Information Extraction: Information Extraction (Slides based on those by Ray Mooney, Craig Knoblock, Dan Weld and Perry)


Information Extraction (IE): Information Extraction (IE) Identify specific pieces of information (data) in a unstructured or semi-structured textual document. Transform unstructured information in a corpus of documents or web pages into a structured database. Applied to different types of text: Newspaper articles Web pages Scientific articles Newsgroup messages Classified ads Medical notes


Information Extraction vs. NLP?: Information Extraction vs. NLP? Information extraction is attempting to find some of the structure and meaning in the hopefully template driven web pages. As IE becomes more ambitious and text becomes more free form, then ultimately we have IE becoming equal to NLP. Web does give one particular boost to NLP Massive corpora..


MUC: MUC DARPA funded significant efforts in IE in the early to mid 1990’s. Message Understanding Conference (MUC) was an annual event/competition where results were presented. Focused on extracting information from news articles: Terrorist events Industrial joint ventures Company management changes Information extraction of particular interest to the intelligence community (CIA, NSA).


Other Applications: Other Applications Job postings: Newsgroups: Rapier from austin.jobs Web pages: Flipdog Job resumes: BurningGlass Mohomine Seminar announcements Company information from the web Continuing education course info from the web University information from the web Apartment rental ads Molecular biology information from MEDLINE


Sample Job Posting: Subject: US-TN-SOFTWARE PROGRAMMER Date: 17 Nov 1996 17:37:29 GMT Organization: Reference.Com Posting Service Message-ID: SOFTWARE PROGRAMMER Position available for Software Programmer experienced in generating software for PC-Based Voice Mail systems. Experienced in C Programming. Must be familiar with communicating with and controlling voice cards; preferable Dialogic, however, experience with others such as Rhetorix and Natural Microsystems is okay. Prefer 5 years or more experience with PC Based Voice Mail, but will consider as little as 2 years. Need to find a Senior level person who can come on board and pick up code with very little training. Present Operating System is DOS. May go to OS-2 or UNIX in future. Please reply to: Kim Anderson AdNET (901) 458-2888 fax kimander@memphisonline.com Subject: US-TN-SOFTWARE PROGRAMMER Date: 17 Nov 1996 17:37:29 GMT Organization: Reference.Com Posting Service Message-ID: SOFTWARE PROGRAMMER Position available for Software Programmer experienced in generating software for PC-Based Voice Mail systems. Experienced in C Programming. Must be familiar with communicating with and controlling voice cards; preferable Dialogic, however, experience with others such as Rhetorix and Natural Microsystems is okay. Prefer 5 years or more experience with PC Based Voice Mail, but will consider as little as 2 years. Need to find a Senior level person who can come on board and pick up code with very little training. Present Operating System is DOS. May go to OS-2 or UNIX in future. Please reply to: Kim Anderson AdNET (901) 458-2888 fax kimander@memphisonline.com Sample Job Posting


Extracted Job Template: Extracted Job Template computer_science_job id: 56nigp$mrs@bilbo.reference.com title: SOFTWARE PROGRAMMER salary: company: recruiter: state: TN city: country: US language: C platform: PC \ DOS \ OS-2 \ UNIX application: area: Voice Mail req_years_experience: 2 desired_years_experience: 5 req_degree: desired_degree: post_date: 17 Nov 1996


Amazon Book Description: Amazon Book Description …. The Age of Spiritual Machines : When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence by Ray Kurzweil List Price: $14.95 Our Price: $11.96 You Save: $2.99 (20%) …. The Age of Spiritual Machines : When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence by Ray Kurzweil List Price: $14.95 Our Price: $11.96 You Save: $2.99 (20%) …


Extracted Book Template: Extracted Book Template Title: The Age of Spiritual Machines : When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence Author: Ray Kurzweil List-Price: $14.95 Price: $11.96 : :


Web Extraction: Web Extraction Many web pages are generated automatically from an underlying database. Therefore, the HTML structure of pages is fairly specific and regular (semi-structured). However, output is intended for human consumption, not machine interpretation. An IE system for such generated pages allows the web site to be viewed as a structured database. An extractor for a semi-structured web site is sometimes referred to as a wrapper. Process of extracting from such pages is sometimes referred to as screen scraping.


