A Web accessibility Quality Mark in France: A Web accessibility Quality Mark in France Dominique BURGER
dburger@snv.jussieu.fr
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
chair of the  Association BrailleNet
INSERM: INSERM Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
Governmental Research Organisation
> 200 labs in France
5 000 employees
partnership with universities
www.inserm.fr
Association BrailleNet: Association BrailleNet Created in 1997
To develop research on the applications of Intrenet for visually handicapped persons and to develop services accordingly
> 40 member organisations
Associations
Manufacturers
Research organisations
Special schools
Hosted by University Paris 6 – Pierre et Marie Curie
www.braillenet.org
Where: Where
Here Eire
An understanding we share …: Accessibility represents an immense potential for the inclusion of people with disabilities
Access to Communication, E-books, E-learning, E-commerce, Tele-working, …
More than 20 billions euros are spend every year in France mainly to help people stay home (2,3M people) An understanding we share …
A basic concept …: A basic concept … ‘  A digital information system is accessible when the data and services it offers can be accessed by any user with different technical plate-forms ’
Slide7: An industrial problem
5 500 public Web sites in France, thousands elsewhere
Hundreds of Web agencies concerned
Great Variety of CMS systems, Assistive technologies
Very limited resources
No industrial solutio
NoTechnical training
No clear policies
How to encourage a better accessible Web for all ?
To share with you our experience and thoughts: To share with you our experience and thoughts
Find a way in a complex world: Find a way in a complex world A heuristic approach
Slide10: WAI BrailleNet 1997 WCAG1.0 1998-99 2000 2001-02 WAI-IST WAI-DA-IST WAI-TIES-IST Circulaire Livre Blanc Guide BrailleNet Résolutions, Council, Parliament CIRE AccessiWeb 2003 ADAE Law 11 feb 2005 WCAG2.0 e-Europe 2002 e-Europe 2005 2004 2005 EuroAccessibility Support-EAM
Outlines: Outlines How does Accessiweb works
Results
Conclusions
A Name, a Logo: A Name, a Logo A name that everybody can understand (in different languages) Human
Web
Movement (going in)
Clear simple
« Do respect the WAI »: « Do respect the WAI » People want a international standard
Make them confident
Save energy
Nothing better
Commitment to apply and defend the WCAG
Braillenet takes part in the WAI EO activities since 1998 (WAI; WAI-DA; WAI-TIES)
A label: A label People want their efforts be recognised
Stimulate competition
3 levels
Transparent (criterias are public)
Independent (3d party)
A gallery
Make people think better: Make people think better Coherence in the message (same concepts, termes, …)
Media (surveys, articles, proposals, …)
Conferences
Expert group
Charter
Discussion forum
Technical seminars
Inspection: Inspection Scope: a limited numebr of pages selected with owners
3 levels: Bronze, Silver, Gold
WC A AA AAA
Criterias 55 92
2-3 experts – at least one blind inspector
Detailed report
Publishable report (Summary)
Code of practice: Code of practice Country France
Provider Braillenet
Provider form  Non Profit
Validity of Quality Mark 2 years
Withdrawal conditions a) if website fails periodic evaluation (12 days time limit to repair) otherwise label is withdrawn ; b) at the end of contract
Frequency of controls Mandatory 1 year after awarding, controls may be made after 6 and 18 months (not mandatory)
Screening process In addition to periodic controls, complaints from users contribute to ongoing verification
Transparency for public a) Label displayed on homepage b) a gallery
Pricing Model Bronze (10pages)=2700€ Silver/Gold (10pages)=3600€ prices include 2 year periodic verifications and follow up Data protection Audit certificates (not detailed reports) are published
Marketing minimal marketing, BrailleNet notoriety sufficient
Publicity  Web site
