Presentation Transcript
Living Landscapes Program : Living Landscapes Program Using conceptual models to show how we think biodiversity is lost and how it can be conserved
Seeing your project clearly : Seeing your project clearly Conservation Target Interventions Threats
Conceptual Model : Conceptual Model Goal Conservation Target Conservation Target Threat (Direct) Threat (Direct) Threat (Direct) Threat (Direct) Threat (Indirect) Threat (Indirect) Threat (Indirect) Intervention Intervention Intervention Intervention
Different terms : Different terms Goal Target Target Barrier (Direct) Barrier (Direct) Barrier (Direct) Barrier (Direct) Barrier (Indirect) Barrier (Indirect) Barrier (Indirect) Opportunity Opportunity Opportunity Opportunity
Comparision to problem tree : Comparision to problem tree
Comparision to logframes : Comparision to logframes Source: A guide for project M&E, IFAD GOAL COMPONENT OUTPUT ACTIVTTY OUTPUT ACTIVTTY OUTPUT OUTPUT
Goal : Goal Goal
Conserve wildlife and their habitat in the Mamiraua landscape over the long-term Goal
Preserve ecosystem function and viable populations of all wildlife in the Apolobamba region Goal
Conserve biodiversity in Belize’s mangrove forests
Conservation Targets : Conservation Targets Desired State
Viable populations of black howlers are conserved across the Peten Desired State
The density of jaguar recovers to levels comparable to Cockscomb, Belize Desired State
Forest habitat within the park remains unfragmented Conservation Target
Black howlers Conservation Target
Jaguar Conservation Target
Forest habitat within the park
Roles of targets : Roles of targets They focus our conservation planning
Targets are proxies for all the flora, fauna and ecological functions within a landscape
Conservation of a target or suite of targets should ensure that you reach your conservation goal
If not then you may need additional targets
Picking targets : Picking targets
Picking targets : Picking targets
Important attributes : Important attributes Area demanding
Functional role
Threatened by human activities
Charismatic
Can be monitored directly or indirectly
Direct Threat : Direct Threat Actor
Non-local market hunters Actor
Local zoning board Actor
Multi-national firm Actor
Park service Actor
Energy Ministry Threat (Direct)
Unsustainable hunting Threat (Direct)
Housing development Threat (Direct)
Unsustainable logging Threat (Direct)
Expansion of water lily Threat (Direct)
Oil spill Habitat Loss
Population depletion
Pollution
Invasion of exotic species
Indirect Threat : Indirect Threat Actor
District Council Actor
Fish and Wildlife Police Actor
Lower House of Parliament Actor
Ministry of Environment Staff Actor
Protected Area Managers Threat (Indirect)
No zoning regulations Threat (Indirect)
Inadequate law enforcement Threat (Indirect)
Policy promotes road building Threat (Indirect)
Conservation impacts unknown Threat (Indirect)
Management needs of wildlife unknown Management Capacity
Awareness and interest
Policies, laws, regulations
Interventions : Interventions Actor
Ministry staff Actor
Ecoguards Actor
Govt staff & NGO Actor
Ranch owner Actor
NGO & Local community Actor
NGO Intervention
Policy reform Intervention
Law enforcement Intervention
Staff training Intervention
Fence repair Intervention
Land mapping & zoning Intervention
Applied research Protected areas
Resource management
Law and policy
Knowledge and awareness
Incentives
Capacity building
Prioritizing interventions : Prioritizing interventions Strengths and weaknesses of your own organization
Role of other organizations and actors
Authority to take action
Severity of direct threats
Sufficient to effect change
Process : Process Threat (Indirect) Threat (Indirect) Threat (Indirect) Goal Threat (Direct) Threat (Direct) Threat (Direct) Threat (Direct) Conservation Target Conservation Target Conservation Target
Process : Process Threat (Indirect) Threat (Indirect) Threat (Indirect) Goal Threat (Direct) Threat (Direct) Threat (Direct) Threat (Direct) Conservation Target Conservation Target Conservation Target Intervention Intervention Intervention Intervention
Conceptual model : Goal
Conserve wildlife and their habitat in the Putumayo landscape over the long term Conservation Target
White-lipped peccary Conservation Target
Native landcover Conservation Target
Giant otter Threat (Direct)
Unsustainable hunting Threat (Direct)
Unsustainable fishing Threat (Direct)
Dieoffs from oil pollution Threat (Direct)
Farming and Ranching Threat (Direct)
Logging Threat (Indirect)
Park borders not enforced Threat (Indirect)
Weak mgmt capacity Threat (Indirect)
Lack of planning skills Threat (Indirect)
Lack of planning info Threat (Indirect)
Anarchic colonization Threat (Indirect)
Insecure land tenure Intervention
Land titling Intervention
Gov. capacity Intervention
FCUNAE training Intervention
Research on wildlife Intervention
Monitor land use Intervention
Info to oil watch Conceptual model
Divide and simplify : Divide and simplify Goal Conservation Target Conservation Target Threat (Direct) Threat (Direct) Threat (Direct) Threat (Direct) Threat (Indirect) Threat (Indirect) Threat (Indirect) Intervention Intervention Intervention Intervention Goal
Working group instructions : Working group instructions Steps
2:30 hrs conceptual model building
Overview of project – 10 minutes
Goal – 15 minutes
Conservation targets – 40 minutes
Direct and Indirect threats – 40 minutes
Causal chains & networks – 15 minutes
Interventions – 30 minutes
Attach cards to flip-chart paper or the wall
Take a Digital Photo!
Catch the
buzz on authorSTREAM
Copyright © 2002-2008 authorSTREAM. All rights reserved.