Web Extraction using DOM Trees: Web Extraction using DOM Trees Web extraction may be aided by first parsing web pages into DOM trees. Extraction patterns can then be specified as paths from the root of the DOM tree to the node containing the text to extract. May still need regex patterns to identify proper portion of the final CharacterData node.


Sample DOM Tree Extraction: Sample DOM Tree Extraction HTML BODY FONT B Age of Spiritual Machines Ray Kurzweil Element Character-Data HEADER by A Title: HTMLBODYBCharacterData Author: HTML BODYFONTA CharacterData


Template Types: Template Types Slots in template typically filled by a substring from the document. Some slots may have a fixed set of pre-specified possible fillers that may not occur in the text itself. Terrorist act: threatened, attempted, accomplished. Job type: clerical, service, custodial, etc. Company type: SEC code Some slots may allow multiple fillers. Programming language Some domains may allow multiple extracted templates per document. Multiple apartment listings in one ad


Simple Extraction Patterns: Simple Extraction Patterns Specify an item to extract for a slot using a regular expression pattern. Price pattern: “\b\$\d+(\.\d{2})?\b” May require preceding (pre-filler) pattern to identify proper context. Amazon list price: Pre-filler pattern: “List Price: ” Filler pattern: “\$\d+(\.\d{2})?\b” May require succeeding (post-filler) pattern to identify the end of the filler. Amazon list price: Pre-filler pattern: “List Price: ” Filler pattern: “.+” Post-filler pattern: “”


Simple Template Extraction: Simple Template Extraction Extract slots in order, starting the search for the filler of the n+1 slot where the filler for the nth slot ended. Assumes slots always in a fixed order. Title Author List price … Make patterns specific enough to identify each filler always starting from the beginning of the document.


Pre-Specified Filler Extraction: Pre-Specified Filler Extraction If a slot has a fixed set of pre-specified possible fillers, text categorization can be used to fill the slot. Job category Company type Treat each of the possible values of the slot as a category, and classify the entire document to determine the correct filler.


Learning for IE: Learning for IE Writing accurate patterns for each slot for each domain (e.g. each web site) requires laborious software engineering. Alternative is to use machine learning: Build a training set of documents paired with human-produced filled extraction templates. Learn extraction patterns for each slot using an appropriate machine learning algorithm.


Finding“Sweet Spots” in computer-mediated cooperative work: Finding“Sweet Spots” in computer-mediated cooperative work It is possible to get by with techniques blythely ignorant of semantics, when you have humans in the loop All you need is to find the right sweet spot, where the computer plays a pre-processing role and presents “potential solutions” …and the human very gratefully does the in-depth analysis on those few potential solutions Examples: The incredible success of “Bag of Words” model! Bag of letters would be a disaster ;-) Bag of sentences and/or NLP would be good ..but only to your discriminating and irascible searchers ;-)


Collaborative Computing AKA Brain Cycle StealingAKA Computizing Eyeballs: Collaborative Computing AKA Brain Cycle Stealing AKA Computizing Eyeballs A lot of exciting research related to web currently involves “co-opting” the masses to help with large-scale tasks It is like “cycle stealing”—except we are stealing “human brain cycles” (the most idle of the computers if there is ever one ;-) Remember the mice in the Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy? (..who were running a mass-scale experiment on the humans to figure out the question..) Collaborative knowledge compilation (wikipedia!) Collaborative Curation Collaborative tagging Paid collacoration/contracting Many big open issues How do you pose the problem such that it can be solved using collaborative computing? How do you “incentivize” people into letting you steal their brain cycles? Pay them! (Amazon mturk.com )


Tapping into the Collective Unconscious: Tapping into the Collective Unconscious Another thread of exciting research is driven by the realization that WEB is not random at all! It is written by humans …so analyzing its structure and content allows us to tap into the collective unconscious .. Meaning can emerge from syntactic notions such as “co-occurrences” and “connectedness” Examples: Analyzing term co-occurrences in the web-scale corpora to capture semantic information (today’s paper) Analyzing the link-structure of the web graph to discover communities DoD and NSA are very much into this as a way of breaking terrorist cells Analyzing the transaction patterns of customers (collaborative filtering)