Feedback / Complaints channel website owner has to provide channel for complaints; complaints are received by BrailleNet and transferred to owners (12 day time limit to repair, if not: withdrawal)
Results: Results
Accessibility is possibleYou can obtain from Web developers they respect technical constraints corresponding to accessibility requirement: Accessibility is possible You can obtain from Web developers they respect technical constraints corresponding to accessibility requirement
Accessibility makes usability easierExample: Grand Chalon and Readspeaker : Accessibility makes usability easier Example: Grand Chalon and Readspeaker
Public Recognition: Public Recognition Accessiweb adopted by the French Agency for the Development of e-Administration (ADAE) as part of their technical reference documents; after a call for comments
Web companies like it : Web companies like it june 2005: 59 member organisations (87 AccessiWeb Experts)
Actualys (1), Anazys (1), Arantis (1), ASCii (1), Atalan (4), Axance (1), Beesnet (1), BrailleNet (5), Business Interactif (6), Business Lab (1), CARDIWEB (1), CECIAA (1), CNRS (1), COM CI COM CA (1), Cosmosbay~vectis (5), CYO (1), Défi Sud (1), DRAC (1), DSI - Experts (1), e-dealiz (1), Eolas (1), Equallia (2), Eric GATEAU (1), Jean-Pierre GAY (1), Didier GRAS (1), Pierre GUICHARD (1), IPEOS (1), ITG Conseil (1), Idéal Productions (1), Euro-Information (2), Pascal LANDEAU (1), Philippe LECA (1), Christine LEPROUX (1), Christian LIEVRE (1), MAAPAR (2), Institut Montéclair (1), Neurosys (1), Nexint (1), Open-S (1), Groupe Optium (2), François PALACI (1), pixfl (1), PointCentral (1), Jean-Michel RAMOS (1), Nathalie RANDON (1), ReadSpeaker (1), groupe Reflect (1), Rezonova (1), Rénato SABA (1), Smart Agence (1), Groupe SQLI (6), TBWA-Interactive (1), TDF (1), Tektonika (2), Témésis (1), Urbilog (2), V-Technologies (2), Wcube-eQuesto (1), Webside (1)
Influence on the Quality Process: Intégration
graphique
et contenu Modélisation Base de données Développement des scripts d’accès aux données Assistance rédactionnelle Tests
globaux Déploiement pilote Recette et Tests utilisateurs Modifications Mise en exploitation
Version 1 Transfert
de compétences Spécifications
fonctionnelles
détaillées Spécifications techniques Spécifications ergonomiques Paramétrage des outils de recherche Réalisation graphique L a n c e m e n t
Validation Validation Validation Mise en ligne Suivi de projet Documentation Design development Exploitation Pilot Follow Up Assistance Analyse des connexions Référencement
Décisions sur l'architecture globale du site
Choix de l'architecture technique
Décisions
Sur la stratégie
de
référencement Accessibility Process Charte de navigation Normative validation User centered design Test :
Multi plateform
Multi devices
Multi browser
Multi user More precise functional specification Contents shall be structured Customisation shall be considered Influence on the Quality Process Frédéric Dulac, FR
A community of interest: A community of interest AccessiWeb Working Group
60 organisations (at least 1 expert)
Commitments to reinforce accessibility, to respect the WCAG
Active in technical seminars
Lobbying force
Future Challenges: Future Challenges Large Scale Training
International harmonisation
ISO Certification ?
Large ScaleTraining: Large ScaleTraining Universities, technical universities
Engineering schools
Distance training
(Experimental) professional training launched with the university Paris 6 in october
International harmonisation: International harmonisation
Babel accessibility ?: Babel accessibility ? AccessiWeb arg&@#@ !!! Drempelvrij... SeeItRight ! Biene Award BlindSurfer ? Euroaccessibility Support-EAM
ISO Certification ?: ISO Certification ? Could be an ultimate goal
Complexity
Obstacles
Many questions
Support EAM is exploring that possibility
Thank you for your attention: Thank you for your attention www.braillenet.org
www.accessiweb.org
www.support-eam.org
www.serveur-helene.org
Contact : dburger@snv.jussieu.fr