logging in or signing up environmental technology preliminary findings marc Mentor Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 434 Category: Science & Tech.. License: All Rights Reserved Like it (1) Dislike it (0) Added: September 07, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Environmental technology - Norway: Environmental technology - Norway Experience from governmental instruments www.miljoteknologi.no Statoil and Shell: Statoil and Shell Innovation policy - Norway : Innovation policy - Norway Ministry of trade and industry, 2003: Plan for a Comprehensive Innovation Policy: Norway shall be one of the most innovative countries in the world, where resourceful and creative enterprises and people are given opportunities for developing profitable business. Norway shall be in the lead internationally in important areas, in terms of knowledge, technology and wealth creation. The Environmental Technology Project – Pollution control Authority (SFT): The Environmental Technology Project – Pollution control Authority (SFT) White paper Ministry of Environment (ME) 2004: SFT - 'Make Norway become an Environmental technology nation' Win-win: employment and environmental effects SFT project reports 2005/2006: Governmental activities for environmental technology (ET) – historical view/evaluation Drivers and barriers Instruments/efforts www.miljoteknologi.no Slide5: 2005 COLLECT INFO - Mapping and analysis Dialogue with stakeholders 'Learning by doing' 2006 PROPOSE CHANGE In cooperation with stake-holders pro-pose measures to promote development and use 2007 MAKE CHANGE Permanent organizing of priority tasks to promote development and use ACCEPTED 'our' job ACCEPTED we contribute ideas given to others Left ideas The SFT project Public research and innovations instruments targeting environmental technology (ET): Public research and innovations instruments targeting environmental technology (ET) Exclusively target ET General 1990 2005 1996 ET-progr. + FORFOR + Normil, NFR ET-grants, SFT Ekspomil, NFR Norviron, Exsp.council Environm.- fund, ME/IN CLIMIT, NFR Grants. Institutes, NFR ENOVA/GASSNOVA IN Forny, NFR Skattefunn, NFR ET-proj. SFT Source: Tor-Petter Johnsen (2005) www.miljoteknologi.no Verdikt/Nanomat/Fuge, NFR Renergi, NFR TREND Guaranties, ME Brukerstyrt innovasjonsarena Eksperience from instrument exclusively targeting ET 1988-2004 (1,2 bill. NOK):: Eksperience from instrument exclusively targeting ET 1988-2004 (1,2 bill. NOK): Effects for institutes, researchers ao.: Increased level of knowledge Integration in higher education Strengthen contact with industry International competitiveness Solid basis for future Slide8: Industrial effects: No 'locomotives' A few successes Water/waste treatment, surveillance systems.. Many disappointed stakeholders Low demand Reduced public ambitions Nitrogen removing, polluted soil/sediments Experience from instrument exclusively targeting ET 1988-2004 (1,2 bill. NOK): Barrieres:: Barrieres: Lack of demand Functionality Risks Are the costumers environmentally conscious? Environmental regulation can be barriers Only national In conflict with other regulations or goals Driving forces: : Companies invest in Randamp;D to maintain and strengthen competitiveness For environmental technologies, regulations are more significant drivers than traditional market mechanisms But regulations must be well adapted to business needs Timing: development of new technologies takes time Costs National and international regulations Dialogue between government and industry/business Driving forces: Slide11: Recommendations: Improve our (SFTs) technology expertise, and get involved in policy development outside our immediate area of responsibility Integrate the development of environmental technologies in policy development for each governmental sector New economic incentives should be integrated in existing financial instruments through increased budgets and focus on users’ needs Better co-ordination of financial and regulatory instruments among governmental agencies, e.g. 'saksbehandlerutvalget' Aim for 'fine tuning' of instruments – not one-sided focus on supply or demand sides instruments Learn from experiences with oil/fish export – how to get into export markets - marketing Technology research is important for the environment – developing new ET: Technology research is important for the environment – developing new ET Potential for avoiding environmental damage Reduced opportunities for influence Environmental damage Research Dev./Design Production Consume/waste Fig dev. from Rejeski 2003: You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
