logging in or signing up Formula1 Final Presentation Obama Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 4139 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (2) Dislike it (0) Added: January 16, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 1 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... By: MeinPagal (7 month(s) ago) plzz i need this Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close By: Jadli (16 month(s) ago) please make me use it Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close Premium member Presentation Transcript Formula 1: Formula 1 Group Members: Quinn Collett Steve Godlewski Tobiah Halter Jeff Swanson Academic Advisor: Dr. Chien Wern June 4, 2003Introduction: Introduction Formula SAE is a competition focused on the design and fabrication of an affordable, weekend racecar. Performance and reliability are necessary attributes. As a Senior Project group we chose to design three major components of the car. Project Scope: Project Scope Design, fabrication and testing of the three design components: Hub Assemblies Drivetrain Aerodynamics Decision Process: Decision Process Product Design Specifications External Search Internal Search Concept EvaluationPresentation Outline: Presentation Outline Rear Hub and Upright Design Front Hub and Upright Design Differential Housing and Drivetrain Design Aerodynamics DesignRear Hub and Upright Design: Rear Hub and Upright DesignComponents: Components Bearing Housing Flanges Connection Points Angle Bracket Bearings FastenersAnalysis of Hub: Analysis of Hub Material: 6061-T6 Aluminum Yield Strength: 40 ksi Factor of Safety: 3 Design Stress: 13.3 ksi Results of FEA Analysis: Max Von Mises Stress: 14.5 ksi Maximum Displacement: 0.002 inAnalysis of Upright: Analysis of Upright Material: 6061-T6 Aluminum Yield Strength: 40 ksi Factor of Safety: 3 Design Stress: 13.3 ksi Results of FEA Analysis Max stress: 16.3 ksi Max Deflection: 0.004 inVerification: Verification PDS Criteria Weight: The hub assembly will weigh less than 17 lbs. Hub=2.5 lb, Upright=4.5 lb, Total = 7 lb Size/shape: Components will fit within an 13 inch wheel. It does fit. Maintenance: 2 hour yearly overhaul Maintenance free: sealed bearings, locktite on all screws Installation: Install in less than 120 min. Can be done inside of an hour: press in bearings, 3 bolts per side Cost (materials, bearings, bolts): less than $400 Housing: $54.00, Hub: $186.94, Flange: $65.20, Connectors: $50.54, Angles: $1.34, Fasteners: $8.61, Bearings: $18.80 Total Cost of Materials: $385.43 Dynamic Testing Has performed properly to this point Front Hub/Upright: Front Hub/Upright Design Criteria PDS 30%-40% weight reduction over last years car Ideal weight of 14 lbs. Assembly fit within a 13 in. dia. Wheel Handle loadings in race conditions Incorporate connecting points for suspension and steering systems Component Selection Suspension Geometry Steering Positioning Brake Components Bearing Selection Front Hub/Upright: Front Hub/Upright Analysis Calculations Track Conditions Top speeds 60 mph/ Avg. Speed 30 mph Safety FactorsFront Hub/Upright: Front Hub/UprightFront Hub/Upright: Front Hub/Upright Materials 6061-T6 Aluminum 304 Stainless Steel Manufacturing CNC Mill Lathe PressFront Hub/Upright: Front Hub/Upright Verification Weight Last years 32 lbs. This year 11.4 lbs. 64% weight reduction Under Ideal weight of 14 lbs. Track testing Handles loads under acceleration, deceleration, and cornering Problems/Improvements Two Piece Separation Spacers Further Advanced Optimization Weight reduction Cost reduction Drivetrain: Drivetrain Use of Common Parts Honda CBR 600 F1 Limited Slip Differential Use of Common Materials 4140 Steel 6061-T6 AluminumRear Differential: Rear Differential Aluminum Housing Zexel Torsen Limited Slip Differential Sealed Bearings Retain Gear Oil Check Valve Roll-Over and Tilt ProtectionPower