logging in or signing up B Pietrzyk040303 Nellwyn Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 19 Category: Product Traini.. License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: October 05, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Status of Bose-Einstein analysis: Status of Bose-Einstein analysis Bolek Pietrzyk LAPP Annecy-le-VieuxSlide2: changes in analysis Final ALEPH data Track selection adapted to final data Thanks to Isabelle De Bonis Evevt selection from the W mass group (v60) Thanks to Stephane Jezequel New global MC tuning BE32 Thanks to Gerald Rudolph and Brigitte Bloch BE analysis is very similar to the Frank’s Martin analysisSlide3: Mixed method in ALEPH We compare fully hadronic W-pair decay with events “constructed” from hadronic parts of two semileptonic events. Thus “constructed” (mixed) events have Bose-Einstein correlations in each W decay and no BE correlations between pions from different W’s. The Wqqbar(W1) of the first WWq1q2bar event is boosted to its center of mass frame. Then, it is boosted in such a way that the final W1 momentum is –PW2, where PW2 is the Momentum of the Wqqbar of the second WWq1q2ln event. W2 has opposite sign to W1. Slide4: today Comparison of new and old results (100 MeV) Go to 40 MeV binning Do some fits (D) and integrations (Dr) Systematics Some numbers Plans for the future Slide5: D’ with background Osaka 00 nowSlide6: D’ with and without background (now) with withoutSlide7: Dr with background Budapest 01 nowSlide8: Dr with and without background (now) with withoutSlide9: Dr without background Budapest 01 nowSlide10: D’ with different binning 100 MeV 40 MeVSlide11: D’ fit with fixed width (2 param.) D’(Q)=k(1+le-s2Q2) Data l=0.020+-0.012 k=0.991+-0.002 BEI BEB l=0.014+-0.005 k=0.999+-0.001 l=0.091+-0.005 k=0.993+-0.001 Data-BEI/BEB-BEI=8% (stat. uncert. only)Slide12: D’ fit (3 param.) D’(Q)=k(1+le-s2Q2) Data l=0.105+-0.049 s=6.99+-1.76 k=0.991+-0.002 BEI BEB l=0.030+-0.014 s=5.13+-1.41 k=0.999+-0.001 l=0.091+-0.007 s=2.61+-0.14 k=0.993+-0.001 I=0.0133 +-0.0046 I=0.0052 +-0.0017 I=0.0309 +-0.0017 Data-BEI/BEB-BEI=32% (stat. uncert. only)Slide13: Dr with different binning 100 MeV 40 MeVSlide14: Dr integration Data BEI BEB 6ch=0.075+-0.060 15ch=-0.101+-0.148 Integral 6ch=0.028+-0.021 15ch=0.022+-0.054 6ch=0.297+-0.022 15ch=0.743+-0.054 Data-BEI/BEB-BEI(6)=17% Data-BEI/BEB-BEI(15)=-17%Slide15: D’ like and unlike sign pairs like unlikeSlide16: Dr like and unlike sign pairs like unlikeSlide17: Track selection systematics on data no –BEI yetSlide18: Event selection systematics on data no –BEI yet Compare qqqq selection with NN cut 0.3 (W mass) and 0.05 (xsection)Slide19: Background subtraction Osaka 00 ALEPH global tuning l = 1.11 DELPHI global tuning l = 1.35 back. subtr. l = 0.9 ALEPH back.subtr. syst. l = 0.9Slide20: Background subtraction systematics on data no –BEI yetSlide21: Total systematics on data no –BEI yetSlide22: Not complete systematics on data (as today) D’ L D’integr Dr integr = 0.0065+-0.0128+-0.0120 (8% BEB-BEI) BEB-BEI = 0.0772 =-0.079+-0.148+-0.444 (-11%BEB-BEI) BEB-BEI = 0.721 =0.0081+-0.0046+-0.0040 (31% BEB-BEI) BEB-BEI = 0.0257 Bin-to-bin correlations are not included in stat. uncertainties BEI MC not included in sys. uncertaintiesSlide23: What to do? To do : Bin-to-bin correlations Finish systematics Correct by BEI instead of standard MC??? Planning : April 10th : draft 1 of the paper April 20th : inform other collaborations May 10th : draft 2 June 10th : submit paper to Editorial Board June 30th : Editorial Board Submit to summer conferences You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
