Presentation Transcript
TECHNICAL ISSUES OF INCREASED ETHANOL BLENDS: TECHNICAL ISSUES OF INCREASED ETHANOL BLENDS Dr. Bruce Jones
Director
Minnesota Center for Automotive Research (MnCAR)
Minnesota State University, Mankato
GOVERNOR’S ETHANOL COALITION
ST. PAUL, MN
9/26/2005
MINNESOTA CENTER FOR AUTOMOTIVE RESEARCH: MINNESOTA CENTER FOR AUTOMOTIVE RESEARCH To provide industry and government with technical expertise in automotive research and product development
To provide undergraduate students the opportunity to become directly involved in comprehensive research projects
MnCAR EMISSION LAB: MnCAR EMISSION LAB
MID RANGE ETHANOL STUDY: MID RANGE ETHANOL STUDY Conducted During 1998 and 1999
Evaluate the Effects of 30% Ethanol and 70% Gasoline Blend on Unmodified Vehicles
1 Year Study Focusing on:
Driveability
Material Compatibility / Durability
Fuel Economy
Emissions
E30 VEHICLE POPULATION: E30 VEHICLE POPULATION 1985 OLDSMOBILE CUTLASS CIERA 2.5L
1985 FORD ECONOLINE 150 4.9L
1990 CHEVROLET C1500 4.3L
1990 DODGE CARAVAN 3.3L
1991 CADILLAC SEDAN DEVILLE 4.9L
1992 FORD TAURUS 3.8L
1992 CHEVROLET K1500 5.7L
1992 GEO METRO 1.0L MANUAL
1994 BUICK REGAL 3.1L
1996 OLDSMOBILE ACHIEVA 3.1L
1997 CHEVROLET K3500 7.4L
1997 CHEVROLET K1500 5.7L
1997 FORD F-150 5.4L
1998 FORD F-250 5.4L
1998 DODGE CARAVAN 3.3L
DRIVEABILITY RESULTS and OBSERVATIONS: DRIVEABILITY RESULTS and OBSERVATIONS Ambient Temperature Ranged from 0o F to 90o F
Standardized Form Used to Record Any Abnormal Characteristics
No Reports Of:
Cold Starting or Hard Starting Problems
Vapor Lock
Hesitation
MATERIAL COMPATABILITY: MATERIAL COMPATABILITY Evaluated Through Use of Maintenance Log and Oil Analysis Testing
Results
No Fuel System Component Failures
Oil Analysis Results Showed No Metal Particles Representing Accelerated Component Wear and No Indication Of Increased Oil Degradation
Critical Area Needing Further Study
VOLUMETRIC FUEL ECONOMY: VOLUMETRIC FUEL ECONOMY Overall Fleet Average Fuel Economy Decreased 9.8%
Volumetric Fuel Economy is Directly Related to the Energy Content of the Fuel.
There is Approximately 9.5% Less Energy in a Gallon of E30 Than Gasoline
Some Vehicles are More Sensitive Than Others
PROJECTED E20 FUEL ECONOMY: PROJECTED E20 FUEL ECONOMY E20 Blend has Approximately 3.3% Less Energy Than Current E10 Blend
Expect a Slight Decrease in MPG Fuel Economy (1%-3% from current E10 blend)
However, the Reduction Is Not Necessarily the Same Magnitude as the Energy Density Difference
EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS: EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS No Significant Trends Identified Pointing to Increased Levels of HC, CO and NOx
Some Vehicles Demonstrated Slightly Higher Levels While Some Lower
All Emission Results Were Low
SUMMARY OF INCREASED ETHANOL CONTENT: SUMMARY OF INCREASED ETHANOL CONTENT
ENGINE CALIBRATION – Will Engines Run Properly?
Unmodified Vehicles (Closed-Loop Fuel Injection) Have Run on Blends Up To 50/50 Blends Without Problems.
Material Compatibility / Vehicle Warranty
Significant Issue for Manufacturers
Area Requiring Additional Research
WHY DO ENGINES RUN PROPERLY?: WHY DO ENGINES RUN PROPERLY? Closed-Loop Fuel Injection
Automatically Adjusts Air/Fuel Mixture
Optimum Performance
Low Emissions
Oxygen Sensor (O2)
Key Component
Measures Excess Oxygen in Exhaust
CLOSED-LOOP SYSTEM OPERATION: CLOSED-LOOP SYSTEM OPERATION As Ethanol Content Increases:
Excess Oxygen in Exhaust
O2 Sensor “Tells” the Computer A/F is Lean
Computer Increases Fuel Flow
Adjusts Mixture Continually
E20 RESEARCH PROJECT: E20 RESEARCH PROJECT Minnesota Corn Research and Promotion Council Supported Research Project
Test Vehicle - 1998 Chevrolet Malibu
Will be Used For All Emissions and Fuel Economy Testing
Other Manufacturers Components will be Evaluated
Comparison of E20 Blended Gasoline Vs:
Non-Oxygenated Gasoline
E10
E20
CRITICAL FUEL SYSTEM COMPONENTS: CRITICAL FUEL SYSTEM COMPONENTS
E20 RESEARCH PROJECT: E20 RESEARCH PROJECT Evaluate the Effects of E20 Blended Fuel On:
Emissions
Using EPA Testing Protocol
Fuel Economy
Laboratory Evaluation in Research Lab
On-Road Fuel Economy
Material Compatibility
Focus on a Variety of Manufacturers
Investigation of Materials Used in Current Fuel Systems
Laboratory Testing of Selected Components
Driveability Issues
Fuel Characteristics
Volatility
QUESTIONS: QUESTIONS ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????