logging in or signing up Verboven working paper Utility of affection powerp Paola Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 103 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: January 17, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript The utility of affection. Towards a new approach to 'friendship' in ancient Rome : The utility of affection. Towards a new approach to 'friendship' in ancient Rome Koenraad VerbovenSlide2: Sociology & anthropology on ‘friendship’ Ancient philosophers and writers Greek philosophy The Roman view : Cicero Utility in friendship Modern views on Roman amicitia (and patronage) Social history Political history Economy Affection Towards an integrated approach Gift-exchange signifying affection Affection in response to favours received Affection as ‘rule reminder’Social sciences: Social sciences Popular subject in structural-functionalism (~ research tradition of ‘reciprocity’) Friendship ~ patronage : ‘Dyadic alliances’ Voluntary relation (achieved, not ascribed) Primarily instrumental relations Particularistic Duration (expected to last ‘for ever’) Generalised or balanced reciprocity Require/expect trust and solidarity Some affection expected Affection expected but not essential: Friendship Equality Exchange balanced SYMMETRY Patronage Inequality Exchange unequal ASYMMETRY Affection expected but not essentialPitt-Rivers: Pitt-Rivers Based on ‘amity’: set of normative premises focused on axiom of prescriptive altruism ( prescriptive reciprocity) Mutual sentiments Reciprocity signifies sentiments Sentimental in inspiration Instrumental in effects Aristotle: Aristotle 3 types of philia Based on utility (to chrèsimon) Based on pleasure (to hèdu) Based op virtue (aretè) => benevolence (eunoia) < love for the ‘absolute good’ (to agathon haplôs) Hellenistic philosophy: Hellenistic philosophy Epicurus philia < need for others happiness is possible only in the enjoyment of friendship Zenon & stoics philia < perception of the absolute good only possible between the wise Cicero’s ‘official’ view: Cicero’s ‘official’ view Amicitia = agreement on all things divine and human with goodwill (benevolentia) and affection (caritas) amor + virtus True friendship only between boni viri admire each other’s virtuesCicero’s other views: Cicero’s other views Cicero, Laelius de amicitia “I do not speak here about vulgar or ordinary friendship, although this also is delightful and useful, but about true and perfect friendship, as it existed between those few of whom we spoke.” Cicero, De inventione “some people believe that amicitia is desirable only for its usefulness, others for itself only, again others for itself and its usefulness. Regardless of who may right, in oratory friendship should be sought for both reasons” Cicero, Pro Roscio Amerino “We cannot do everything by ourselves. Another is more useful in other things. This is why friendships (amicitiae) are formed, so that through mutual services the common good may be managed”Other writers: Other writers Seneca, De beneficiis As I would not accept an unworthy person in my friendship, neither would I in the most sacred bond of services, from which friendship is born. Plautus, Truculentus The saying is true: where there are friends, there are resources (opes) Terentius, Eunuchus I have no one here / neither friend nor family: therefore, Phaedria, / I wish to procure some friends through my service (beneficio meo)Ancient literature=> opposition between: Ancient literature => opposition between Ideals & philosophy Practice & Common senseAncient social history: Ancient social history Rarely independent research object Instrumental Gift-exchange Affection secondary role Idealisation in philosophy Patronage = ‘lop-sided friendship’ (~Pitt-Rivers) ~ underdevelopment of impersonal institutionsAncient political history: Ancient political history dominance prosopographic approach amicitia ~ political parties New ‘institutional’ approach Amicitia ~ volatile alliances / networks ° political resources Ancient economy: Ancient economy Primitivism / minimalism Embedded economy Gift-exchange and redistribution dominant modes of ‘economic’ transactions Amicitia primary non-kin social relation ‘embedding’ gift-exchange New ‘empiricism’ / ‘pre-industrialism’ Rupture ~ industrial revolution Importance of market exchange / dynamics Shape structural / institutional framework: monetisation, policy-making, fiscality, law … Amicitia: vital resources (credit, surety, agency, partnership, …) Affection ?: Affection ? Little attention : expected but not essential Exceptions Peter Brunt: amicitia °< affection, obligation, honour David Konstan : Amicitia < affection ‘space of personal intimacy and unselfish affection’ norms regulating public and commercial life structured forms of interaction based on kinship, civic identity, or commercial activity Integrated approach: Integrated approach Gift-exchange signifies affection Norm of affection => expectation Interiorisation ‘emotional habitus’ ° real sense of obligation predictability of behaviour Affection as ‘rule reminder’ Norm of affection is instrumental You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
