Presentation Transcript
Personality: Personality Chapter 12
Overview: Overview What is personality?
Approaches:
Trait approach
Psychodynamic Approach
Humanistic Approach
Cognitive-Behavioral Approach
How do we assess personality?
What is Personality?: What is Personality?
Relatively stable and distinctive patterns of behavior that characterize an individual and his or her reactions to the environment
What is Personality?: What is Personality? Three basic assumptions:
1) PTs relatively stable and therefore predictable
2) PTs are relatively stable across situations
3) People differ in how much of a particular trait they possess; no two people exactly alike on all traits
Part I: The Trait Approach: Part I: The Trait Approach Factor Analysis
Mathematical procedure used to analyze correlations among a large number of variables
Goal is simplification; Terms that go together likely reflect some general personality characteristics
Cattell
Eysenck
Big Five
Interpersonal Circle
Allport
Cattell’s 16 Factors: Cattell’s 16 Factors First to conduct factor analysis early 1960s
Identified 16 factors
E.g., Reserved -- Outgoing, Trusting -- Suspicious
16 Personality Factor Questionnaire
These factors are source traits
Means that they represent the underlying causes of behavior
Eysenck’s Three Dimensions: Eysenck’s Three Dimensions Resulted in three clear dimensions
Major complaint Cattell’s factors overlapping
Used type FA produces non-overlapping factors
Eysenck’s Three Dimensions: Eysenck’s Three Dimensions
Big Five Model: Big Five Model Believes that personality is organized around only five basic factors:
Openness to Experience
Conscientious ness
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Neuroticism
Five Factor Model: Five Factor Model
Interpersonal Circle: Interpersonal Circle Identifies two main dimensions
Agency andamp; Communion
AKA Control andamp; Affiliation
All interpersonal traits form a circle
Closer two traits are, more highly correlated they are
Slide12: Warm Dominant Warm Submissive Hostile Submissive Hostile Dominant
Allport’s Theory: Allport’s Theory Cardinal Trait
Dominant trait that characterizes nearly all of a person’s behavior
Central Trait
Prominent, general dispositions found in anyone
Secondary traits
Dispositions that surface in some situations but not others
Part II: Freud’s Theory: Part II: Freud’s Theory
Structure Mind
View of Personality
Psychosexual Stages
Criticisms
Neoanalytic/Object Relations Approaches
Freud’s Psychodynamic Appraoch: Freud’s Psychodynamic Appraoch Structure of the mind has 3 levels of awareness:
Conscious
Contents of current awareness
Preconscious
Inactive but accessible thoughts and memories
Unconscious
All memories, urges, conflicts beyond awareness
Freud’s View of Personality: Freud’s View of Personality Personality is influenced by three forces:
Id
Governed by inborn instinctual drives, especially those related to sex and aggression
Obeys the pleasure principle
Superego
Motivates people to act in an ideal fashion, according to moral customs of parents and culture
Obeys the idealistic principle
Ego
Induces people to act with reason and deliberation, and to conform to the requirements of the outside world
Obeys the reality principle
Slide17: Preconcious
mind
Defense Mechanisms: Defense Mechanisms
Psychosexual Development: Psychosexual Development Freud proposed children pass through a series of psychosexual stages
During these stages, IDs pleasure-seeking tendencies are focused on specific pleasure-sensitive areas
Can become fixated at a stage
Excessive gratification or excessive frustration
Psychosexual Stages: Psychosexual Stages
Summary Psychodynamic Concepts: Summary Psychodynamic Concepts Psychodynamic theory suggests:
1) Unconscious forces can influence behavior
2) Internal conflict often plays a key role in generating psychological distress
3) Early childhood experiences can influence adult personality
Criticisms of Psychodynamic Formulations: Criticisms of Psychodynamic Formulations Poor Testability
Inadequate evidence
'science fiction' versus 'science'
Sexism
Neoanalytic & Object Relations Theories: Neoanalytic andamp; Object Relations Theories Some disagreed with Freud’s thinking:
Did not give enough emphasis to social and cultural factors
Believed he stressed infantile sexuality too much
Too much emphasis on childhood as determinant of adult personality
Neoanalytic & Object Relations Theories: Neoanalytic andamp; Object Relations Theories After 1939, new psychodynamic emphasis called object relations:
Focus on images or mental representations that people form of themselves or other people based on early experiences with caregivers
These become working models through which later social interactions are viewed
Attachment theory!!!