4/19: Information Extraction from unstructured text: 4/19: Information Extraction from unstructured text


Information Extraction from Unstructured Text:Automated Support for “Semantic Web”: Information Extraction from Unstructured Text: Automated Support for “Semantic Web” Semantic web needs: Tagged data Background knowledge (blue sky approaches to) automate both Knowledge Extraction Extract base level knowledge (“facts”) directly from the web Automated tagging Start with a background ontology and tag other web pages Semtag/Seeker


Extraction from Free Text involvesNatural Language Processing: Extraction from Free Text involves Natural Language Processing If extracting from automatically generated web pages, simple regex patterns usually work. If extracting from more natural, unstructured, human-written text, some NLP may help. Part-of-speech (POS) tagging Mark each word as a noun, verb, preposition, etc. Syntactic parsing Identify phrases: NP, VP, PP Semantic word categories (e.g. from WordNet) KILL: kill, murder, assassinate, strangle, suffocate Off-the-shelf software available to do this! The “Brill” tagger Extraction patterns can use POS or phrase tags. Analogy to regex patterns on DOM trees for structured tex


I. Generate-n-Test Architecture: I. Generate-n-Test Architecture Generic extraction patterns (Hearst ’92): “…Cities such as Boston, Los Angeles, and Seattle…” (“C such as NP1, NP2, and NP3”) => IS-A(each(head(NP)), C), … Detailed information for several countries such as maps, …” ProperNoun(head(NP)) “I listen to pretty much all music but prefer country such as Garth Brooks” Template Driven Extraction (where template In in terms of Syntax Tree)


Test: Test Assess candidate extractions using Mutual Information (PMI-IR) (Turney ’01). Many variations are possible…


Assessment: Assessment PMI = frequency of I & D co-occurrence 5-50 discriminators Di Each PMI for Di is a feature fi Naïve Bayes evidence combination: PMI is used for feature selection. NBC is used for learning. Hits used for assessing PMI as well as conditional probabilities


Assessment In Action: Assessment In Action I = “Yakima” (1,340,000) D = I+D = “Yakima city” (2760) PMI = (2760 / 1.34M)= 0.02 I = “Avocado” (1,000,000) I+D =“Avocado city” (10) PMI = 0.00001 << 0.02


Some Sources of ambiguity: Some Sources of ambiguity Time: “Clinton is the president” (in 1996). Context: “common misconceptions..” Opinion: Elvis… Multiple word senses: Amazon, Chicago, Chevy Chase, etc. Dominant senses can mask recessive ones! Approach: unmasking. ‘Chicago –City’


Chicago: Chicago City Movie


Chicago Unmasked: Chicago Unmasked City sense Movie sense


Impact of Unmasking on PMI: Impact of Unmasking on PMI Name Recessive Original Unmask Boost Washington city 0.50 0.99 96% Casablanca city 0.41 0.93 127% Chevy Chase actor 0.09 0.58 512% Chicago movie 0.02 0.21 972%


CBioC: Collaborative Bio-Curation: CBioC: Collaborative Bio-Curation Motivation To help get information nuggets of articles and abstracts and store in a database. The challenge is that the number of articles are huge and they keep growing, and need to process natural language. The two existing approaches human curation and use of automatic information extraction systems They are not able to meet the challenge, as the first is expensive, while the second is error-prone.


CBioC (cont’d): CBioC (cont’d) Approach: We propose a solution that is inexpensive, and that scales up. Our approach takes advantage of automatic information extraction methods as a starting point, Based on the premise that if there are a lot of articles, then there must be a lot of readers and authors of these articles. We provide a mechanism by which the readers of the articles can participate and collaborate in the curation of information. We refer to our approach as “Collaborative Curation''.


Using the C-BioCurator System (cont’d): Using the C-BioCurator System (cont’d)


Slide43: What is the main difference between Knowitall and CBIOC? Assessment– Knowitall does it by HITS. CBioC by voting


Annotation: Annotation “The Chicago Bulls announced yesterday that Michael Jordan will. . . ” The Chicago Bulls announced yesterday that Michael Jordan will...’’


