logging in or signing up Social 05 0 Attitudes and Behavior Maria Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 1673 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: January 13, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 1 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... By: mini123kaur (7 month(s) ago) Nice one.... Thank you :-) Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close By: Ugarriza (23 month(s) ago) Could you please send me tihis ppt? gustavougarriza@yahoo.es Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close Premium member Presentation Transcript Beliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior: Beliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior Beliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior: Beliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior Beliefs, attitudes, and values Cognitive structure Attitude-behavior consistency Historical research Criticisms Methodological Theoretical Explanations for inconsistencyBeliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior: Beliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior Beliefs, attitudes, and values Cognitive structure Attitude-behavior consistency Historical research Criticisms Methodological Theoretical Explanations for inconsistencyWhat is a belief?: What is a belief? The perception of a relationship between two objects or something and a characteristic of it Bananas are yellow Physical activity is boring Lawyers are dishonest Bob loves JaneBeliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior: Beliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior Beliefs, attitudes, and values Cognitive structure Attitude-behavior consistency Historical research Criticisms Methodological Theoretical Explanations for inconsistencyThe relationship of beliefs to attitudes: The relationship of beliefs to attitudes Beliefs are translated into attitudes through values BELIEF: Lawyers overcharge their clients VALUE: Fairness ATTITUDE: I don’t like lawyersCognitive structure: Cognitive structure Beliefs: Lawyers overcharge their clients Values: Fairness Attitude: I don’t like lawyersCognitive structure: Cognitive structure Beliefs: Lawyers overcharge their clients Lawyers help their clients lie Values: Fairness Honesty Attitude: I don’t like lawyersCognitive structure: Cognitive structure Beliefs: Lawyers overcharge their clients Lawyers help their clients lie Lawyers help rich people Values: Fairness Honesty Equality Attitude: I don’t like lawyersCognitive structure: Cognitive structure Beliefs: Lawyers overcharge their clients Lawyers help their clients lie Lawyers help everybody Values: Fairness Honesty Equality Attitude: I don’t like lawyersBeliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior: Beliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior Beliefs, attitudes, and values Cognitive structure Attitude-behavior consistency Historical research Criticisms Methodological Theoretical Explanations for inconsistencyBeliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior: Beliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior Beliefs, attitudes, and values Cognitive structure Attitude-behavior consistency Historical research Criticisms Methodological Theoretical Explanations for inconsistencyClassic studies in attitude-behavior consistency: Classic studies in attitude-behavior consistency LaPiere Kutner Wicker (1969)--review of attitude-behavior studies Average correlation [r] = .30 % of variance in behavior explained = 9% (r2)Attitude-behavior correlation: Cheating on exams: Attitude-behavior correlation: Cheating on exams 1 2 3 4 5 5 4 3 2 1 Attitude Behavior Freq Never Strongly Agree Strongly DisagreeAttitude-behavior correlation: Cheating on exams: Attitude-behavior correlation: Cheating on exams 1 2 3 4 5 5 4 3 2 1 Attitude Behavior Freq Never Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree Attitude-behavior correlation: Cheating on exams: Attitude-behavior correlation: Cheating on exams 1 2 3 4 5 5 4 3 2 1 Attitude Behavior Freq Never Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree Attitude-behavior correlation: Cheating on exams: Attitude-behavior correlation: Cheating on exams 1 2 3 4 5 5 4 3 2 1 Attitude Behavior Freq Never Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree r = 1.0Attitude-behavior correlation: Cheating on exams: Attitude-behavior correlation: Cheating on exams 1 2 3 4 5 5 4 3 2 1 Attitude Behavior Freq Never Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree Attitude-behavior correlation: Cheating on exams: Attitude-behavior correlation: Cheating on exams 1 2 3 4 5 5 4 3 2 1 Attitude Behavior Freq