logging in or signing up 02 skog Nevada Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 33 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: January 07, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Discussion of sustainability measures from the 5th RPA Timber Assessment: Discussion of sustainability measures from the 5th RPA Timber Assessment Ken Skog USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI(Montreal) Criteria for the conservation and sustainable management of temperate and boreal forests: (Montreal) Criteria for the conservation and sustainable management of temperate and boreal forests Conservation of biological diversity Maintenance of productive capacity Maintenance of ecosystem health and vitality Conservation and maintenance of soil and water resources Maintenance of contribution to global carbon cycles Maintenance and enhancement of socioeconomic benefits Legal, institutional and economic framework for forest conservation and managementSlide3: 5th RPA Timber Assessment http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/sev/rpa/ 2003 National report on sustainable forests: http://www2.srs.fs.fed.us/2003/2003.htm Sustainability Evaluation Approaches: Sustainability Evaluation Approaches Ecosystem – centered : sustainable ecosystems are fundamental Market – centered: economic vitality is fundamental Ethics – centered: equitable access to natural resources and markets is fundamentalInterpretation method ideas: Interpretation method ideas Single indicator trends – good, bad Single indicator status – desirable, neutral, undesirable ; pros, cons Pros, cons given interaction with other variables Interacting set of indicators – pros and cons of current state or trends of the set Indexes combining indicatorsInter-related Indicators – Timber / biological diversity: Inter-related Indicators – Timber / biological diversity Criterion 6 – Maintenance/ enhancement of socioeconomic benefits Supply and consumption for wood and wood products (31) Value and volume of wood and wood products production (29) Criterion 2 – Maintenance of productive capacity of forest ecosystems Annual removals of wood compared to volume sustainable (13) Area and growing stock in plantations (12) Criterion 1 – Conservation of biological diversity Extent of forest area by age class or successional stage (2) Extent of area by forest type (1)Selected Montreal Indicators: Selected Montreal Indicators Criterion 6 – Maintenance/ enhancement of socioeconomic benefits Supply and consumption for wood and wood products (31) Value and volume of wood and wood products production (29) Criterion 2 – Maintenance of productive capacity of forest ecosystems Annual removals of wood compared to volume sustainable (13) Area and growing stock in plantations (12) Total growing stock of merchantable and non merchantable trees (11) Criterion 1 – Conservation of biological diversity Extent of forest area by age class or successional stage (2) Extent of area by forest type (1)Figure 31-2 -- U.S. wood/paper product and apparent roundwood consumption per capita: Figure 31-2 -- U.S. wood/paper product and apparent roundwood consumption per capita Product consumption Total Roundwood consumption Domestic roundwood consumptionSlide10: Supply and consumption of wood and paper products (31) The percent of wood and paper products from imports is projected to increaseSelected Montreal Indicators: Selected Montreal Indicators Criterion 6 – Maintenance/ enhancement of socioeconomic benefits Supply and consumption for wood and wood products (31) Value and volume of wood and wood products production (29) Criterion 2 – Maintenance of productive capacity of forest ecosystems Annual removals of wood compared to volume sustainable (13) Area and growing stock in plantations (12) Criterion 1 – Conservation of biological diversity Extent of forest area by age class or successional stage (2) Extent of area by forest type (1)Figure 29-1 U.S. Roundwood harvest and forest products production for domestic use and exports, 1965 – 1998, with Projections to 2050 Million tons, dry weight: Figure 29-1 U.S. Roundwood harvest and forest products production for domestic use and exports, 1965 – 1998, with Projections to 2050 Million tons, dry weight Production for domestic use Exported products Roundwood harvestU.S. Production of Forest Products 1965 – 1998, with projections to 2050 Million tons, dry weight: U.S. Production of Forest Products 1965 – 1998, with projections to 2050 Million tons, dry weight Lumber Composites Pulp, Paper & paperboardFigure 31– Roundwood harvest for by timber type, 1965 – 1998, with projections to 2050Million tons, dry weight: Figure 31– Roundwood harvest for by timber type, 1965 – 1998, with projections to 2050 Million tons, dry weightFigure 31-- Roundwood harvest by owner, 1965 – 1998, with projections to 2050Million tons, dry weight: Figure 31-- Roundwood harvest by owner, 1965 – 1998, with projections to 2050 Million tons, dry weightRoundwood harvest by region, 1965 – 1998, with projections to 2050Million tons, dry weight: Roundwood harvest by region, 1965 – 1998, with projections to 2050 Million tons, dry