B Pietrzyk040303 Nellwyn Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 19 Category: Product Traini.. License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: October 05, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Status of Bose-Einstein analysis: Status of Bose-Einstein analysis Bolek Pietrzyk LAPP Annecy-le-VieuxSlide2: changes in analysis Final ALEPH data Track selection adapted to final data Thanks to Isabelle De Bonis Evevt selection from the W mass group (v60) Thanks to Stephane Jezequel New global MC tuning BE32 Thanks to Gerald Rudolph and Brigitte Bloch BE analysis is very similar to the Frank’s Martin analysisSlide3: Mixed method in ALEPH We compare fully hadronic W-pair decay with events “constructed” from hadronic parts of two semileptonic events. Thus “constructed” (mixed) events have Bose-Einstein correlations in each W decay and no BE correlations between pions from different W’s. The Wqqbar(W1) of the first WWq1q2bar event is boosted to its center of mass frame. Then, it is boosted in such a way that the final W1 momentum is –PW2, where PW2 is the Momentum of the Wqqbar of the second WWq1q2ln event. W2 has opposite sign to W1. Slide4: today Comparison of new and old results (100 MeV) Go to 40 MeV binning Do some fits (D) and integrations (Dr) Systematics Some numbers Plans for the future Slide5: D’ with background Osaka 00 nowSlide6: D’ with and without background (now) with withoutSlide7: Dr with background Budapest 01 nowSlide8: Dr with and without background (now) with withoutSlide9: Dr without background Budapest 01 nowSlide10: D’ with different binning 100 MeV 40 MeVSlide11: D’ fit with fixed width (2 param.) D’(Q)=k(1+le-s2Q2) Data l=0.020+-0.012 k=0.991+-0.002 BEI BEB l=0.014+-0.005 k=0.999+-0.001 l=0.091+-0.005 k=0.993+-0.001 Data-BEI/BEB-BEI=8% (stat. uncert. only)Slide12: D’ fit (3 param.) D’(Q)=k(1+le-s2Q2) Data l=0.105+-0.049 s=6.99+-1.76 k=0.991+-0.002 BEI BEB l=0.030+-0.014 s=5.13+-1.41 k=0.999+-0.001 l=0.091+-0.007 s=2.61+-0.14 k=0.993+-0.001 I=0.0133 +-0.0046 I=0.0052 +-0.0017 I=0.0309 +-0.0017 Data-BEI/BEB-BEI=32% (stat. uncert. only)Slide13: Dr with different binning 100 MeV 40 MeVSlide14: Dr integration Data BEI BEB 6ch=0.075+-0.060 15ch=-0.101+-0.148 Integral 6ch=0.028+-0.021 15ch=0.022+-0.054 6ch=0.297+-0.022 15ch=0.743+-0.054 Data-BEI/BEB-BEI(6)=17% Data-BEI/BEB-BEI(15)=-17%Slide15: D’ like and unlike sign pairs like unlikeSlide16: Dr like and unlike sign pairs like unlikeSlide17: Track selection systematics on data no –BEI yetSlide18: Event selection systematics on data no –BEI yet Compare qqqq selection with NN cut 0.3 (W mass) and 0.05 (xsection)Slide19: Background subtraction Osaka 00 ALEPH global tuning l = 1.11 DELPHI global tuning l = 1.35 back. subtr. l = 0.9 ALEPH back.subtr. syst. l = 0.9Slide20: Background subtraction systematics on data no –BEI yetSlide21: Total systematics on data no –BEI yetSlide22: Not complete systematics on data (as today) D’ L D’integr Dr integr = 0.0065+-0.0128+-0.0120 (8% BEB-BEI) BEB-BEI = 0.0772 =-0.079+-0.148+-0.444 (-11%BEB-BEI) BEB-BEI = 0.721 =0.0081+-0.0046+-0.0040 (31% BEB-BEI) BEB-BEI = 0.0257 Bin-to-bin correlations are not included in stat. uncertainties BEI MC not included in sys. uncertaintiesSlide23: What to do? To do : Bin-to-bin correlations Finish systematics Correct by BEI instead of standard MC??? Planning : April 10th : draft 1 of the paper April 20th : inform other collaborations May 10th : draft 2 June 10th : submit paper to Editorial Board June 30th : Editorial Board Submit to summer conferences