logging in or signing up Trasparenze Paola Gen2003 Misree Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 38 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: January 04, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide1: Virgo Collaboration Meeting Cascina – January 20-22, 2003 Measurements of non linear effects between the marionetta arms and the coils Edoardo Bompiani and Paola Puppo Virgo – Rome group Measurements on the marionetta: with AISI304 arms; with Al6063 arms; with steel AISI316L arms; discussion of the results; ConclusionsExperimental Setup: Virgo Collaboration Meeting Cascina – January 20-22, 2003 Experimental Setup We have used a payload prototype similar to the test masses one The mirror displacement was monitored using a camera looking at the markers placed on the mirror, like in the Virgo Payloads. Two kinds of measurements were performed: DC measurements: a costant current I were injected in the coils (same sign) with magnets without magnets AC measurements: a sinusoidal current I at the frequency n were injected in the coils in counter-phase in order to have a traslation along z; with magnetsSlide3: Virgo Collaboration Meeting Cascina – January 20-22, 2003 DC Measurements with the magnets attached on the arms: The measurement of the alinear is performedSlide4: Virgo Collaboration Meeting Cascina – January 20-22, 2003 alinear = (31.5 ± 0.7) mN/A = (319 ± 3) mrad/A DC Measurements without magnets: Virgo Collaboration Meeting Cascina – January 20-22, 2003 DC Measurements without magnets With steel AISI304 arms: aquadratic = (- 30.3 ± 0.7) mN/A2 With steel AISI316L arms: aquadratic = (- 180 ± 10) mN/A2 With Al6063 arms: aquadratic = (- 23 ± 3) mN/A2Slide6: Virgo Collaboration Meeting Cascina – January 20-22, 2003 Force due to magnetization: Fm = = mo cm I2 ∂W (z) ∂z ∂G (z) ∂z where W (z) = mo cm (H (z))2t is the magnetic energy of the arms having a form factor t and (H(z))2 ≈ I2 G(z) is the coil magnetic field squared. cm is the magnetic susceptibility The measured forces are given by a DC effect and are attractive. As a consequence they cannot be due to eddy current effects but to magnetization effects. Force due to magnetization:Slide7: Virgo Collaboration Meeting Cascina – January 20-22, 2003 AC Measurements with the magnets attached on the arms: I=Io sin(wt) Þ F = Fqyo (w, Io2) + Fqy (w, Io2) (cos(2wt)) Fqyo (w, Io2) = Fmagn/2 + Fe.c DC (w) Io2 ; Fqy (w, Io2) = Fmagn/2 + Fe.c. (w) Io2AC Measurements: steel arms (@1.4 Hz): Virgo Collaboration Meeting Cascina – January 20-22, 2003 AC Measurements: steel arms (@1.4 Hz) With steel AISI304 arms: attractive force aquadratic = (- 10 ± 1) mN/A2 With steel AISI316L arms: attractive force aquadratic = (- 63 ± 3) mN/A2 mNSlide9: Virgo Collaboration Meeting Cascina – January 20-22, 2003 With Al6063 arms: repulsive force aquadratic = (31 ± 2) mN/A2 AC Measurements: Al6063 arms (@1.8 Hz)Slide10: Virgo Collaboration Meeting Cascina – January 20-22, 2003 The measured forces are given by an AC effect. As a consequence they could be due both to eddy current effects and to magnetization effects. Force due to eddy current: Feddy = mo s F (z) w I2 = aeddy w I2 where F (z) is a form factor taking into account the coils and arms geometry and s is electrical conductivity of the arms. The eddy current depends on the driving frequency w. With PVC arms: aquadratic = (- 0.25 ± 0.25) mN/A2AC Measurements: steel arms: Virgo Collaboration Meeting Cascina – January 20-22, 2003 AC Measurements: steel arms mN/A2 AISI 304 AISI316L Slide12: Virgo Collaboration Meeting Cascina – January 20-22, 2003 mN/A2 Eddy current residual effect on Steel AISI 316L arms compared with Al6063 eddy currents effect.Slide13: Virgo Collaboration Meeting Cascina – January 20-22, 2003 Discussion AISI304 Arms: DC measurements: aquadratic m = (- 30.3 ± 0.7) mN/A2 AC measurements: aquadratic m = (- 20 ± 1) mN/A2 due to unexpected magnetization of the material Al6063 Arms: DC measurements: aquadratic m = (- 23 ± 3) mN/A2 magnetization AC measurements due to a strong eddy currents effect. PVC Arms: aquadratic = (- 0.25 ± 0.25) mN/A2 the marionetta body does not generate any quadratic effect. AISI316L Arms: DC measurements: aquadratic m = (- 180 ± 10) mN/A2 AC measurements due to eddy currents and magnetization. Eddy current effect » 2 mN/A2/HzSlide14: Virgo Collaboration Meeting Cascina – January 20-22, 2003 Conclusions Arms made in the amagnetic steel AIS316L, with cm = 5 10-3 r = 1/s = 4.5 10-7 W/m. Fmagn. = 1/10 Fcoils @ I=18 A Fe.c. (1 Hz) = 1/10 Fcoils @ I=1600 ATime and costs: Virgo Collaboration Meeting Cascina – January 20-22, 2003 Time and costs 6 series of marionetta arms Needed Time: Material: 2 working weeks; Machining: 1 working month. Costs for both material and machining 1 serie costs 3000 Euro + IVA Total: 18000 Euro + IVA The substitution of the arms can be done without disassembling the payload, by using the new payload safety structure. You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
