logging in or signing up Graham GISIN Nevada Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 20 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: October 24, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Invasive Species Systems Task Group Status Update and Some Performance Analysis: Invasive Species Systems Task Group Status Update and Some Performance Analysis Jim Graham PhD Candidate, Colorado State University Annie Simpson, Michael Brown, Greg Newman, Catherine Jarnevich, Tom StohlgrenInvasive Species: Invasive Species $120 Billion spent annually in the US Between 5000 and 50,000 invasive species in the US Impact agriculture, environment, and human health Reduce area for viable grazing 46% of species on threatened and endangered list are listed because of invasive species Human health concerns (e.g. West Nile Virus)Resource Managers Need Help!: Resource Managers Need Help!Invasive Species System: Invasive Species System Herbariums Museums Invasive Databases Inspection Databases Portals Search Engines Modelers Users Consumers (Clients) End-Users Providers (Server) Web Services Web PagesCustomers: Customers End-Users Researchers Citizen scientists Decision makers Resource managers Data Consumers Modelers Map Generators Portals Data Providers Over 252 invasive species databases in the US alone (Crall et al. 2006)Research and Production: Research and ProductionSoftware Lifecycle: Software Lifecycle Investigation Design Implementation Testing Maintenance Time ISSTG Initial Schedule: ISSTG Initial Schedule October, 2006 – Formation of TDWG task group December, 2006 Investigation completed – Draft design February, 2007 – Design completed May, 2007 – Test implementation September, 2007 – Toolkits available?Current Status: Current Status Investigation Initial use case analysis Draft requirement specification Starting alternatives analysis Starting feasibility studies Design Draft schema Terminology definition tools Implementation PrototypesUse Case Analysis: Use Case Analysis Example Cases Create map of species Research status of species Find environmental niche of species Research control methods Find native distribution of species Possible Actions Refer to existing solution Build web site Build portal Add to the protocolSome Requirements: Some Requirements Provider Requirements Common language support Platform independent Broad database support Easy to implement, use Fast access to large amounts of occurrence data Invasive Species Data: Invasive Species Data Existing Standards Locations Taxa identification Dates Depth, Elevation, Sex, LifeStage Extensions BioStatus (non-native, harmful) Additional ancillary data (percent cover, date introduced) Management information Life historyAdditional data: Additional dataQuality: QualitySearch Times on Resources: Search Times on Resources Times are in secondsPerformance Variables: Performance Variables Internet connect speed Number of hops between client and server Server speed Web server software Protocol complexity (3) Provider software (3) Database software Database structure Number of records (1) Search type Fields requested Number of matches (2)Search time vs. number of records: Search time vs. number of recordsSearch time by number of hits: Search time by number of hitsProtocol and Provider Software: Protocol and Provider SoftwareTypical Harvest Times?: Typical Harvest Times? - Times are in seconds unless noted otherwise - Only the Internet sample time includes Internet latencyConclusions: Conclusions Protocol fit to draft requirements Removing embedded requests improves performance and robustness Current DiGIR SW has performance problems with SQL Server Will look at: other provider software Simple request/response Schema fit to requirements Portions of DarwinCore and ABCD Additional extensionsDuplicate Standard Nightmare!: Duplicate Standard Nightmare! TIFF Too complicated to use Toolkits were late JPEG, GIF, IMG, PNG, EPS, Targa… Thousands of formats! TWAIN Simplest solution that met the requirements Delivered with cross-platform toolkits Only scanner interface standard Can we get all the folks working on occurrence data together?Acknowledgements: Acknowledgements Funding: NASA USGS, National Biological Information Infrastructure Tamarix Coalition Help: Catherine Jarnevich Annie Simpson Michael Browne Bob Morris Jacob Asiedu Dave Vieglas James Macklin Everyone at the Natural Resource Ecology Lab at Colorado State University ----------------: ---------------- WMS Performance: WMS PerformanceHarvest DiGIR Records: Harvest DiGIR Records Seven invasive species, one genus Harvested all available data from 637 registered resources (UDDI) 100 records maximum per request Fields: DecimalLatitude, DecimalLongitude, ScientificName, Kingdom EarliestCollectionDate, LatestCollectionDate Removed embedded requestsForecasting at Various Scales: Forecasting at Various Scales Local Regional National GlobalTop 10 Times for S. vulgaris: Top 10 Times for S. vulgarisRasters from JPL: Rasters from JPL Web Map Service (WMS) Protocol from OpenGIS Requested 1000 rasters Randomized: from 100x100 to 1000x1000 pixels Within the continental US Time from request to entire image received Digital elevation rasterswww.NIISS.org: www.NIISS.orgInvasive Species Cyberinfrastructure: Invasive Species Cyberinfrastructure 3D Spatial Prototype: 3D Spatial Prototype Hackberry Canyon Watershed, Utah Relative Biomass (g/0.5m2) Kumar, Sunil 2006 You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