Verboven working paper Utility of affection powerp Paola Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 103 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: January 17, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript The utility of affection. Towards a new approach to 'friendship' in ancient Rome : The utility of affection. Towards a new approach to 'friendship' in ancient Rome Koenraad VerbovenSlide2: Sociology & anthropology on ‘friendship’ Ancient philosophers and writers Greek philosophy The Roman view : Cicero Utility in friendship Modern views on Roman amicitia (and patronage) Social history Political history Economy Affection Towards an integrated approach Gift-exchange signifying affection Affection in response to favours received Affection as ‘rule reminder’Social sciences: Social sciences Popular subject in structural-functionalism (~ research tradition of ‘reciprocity’) Friendship ~ patronage : ‘Dyadic alliances’ Voluntary relation (achieved, not ascribed) Primarily instrumental relations Particularistic Duration (expected to last ‘for ever’) Generalised or balanced reciprocity Require/expect trust and solidarity Some affection expected Affection expected but not essential: Friendship Equality Exchange balanced SYMMETRY Patronage Inequality Exchange unequal ASYMMETRY Affection expected but not essentialPitt-Rivers: Pitt-Rivers Based on ‘amity’: set of normative premises focused on axiom of prescriptive altruism ( prescriptive reciprocity) Mutual sentiments Reciprocity signifies sentiments Sentimental in inspiration Instrumental in effects Aristotle: Aristotle 3 types of philia Based on utility (to chrèsimon) Based on pleasure (to hèdu) Based op virtue (aretè) => benevolence (eunoia) < love for the ‘absolute good’ (to agathon haplôs) Hellenistic philosophy: Hellenistic philosophy Epicurus philia < need for others happiness is possible only in the enjoyment of friendship Zenon & stoics philia < perception of the absolute good only possible between the wise Cicero’s ‘official’ view: Cicero’s ‘official’ view Amicitia = agreement on all things divine and human with goodwill (benevolentia) and affection (caritas) amor + virtus True friendship only between boni viri admire each other’s virtuesCicero’s other views: Cicero’s other views Cicero, Laelius de amicitia “I do not speak here about vulgar or ordinary friendship, although this also is delightful and useful, but about true and perfect friendship, as it existed between those few of whom we spoke.” Cicero, De inventione “some people believe that amicitia is desirable only for its usefulness, others for itself only, again others for itself and its usefulness. Regardless of who may right, in oratory friendship should be sought for both reasons” Cicero, Pro Roscio Amerino “We cannot do everything by ourselves. Another is more useful in other things. This is why friendships (amicitiae) are formed, so that through mutual services the common good may be managed”Other writers: Other writers Seneca, De beneficiis As I would not accept an unworthy person in my friendship, neither would I in the most sacred bond of services, from which friendship is born. Plautus, Truculentus The saying is true: where there are friends, there are resources (opes) Terentius, Eunuchus I have no one here / neither friend nor family: therefore, Phaedria, / I wish to procure some friends through my service (beneficio meo)Ancient literature=> opposition between: Ancient literature => opposition between Ideals & philosophy Practice & Common senseAncient social history: Ancient social history Rarely independent research object Instrumental Gift-exchange Affection secondary role Idealisation in philosophy Patronage = ‘lop-sided friendship’ (~Pitt-Rivers) ~ underdevelopment of impersonal institutionsAncient political history: Ancient political history dominance prosopographic approach amicitia ~ political parties New ‘institutional’ approach Amicitia ~ volatile alliances / networks ° political resources Ancient economy: Ancient economy Primitivism / minimalism Embedded economy Gift-exchange and redistribution dominant modes of ‘economic’ transactions Amicitia primary non-kin social relation ‘embedding’ gift-exchange New ‘empiricism’ / ‘pre-industrialism’ Rupture ~ industrial revolution Importance of market exchange / dynamics Shape structural / institutional framework: monetisation, policy-making, fiscality, law … Amicitia: vital resources (credit, surety, agency, partnership, …) Affection ?: Affection ? Little attention : expected but not essential Exceptions Peter Brunt: amicitia °< affection, obligation, honour David Konstan : Amicitia < affection ‘space of personal intimacy and unselfish affection’ norms regulating public and commercial life structured forms of interaction based on kinship, civic identity, or commercial activity Integrated approach: Integrated approach Gift-exchange signifies affection Norm of affection => expectation Interiorisation ‘emotional habitus’ ° real sense of obligation predictability of behaviour Affection as ‘rule reminder’ Norm of affection is instrumental