Presentation Transcript
Knoxville External Video Survey:Background & Status Report: Knoxville External Video Survey: Background & Status Report Tennessee Model Users Group Meeting
October 24, 2007
Why conduct the survey ?: Why conduct the survey ? Background:
Why conduct the survey?
Why a video camera license plate matching method?
Knoxville Survey Specifics
Station Locations
Volumes
Date / Time
Cameras
Data entry
Database Matching Program
Reports – Stay tuned !
Why conduct the survey ?: Why conduct the survey ? Background:
Why conduct the survey?
Why a video camera license plate matching method?
Knoxville Survey Specifics
Station Locations
Volumes
Date / Time
Cameras
Data entry
Database Matching Program
Reports – Stay tuned !
Why conduct the survey ?: Why conduct the survey ? Preparation for major model update and LRP
Significant discrepancy between external flows in the Statewide Model vs. the Knoxville Regional Model
Slide5: TDOT Statewide Model vs. KRTDM External Travel Comparison Order-of-magnitude cordon line volumes more realistic in KRTDM: 323,316 cordon line ADT in 2006.
Considerable more travel through the Knoxville region in the Statewide Model.
Much higher percent of trucks traveling through the Knoxville region in the Statewide Model
Slide6: External Station Locations I-75 South I-40 West I-75 North US 11 East I-81 North I-40 East
Slide7: ADT Comparisons by External Stations KRTDM volumes at external stations generally more accurate than Statewide Model
Slide8: Total Trip Comparisons by External Station & Vehicle Class KRTDM: More trucks crossing the cordon line
Statewide: More auto trips crossing the cordon line
At major stations, volumes are in the same “order-of-magnitude”.
Slide9: External-External (EE) Trip Comparisons by External Stations By station, the % differences of external trips are high, even at the major stations.
Much of this is due to the larger number of external trips in the Statewide Model across the board.
Slide10: Percent of External-External (EE) Auto Trips – External Stations Both models have external trips generally where you would expect them.
At major stations, Statewide model has higher %’s of external auto trips.
Slide11: Percent of External-External (EE) Truck Trips – External Stations At major stations, %’s of external truck trips are much higher in the Statewide Model vs. the KRTDM.
Slide12: Major O-D Differences between KRTDM and Statewide Models: Ex-Ex Auto Trips
Slide13: Major O-D Differences between KRTDM and Statewide Models: Ex-Ex Truck Trips
Slide14: Order-of-magnitude aggregate cordon line volumes more realistic in KRTDM: 323,316 cordon line ADT in 2006. Same holds true at individual stations.
Considerable more travel through the Knoxville region in the Statewide Model.
Much higher percent of trucks traveling through the Knoxville region in the Statewide Model.
KRTDM: More trucks crossing the cordon line.
Statewide: More auto trips crossing the cordon line.
At major stations, Statewide model has higher %’s of external auto trips.
At major stations, Statewide model has much higher %’s of external truck trips.
Summary of KRTDM-Statewide Model Comparison of External Travel
Why conduct the survey ?: Why conduct the survey ? Background:
Why conduct the survey?
Why a video camera license plate matching method?
Knoxville Survey Specifics
Station Locations
Volumes
Date / Time
Cameras
Data entry
Database Matching Program
Reports – Stay tuned !
Alternative Methods: Alternative Methods Roadside Interviews
Great data at reasonable cost. However….
Very dangerous; on-site law enforcement a virtual necessity
Some states have outlawed it or have strict policies against it.
Indiana’s Attorney General gave a legal opinion that method violates legal conditions for pulling over traffic
Always unpopular – Expect a mad phone call from the Mayor’s Office
License Plate / Post Card Survey
Poor quality data for lots of reasons …
Requires fast data reduction and timely cooperation with State BMV, which rarely happens
Should have cooperation of multiple state BMVs, which rarely happens
Respondent memory lapse in the intervening weeks
Poor response rate and likely biased – No sample control
Alternative Methods: Alternative Methods License Plate Matching using Digital Automated Character Recognition
Advantages:
No interruption in the flow of traffic
Relatively safe
Capture rate of trucks is relatively high vs. License Plate / Post Card Method
Out-of-state vehicles are captured in the in the sample
No need for timely cooperation with BMVs
No memory lapse
No sample control issues
Disadvantages:
Detailed trip information is lost
Hyper-expensive due to the cost of high-end camera equipment with character recognition software
Severe limitation on the number of stations
Alternative Methods: Alternative Methods License Plate Matching using Video / Surveillance Camera Technology and Human Data Reduction
Advantages:
No interruption in the flow of traffic
Relatively safe
Capture rate of trucks is relatively high vs. License Plate / Post Card Method
Out-of-state vehicles are captured in the in the sample
No need for timely cooperation with BMVs
No memory lapse
No sample control issues
Reasonable cost
Disadvantages:
Detailed trip information cannot be collected
Practical limit to the number of stations
Knoxville Survey Specifics: Knoxville Survey Specifics Background:
Why conduct the survey?
Why a video camera license plate matching method?
Knoxville Specifics
Station Locations
Volumes
Date / Time
Cameras
Data entry
Database Matching Program
Reports – Stay tuned !
Slide20: I-40 West
Roane-Cumberland County Line I-75 North
Anderson-Campbell County Line I-40 East
Jefferson-Cocke County Line I-81 North
Jefferson-Hamblen County Line US 11 East
Jefferson-Hamblen
County Line I-75 South
Loudon-Monroe County Line Locations of Survey Stations Video camera Survey conducted:
September 18, 2007
7am – 7pm
Slide21: I-40 West 42,200 ADT
24-Hour Trucks 37%
6am-6pm Trucks 61% I-75 North 42,100 ADT
24-Hour Trucks 41%
6am-6pm Trucks 44% I-40 East 28,700 ADT
24-Hour Trucks 41%
6am-6pm Trucks 61% I-81 North 33,800 ADT
24-Hour Trucks 38%
6am-6pm Trucks 64% US 11 East 21,500 ADT
24-Hour Trucks 10%
6am-6pm Trucks 14% I-75 South 40,500 ADT
24-Hr Trucks 28%
6pm-6am Trucks 45% Cordon Line Traffic Volumes & Trucks %’s Note: All numbers are subject to change. Counts will be verified against videotapes and vehicles classifications re-calibrated based on visual verification.
Cameras: Cameras One camera-per-lane powered by marine batteries
Standard video and surveillance equipment
Records to videotape or digital tape and converted to DVD
Slide23: Tedious, but the human eye beats automated character recognition.
90%+ recognition of all auto plate characters
65%+ recognition of all truck plate characters Data Entry
Database & Matching Program: Database & Matching Program
Database & Matching Program: Database & Matching Program Program allows matches for any time slices
User-specified elapsed time between each station pair
Makes probabilistic “wild card” matches when there are unrecognized characters
User-specified treatment of missing plates
Reports will …: Reports will … For unobserved hours sample data are expanded using off-peak match rates by vehicle class; user-experimentation allowed
Trip tables will be by…
Time-of-day periods to match model
Auto, Single-Unit, and Combination Trucks
Additional vehicle class detail is possible
Status Report: Status Report Data entry about one-third complete
Scheduled completion for data entry - Thanksgiving
Report Delivery – Year End
Slide28: thank you !