logging in or signing up Cowling Lucianna Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 49 Category: News & Reports.. License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: April 18, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript 2005 Pensions ConventionThe top 10 papers every scheme actuary should know about: abcd 2005 Pensions Convention The top 10 papers every scheme actuary should know about Charles Cowling 5 – 7 June Grand Hotel, Brighton Top 10 Papers?: Top 10 Papers? Actuaries, pension funds and investment– Arthur, Randall (1989) The financial theory of defined benefit pension schemes - Exley, Mehta, Smith (1997) Pensions, funding and risk - Chapman, Gordon, Speed (2001) Reinventing pension actuarial science– Bader, Gold (2002) Note on the relationship between pension assets and liabilities– Speed, Bowie, Exley, Jones, Mounce, Ralston, Spiers, Williams (2003) Principles of Corporate Finance– Brealey, Myers (2003) Essentials of corporate bonds for pensions actuaries– Forman, Freeman, Marshall, McKinlay (2003) Funding defined benefit pension schemes – Cowling, Gordon, Speed (2004) Longevity in the 21st Century– Willets, Gallop, Leandro, Lu, MacDonald, Miller, Richards, Robjohns, Ryan, Waters (2004) Financial aspects of longevity risks– Jones, Richards (2004) Top 10 Papers?: Top 10 Papers? Actuaries, pension funds and investment – Arthur, Randall (1989) On the risks of stocks in the long run - Bodie (1995) The financial theory of defined benefit pension schemes - Exley, Mehta, Smith (1997) The price of actuarial values - Gordon (1999) Reinventing pension actuarial science– Bader, Gold (2002) Note on the relationship between pension assets and liabilities– Speed, Bowie, Exley, Jones, Mounce, Ralston, Spiers, Williams (2003) Essentials of corporate bonds for pensions actuaries– Forman, Freeman, Marshall, McKinlay (2003) Pension fund asset allocation– Bianco, Cooper (2003) Funding defined benefit pension schemes– Cowling, Gordon, Speed (2004) Financial aspects of longevity risks– Jones, Richards (2004) Actuaries, pension funds and investmentArthur, Randall (1989): Actuaries, pension funds and investment Arthur, Randall (1989) Key lessons The importance of asset / liability matching The implications of mismatching Performance measurement The sponsoring employer Investment objectivesActuaries, pension funds and investmentArthur, Randall (1989): Actuaries, pension funds and investment Arthur, Randall (1989) Further Reading Objectives and methods of funding defined benefit pension schemes – McLeish, Stewart (1987) A realistic approach to pension funding - Thornton, Wilson (1992)On the risk of stocks in the long runBodie (1995): On the risk of stocks in the long run Bodie (1995) Key lessons Measure risk by the cost of insuring against that risk The cost of insuring against a fall in stock values increases with time Put-call parity The riskiness of equities (stocks) increases with time (as does the expected return) Investment implications for individualsOn the risk of stocks in the long runBodie (1995): On the risk of stocks in the long run Bodie (1995) Further reading Lifetime Portfolio Selection by Dynamic Stochastic Programming: The Continuous Time Case – Merton (1969) Principles of Corporate Finance – Brealey, Myers (2003) Financial Calculus An introduction to derivative pricing – Baxter, Rennie (1996) Derivatives The Theory and Practice of Financial Engineering – Wilmott (1998) The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities – Black, Scholes (1973) Theory of Rational Option Pricing – Merton (1973)The financial theory of defined benefit pension schemes Exley, Mehta, Smith (1997): The financial theory of defined benefit pension schemes Exley, Mehta, Smith (1997) Key lessons Pension schemes and corporate finance Measure assets (and liabilities) at market value A blueprint for pricing and hedging liabilities Bonds are the best match for pension liabilities Link between equity returns and salary growth is spurious Allocation of fund assets to bonds/equities has no material impact on economic cost of the liabilities Pension liabilities should be priced relative to bonds (term structure models of interest rates) View company and pension scheme as a single economic entity Shareholder value is enhanced by pension fund investment in bonds The financial theory of defined benefit pension schemes Exley, Mehta, Smith (1997): The financial theory of defined benefit pension schemes Exley, Mehta, Smith (1997) Further reading Risk and reward in corporate pension funds – Treynor (1972) Corporate pension funding policy – Sharpe (1976) Executive compensation, pension funding, signalling and taxation – Scholes (1979) The tax advantages of pension fund investment in bonds – Black (1980) Taxation and Corporate Pension Policy – Tepper (1981) Pension funding and corporate valuation – Miller, Merton, Scholes (1981) What are corporate pension liabilities? – Bulow (1982) Optimal funding