logging in or signing up cronqvist Nivedi Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 39 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: December 31, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Using (MV-)QCA to determine the conditions of success of Green Parties: Using (MV-)QCA to determine the conditions of success of Green Parties Lasse Cronqvist Institute of Political Science University of Marburg (Germany)This presentation : This presentation This presentation will ... use QCA style analysis to find conditions of success of green parties in the 80s ... use a modification of QCA which allows the use of multi-valued conditions ... start with a few conditions and add further conditions after the study of contradicting configurationsWhy Multi-Value QCA: Why Multi-Value QCA QCA uses dichotomized values Some data can only be dichotomized with a substancial loss of data + nominal data might be better operationalized with non-dichotomized conditions (e.g. G. Esping-Andersens „Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism“)Example: Example Example: ExampleMVQCA: MVQCA The use of multi-value scales may result in configurations closer to original data and be used to reduce contradictions in the truth table But: Do not overdo: Using too many categories will „individualize“ the configurations Few minimisations possibleMVQCA: MVQCA MVQCA works exactly like QCA, except: 1. Use of set notation (A{0}, B{1}, C{2}, etc.) 2. Minimisation is only possible if all values combined with the shorter expression share the outcome value QCA: ab + Ab b with A dichotomous MVQCA: A{0}B{0} + A{1}B{0} + A{2}B{0} B{0} possible values for A: {0,1,2}Success : Success Intention: Determination of conditions of success of Green Parties in the 80s So far: No coherent explanations on varying success of Green Parties But how to code „Success“?Success (2) : Success (2) Some authors: 4% Threshold Above: Success, Below: No success But: If the electoral threshold is set at 5%, a party winning 4.9% of votes will not consider itself as „successful“ Here: Success if party was elected into parliament on a sustainable basis winning more than just one or two seats.Success (3): Success (3) Success = 1 Success = 0Possible Conditions: Possible Conditions Well known statements on the success of Green Parties New parties are disadvantaged in majority vote systems Postmaterialism Possible Conditions (2): Possible Conditions (2) Elec = 1 Elec = 0 GNP = 2 GNP = 1 GNP = 0Truth Table: Truth Table Sufficient causes for the outcome 0 are found, but: Not all cases with outcome 0 are explained No case with outcome 1 is explainedFurther Conditions?: Further Conditions? Cleavage-Theory by Stein Rokkan. Political conflicts are found in every society, but special circumstances are needed to create a cleavage with influence on the party system Is there an ecological cleavage? If yes: Which ecological questions are strong enough to found this cleavage? Casestudies on Germany & Sweden: Maybe nuclear policy?Nuclear Power Policy: Nuclear Power Policy Population density: Population densityMVQCA Solutions: MVQCA Solutions Green parties were successful where necessary institutional (proportional elections) and socio-economical (medium or high GNP per capita) conditions were met and where conflicts over ecological issues were strong enough to found an ecological cleavage (active nuclear energy policy and/or high population density). MVQCA Solutions: MVQCA Solutions 1. a majority vote system 2. low GNP / cap. 3. low or medium population density combined with the absence of nuclear power plants ... are all sufficient conditions for the absence of successful green parties Remarks: Remarks Things to remember... Iceland: No successful Green Party, but: „Womens alliance“ France: EP elections MVQCA QCA: MVQCA QCA Green parties were successful where necessery institutional (proportional elections) and socio-economical (medium or high GNP per capita) conditions were met and where conflicts over ecological issues were strong enough to found an ecological cleavage (active nuclear energy policy and/or high population density). Using this information we can convert the solution to a purely dichotomous QCA solutionUsing (MV-)QCA to determine the conditions of success of Green Parties: Using (MV-)QCA to determine the conditions of success of Green Parties More Information: http://www.tosmana.org/oxford2006 You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
cronqvist Nivedi Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 39 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: December 31, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Using (MV-)QCA to determine the conditions of success of Green Parties: Using (MV-)QCA to determine the conditions of success of Green Parties Lasse Cronqvist Institute of Political Science University of Marburg (Germany)This presentation : This presentation This presentation will ... use QCA style analysis to find conditions of success of green parties in the 80s ... use a modification of QCA which allows the use of multi-valued conditions ... start with a few conditions and add further conditions after the study of contradicting configurationsWhy Multi-Value QCA: Why Multi-Value QCA QCA uses dichotomized values Some data can only be dichotomized with a substancial loss of data + nominal data might be better operationalized with non-dichotomized conditions (e.g. G. Esping-Andersens „Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism“)Example: Example Example: ExampleMVQCA: MVQCA The use of multi-value scales may result in configurations closer to original data and be used to reduce contradictions in the truth table But: Do not overdo: Using too many categories will „individualize“ the configurations Few minimisations possibleMVQCA: MVQCA MVQCA works exactly like QCA, except: 1. Use of set notation (A{0}, B{1}, C{2}, etc.) 2. Minimisation is only possible if all values combined with the shorter expression share the outcome value QCA: ab + Ab b with A dichotomous MVQCA: A{0}B{0} + A{1}B{0} + A{2}B{0} B{0} possible values for A: {0,1,2}Success : Success Intention: Determination of conditions of success of Green Parties in the 80s So far: No coherent explanations on varying success of Green Parties But how to code „Success“?Success (2) : Success (2) Some authors: 4% Threshold Above: Success, Below: No success But: If the electoral threshold is set at 5%, a party winning 4.9% of votes will not consider itself as „successful“ Here: Success if party was elected into parliament on a sustainable basis winning more than just one or two seats.Success (3): Success (3) Success = 1 Success = 0Possible Conditions: Possible Conditions Well known statements on the success of Green Parties New parties are disadvantaged in majority vote systems Postmaterialism Possible Conditions (2): Possible Conditions (2) Elec = 1 Elec = 0 GNP = 2 GNP = 1 GNP = 0Truth Table: Truth Table Sufficient causes for the outcome 0 are found, but: Not all cases with outcome 0 are explained No case with outcome 1 is explainedFurther Conditions?: Further Conditions? Cleavage-Theory by Stein Rokkan. Political conflicts are found in every society, but special circumstances are needed to create a cleavage with influence on the party system Is there an ecological cleavage? If yes: Which ecological questions are strong enough to found this cleavage? Casestudies on Germany & Sweden: Maybe nuclear policy?Nuclear Power Policy: Nuclear Power Policy Population density: Population densityMVQCA Solutions: MVQCA Solutions Green parties were successful where necessary institutional (proportional elections) and socio-economical (medium or high GNP per capita) conditions were met and where conflicts over ecological issues were strong enough to found an ecological cleavage (active nuclear energy policy and/or high population density). MVQCA Solutions: MVQCA Solutions 1. a majority vote system 2. low GNP / cap. 3. low or medium population density combined with the absence of nuclear power plants ... are all sufficient conditions for the absence of successful green parties Remarks: Remarks Things to remember... Iceland: No successful Green Party, but: „Womens alliance“ France: EP elections MVQCA QCA: MVQCA QCA Green parties were successful where necessery institutional (proportional elections) and socio-economical (medium or high GNP per capita) conditions were met and where conflicts over ecological issues were strong enough to found an ecological cleavage (active nuclear energy policy and/or high population density). Using this information we can convert the solution to a purely dichotomous QCA solutionUsing (MV-)QCA to determine the conditions of success of Green Parties: Using (MV-)QCA to determine the conditions of success of Green Parties More Information: http://www.tosmana.org/oxford2006