: NASA optical comms plans Operational demonstration on Mars Telecom Orbiter (2009) 5W average power (300W peak) 1064μm wavelength (NIR) 300mm aperture transmitter 3 – 10 Mbps 3-9 х 8-10m receiving telescopesAAO input: AAO input Proposed NASA parameters near-identical to AAO suggestions AAO discussions with NASA to encourage change in wavelength (to 532nm) Go for Green!AAO input – 532 vs. 1064nm: AAO input – 532 vs. 1064nm Achieve change with frequency doubler cell (can conceivably switch in & out) Better pointing (so higher power density, less spill) Worse detector efficiency Visible (marginally by eye, certainly by amateur astronomers) – public relations coup comparable to USSR Sputnik Suggestion favourably received by NASA and under serious considerationAn Australian Role: An Australian Role Australian organisations have unique capabilities in the key technologies required for deep space optical communications links Existing DSN involvement High-power, high beam quality lasers Holographic correction of large telescopes Telescope-based instrumentation Telescope tracking and guiding Australian involvement in missions to Mars: Take advantage of unique Australian capabilities Australian technology critical to deep space missions Continued important role in space FOR MORE INFO... http://www.aao.gov.au/lasers Australian involvement in missions to Mars