Never Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree r = 0Beliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior: Beliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior Beliefs, attitudes, and values Cognitive structure Attitude-behavior consistency Historical research Criticisms Methodological Theoretical Explanations for inconsistencyCriticisms of classic research: Criticisms of classic research Methodological Not necessarily measured the same person Two measures of behavior (no measure of attitude) Used only single measures (low reliability) Theoretical Ignoring social normsWeigel & Neuman (1976): Weigel & Neuman (1976) Measured attitudes toward environment (20 item scale) Also measured six environmentally related behaviors, e.g., Signing a petition against off shore oil drilling Leaving newspapers out for recycling weekly over a period of 8 weeksWeigel & Neuman results: Weigel & Neuman results Each behavior by itself correlated about .29 with the attitude scale All the behaviors added together (a behavior scale) correlated .68 with the attitude scaleWeigel & Neuman: Weigel & Neuman Attitude1 Behavior1 Attitude2 Behavior2 Attitude3 Behavior3 Attitude4 Behavior4 Attitude5 Behavior5Weigel & Neuman: Weigel & Neuman Attitude1 Behavior1 Attitude2 Behavior2 Attitude3 Behavior3 Attitude4 Behavior4 Attitude5 Behavior5 r = .30Weigel & Neuman: Weigel & Neuman Attitude1 Behavior1 Attitude2 Behavior2 Attitude3 Behavior3 Attitude4 Behavior4 Attitude5 Behavior5 r = .30Weigel & Neuman: Weigel & Neuman Attitude1 Behavior1 Attitude2 Behavior2 Attitude3 Behavior3 Attitude4 Behavior4 Attitude5 Behavior5 r = .30Weigel & Neuman: Weigel & Neuman Attitude1 Behavior1 Attitude2 Behavior2 Attitude3 Behavior3 Attitude4 Behavior4 Attitude5 Behavior5 r = .70Weigel & Neuman results: Weigel & Neuman results Each behavior by itself correlated about .29 with the attitude scale All the behaviors added together (a behavior scale) correlated .68 with the attitude scale CONCLUSION: High attitude-behavior consistency when both measured reliably and situational pressures not overwhelming attitudesBeliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior: Beliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior Beliefs, attitudes, and values Cognitive structure Attitude-behavior consistency Historical research Criticisms Methodological Theoretical Explanations for inconsistency Classical conditioningClassical conditioning of emotional responses: Classical conditioning of emotional responses USClassical conditioning of emotional responses: Classical conditioning of emotional responses US unconditioned stimulusClassical conditioning of emotional responses: Classical conditioning of emotional responses US UR unconditioned responseClassical conditioning of emotional responses: Classical conditioning of emotional responses US UR CS conditioned stimulusClassical conditioning of emotional responses: Classical conditioning of emotional responses US UR CS CR conditioned responseClassical conditioning of emotional responses: Classical conditioning of emotional responses US UR CS CR Classical conditioning of emotional responses: Classical conditioning of emotional responses US UR CS CR meat powderClassical conditioning of emotional responses: Classical conditioning of emotional responses US UR CS CR meat powder salivatingClassical conditioning of emotional responses: Classical conditioning of emotional responses US UR CS CR meat powder salivating bellClassical conditioning of emotional responses: Classical conditioning of emotional responses US UR CS CR meat powder salivating bell salivatingClassical conditioning of emotional responses: Classical conditioning of emotional responses US UR CS CR Obscene, vulgar wordsClassical conditioning of emotional responses: Classical conditioning of emotional responses US UR CS CR Obscene, vulgar words Negative emotional reactionClassical conditioning of emotional responses: Classical conditioning of emotional responses US UR CS CR Obscene, vulgar words Negative emotional reaction Ethnic groupClassical conditioning of emotional responses: Classical conditioning of emotional responses US UR CS CR Obscene, vulgar words Negative emotional reaction Ethnic group Negative emotional reactionInstructions: Instructions These statements concern your personal reactions to a number of different situations. No two statements are exactly alike, so consider each statement carefully before answering. If a statement is TRUE or MOSTLY TRUE as applied to you, mark T; if a statement is FALSE or MOSTLY FALSE, mark F.Self-monitoring (Mark Snyder): Self-monitoring (Mark Snyder) Concern for social appropriateness Sensitive to self-presentation of others