logging in or signing up LAO Overview 2005 Presentation Patrizia Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: Embed: Flash iPad Dynamic Copy Does not support media & animations Automatically changes to Flash or non-Flash embed WordPress Embed Customize Embed URL: Copy Thumbnail: Copy The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 433 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: January 21, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Prospects and Challenges for Lorentz-Augmented OrbitsorElectrodynamic Propulsion without a Tether: Prospects and Challenges for Lorentz-Augmented Orbits or Electrodynamic Propulsion without a Tether Mason A. Peck Cornell University Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Overview: Overview 18 Dynamics Electrodynamics in a rotating frame Celestial mechanics Key solutions Designing LAO-capable Spacecraft Plasma interactions Faraday cage concept Structural limitations Subsystem idiosyncrasies Some Applications Rendezvous LAO formations Earth escape Jupiter capture Future DirectionsThe Idea: a Lorentz-Augmented Orbit (LAO): The lorentz force accelerates charged particles traveling in a magnetic field. Can it be used to control the motion of a spacecraft? For example, Burns, Schaeffer, et al.; Cassini, Voyager data Lorentz resonances determine structures in the rings of Jupiter and Saturn Micron-size particles A few volts of potential It's not an electrodynamic tether Current in a tether interacts with the geomagnetic field: J×B Electrons traveling at cm/sec through a conductor This spacecraft's charge is a current (high charge at high speed): qv×B The Idea: a Lorentz-Augmented Orbit (LAO) 17 e- q(t)Dynamics: Dynamics Electrodynamics in a rotating frame Lorentz Force, as you’ve seen it before: B rotates with the planet Rotating frame E; inertial frame N Position and angular velocity of E w.r.t N Classically, orbital velocity is inertial: 16 This distinction matters because the rotating B acts as an electric field in N (the "co-rotational" field).Dynamics: Dynamics Electrodynamics in a rotating frame We're interested in the case of E=0 Debye shielding makes E from neighboring bodies (e.g. spacecraft) negligible--more later. The co-rotational field in the rotating frame is zero Time-varying B (due to solar wind) causes an E which may matter and will be addressed in future work The Lorentz force becomes 15 Dynamics: Dynamics "Magnetic fields do no work" Since , the Hamiltonian in the rotating frame is constant: Integrate between arbitrary t1 and t2: Hamiltonian in is constant in E… 14 r, Dynamics: Dynamics …but an LAO's energy is not constant in N Consider an equatorial elliptical orbit, 13 An LAO steals a little energy from a planet's rotation, like a flyby steals some from its orbitDynamics: Dynamics Sometimes you get nothing Line of apsides aligned with magnetic poles: Geostationary satellite with time-invariant B in E In fact, non-dipolar terms in B complicate these simple results. 12Designing LAO-capable Spacecraft: Designing LAO-capable Spacecraft Important Questions How much charge do you need? How much power does it take? How big is the spacecraft? How is charge established and maintained? What is the impact of this charge on spacecraft subsystems? 11Designing LAO-capable Spacecraft: Designing LAO-capable Spacecraft How much charge do you need? 10Designing LAO-capable Spacecraft: Designing LAO-capable Spacecraft How much power does it take? If it weren't for ionospheric plasma, no power--all that would be required is to set the charge and forget it. However, discharge into the plasma means a constant current is necessary to maintain an arbitrary potential. From SPEAR I, assuming , 0.06 W/V at 200-350 km altitude. Much less at higher altitudes (0.001 - 0.0001 W/V at MEO) The equivalent RC circuit has a time constant of about 1.4 seconds. Consider charge & discharge cycles (rather than maintaining constant charge) in resonance with the orbit 9 Designing LAO-capable Spacecraft: Designing LAO-capable Spacecraft How big is the spacecraft? The key sizing parameter is charge per unit mass (q/m), which is proportional to the acceleration (Dv) available Charge depends on capacitance: q=CV (although capacitors per se are not useful) For a spherical spacecraft surrounded by plasma, 8 Where is the Debye length, the thickness of an oppositely charged sheath that surrounds the charged body. + - Sheath thickness depends on plasma temperature (i.e. altitude)Designing LAO-capable Spacecraft: Designing LAO-capable Spacecraft How big is the spacecraft? To maximize q/m, we seek a conductor on which high charge can reside with minimal discharge, but we want low mass. Material stress from the charge will pressurize a sphere used as a conductor. The material's tensile strength therefore determines the Dv performance: 7 Cubesat Example high-strength polypropylene balloon, 10m radius < 1 mil thick => 0.6 kg q/m=0.1 C/kg (1 MV charge) for a 1 kg cubesat. 0.6 kg Designing LAO-capable Spacecraft: Designing LAO-capable Spacecraft How is charge established and maintained? Natural charging (due to plasma interactions and/or photoelectric effect) can't offer more than a few kV. Requires hundreds of kV Emit ions or electrons via a plasma contactor Electron emission is a little easier and lighter, and it requires no propellant Overcome discharge into the plasma Power required depends on altitude, area, space weather… Probably a few thousand Watts for a system of interest 6 e- q(t) 400 kV Van de Graaff Generator L'Garde Conductive SphereDesigning LAO-capable Spacecraft: Designing LAO-capable Spacecraft What is the impact on other subsystems? Structural and Mechanical Requirements for the Sphere: Conductive Acts as a Faraday cage, shielding components from differential charging Transparent for solar power (unless nuclear power is possible) Deployable (note that the charge inflates it) Is there a better way? Payload Options Has to work through a conductive shell Maybe off until the spacecraft is in its operational orbit T&C Options Lasercomm through the sphere Antenna protrudes through sphere (ESD issues) Attitude Control Little direct impact (the Lorentz force is independent of attitude) Differential charge acts like a gravity-gradient effect, offering a means of attitude control (that's another paper…) 5 Some Applications: Some Applications Rendezvous The potential function for an LAO alters Kepler's equation. There are two solutions for the mean motion, depending on the sign of q and the orientation of B. Charge one spacecraft, or each of a pair, and one will catch up to the other at the same altitude. Retrograde orbits catch up faster because the velocity in E is greater. 4 Time to Rendezvous (years) in Circular Orbit; q/m=0.001 C/kg Some Applications: Some Applications 3 Vertical Spacing for Circular Prograde Orbits: q/m=0.001 C/kg LAO Formations LAO spacecraft in a formation do not have to interact through Coulomb forces Most cannot because of the Debye sheath Spacecraft with different electrical potentials and orbital altitudes can orbit with the same period.Some Applications: Some Applications 2 Earth Escape It takes about 1 year for a q/m=5 C/kg spacecraft to escape earth orbit, with appropriate phasing of charge with true anomaly. This level of charge is out of reach for the spherical-shell architecture, but its prospect might inspire other technical solutions. Some Applications: Some Applications 1 Jupiter Capture Jupiter's magnetic field is about 20,000 times more powerful than earth's. Its faster rotation (once every 9 hours) means that the co-rotational field can contribute energy to an LAO quickly. Altitude above Jupiter (Rj=71,492 km) during 472 Day Orbit Insertion For q/m=0.01 C/kg, a spacecraft can transition from a parabolic orbit at Jupiter to the orbit of Ganymede in a little over a year. Time, seconds Altitude, kmFuture Directions: Future Directions 0 Though difficult to achieve, an LAO seems feasible q/m=0.1 C/kg is an optimistic result for a small spacecraft q/m=0.01 - 0.001 C/kg can lead to useful maneuvers Perform more detailed hardware trade studies The spherical conductive shell concept solves many problems, including ESD, but it does not efficiently store charge. Derive general, optimal orbit control (probably bang-bang) Fuse LAO, Coulomb-based formation flying, and EM formation flying? You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.