Transmission : Power Transmission Axle Shafts 4140-3/4” Steel U-Joints Drive Shaft Splined Drive Chain and Sprocket Rear Mono-BrakeDrive Train Verification: Drive Train Verification Performance Dyno-Testinig Road Testing Weight Target 50 lbs Manufacturing Time Target 15 hours Production Cost Target $2000 Failures Drive Axle Welds Shielded Bearings Changes?Acceleration Torsion Testing: Acceleration Torsion TestingAerodynamics & Body: Aerodynamics & Body Modeled using 3-D software package, SOLIDWORKS® Forms CNC machined Allowed for precision forming and exact fit Material: 1/8” fiberglass mat w/ fine mat finish Light weight and durable Total Weight: 8.5 lbs. Significantly below PDS target Body & Aerodynamics con’t…: Body & Aerodynamics con’t… Estimated drag coefficient (CD), front lift coefficient (CL), drag force (D) and lift force (L) CD = 0.14 D = 1.950 lbf CL = 0.15 L = 0.910 lbf © 1992 SAEBody & Aerodynamics con’t…: Body & Aerodynamics con’t… Estimated skin drag coefficient (CF) and surface shear force per unit surface area (τ) (friction resistance) CF = 4000 τ = 901.87 lbf/ft2 Source: Race Car Engineering, KatzBody & Aerodynamics con’t…: Body & Aerodynamics con’t… Overall Performance Evaluation Overall weight of car significantly minimized PDS projected weight = 30 lb Actual weight = 8.5 lb Dimensions of car w/in 2% of desired Drag force minimized as specified in PDS Typical F-1 CD = 1.07 PSU Formula CD = 0.015 Lift force acceptable but could be further minimized by introducing further down force components which were sacrificed to make room for critical components (i.e. intake apparatus, radiator) Typical F-1 CL = -0.99 PSU Formula CL = 0.015 Cooling performance maximized by channeling air over water-cooled components average engine temperature w/o channeled air over radiator = 220°F average engine temperature w/ channeled air over radiator = 200°FPerformance in Action: Performance in Action You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
Formula1 Final Presentation Obama Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 4139 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (2) Dislike it (0) Added: January 16, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 1 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... By: MeinPagal (7 month(s) ago) plzz i need this Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close By: Jadli (16 month(s) ago) please make me use it Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close Premium member Presentation Transcript Formula 1: Formula 1 Group Members: Quinn Collett Steve Godlewski Tobiah Halter Jeff Swanson Academic Advisor: Dr. Chien Wern June 4, 2003Introduction: Introduction Formula SAE is a competition focused on the design and fabrication of an affordable, weekend racecar. Performance and reliability are necessary attributes. As a Senior Project group we chose to design three major components of the car. Project Scope: Project Scope Design, fabrication and testing of the three design components: Hub Assemblies Drivetrain Aerodynamics Decision Process: Decision Process Product Design Specifications External Search Internal Search Concept EvaluationPresentation Outline: Presentation Outline Rear Hub and Upright Design Front Hub and Upright Design Differential Housing and Drivetrain Design Aerodynamics DesignRear Hub and Upright Design: Rear Hub and Upright DesignComponents: Components Bearing Housing Flanges Connection Points Angle Bracket Bearings FastenersAnalysis of Hub: Analysis of Hub Material: 6061-T6 Aluminum Yield Strength: 40 ksi Factor of Safety: 3 Design Stress: 13.3 ksi Results of FEA Analysis: Max Von Mises Stress: 14.5 ksi Maximum Displacement: 0.002 inAnalysis of Upright: Analysis of Upright Material: 6061-T6 Aluminum Yield Strength: 40 ksi Factor of Safety: 3 Design Stress: 13.3 ksi Results of FEA Analysis Max stress: 16.3 ksi Max