Used as guidelines for monitoring own self-presentation Two components of self-monitoring Interest in social information Ability to control self-presentationSelf-monitors’ interest in social comparison: Self-monitors’ interest in social comparison Subjects given a self-descriptive (T-F) “personality test” [designed to facilitate self-monitoring] Given opportunity to consult “majority response sheet” D.V.: Observer noted frequency of looking at sheet and length of time spent looking High self-monitors: looked more frequently for longer timeExpression of emotion: Expression of emotion Different groups’ ability to convey emotion Students Actors Hospitalized mental patients Communication of emotion Subjects conveyed seven different emotions: anger, happiness, sadness, surprise, disgust, fear, guilt Judges guessed emotionsExpression of emotion: Expression of emotion Different groups’ ability to convey emotion Students mean=14 Actors Hospitalized mental patients Communication of emotion Subjects conveyed seven different emotions: anger, happiness, sadness, surprise, disgust, fear, guilt Judges guessed emotionsExpression of emotion: Expression of emotion Different groups’ ability to convey emotion Students mean=14 Actors mean=18.4 Hospitalized mental patients Communication of emotion Subjects conveyed seven different emotions: anger, happiness, sadness, surprise, disgust, fear, guilt Judges guessed emotionsExpression of emotion: Expression of emotion Different groups’ ability to convey emotion Students mean=14 Actors mean=18.4 Hospitalized mental patients mean=10.3 Communication of emotion Subjects conveyed seven different emotions: anger, happiness, sadness, surprise, disgust, fear, guilt Judges guessed emotionsExpression of emotion: Expression of emotion Different groups’ ability to convey emotion Students mean=14 Actors mean=18.4 Hospitalized mental patients mean=10.3 Communication of emotion Subjects conveyed seven different emotions: anger, happiness, sadness, surprise, disgust, fear, guilt Judges guessed emotions High SM conveyed emotions betterSelf-monitoring and attitude-behavior correlations: Self-monitoring and attitude-behavior correlations High self-monitors have lower attitude-behavior correlations Their behavior is less reflective of their actual attitudes; more in line with what they think is socially appropriate You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
Social 05 0 Attitudes and Behavior Maria Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 1673 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: January 13, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 1 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... By: mini123kaur (7 month(s) ago) Nice one.... Thank you :-) Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close By: Ugarriza (23 month(s) ago) Could you please send me tihis ppt? gustavougarriza@yahoo.es Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close Premium member Presentation Transcript Beliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior: Beliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior Beliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior: Beliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior Beliefs, attitudes, and values Cognitive structure Attitude-behavior consistency Historical research Criticisms Methodological Theoretical Explanations for inconsistencyBeliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior: Beliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior Beliefs, attitudes, and values Cognitive structure Attitude-behavior consistency Historical research Criticisms Methodological Theoretical Explanations for inconsistencyWhat is a belief?: What is a belief? The perception of a relationship between two objects or something and a characteristic of it Bananas are yellow Physical activity is boring Lawyers are dishonest Bob loves JaneBeliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior: Beliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior Beliefs, attitudes, and values Cognitive structure Attitude-behavior consistency Historical research Criticisms Methodological Theoretical Explanations for inconsistencyThe relationship of beliefs to attitudes: The relationship of beliefs to attitudes Beliefs are translated into attitudes through values BELIEF: Lawyers overcharge their clients VALUE: Fairness ATTITUDE: I don’t like lawyersCognitive structure: Cognitive structure Beliefs: Lawyers overcharge their clients Values: Fairness Attitude: I don’t like lawyersCognitive structure: Cognitive structure Beliefs: Lawyers overcharge their clients Lawyers help their clients lie Values: Fairness Honesty Attitude: I don’t like lawyersCognitive structure: Cognitive structure Beliefs: Lawyers overcharge their clients Lawyers help their clients lie Lawyers help rich people Values: Fairness Honesty Equality Attitude: I don’t like lawyersCognitive structure: Cognitive structure Beliefs: Lawyers overcharge their clients Lawyers help their clients lie Lawyers help everybody Values: Fairness Honesty Equality Attitude: I don’t like lawyersBeliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior: Beliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior Beliefs, attitudes, and values Cognitive structure Attitude-behavior consistency Historical research Criticisms Methodological Theoretical Explanations for inconsistencyBeliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior: Beliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior Beliefs, attitudes, and values Cognitive structure Attitude-behavior consistency Historical research Criticisms Methodological Theoretical Explanations for inconsistencyClassic studies in attitude-behavior consistency: Classic studies in attitude-behavior consistency LaPiere Kutner Wicker (1969)--review of attitude-behavior studies Average correlation [r] = .30 % of variance in behavior explained = 9% (r2)Attitude-behavior correlation: Cheating on exams: Attitude-behavior correlation: Cheating on exams 1 2 3 4 5 5 4 3 2 1 Attitude Behavior Freq Never Strongly Agree Strongly DisagreeAttitude-behavior correlation: Cheating on exams: Attitude-behavior correlation: Cheating on exams 1 2 3 4 5 5 4 3 2 1 Attitude Behavior Freq Never Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree Attitude-behavior correlation: Cheating on exams: Attitude-behavior correlation: Cheating on exams 1 2 3 4 5 5 4 3 2 1 Attitude Behavior Freq Never Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree Attitude-behavior correlation: Cheating on exams: Attitude-behavior correlation: Cheating on exams 1 2 3 4 5 5 4 3 2 1 Attitude Behavior Freq Never Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree r = 1.0Attitude-behavior correlation: Cheating on exams: Attitude-behavior correlation: Cheating on exams 1 2 3 4 5 5 4 3 2 1 Attitude Behavior Freq Never Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree Attitude-behavior correlation: Cheating on exams: Attitude-behavior correlation: Cheating on exams 1 2 3 4 5 5 4 3 2 1 Attitude Behavior Freq Never Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree r = 0Beliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior: Beliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior Beliefs, attitudes, and values Cognitive structure Attitude-behavior consistency Historical research Criticisms Methodological Theoretical Explanations for inconsistencyCriticisms of classic research: Criticisms of classic research Methodological Not necessarily measured the same person Two measures of behavior (no measure of attitude) Used only single measures (low reliability) Theoretical Ignoring social normsWeigel & Neuman (1976): Weigel & Neuman (1976) Measured attitudes toward environment (20 item scale) Also measured six environmentally related behaviors, e.g., Signing a petition against off shore oil drilling Leaving newspapers out for recycling weekly over a period of 8 weeksWeigel & Neuman results: Weigel & Neuman results Each behavior by itself correlated about .29 with the attitude scale All the behaviors added together (a behavior scale) correlated .68 with the attitude scaleWeigel & Neuman: Weigel & Neuman Attitude1 Behavior1 Attitude2 Behavior2 Attitude3 Behavior3 Attitude4 Behavior4 Attitude5 Behavior5Weigel & Neuman: Weigel & Neuman Attitude1 Behavior1 Attitude2 Behavior2 Attitude3 Behavior3 Attitude4 Behavior4 Attitude5 Behavior5 r = .30Weigel & Neuman: Weigel & Neuman Attitude1 Behavior1 Attitude2 Behavior2 Attitude3 Behavior3 Attitude4 Behavior4 Attitude5 Behavior5 r = .30Weigel & Neuman: Weigel & Neuman Attitude1 Behavior1 Attitude2 Behavior2 Attitude3 Behavior3 Attitude4 Behavior4 Attitude5 Behavior5 r = .30Weigel & Neuman: Weigel & Neuman Attitude1 Behavior1 Attitude2 Behavior2 Attitude3 Behavior3 Attitude4 Behavior4 Attitude5 Behavior5 r = .70Weigel & Neuman results: Weigel & Neuman results Each behavior by itself correlated about .29 with the attitude scale All the behaviors added together (a behavior scale) correlated .68 with the attitude scale CONCLUSION: High attitude-behavior consistency when both measured reliably and situational pressures not overwhelming attitudesBeliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior: Beliefs, Attitudes, and Behavior Beliefs, attitudes, and values Cognitive structure Attitude-behavior consistency Historical research Criticisms Methodological