weightSelected Montreal Indicators: Selected Montreal Indicators Criterion 6 – Maintenance/ enhancement of socioeconomic benefits Supply and consumption for wood and wood products (31) Value and volume of wood and wood products production (29) Criterion 2 – Maintenance of productive capacity of forest ecosystems Annual removals of wood compared to volume sustainable (13) Area and growing stock in plantations (12) Criterion 1 – Conservation of biological diversity Extent of forest area by age class or successional stage (2) Extent of area by forest type (1)Slide19: Softwoods South Softwoods WestSlide20: Hardwoods South Hardwoods NorthSelected Montreal Indicators: Selected Montreal Indicators Criterion 6 – Maintenance/ enhancement of socioeconomic benefits Supply and consumption for wood and wood products (31) Value and volume of wood and wood products production (29) Criterion 2 – Maintenance of productive capacity of forest ecosystems Annual removals of wood compared to volume sustainable (13) Area and growing stock in plantations (12)) Criterion 1 – Conservation of biological diversity Extent of forest area by age class or successional stage (2) Extent of area by forest type (1)Slide22: SW plantation area SW plantation harvestInter-related Indicators: Inter-related Indicators Criterion 6 – Maintenance/ enhancement of socioeconomic benefits Supply and consumption for wood and wood products (31) Value and volume of wood and wood products production (29) Criterion 2 – Maintenance of productive capacity of forest ecosystems Annual removals of wood compared to volume sustainable (13) Area and growing stock in plantations (12) Criterion 1 – Conservation of biological diversity Extent of forest area by age class or successional stage (2) Extent of area by forest type (1)Slide25: Hardwoods Softwoods North South NorthSelected Montreal Indicators: Selected Montreal Indicators Criterion 6 – Maintenance/ enhancement of socioeconomic benefits Supply and consumption for wood and wood products (31) Value and volume of wood and wood products production (29) Criterion 2 – Maintenance of productive capacity of forest ecosystems Annual removals of wood compared to volume sustainable (13) Area and growing stock in plantations (12) Criterion 1 – Conservation of biological diversity Extent of forest area by age class or successional stage (2) Extent of area by forest type (1)Slide30: 5th RPA Timber Assessment http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/sev/rpa/ 2003 National report on sustainable forests: http://www2.srs.fs.fed.us/2003/2003.htm You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
02 skog Nevada Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 33 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: January 07, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Discussion of sustainability measures from the 5th RPA Timber Assessment: Discussion of sustainability measures from the 5th RPA Timber Assessment Ken Skog USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI(Montreal) Criteria for the conservation and sustainable management of temperate and boreal forests: (Montreal) Criteria for the conservation and sustainable management of temperate and boreal forests Conservation of biological diversity Maintenance of productive capacity Maintenance of ecosystem health and vitality Conservation and maintenance of soil and water resources Maintenance of contribution to global carbon cycles Maintenance and enhancement of socioeconomic benefits Legal, institutional and economic framework for forest conservation and managementSlide3: 5th RPA Timber Assessment http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/sev/rpa/ 2003 National report on sustainable forests: http://www2.srs.fs.fed.us/2003/2003.htm Sustainability Evaluation Approaches: Sustainability Evaluation Approaches Ecosystem – centered : sustainable ecosystems are fundamental Market – centered: economic vitality is fundamental Ethics – centered: equitable access to natural resources and markets is fundamentalInterpretation method ideas: Interpretation method ideas Single indicator trends – good, bad Single indicator status – desirable, neutral, undesirable ; pros, cons Pros, cons given interaction with other variables Interacting set of indicators – pros and cons of current state or trends of the set Indexes combining indicatorsInter-related Indicators – Timber / biological diversity: Inter-related Indicators – Timber / biological diversity Criterion 6 – Maintenance/ enhancement of socioeconomic benefits Supply and consumption for wood and wood products (31) Value and volume of wood and wood products production (29) Criterion 2 – Maintenance of productive capacity of forest ecosystems Annual removals of wood compared to volume sustainable (13) Area and growing stock in plantations (12) Criterion 1 – Conservation of biological diversity Extent of forest area by age class or successional stage (2) Extent of area by forest type (1)Selected Montreal Indicators: Selected Montreal Indicators Criterion 6 – Maintenance/ enhancement of socioeconomic benefits Supply and consumption for wood and wood products (31) Value and