Trasparenze Paola Gen2003 Misree Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 38 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: January 04, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide1: Virgo Collaboration Meeting Cascina – January 20-22, 2003 Measurements of non linear effects between the marionetta arms and the coils Edoardo Bompiani and Paola Puppo Virgo – Rome group Measurements on the marionetta: with AISI304 arms; with Al6063 arms; with steel AISI316L arms; discussion of the results; ConclusionsExperimental Setup: Virgo Collaboration Meeting Cascina – January 20-22, 2003 Experimental Setup We have used a payload prototype similar to the test masses one The mirror displacement was monitored using a camera looking at the markers placed on the mirror, like in the Virgo Payloads. Two kinds of measurements were performed: DC measurements: a costant current I were injected in the coils (same sign) with magnets without magnets AC measurements: a sinusoidal current I at the frequency n were injected in the coils in counter-phase in order to have a traslation along z; with magnetsSlide3: Virgo Collaboration Meeting Cascina – January 20-22, 2003 DC Measurements with the magnets attached on the arms: The measurement of the alinear is performedSlide4: Virgo Collaboration Meeting Cascina – January 20-22, 2003 alinear = (31.5 ± 0.7) mN/A = (319 ± 3) mrad/A DC Measurements without magnets: Virgo Collaboration Meeting Cascina – January 20-22, 2003 DC Measurements without magnets With steel AISI304 arms: aquadratic = (- 30.3 ± 0.7) mN/A2 With steel AISI316L arms: aquadratic = (- 180 ± 10) mN/A2 With Al6063 arms: aquadratic = (- 23 ± 3) mN/A2Slide6: Virgo Collaboration Meeting Cascina – January 20-22, 2003 Force due to magnetization: Fm = = mo cm I2 ∂W (z) ∂z ∂G (z) ∂z where W (z) = mo cm (H (z))2t is the magnetic energy of the arms having a form factor t and (H(z))2 ≈ I2 G(z) is the coil magnetic field squared. cm is the magnetic susceptibility The measured forces are given by a DC effect and are attractive. As a consequence they cannot be due to eddy current effects but to magnetization effects. Force due to magnetization:Slide7: Virgo Collaboration Meeting Cascina – January 20-22, 2003 AC Measurements with the magnets attached on the arms: I=Io sin(wt) Þ F = Fqyo (w, Io2) + Fqy (w, Io2) (cos(2wt)) Fqyo (w, Io2) = Fmagn/2 + Fe.c DC (w) Io2 ; Fqy (w, Io2) = Fmagn/2 + Fe.c. (w) Io2AC Measurements: steel arms (@1.4 Hz): Virgo Collaboration Meeting Cascina – January 20-22, 2003 AC Measurements: steel arms (@1.4 Hz) With steel AISI304 arms: attractive force aquadratic = (- 10 ± 1) mN/A2 With steel AISI316L arms: attractive force aquadratic = (- 63 ± 3) mN/A2 mNSlide9: Virgo Collaboration Meeting Cascina – January 20-22, 2003 With Al6063 arms: repulsive force aquadratic = (31 ± 2) mN/A2 AC Measurements: Al6063 arms (@1.8 Hz)Slide10: Virgo Collaboration Meeting Cascina – January 20-22, 2003 The measured forces are given by an AC effect. As a consequence they could be due both to eddy current effects and to magnetization effects. Force due to eddy current: Feddy = mo s F (z) w I2 = aeddy w I2 where F (z) is a form factor taking into account the coils and arms geometry and s is electrical conductivity of the arms. The eddy current depends on the driving frequency w. With PVC arms: aquadratic = (- 0.25 ± 0.25) mN/A2AC Measurements: steel arms: Virgo Collaboration Meeting Cascina – January 20-22, 2003 AC Measurements: steel arms mN/A2 AISI 304 AISI316L Slide12: Virgo Collaboration Meeting Cascina – January 20-22, 2003 mN/A2 Eddy current residual effect on Steel AISI 316L arms compared with Al6063 eddy currents effect.Slide13: Virgo Collaboration Meeting Cascina – January 20-22, 2003 Discussion AISI304 Arms: DC measurements: aquadratic m = (- 30.3 ± 0.7) mN/A2 AC measurements: aquadratic m = (- 20 ± 1) mN/A2 due to unexpected magnetization of the material Al6063 Arms: DC measurements: aquadratic m = (- 23 ± 3) mN/A2 magnetization AC measurements due to a strong eddy currents effect. PVC Arms: aquadratic = (- 0.25 ± 0.25) mN/A2 the marionetta body does not generate any quadratic effect. AISI316L Arms: DC measurements: aquadratic m = (- 180 ± 10) mN/A2 AC measurements due to eddy currents and magnetization. Eddy current effect » 2 mN/A2/HzSlide14: Virgo Collaboration Meeting Cascina – January 20-22, 2003 Conclusions Arms made in the amagnetic steel AIS316L, with cm = 5 10-3 r = 1/s = 4.5 10-7 W/m. Fmagn. = 1/10 Fcoils @ I=18 A Fe.c. (1 Hz) = 1/10 Fcoils @ I=1600 ATime and costs: Virgo Collaboration Meeting Cascina – January 20-22, 2003 Time and costs 6 series of marionetta arms Needed Time: Material: 2 working weeks; Machining: 1 working month. Costs for both material and machining 1 serie costs 3000 Euro + IVA Total: 18000 Euro + IVA The substitution of the arms can be done without disassembling the payload, by using the new payload safety structure.