Theoretical Explanations for inconsistency Classical conditioningClassical conditioning of emotional responses: Classical conditioning of emotional responses USClassical conditioning of emotional responses: Classical conditioning of emotional responses US unconditioned stimulusClassical conditioning of emotional responses: Classical conditioning of emotional responses US UR unconditioned responseClassical conditioning of emotional responses: Classical conditioning of emotional responses US UR CS conditioned stimulusClassical conditioning of emotional responses: Classical conditioning of emotional responses US UR CS CR conditioned responseClassical conditioning of emotional responses: Classical conditioning of emotional responses US UR CS CR Classical conditioning of emotional responses: Classical conditioning of emotional responses US UR CS CR meat powderClassical conditioning of emotional responses: Classical conditioning of emotional responses US UR CS CR meat powder salivatingClassical conditioning of emotional responses: Classical conditioning of emotional responses US UR CS CR meat powder salivating bellClassical conditioning of emotional responses: Classical conditioning of emotional responses US UR CS CR meat powder salivating bell salivatingClassical conditioning of emotional responses: Classical conditioning of emotional responses US UR CS CR Obscene, vulgar wordsClassical conditioning of emotional responses: Classical conditioning of emotional responses US UR CS CR Obscene, vulgar words Negative emotional reactionClassical conditioning of emotional responses: Classical conditioning of emotional responses US UR CS CR Obscene, vulgar words Negative emotional reaction Ethnic groupClassical conditioning of emotional responses: Classical conditioning of emotional responses US UR CS CR Obscene, vulgar words Negative emotional reaction Ethnic group Negative emotional reactionInstructions: Instructions These statements concern your personal reactions to a number of different situations. No two statements are exactly alike, so consider each statement carefully before answering. If a statement is TRUE or MOSTLY TRUE as applied to you, mark T; if a statement is FALSE or MOSTLY FALSE, mark F.Self-monitoring (Mark Snyder): Self-monitoring (Mark Snyder) Concern for social appropriateness Sensitive to self-presentation of others Used as guidelines for monitoring own self-presentation Two components of self-monitoring Interest in social information Ability to control self-presentationSelf-monitors’ interest in social comparison: Self-monitors’ interest in social comparison Subjects given a self-descriptive (T-F) “personality test” [designed to facilitate self-monitoring] Given opportunity to consult “majority response sheet” D.V.: Observer noted frequency of looking at sheet and length of time spent looking High self-monitors: looked more frequently for longer timeExpression of emotion: Expression of emotion Different groups’ ability to convey emotion Students Actors Hospitalized mental patients Communication of emotion Subjects conveyed seven different emotions: anger, happiness, sadness, surprise, disgust, fear, guilt Judges guessed emotionsExpression of emotion: Expression of emotion Different groups’ ability to convey emotion Students mean=14 Actors Hospitalized mental patients Communication of emotion Subjects conveyed seven different emotions: anger, happiness, sadness, surprise, disgust, fear, guilt Judges guessed emotionsExpression of emotion: Expression of emotion Different groups’ ability to convey emotion Students mean=14 Actors mean=18.4 Hospitalized mental patients Communication of emotion Subjects conveyed seven different emotions: anger, happiness, sadness, surprise, disgust, fear, guilt Judges guessed emotionsExpression of emotion: Expression of emotion Different groups’ ability to convey emotion Students mean=14 Actors mean=18.4 Hospitalized mental patients mean=10.3 Communication of emotion Subjects conveyed seven different emotions: anger, happiness, sadness, surprise, disgust, fear, guilt Judges guessed emotionsExpression of emotion: Expression of emotion Different groups’ ability to convey emotion Students mean=14 Actors mean=18.4 Hospitalized mental patients mean=10.3 Communication of emotion Subjects conveyed seven different emotions: anger, happiness, sadness, surprise, disgust, fear, guilt Judges guessed emotions High SM conveyed emotions betterSelf-monitoring and attitude-behavior correlations: Self-monitoring and attitude-behavior correlations High self-monitors have lower attitude-behavior correlations Their behavior is less reflective of their actual attitudes; more in line with what they think is socially appropriate