Part III: Humanistic Perspective: Part III: Humanistic Perspective Humanistic psychologists speak of growth and potential
Gestalt: people are more than a sum of predictable parts.
Each person is a unique and individual whole
Key figure: Carl Rogers
Carl Rogers: Carl Rogers The Self
An organized, consistent set of perceptions of and beliefs about
oneself
Mental picture of yourself
Once our self-concept is established, we have a need to maintain it
Humanistic Perspective: Humanistic Perspective Because we have a need to maintain our self concept, we have two kinds of needs:
Self-Consistency
An absence of conflict among self perceptions
Congruence
Consistency between self-perceptions and experience
Any experience inconsistent with our self concept evokes threat and anxiety
Carl Rogers: Carl Rogers Need for positive regard
Acceptance, sympathy, love from others
Essential for healthy development
Unconditional positive regard
Communicates that the child is inherently worthy of love
Conditional positive regard
Depends on how child behaviors. Love and acceptance only given when child behaves as parents want
Carl Rogers: Carl Rogers Need for positive self-regard
People need positive regard from themselves as well
Lack of unconditional positive regard from others teaching people they are worthy of approval and love only sometimes
Conditions of worth
Dictate when we approve or disapprove of ourselves
Carl Rogers: Carl Rogers Our self-concept gradually stabilizes
We’re very loyal to our self-concept which produces two effects:
Self Fulfilling Prophecy:
Person tends to behave in ways that are consistent with self-concept
Resistance to information that contradicts their self concept
Criticisms of Humanistic Approach: Criticisms of Humanistic Approach Adopts too positive a view of human nature
Concepts are vague
Difficult to test scientifically
Inadequate evdience
Rely too much on reports of personal experiences
Take what people say at face value
Part IV: Cognitive Behavioral Approaches: Part IV: Cognitive Behavioral Approaches Summary view
Bandura
Rotter
Cognitive Behavioral Approaches: Cognitive Behavioral Approaches Explain personality in terms of learning
Behavioral:
Emphasizes the actual experiences delivered by the environment
Cognitive:
Emphasizes how interpretations and expectations about events play significant role in determining what we learn
Bandura: Bandura Social Learning Theory
Bandura believes personality
largely shaped through learning
Contends conditioning is not a mechanical process in which people are passive participants
Bandura- Reciprocal Determinism: Bandura- Reciprocal Determinism Reciprocal Determinism
Internal mental events, external environmental events, and overt behavior all influence one another
Humans neither masters own destiny nor hapless victims: truth lies between
Reciprocal Determinism: Reciprocal Determinism Behavior Environment Personal/Cognitive factors
(expectations, beliefs, self-efficacy)
Bandura - Observational Learning: Bandura - Observational Learning Observational Learning
Occurs when an organism’s responding is influenced by the observation of others, who are called models
People’s characteristic patterns of behavior are shaped by the models that they’re exposed to
Characteristics of “Models”: Characteristics of 'Models' More likely to imitate people like and respect
Imitation more likely when see similarity between self and model (same sex role models)
Children learn to be assertive, self-sufficient, dependable, etc., by observing others behaving in these ways
Bandura – Self-Efficacy: Bandura – Self-Efficacy Self-efficacy
One’s belief about one’s ability to perform behaviors that should lead to expected outcomes
How to foster self-efficacy?