environmental technology preliminary findings marc Mentor Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINT Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 434 Category: Science & Tech.. License: All Rights Reserved Like it (1) Dislike it (0) Added: September 07, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Environmental technology - Norway: Environmental technology - Norway Experience from governmental instruments www.miljoteknologi.no Statoil and Shell: Statoil and Shell Innovation policy - Norway : Innovation policy - Norway Ministry of trade and industry, 2003: Plan for a Comprehensive Innovation Policy: Norway shall be one of the most innovative countries in the world, where resourceful and creative enterprises and people are given opportunities for developing profitable business. Norway shall be in the lead internationally in important areas, in terms of knowledge, technology and wealth creation. The Environmental Technology Project – Pollution control Authority (SFT): The Environmental Technology Project – Pollution control Authority (SFT) White paper Ministry of Environment (ME) 2004: SFT - 'Make Norway become an Environmental technology nation' Win-win: employment and environmental effects SFT project reports 2005/2006: Governmental activities for environmental technology (ET) – historical view/evaluation Drivers and barriers Instruments/efforts www.miljoteknologi.no Slide5: 2005 COLLECT INFO - Mapping and analysis Dialogue with stakeholders 'Learning by doing' 2006 PROPOSE CHANGE In cooperation with stake-holders pro-pose measures to promote development and use 2007 MAKE CHANGE Permanent organizing of priority tasks to promote development and use ACCEPTED 'our' job ACCEPTED we contribute ideas given to others Left ideas The SFT project Public research and innovations instruments targeting environmental technology (ET): Public research and innovations instruments targeting environmental technology (ET) Exclusively target ET General 1990 2005 1996 ET-progr. + FORFOR + Normil, NFR ET-grants, SFT Ekspomil, NFR Norviron, Exsp.council Environm.- fund, ME/IN CLIMIT, NFR Grants. Institutes, NFR ENOVA/GASSNOVA IN Forny, NFR Skattefunn, NFR ET-proj. SFT Source: Tor-Petter Johnsen (2005) www.miljoteknologi.no Verdikt/Nanomat/Fuge, NFR Renergi, NFR TREND Guaranties, ME Brukerstyrt innovasjonsarena Eksperience from instrument exclusively targeting ET 1988-2004 (1,2 bill. NOK):: Eksperience from instrument exclusively targeting ET 1988-2004 (1,2 bill. NOK): Effects for institutes, researchers ao.: Increased level of knowledge Integration in higher education Strengthen contact with industry International competitiveness Solid basis for future Slide8: Industrial effects: No 'locomotives' A few successes Water/waste treatment, surveillance systems.. Many disappointed stakeholders Low demand Reduced public ambitions Nitrogen removing, polluted soil/sediments Experience from instrument exclusively targeting ET 1988-2004 (1,2 bill. NOK): Barrieres:: Barrieres: Lack of demand Functionality Risks Are the costumers environmentally conscious? Environmental regulation can be barriers Only national In conflict with other regulations or goals Driving forces: : Companies invest in Randamp;D to maintain and strengthen competitiveness For environmental technologies, regulations are more significant drivers than traditional market mechanisms But regulations must be well adapted to business needs Timing: development of new technologies takes time Costs National and international regulations Dialogue between government and industry/business Driving forces: Slide11: Recommendations: Improve our (SFTs) technology expertise, and get involved in policy development outside our immediate area of responsibility Integrate the development of environmental technologies in policy development for each governmental sector New economic incentives should be integrated in existing financial instruments through increased budgets and focus on users’ needs Better co-ordination of financial and regulatory instruments among governmental agencies, e.g. 'saksbehandlerutvalget' Aim for 'fine tuning' of instruments – not one-sided focus on supply or demand sides instruments Learn from experiences with oil/fish export – how to get into export markets - marketing Technology research is important for the environment – developing new ET: Technology research is important for the environment – developing new ET Potential for avoiding environmental damage Reduced opportunities for influence Environmental damage Research Dev./Design Production Consume/waste Fig dev. from Rejeski 2003: