Creating Valuable CitiesULI Asia ConferenceHong Kong 23 May 2006The Value of a Quality Environment: Creating Valuable Cities ULI Asia Conference Hong Kong 23 May 2006 The Value of a Quality Environment Fiona Waters
Director, GHK (HK) Ltd.
Clean Air, Purer Water, Open Space, a Better Harbour How Valuable Are They and can Hong Kong Afford Them?: Clean Air, Purer Water, Open Space, a Better Harbour How Valuable Are They and can Hong Kong Afford Them? ..We would have liked to Develop more Parks, Piazzas, Open Spaces, Cultural and Heritage Sites. But Where is the Money for All These Going to Come From?..
Linkages between a Quality Urban Environment and Competitiveness Underpin the Success of a City
Creation of Business Opportunities, more Investment, more Tourism
Community Benefits also Have a Value but it is not Expressed in Money Terms
Can Hong Kong Afford not to Have More Parks, Piazzas, Open Spaces etc?
Opinion Surveys etc provide Evidence but they do not Tell Us Values in Dollar Terms
Research Techniques Available
Better Understanding of Values and Preferences can Help Decision Making
Sustainable Development in Hong Kong: Sustainable Development in Hong Kong Sustainability Assessments in Hong Kong require Cost Benefit Analysis but Costs and Benefits that are difficult to Measure in Dollar Terms are generally Not Included
Example of Harbour Area Treatment Scheme
Calls for Studies which Help to Value the Environment/Culture/Heritage in Dollar Terms
Air Pollution
An Improved Harbour…
Valuing the Community Benefits of Improvements to the Planning and Development of the Harbour: Valuing the Community Benefits of Improvements to the Planning and Development of the Harbour Study Undertaken to Assess the Community Benefits of Improvements to the Planning and Development of the Harbour
Commissioned by the Harbour Business Forum (HBF)
Nearing Completion
Objective to Provide Estimates of the Community Value of Improvements to the Harbour
Two Issues Need to be Researched
Direction of Preference…More of ‘x’ is Better, Less of ‘y’ is Better
Strength of Preference…how Valuable is More of ‘x’ and Less of ‘y’
Establishing Direction of Preference is not Difficult – Ask People
But Researching Values More Complex and Requires Care
Direction of Preference Builds on the previous HBF Harbour Opinion Survey
Harbour Opinion Survey – Harbour is a Valuable Asset: Harbour Opinion Survey – Harbour is a Valuable Asset Telephone Survey of 1039 Hong Kong Residents, Reported in Feb 2006
80%+ Agreed that the Harbour was
Shared by all Hong Kong People
Valuable to Them
Symbolises the Success and Prosperity of Hong Kong
Less than Half rated the Harbour as Good/Very Good
Negative Associations were mainly due to
Water Quality (57%)
Reclamation (48%)
Air Quality (38%)
Level of Greening (31%)
Harbour Opinion Survey - A Future Harbour: Harbour Opinion Survey - A Future Harbour Unified Vision of What the Harbour Should Be
More Greening Areas (88%)
More Promenades (77%)
More Ground Level Access (73%)
Current Level of Resources Devoted to the Harbour is insufficient (58%)
More Resources should be Dedicated to the Harbour (89%)
Methods of Valuing Non Market Resources: Methods of Valuing Non Market Resources Revealed Preference – Value is Derived through the Analysis of Behaviour
Hedonic Price Models
Time Cost Models
Dose Response
Stated Preference –Value is Derived through Analysis of Surveys
Choice Modeling
Contingent Valuation
Contingent Valuation: Contingent Valuation Measures Value by Eliciting Willingness to Pay or Willingness to Accept
Developed in 1960’s Theory based on Simulation of a Market
Popular Name Arose because Elicited Values are Contingent upon Particular Scenario
Scenarios Presented in a Variety of Ways dependent on the Subject Matter, Resources, Culture etc
Verbal Description
Images
Video
Virtual Reality
Pros and Cons
Transparent and Direct Method
Main Challenge is for Respondents to Understand the Scenario or Outcome
Uses and Experience of Contingent Valuation: Uses and Experience of Contingent Valuation Contingent Valuation is Used For
Cost Benefit Analysis
Demonstration of Importance
Priority Setting
Design of Economic Instruments and Pricing
Legal Damage Assessment
Several Thousand Studies Undertaken Worldwide
Studies in Australia, Austria, Canada, China, Costa Rica, Finland, Germany, Italy, Kenya, Malaysia, Netherlands, Norway, New Zealand, Sweden, Taiwan, UK, USA, Vanuatu ….
