logging in or signing up 6 M Outwater MTC HSR TRB PlanningApplications Conf Marigold Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 67 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: October 31, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide1: presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Elizabeth Sall Maren Outwater Cambridge Systematics, Inc. with Metropolitan Transportation Commission California High-Speed Rail Authority May 9, 2007 Bay Area/California High-Speed Rail Ridership and Revenue Forecasting StudyModel Overview: Model Overview Forecast all interregional trips within California Forecast intraregional trips in largest urban areas Induced travel for interregional tripsIntegrated Modeling Process: Integrated Modeling Process Peak and off-peak time periods Highway, air, conventional and high-speed rail modesNetworks : Networks HighwayData for Model Validation: Data for Model Validation Travel surveys American Traveler Survey (ATS) Caltrans Household Travel Survey Census Transportation Planning Package (CTPP) Volume data Air passengers Rail passengers Highway volumesTrip Frequency Model Validation: Trip Frequency Model Validation Remainder of CA Los Angeles Region San Francisco Region San Diego Region Sacramento Region Short Model Trips by Purpose and Region Long Model Trips by Purpose and RegionDestination Choice Model Validation: Destination Choice Model ValidationMode Choice Model Validation: Mode Choice Model ValidationAir Assignment Validation: Air Assignment Validation2030 Travel Markets for Interregional Trips: 2030 Travel Markets for Interregional Trips 2.5 million daily trips (0.7 million daily trips in 2000 business plan)Door to Door Travel Times – ExampleSouth San Francisco to Central LA: Door to Door Travel Times – Example South San Francisco to Central LA Travel Time Components – Door to Door 100 200 300 400 500 600 Travel Time in Minutes Air HSR Auto Access Origin to Station Terminal Curb to Waiting Area Wait Board Vehicle Line-Haul In-Vehicle Terminal Seat to Curb Egress Station to Destination 0Level of Service and Mode Choice – ExampleSouth San Francisco to Central LA: Level of Service and Mode Choice – Example South San Francisco to Central LAAnnual Interregional Ridership in 2030 In Millions: Annual Interregional Ridership in 2030 In Millions Air and auto costs are 50 percent higher than the baseAnnual Interregional Ridership in 2030 by Market In Millions: Annual Interregional Ridership in 2030 by Market In Millions 0 5 10 15 20 25 Total Boardings by Market LA to Sacramento LA to San Diego LA to SF Sacramento to SF Sacramento to San Diego San Diego to SF LA/SF to SJV Other to SJV Intraregion (1) Pacheco Pass Alternative Base Altamont Pass Alternative Base In Millions2030 Mode Shares by Travel Market: 2030 Mode Shares by Travel MarketInterregional HSR Ridership by Purpose: Interregional HSR Ridership by PurposeSensitivity Tests: Sensitivity TestsFare Structure: Fare Structure Interregional fares set to 50 percent of air fare in SF to LA market Intraregional fares set to 50 percent higher than commuter rail 25 percent increase in fares caused 13 percent drop in ridership 2 percent increase in revenues In 2005 dollarsAnnual Interregional Revenues in 2030In Millions: Annual Interregional Revenues in 2030 In Millions Air and auto costs are 50 percent higher than the base In 2005 dollarsAnnual Intraregional Ridership and Revenue in 2030: Annual Intraregional Ridership and Revenue in 2030 A 50 percent increase in air and auto costs would increase intraregional ridership and revenues by 6 percent, or 21.7 million annual HSR riders and $197 million in revenues In 2005 dollarsSources of HSR Ridership: Sources of HSR Ridership Interregional trips Air 16% Rail 3% Auto 79% Induced 2% Total Statewide HSR Ridership and Revenue: Total Statewide HSR Ridership and RevenueReports Available on the CHSRA Web Site: Reports Available on the CHSRA Web Site Interregional Model System Development Level-of-Service Assumptions and Forecast Alternatives Findings from the Second Peer Review Panel Meeting and Findings from the First Peer Review Panel Meeting Survey Documentation Socioeconomic Data, Transportation Supply, and Base Year Travel Patterns DataNext Steps: Next Steps Generate data for environmental studies Conduct additional alternative tests Finalize intraregional models in Southern California You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