Semantic Annotation: Semantic Annotation Picture from http://lsdis.cs.uga.edu/courses/SemWebFall2005/courseMaterials/CSCI8350-Metadata.ppt This simplest task of meta-data extraction on NL is to establish “type” relation between entities in the NL resources and concepts in ontologies. Name Entity Identification


Semantics: Semantics Semantic Annotation - The content of annotation consists of some rich semantic information - Targeted not only at human reader of resources but also software agents - formal : metadata following structural standards informal : personal notes written in the margin while reading an article - explicit : carry sufficient information for interpretation tacit : many personal annotations (telegraphic and incomplete) http://www-scf.usc.edu/~csci586/slides/6


Uses of Annotation: Uses of Annotation http://www-scf.usc.edu/~csci586/slides/8


Objectives of Annotation: Objectives of Annotation Generate Metadata for existing information e.g., author-tag in HTML RDF descriptions to HTML Content description to Multimedia files Employ metadata for Improved search Navigation Presentation Summarization of contents http://www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/WBS/sst/Teaching/Intelligente%20System%20im%20WWW%20SS%202000/10-Annotation.pdf


Annotation: Annotation Current practice of annotation for knowledge identification and extraction Reduce burden of text annotation for Knowledge Management www.racai.ro/EUROLAN-2003/html/presentations/SheffieldWilksBrewsterDingli/Eurolan2003AlexieiDingli.ppt


SemTag & Seeker: SemTag & Seeker WWW-03 Best Paper Prize Seeded with TAP ontology (72k concepts) And ~700 human judgments Crawled 264 million web pages Extracted 434 million semantic tags Automatically disambiguated


SemTag: SemTag Research project IBM Very large scale – largest to date 264 million web pages Goal: to provide early set of widespread semantic tags through automated generation


SemTag: SemTag Uses broad, shallow knowledge base TAP – lexical and taxonomic information about popular objects Music Movies Sports Etc.


SemTag: SemTag Problem: No write access to original document, so how do you annotate? Solution: Store annotations in a web-available database


SemTag: SemTag Semantic Label Bureau Separate store of semantic annotation information HTTP server that can be queried for annotation information Example Find all semantic tags for a given document Find all semantic tags for a particular object


SemTag: SemTag Methodology


SemTag: SemTag Three phases Spotting Pass: Tokenize the document All instances plus 20 word window Learning Pass: Find corpus-wide distribution of terms at each internal node of taxonomy Based on a representative sample Tagging Pass: Scan windows to disambiguate each reference Finally determined to be a TAP object


SemTag: SemTag Another problem magnified by the scale: Ambiguity Resolution Two fundamental categories of ambiguities: Some labels appear at multiple locations Some entities have labels that occur in contexts that have no representative in the taxonomy


SemTag: SemTag Solution: Taxonomy Based Disambiguation (TBD) TBD expectation: Human tuned parameters used in small, critical sections Automated approaches deal with bulk of information


SemTag: SemTag TBD methodology: Each node in the taxonomy is associated with a set of labels Cats, Football, Cars all contain “jaguar” Each label in the text is stored with a window of 20 words – the context Each node has an associated similarity function mapping a context to a similarity Higher similarity  more likely to contain a reference


SemTag: SemTag Similarity: Built a 200,000 word lexicon (200,100 most common – 100 most common) 200,000 dimensional vector space Training: spots (label, context) and correct node Estimated the distribution of terms for nodes Standard cosine similarity TFIDF vectors (context vs. node)


SemTag: SemTag References inside the taxonomy vs. References outside the taxonomy Multiple nodes: b = r  b != p(v) Is a context c appropriate for a node v


SemTag: SemTag Some internal nodes very popular: Associate a measurement of how accurate Sim is likely to be at a node Also, how ambiguous the node is overall (consistency of human judgment) TBD Algorithm: returns 1 or 0 to indicate whether a particular context c is on topic for a node v 82% accuracy on 434 million spots


SemTag: SemTag


Summary: Summary Information extraction can be motivated either as explicating more structure from the data or as an automated way to Semantic Web Extraction complexity depends on whether the text you have is “templated” or “free-form” Extraction from templated text can be done by regular expressions Extraction from free form text requires NLP Can be done in terms of parts-of-speech-tagging “Annotation” involves connecting terms in a free form text to items in the background knowledge It too can be automated