World Bank – 184 member countries
Asian Development Bank – 65 member countries
Huge Range of Subjects: Protecting Rainforests, Noise, Air and Water Pollution, Endangered Species, Open Space in Urban Areas, Parks, Greenbelt Land
More Recently Culture and Heritage Assets as well as the Environment
Exxon Valdez Oil Spill: Exxon Valdez Oil Spill 1989 Exxon Valdez Oil Spill, 11 million Gallons of Crude Oil into Prince William Sound
Killed an estimated 250,000 seabirds, 2,800 sea otters, 300 harbour seals, 250 bald eagles, up to 22 killer whales, and an unknown number of salmon and herring
Impacts on Recreational Fishing, Tourism
Contingent Valuation Conducted Estimated Value of Preventing a Similar Future Accident
Estimated at US$2.8 billion, later Estimates up to US$7.2 billion
Court Settlement over US$1 billion, Exxon Estimated Clean Up Costs US$2 billion
Prompted National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to Review Use of Contingent Valuation, Expert Panel concluded that it provides Useful Information provided that Guidelines are met
In Practise has Led to Greater Use of Preventative Measures and Better Emergency Response Systems
The Bid for the London Olympics: The Bid for the London Olympics Contingent Valuation Commissioned by UK Department of Culture, Media and Sport
Undertaken by Economics for the Environment Consultancy Ltd (EFTEC)
Follows UK Treasury Greenbook Guidance on Valuation
Objective to Find out the Willingness to Pay of People both within and outside London for the Intangible Benefits of Hosting the 2012 Olympic Games
Study Surveyed Representative Samples of Residents: 602 in London and 201 outside
Results showed Average Household Willingness to Pay of £22 in London and £12 outside
Time Period was set for 10 years
Aggregate Value £3.2 billion over 10 years
Demonstrated the Communities Strength of Preference for the Bid
Helped to Justify and Support the Successful London Bid
Cultural Heritage Sites – the Historic Medina in Fez, Morocco: Cultural Heritage Sites – the Historic Medina in Fez, Morocco Contingent Valuation Commissioned by World Bank, Undertaken in 1997
Pioneering Effort in the Use of Contingent Valuation for Cultural Heritage Sites
Medina was in Need of Conservation and Rehabilitation of Housing Stock, Modernisation of Infrastructure and Environmental Improvements including Poor Air and Water Quality
Objective to Assess Willingness to Pay for such Improvements
Visitors to the Site (US$70 per person)
Non-visitors to the Site (US$30 per person)
Delphi Survey to Estimated Willingness to Pay of About US$12.1 (Mean) US$2.15 (Median)
European Households place a Relatively High Value on Restoration of the Fez Medina Even if only a Fraction of Benefits Received by Visitors could be Captured, this Would Exceed the Investment Requirements
World Bank Loan of US$14 Million Approved in October 1998
Centennial Park, Sydney: Centennial Park, Sydney Contingent Valuation, Funded by Centennial and Moore Park Trust
Undertaken by Senior Academics Lockwood and Tracey in 1995
Also included Estimate of Travel Cost as an Alternative Valuation Method
Covers 220 ha, more than 3.5 million visits per annum
Major activities include relaxation, picnics, walking, jogging, cycling, in line skating, cricket, soccer, football, hockey, musicals, outdoor cinema, theatre, art exhibitions and environmental education programs
Estimated Value Aus$23 million – Aus$33 million Helped to Justify the Expenditure of Public Money on Management and Maintenance
Foundation Set Up in 1998 to Enable People to Donate to Centennial Parklands for Environmental Projects
Recreation-Amenity Use of Urban Greenspaces in Guangzhou: Recreation-Amenity Use of Urban Greenspaces in Guangzhou Contingent Valuation, Academic Research by Department of Geography HKU
Professor C.Y. Jim and Wendy Y. Chen
Importance of Recreational Opportunities and Amenities Created by Green spaces
Small and Low Quality Sites Near Homes were Shunned
Accustomed to Paying Green space Entrance Fee
Willingness to Pay RMB17.40 /person/month, Higher than Actual Fee Payment
Aggregate Value RMB547 million per year, 6 times Guangzhou Expenditure on Urban Green space Verifies Applicability of Contingent Valuation to Urban Green spaces in China
Assist Cost Benefit Analysis to Justify More Resources?
Incorporating Public Opinions into Planning for Sustainable Cities
Clean Air, Purer Water, Open Space, a Better Harbour How Valuable Are They and can Hong Kong Afford Them?: Clean Air, Purer Water, Open Space, a Better Harbour How Valuable Are They and can Hong Kong Afford Them? Can Hong Kong Afford Improvements to the Urban Environment?
Opinion Surveys Have Clearly Demonstrated Community Preferences
Important for Long Term Competitiveness
Can We Afford Not To?
Research Techniques Used Elsewhere Could be Adopted and Adapted
Provide Better Information About the Strength of Preferences
Create a Place for Business, to Live, Work and Visit - a Valuable City with a Quality Environment