6 M Outwater MTC HSR TRB PlanningApplications Conf Marigold Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 67 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: October 31, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide1: presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Elizabeth Sall Maren Outwater Cambridge Systematics, Inc. with Metropolitan Transportation Commission California High-Speed Rail Authority May 9, 2007 Bay Area/California High-Speed Rail Ridership and Revenue Forecasting StudyModel Overview: Model Overview Forecast all interregional trips within California Forecast intraregional trips in largest urban areas Induced travel for interregional tripsIntegrated Modeling Process: Integrated Modeling Process Peak and off-peak time periods Highway, air, conventional and high-speed rail modesNetworks : Networks HighwayData for Model Validation: Data for Model Validation Travel surveys American Traveler Survey (ATS) Caltrans Household Travel Survey Census Transportation Planning Package (CTPP) Volume data Air passengers Rail passengers Highway volumesTrip Frequency Model Validation: Trip Frequency Model Validation Remainder of CA Los Angeles Region San Francisco Region San Diego Region Sacramento Region Short Model Trips by Purpose and Region Long Model Trips by Purpose and RegionDestination Choice Model Validation: Destination Choice Model ValidationMode Choice Model Validation: Mode Choice Model ValidationAir Assignment Validation: Air Assignment Validation2030 Travel Markets for Interregional Trips: 2030 Travel Markets for Interregional Trips 2.5 million daily trips (0.7 million daily trips in 2000 business plan)Door to Door Travel Times – ExampleSouth San Francisco to Central LA: Door to Door Travel Times – Example South San Francisco to Central LA Travel Time Components – Door to Door 100 200 300 400 500 600 Travel Time in Minutes Air HSR Auto Access Origin to Station Terminal Curb to Waiting Area Wait Board Vehicle Line-Haul In-Vehicle Terminal Seat to Curb Egress Station to Destination 0Level of Service and Mode Choice – ExampleSouth San Francisco to Central LA: Level of Service and Mode Choice – Example South San Francisco to Central LAAnnual Interregional Ridership in 2030 In Millions: Annual Interregional Ridership in 2030 In Millions Air and auto costs are 50 percent higher than the baseAnnual Interregional Ridership in 2030 by Market In Millions: Annual Interregional Ridership in 2030 by Market In Millions 0 5 10 15 20 25 Total Boardings by Market LA to Sacramento LA to San Diego LA to SF Sacramento to SF Sacramento to San Diego San Diego to SF LA/SF to SJV Other to SJV Intraregion (1) Pacheco Pass Alternative Base Altamont Pass Alternative Base In Millions2030 Mode Shares by Travel Market: 2030 Mode Shares by Travel MarketInterregional HSR Ridership by Purpose: Interregional HSR Ridership by PurposeSensitivity Tests: Sensitivity TestsFare Structure: Fare Structure Interregional fares set to 50 percent of air fare in SF to LA market Intraregional fares set to 50 percent higher than commuter rail 25 percent increase in fares caused 13 percent drop in ridership 2 percent increase in revenues In 2005 dollarsAnnual Interregional Revenues in 2030In Millions: Annual Interregional Revenues in 2030 In Millions Air and auto costs are 50 percent higher than the base In 2005 dollarsAnnual Intraregional Ridership and Revenue in 2030: Annual Intraregional Ridership and Revenue in 2030 A 50 percent increase in air and auto costs would increase intraregional ridership and revenues by 6 percent, or 21.7 million annual HSR riders and $197 million in revenues In 2005 dollarsSources of HSR Ridership: Sources of HSR Ridership Interregional trips Air 16% Rail 3% Auto 79% Induced 2% Total Statewide HSR Ridership and Revenue: Total Statewide HSR Ridership and RevenueReports Available on the CHSRA Web Site: Reports Available on the CHSRA Web Site Interregional Model System Development Level-of-Service Assumptions and Forecast Alternatives Findings from the Second Peer Review Panel Meeting and Findings from the First Peer Review Panel Meeting Survey Documentation Socioeconomic Data, Transportation Supply, and Base Year Travel Patterns DataNext Steps: Next Steps Generate data for environmental studies Conduct additional alternative tests Finalize intraregional models in Southern California