volume of wood and wood products production (29) Criterion 2 – Maintenance of productive capacity of forest ecosystems Annual removals of wood compared to volume sustainable (13) Area and growing stock in plantations (12) Total growing stock of merchantable and non merchantable trees (11) Criterion 1 – Conservation of biological diversity Extent of forest area by age class or successional stage (2) Extent of area by forest type (1)Figure 31-2 -- U.S. wood/paper product and apparent roundwood consumption per capita: Figure 31-2 -- U.S. wood/paper product and apparent roundwood consumption per capita Product consumption Total Roundwood consumption Domestic roundwood consumptionSlide10: Supply and consumption of wood and paper products (31) The percent of wood and paper products from imports is projected to increaseSelected Montreal Indicators: Selected Montreal Indicators Criterion 6 – Maintenance/ enhancement of socioeconomic benefits Supply and consumption for wood and wood products (31) Value and volume of wood and wood products production (29) Criterion 2 – Maintenance of productive capacity of forest ecosystems Annual removals of wood compared to volume sustainable (13) Area and growing stock in plantations (12) Criterion 1 – Conservation of biological diversity Extent of forest area by age class or successional stage (2) Extent of area by forest type (1)Figure 29-1 U.S. Roundwood harvest and forest products production for domestic use and exports, 1965 – 1998, with Projections to 2050 Million tons, dry weight: Figure 29-1 U.S. Roundwood harvest and forest products production for domestic use and exports, 1965 – 1998, with Projections to 2050 Million tons, dry weight Production for domestic use Exported products Roundwood harvestU.S. Production of Forest Products 1965 – 1998, with projections to 2050 Million tons, dry weight: U.S. Production of Forest Products 1965 – 1998, with projections to 2050 Million tons, dry weight Lumber Composites Pulp, Paper & paperboardFigure 31– Roundwood harvest for by timber type, 1965 – 1998, with projections to 2050Million tons, dry weight: Figure 31– Roundwood harvest for by timber type, 1965 – 1998, with projections to 2050 Million tons, dry weightFigure 31-- Roundwood harvest by owner, 1965 – 1998, with projections to 2050Million tons, dry weight: Figure 31-- Roundwood harvest by owner, 1965 – 1998, with projections to 2050 Million tons, dry weightRoundwood harvest by region, 1965 – 1998, with projections to 2050Million tons, dry weight: Roundwood harvest by region, 1965 – 1998, with projections to 2050 Million tons, dry weightSelected Montreal Indicators: Selected Montreal Indicators Criterion 6 – Maintenance/ enhancement of socioeconomic benefits Supply and consumption for wood and wood products (31) Value and volume of wood and wood products production (29) Criterion 2 – Maintenance of productive capacity of forest ecosystems Annual removals of wood compared to volume sustainable (13) Area and growing stock in plantations (12) Criterion 1 – Conservation of biological diversity Extent of forest area by age class or successional stage (2) Extent of area by forest type (1)Slide19: Softwoods South Softwoods WestSlide20: Hardwoods South Hardwoods NorthSelected Montreal Indicators: Selected Montreal Indicators Criterion 6 – Maintenance/ enhancement of socioeconomic benefits Supply and consumption for wood and wood products (31) Value and volume of wood and wood products production (29) Criterion 2 – Maintenance of productive capacity of forest ecosystems Annual removals of wood compared to volume sustainable (13) Area and growing stock in plantations (12)) Criterion 1 – Conservation of biological diversity Extent of forest area by age class or successional stage (2) Extent of area by forest type (1)Slide22: SW plantation area SW plantation harvestInter-related Indicators: Inter-related Indicators Criterion 6 – Maintenance/ enhancement of socioeconomic benefits Supply and consumption for wood and wood products (31) Value and volume of wood and wood products production (29) Criterion 2 – Maintenance of productive capacity of forest ecosystems Annual removals of wood compared to volume sustainable (13) Area and growing stock in plantations (12) Criterion 1 – Conservation of biological diversity Extent of forest area by age class or successional stage (2) Extent of area by forest type (1)Slide25: Hardwoods Softwoods North South NorthSelected Montreal Indicators: Selected Montreal Indicators Criterion 6 – Maintenance/ enhancement of socioeconomic benefits Supply and consumption for wood and wood products (31) Value and volume of wood and wood products production (29) Criterion 2 – Maintenance of productive capacity of forest ecosystems Annual removals of wood compared to volume sustainable (13) Area and growing stock in plantations (12) Criterion 1 – Conservation of biological diversity Extent of forest area by age class or successional stage (2) Extent of area by forest type (1)Slide30: 5th RPA Timber Assessment http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/sev/rpa/ 2003 National report on sustainable forests: http://www2.srs.fs.fed.us/2003/2003.htm