logging in or signing up ucsd Matild Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 34 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: January 11, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide1: Antoine Georges Olivier Parcollet Nick Read Subir Sachdev Jinwu Ye Mean field theories of quantum spin glasses Talk online: Sachdev Slide2: Classical Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model Jij : a Gaussian random variable with zero meanSlide3: Two routes to quantization A. Quantum rotor model n=1: Ising model is a transverse field g Spectrum at Jij=0 g n=3: randomly coupled spin dimers Spectrum at Jij=0 gSlide4: Two routes to quantization B. Heisenberg spins Spectrum at Jij=0 (2S+1)-fold degeneracy Generalize model to SU(N) spins and explore phase diagram in N, S planeSlide5: Outline Insulating quantum rotors. Insulating Heisenberg spins DMFT of a random t-J model Metallic spin glasses: DMFT of a random Kondo latticeSlide6: A. Insulating quantum rotorsSlide7: A. Quantum rotor model Jij : a Gaussian random variable with zero meanSlide8: g Spin glass Paramagnet T=0 phases Local dynamic spin susceptibility Specific heat C ~ T (?) D.A. Huse and J. Miller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3147 (1993). J. Ye, S. Sachdev, and N. Read, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 4011 (1993). N. Read, S. Sachdev, and J. Ye, Phys. Rev. B 52, 384 (1995). A. Georges, O. Parcollet, and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 63, 134406 (2001). Slide9: T > 0 phase diagram g J. Ye, S. Sachdev, and N. Read, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 4011 (1993). N. Read, S. Sachdev, and J. Ye, Phys. Rev. B 52, 384 (1995). gcSlide10: B. Insulating Heisenberg spinsSlide11: B. Heisenberg spin glass Jij : a Gaussian random variable with zero mean S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3339 (1993).Slide12: T=0 phase diagram S N Spin glass order Specific heat C ~ T (C ~ T2 ?) S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3339 (1993). A. Georges, O. Parcollet, and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 840 (2000). A. Camjayi and M. J. Rozenberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 217202 (2003).Slide13: Quantum critical phase is described by fractionalized S=1/2 neutral spinon excitations w Spinon spectral density S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3339 (1993).Slide14: S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3339 (1993). A. Georges, O. Parcollet, and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 840 (2000). A. Camjayi and M. J. Rozenberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 217202 (2003). T > 0 phase diagramSlide15: C. Doping the quantum critical spin liquidSlide16: C. DMFT of a random t-J model Jij : a Gaussian random variable with zero mean O. Parcollet and A. Georges, Phys. Rev. B 59, 5341 (1999). Slide17: O. Parcollet and A. Georges, Phys. Rev. B 59, 5341 (1999). = carrier densitySlide18: O. Parcollet and A. Georges, Phys. Rev. B 59, 5341 (1999). Physical consequences of quantum criticality 1. Electron spectral function (photoemission) Momentum resolved spectral densitySlide19: O. Parcollet and A. Georges, Phys. Rev. B 59, 5341 (1999). Physical consequences of quantum criticality 2. d.c ResistivitySlide20: O. Parcollet and A. Georges, Phys. Rev. B 59, 5341 (1999). Physical consequences of quantum criticality 3. NMR 1/T1 relaxation rateSlide21: O. Parcollet and A. Georges, Phys. Rev. B 59, 5341 (1999). Physical consequences of quantum criticality 4. Optical conductivitySlide22: O. Parcollet and A. Georges, Phys. Rev. B 59, 5341 (1999). Phenomenological phase diagram for cupratesSlide23: D. Metallic spin glassesSlide24: C. DMFT of a random Kondo lattice model Jij : a Gaussian random variable with zero mean S. Sachdev, N. Read, and R. Oppermann, Phys. Rev. B 52, 10286 (1995). A. M. Sengupta and A. Georges, Phys. Rev. B 52, 10295 (1995). Slide25: S. Sachdev, N. Read, and R. Oppermann, Phys. Rev. B 52, 10286 (1995). A. M. Sengupta and A. Georges, Phys. Rev. B 52, 10295 (1995). JKSlide26: Outlook Spin glass order is an attractive candidate for a quantum critical point in the cuprates, on both theoretical and experimental grounds. (Impurities break the translational symmetry associated with charge-ordered states, and the Imry-Ma argument then prohibits a quantum critical point associated with charge order in the presence of randomness in two dimensions) A simple mean-field theory of a doped Heisenberg spin glass naturally reproduces all the “marginal” phenomenology. Needed: better theory of fluctuations in low dimensions You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