Graham GISIN Nevada Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 20 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: October 24, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Invasive Species Systems Task Group Status Update and Some Performance Analysis: Invasive Species Systems Task Group Status Update and Some Performance Analysis Jim Graham PhD Candidate, Colorado State University Annie Simpson, Michael Brown, Greg Newman, Catherine Jarnevich, Tom StohlgrenInvasive Species: Invasive Species $120 Billion spent annually in the US Between 5000 and 50,000 invasive species in the US Impact agriculture, environment, and human health Reduce area for viable grazing 46% of species on threatened and endangered list are listed because of invasive species Human health concerns (e.g. West Nile Virus)Resource Managers Need Help!: Resource Managers Need Help!Invasive Species System: Invasive Species System Herbariums Museums Invasive Databases Inspection Databases Portals Search Engines Modelers Users Consumers (Clients) End-Users Providers (Server) Web Services Web PagesCustomers: Customers End-Users Researchers Citizen scientists Decision makers Resource managers Data Consumers Modelers Map Generators Portals Data Providers Over 252 invasive species databases in the US alone (Crall et al. 2006)Research and Production: Research and ProductionSoftware Lifecycle: Software Lifecycle Investigation Design Implementation Testing Maintenance Time ISSTG Initial Schedule: ISSTG Initial Schedule October, 2006 – Formation of TDWG task group December, 2006 Investigation completed – Draft design February, 2007 – Design completed May, 2007 – Test implementation September, 2007 – Toolkits available?Current Status: Current Status Investigation Initial use case analysis Draft requirement specification Starting alternatives analysis Starting feasibility studies Design Draft schema Terminology definition tools Implementation PrototypesUse Case Analysis: Use Case Analysis Example Cases Create map of species Research status of species Find environmental niche of species Research control methods Find native distribution of species Possible Actions Refer to existing solution Build web site Build portal Add to the protocolSome Requirements: Some Requirements Provider Requirements Common language support Platform independent Broad database support Easy to implement, use Fast access to large amounts of occurrence data Invasive Species Data: Invasive Species Data Existing Standards Locations Taxa identification Dates Depth, Elevation, Sex, LifeStage Extensions BioStatus (non-native, harmful) Additional ancillary data (percent cover, date introduced) Management information Life historyAdditional data: Additional dataQuality: QualitySearch Times on Resources: Search Times on Resources Times are in secondsPerformance Variables: Performance Variables Internet connect speed Number of hops between client and server Server speed Web server software Protocol complexity (3) Provider software (3) Database software Database structure Number of records (1) Search type Fields requested Number of matches (2)Search time vs. number of records: Search time vs. number of recordsSearch time by number of hits: Search time by number of hitsProtocol and Provider Software: Protocol and Provider SoftwareTypical Harvest Times?: Typical Harvest Times? - Times are in seconds unless noted otherwise - Only the Internet sample time includes Internet latencyConclusions: Conclusions Protocol fit to draft requirements Removing embedded requests improves performance and robustness Current DiGIR SW has performance problems with SQL Server Will look at: other provider software Simple request/response Schema fit to requirements Portions of DarwinCore and ABCD Additional extensionsDuplicate Standard Nightmare!: Duplicate Standard Nightmare! TIFF Too complicated to use Toolkits were late JPEG, GIF, IMG, PNG, EPS, Targa… Thousands of formats! TWAIN Simplest solution that met the requirements Delivered with cross-platform toolkits Only scanner interface standard Can we get all the folks working on occurrence data together?Acknowledgements: Acknowledgements Funding: NASA USGS, National Biological Information Infrastructure Tamarix Coalition Help: Catherine Jarnevich Annie Simpson Michael Browne Bob Morris Jacob Asiedu Dave Vieglas James Macklin Everyone at the Natural Resource Ecology Lab at Colorado State University ----------------: ---------------- WMS Performance: WMS PerformanceHarvest DiGIR Records: Harvest DiGIR Records Seven invasive species, one genus Harvested all available data from 637 registered resources (UDDI) 100 records maximum per request Fields: DecimalLatitude, DecimalLongitude, ScientificName, Kingdom EarliestCollectionDate, LatestCollectionDate Removed embedded requestsForecasting at Various Scales: Forecasting at Various Scales Local Regional National GlobalTop 10 Times for S. vulgaris: Top 10 Times for S. vulgarisRasters from JPL: Rasters from JPL Web Map Service (WMS) Protocol from OpenGIS Requested 1000 rasters Randomized: from 100x100 to 1000x1000 pixels Within the continental US Time from request to entire image received Digital elevation rasterswww.NIISS.org: www.NIISS.orgInvasive Species Cyberinfrastructure: Invasive Species Cyberinfrastructure 3D Spatial Prototype: 3D Spatial Prototype Hackberry Canyon Watershed, Utah Relative Biomass (g/0.5m2) Kumar, Sunil 2006