Parenting Styles
Four determinants
Four Determinants of Self-Efficacy: Four Determinants of Self-Efficacy Observation of
the behaviors and
consequences of similar
models in similar situations Arousal that can be
interpreted as
enthusiasm or anxiety
Previous success and
failure experiences
on similar tasks
Encouraging or discouraging messages from others
Performance Experiences Observational Learning Verbal persuasion Emotional Arousal Self-efficacy
beliefs
Rotter: Rotter Expectancy Theory
Likelihood engage in a behavior depends on two factors:
(1)Expectancies
(2)Positive Reinforcers
Rotter - Locus of Control : Rotter - Locus of Control How much control people feel they exert over environment
Internal Locus of Control
Life outcomes are largely under personal control and depend on own behavior
External Locus of Control
Expect events to be determined by external forces over which have no control (e.g., luck)
Rotter – Locus of Control: Rotter – Locus of Control Compared to Externals, Internals show:
More resistance to social influence
More likely engage in health promoting behaviors (e.g., exercise, healthy diet)
Higher self esteem
Cope with stress in active and problem focused manner
Tend to have higher academic performance
Criticisms of Cognitive-Behavioral Approach: Criticisms of Cognitive-Behavioral Approach Neglect individual as whole
Concentrates on responses in specific situations
Ignores biological/genetic factors
Miss considering importance of motivational factors controlled by biological processes
Part V: Assessing Personality: Part V: Assessing Personality Self Report Questionnaires
Projective Tests
Self-Report Questionnaires: Self-Report Questionnaires Self Report Questionnaires:
Provide a list of statements and require participants to respond to each, such as marking T or F
Responses scored objectively
Scores compared to norms (thousands of other test takers)
Often called the objective or structured method of personality assessment
MMPI - 2: MMPI - 2 Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory
Inferences about typical ways of behaving and thinking
Designed to aid in diagnosis / assessment of psychological disorders
Developed empirically
Originally developed 1943
MMPI - 2: MMPI - 2 567 item T/F self report questionnaire
E.g., 'I never have trouble falling asleep'
'I certainly feel worthless sometimes'
Intended for use with adults over 18 years
MMPI – A for adolescents
MMPI - 2: MMPI - 2 Two main kinds of scales:
Validity Scales
Information concerning person’s approach to testing
Clinical Scales
10 clinical scales
MMPI – 2 Validity Scales: MMPI – 2 Validity Scales
MMPI – 2 Clinical Scales: MMPI – 2 Clinical Scales
Projective Tests: Projective Tests Projective Hypothesis
When people attempt to understand vague stimuli, their interpretation reflects their needs, feelings, experiences, thought processes, etc.
What see in stimulus thought to reflect personal qualities or characteristics
Rorschach Inkblot Test: Rorschach Inkblot Test Early 1900s
Dropped ink onto piece of paper and folded it:
Five black and gray
Two black, gray and red
Three pastel colors of various shades
10 cards are presented to person with minimal structure
Sample of Inkblot: Sample of Inkblot
Rorschach Inkblot Test: Rorschach Inkblot Test 'What might this be'
Examiner is vague
Responses are scored a variety of dimensions including location and content
Rorschach scoring is difficult and complex
Criticisms of Rorschach: Criticisms of Rorschach Lacks universal approach to administration, scoring, interpretation
Evaluations of data are subjective
Results unstable over time?
Is unscientific
Is inadequate by traditional standards
TAT: TAT Thermatic Apperception Test
1935
30 pictures and one blank card
Specific cards for males and females
Some cards appropriate for all
Sample TAT card: Sample TAT card
TAT: TAT What led up to the story, what is happening, what characters are thinking and feeling and what outcome will be
Storyteller typically identifies with one person in the drama. The wishes, conflicts of this person may reflect those of the story teller
Look for recurrent themes
As per Rorschach, some problems with standardized administration and scoring