ucsd Matild Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 34 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: January 11, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide1: Antoine Georges Olivier Parcollet Nick Read Subir Sachdev Jinwu Ye Mean field theories of quantum spin glasses Talk online: Sachdev Slide2: Classical Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model Jij : a Gaussian random variable with zero meanSlide3: Two routes to quantization A. Quantum rotor model n=1: Ising model is a transverse field g Spectrum at Jij=0 g n=3: randomly coupled spin dimers Spectrum at Jij=0 gSlide4: Two routes to quantization B. Heisenberg spins Spectrum at Jij=0 (2S+1)-fold degeneracy Generalize model to SU(N) spins and explore phase diagram in N, S planeSlide5: Outline Insulating quantum rotors. Insulating Heisenberg spins DMFT of a random t-J model Metallic spin glasses: DMFT of a random Kondo latticeSlide6: A. Insulating quantum rotorsSlide7: A. Quantum rotor model Jij : a Gaussian random variable with zero meanSlide8: g Spin glass Paramagnet T=0 phases Local dynamic spin susceptibility Specific heat C ~ T (?) D.A. Huse and J. Miller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3147 (1993). J. Ye, S. Sachdev, and N. Read, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 4011 (1993). N. Read, S. Sachdev, and J. Ye, Phys. Rev. B 52, 384 (1995). A. Georges, O. Parcollet, and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. B 63, 134406 (2001). Slide9: T > 0 phase diagram g J. Ye, S. Sachdev, and N. Read, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 4011 (1993). N. Read, S. Sachdev, and J. Ye, Phys. Rev. B 52, 384 (1995). gcSlide10: B. Insulating Heisenberg spinsSlide11: B. Heisenberg spin glass Jij : a Gaussian random variable with zero mean S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3339 (1993).Slide12: T=0 phase diagram S N Spin glass order Specific heat C ~ T (C ~ T2 ?) S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3339 (1993). A. Georges, O. Parcollet, and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 840 (2000). A. Camjayi and M. J. Rozenberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 217202 (2003).Slide13: Quantum critical phase is described by fractionalized S=1/2 neutral spinon excitations w Spinon spectral density S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3339 (1993).Slide14: S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3339 (1993). A. Georges, O. Parcollet, and S. Sachdev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 840 (2000). A. Camjayi and M. J. Rozenberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 217202 (2003). T > 0 phase diagramSlide15: C. Doping the quantum critical spin liquidSlide16: C. DMFT of a random t-J model Jij : a Gaussian random variable with zero mean O. Parcollet and A. Georges, Phys. Rev. B 59, 5341 (1999). Slide17: O. Parcollet and A. Georges, Phys. Rev. B 59, 5341 (1999). = carrier densitySlide18: O. Parcollet and A. Georges, Phys. Rev. B 59, 5341 (1999). Physical consequences of quantum criticality 1. Electron spectral function (photoemission) Momentum resolved spectral densitySlide19: O. Parcollet and A. Georges, Phys. Rev. B 59, 5341 (1999). Physical consequences of quantum criticality 2. d.c ResistivitySlide20: O. Parcollet and A. Georges, Phys. Rev. B 59, 5341 (1999). Physical consequences of quantum criticality 3. NMR 1/T1 relaxation rateSlide21: O. Parcollet and A. Georges, Phys. Rev. B 59, 5341 (1999). Physical consequences of quantum criticality 4. Optical conductivitySlide22: O. Parcollet and A. Georges, Phys. Rev. B 59, 5341 (1999). Phenomenological phase diagram for cupratesSlide23: D. Metallic spin glassesSlide24: C. DMFT of a random Kondo lattice model Jij : a Gaussian random variable with zero mean S. Sachdev, N. Read, and R. Oppermann, Phys. Rev. B 52, 10286 (1995). A. M. Sengupta and A. Georges, Phys. Rev. B 52, 10295 (1995). Slide25: S. Sachdev, N. Read, and R. Oppermann, Phys. Rev. B 52, 10286 (1995). A. M. Sengupta and A. Georges, Phys. Rev. B 52, 10295 (1995). JKSlide26: Outlook Spin glass order is an attractive candidate for a quantum critical point in the cuprates, on both theoretical and experimental grounds. (Impurities break the translational symmetry associated with charge-ordered states, and the Imry-Ma argument then prohibits a quantum critical point associated with charge order in the presence of randomness in two dimensions) A simple mean-field theory of a doped Heisenberg spin glass naturally reproduces all the “marginal” phenomenology. Needed: better theory of fluctuations in low dimensions