Deflection: 0.004 inVerification: Verification PDS Criteria Weight: The hub assembly will weigh less than 17 lbs. Hub=2.5 lb, Upright=4.5 lb, Total = 7 lb Size/shape: Components will fit within an 13 inch wheel. It does fit. Maintenance: 2 hour yearly overhaul Maintenance free: sealed bearings, locktite on all screws Installation: Install in less than 120 min. Can be done inside of an hour: press in bearings, 3 bolts per side Cost (materials, bearings, bolts): less than $400 Housing: $54.00, Hub: $186.94, Flange: $65.20, Connectors: $50.54, Angles: $1.34, Fasteners: $8.61, Bearings: $18.80 Total Cost of Materials: $385.43 Dynamic Testing Has performed properly to this point Front Hub/Upright: Front Hub/Upright Design Criteria PDS 30%-40% weight reduction over last years car Ideal weight of 14 lbs. Assembly fit within a 13 in. dia. Wheel Handle loadings in race conditions Incorporate connecting points for suspension and steering systems Component Selection Suspension Geometry Steering Positioning Brake Components Bearing Selection Front Hub/Upright: Front Hub/Upright Analysis Calculations Track Conditions Top speeds 60 mph/ Avg. Speed 30 mph Safety FactorsFront Hub/Upright: Front Hub/UprightFront Hub/Upright: Front Hub/Upright Materials 6061-T6 Aluminum 304 Stainless Steel Manufacturing CNC Mill Lathe PressFront Hub/Upright: Front Hub/Upright Verification Weight Last years 32 lbs. This year 11.4 lbs. 64% weight reduction Under Ideal weight of 14 lbs. Track testing Handles loads under acceleration, deceleration, and cornering Problems/Improvements Two Piece Separation Spacers Further Advanced Optimization Weight reduction Cost reduction Drivetrain: Drivetrain Use of Common Parts Honda CBR 600 F1 Limited Slip Differential Use of Common Materials 4140 Steel 6061-T6 AluminumRear Differential: Rear Differential Aluminum Housing Zexel Torsen Limited Slip Differential Sealed Bearings Retain Gear Oil Check Valve Roll-Over and Tilt ProtectionPower Transmission : Power Transmission Axle Shafts 4140-3/4” Steel U-Joints Drive Shaft Splined Drive Chain and Sprocket Rear Mono-BrakeDrive Train Verification: Drive Train Verification Performance Dyno-Testinig Road Testing Weight Target 50 lbs Manufacturing Time Target 15 hours Production Cost Target $2000 Failures Drive Axle Welds Shielded Bearings Changes?Acceleration Torsion Testing: Acceleration Torsion TestingAerodynamics & Body: Aerodynamics & Body Modeled using 3-D software package, SOLIDWORKS® Forms CNC machined Allowed for precision forming and exact fit Material: 1/8” fiberglass mat w/ fine mat finish Light weight and durable Total Weight: 8.5 lbs. Significantly below PDS target Body & Aerodynamics con’t…: Body & Aerodynamics con’t… Estimated drag coefficient (CD), front lift coefficient (CL), drag force (D) and lift force (L) CD = 0.14 D = 1.950 lbf CL = 0.15 L = 0.910 lbf © 1992 SAEBody & Aerodynamics con’t…: Body & Aerodynamics con’t… Estimated skin drag coefficient (CF) and surface shear force per unit surface area (τ) (friction resistance) CF = 4000 τ = 901.87 lbf/ft2 Source: Race Car Engineering, KatzBody & Aerodynamics con’t…: Body & Aerodynamics con’t… Overall Performance Evaluation Overall weight of car significantly minimized PDS projected weight = 30 lb Actual weight = 8.5 lb Dimensions of car w/in 2% of desired Drag force minimized as specified in PDS Typical F-1 CD = 1.07 PSU Formula CD = 0.015 Lift force acceptable but could be further minimized by introducing further down force components which were sacrificed to make room for critical components (i.e. intake apparatus, radiator) Typical F-1 CL = -0.99 PSU Formula CL = 0.015 Cooling performance maximized by channeling air over water-cooled components average engine temperature w/o channeled air over radiator = 220°F average engine temperature w/ channeled air over radiator = 200°FPerformance in Action: Performance in Action