and asset allocation rules for defined benefit pension plans – Harrison, Sharpe (1983)The price of actuarial values Gordon (1999): The price of actuarial values Gordon (1999) Key lessons Modern finance theory Application to UK pension schemes Actuarial myths “Modern finance theory is not practical” “Modern finance theory is invalid because it is based on unrealistic assumptions” “Investing the assets of a DB pension scheme in equities reduces company cost” “Equities are the best match for salary-related liabilities” “Risk premiums need to be allowed for when valuing long-term liabilities” “In the long term …” “Smoothed values are a good thing” Risk can be diversified over time” The pension scheme investment success story” Paying pensions with new money means we can ignore the short term”The price of actuarial values Gordon (1999): The price of actuarial values Gordon (1999) Further reading Pension fund asset valuation and investment – Dyson, Exley (1995) Actuaries and derivatives – Kemp (1997) Pensions, funding and risk - Chapman, Gordon, Speed (2001) Reinventing Pension Actuarial Science Bader, Gold (2002): Reinventing Pension Actuarial Science Bader, Gold (2002) Key lessons Corporate finance principles: $1million of bonds has the same value as $1million of equities A fair trade of a marketed security or portfolio must occur at a market price All parties to market transactions are entitled to full current information on the market prices of the relevant assets and liabilities A liability is valued at the price at which a reference security trades in a liquid and deep market. A reference security (or portfolio) has cash flows that natch the liability in amount, timing and probability of payment Risks are borne and rewards are earned by individuals not by institutions Actuarial violations of corporate finance principles Transferring risk to future generations Underpricing pensions in compensation decisions Actuarial / accounting processes biasing investment decisions Hypothetical actuarial gains concealing real economic losses Concealing risk by smoothing Extended amortization Reinventing Pension Actuarial Science Bader, Gold (2002): Reinventing Pension Actuarial Science Bader, Gold (2002) Further reading Is the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation the FSLIC of the nineties – Bodie (1992) On the management of financial guarantees – Bodie, Merton (1992) What the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation can learn from the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation – Bodie (1996) Pension deficits – an unnecessary evil – Bader (2004)Note on the relationship between pension assets and liabilities Speed, Bowie, Exley, Jones, Mounce, Ralston, Spiers, Williams (2003): Note on the relationship between pension assets and liabilities Speed, Bowie, Exley, Jones, Mounce, Ralston, Spiers, Williams (2003) Key lessons Response to Myners Greater transparency to trustees and sponsors on the relationship between assets and liabilities Liability Benchmark Portfolio (LBP) Monitor assets against LBP Measure risk against LBPEssentials of corporate bonds for pensions actuaries Forman, Freeman, Marshall, McKinlay (2003): Essentials of corporate bonds for pensions actuaries Forman, Freeman, Marshall, McKinlay (2003) Key lessons Sterling bonds are issued by a wide variety of issuers Corporate bonds offer higher expected returns than gilts but with various risks Risk profile is asymetric Swaps can provide longer durations than the physical market Investment grade corporate bonds are closely correlated with gilts Essentials of corporate bonds for pensions actuaries Forman, Freeman, Marshall, McKinlay (2003): Essentials of corporate bonds for pensions actuaries Forman, Freeman, Marshall, McKinlay (2003) Further reading Equity Gilt Study – Barclays Capital (2005)Pension fund asset allocationBianco, Cooper (2003): Pension fund asset allocation Bianco, Cooper (2003) Key lessons Analysts are beginning to look at the pension scheme assets and liabilities as assets and liabilities of the company Three key principles beginning to emerge: Treat pension deficits as corporate debt Fund pensions fully – through borrowings if necessary Investing pension fund assets in bonds maximises shareholder value Catalysts for change Analysis by equity analysts (as well as bond analysts and credit rating agencies) is getting a lot better Pension fund asset allocationBianco, Cooper (2003): Pension fund asset allocation Bianco, Cooper (2003) Further reading JP Morgan, ABN AMRO, Merrill Lynch, Moody’s, Standard & Poors Credit Rating Criteria – Standard & Poors (2004) Did pension plan accounting contribute to a stock market bubble? Coronado, Sharpe (2003) Do a firm’s equity returns reflect the risk of its pension plan? – Jin, Merton, Bodie (2004) Funding Defined Benefit Pension SchemesCowling, Gordon, Speed (2004): Funding Defined Benefit Pension Schemes Cowling, Gordon, Speed (2004) Key lessons Actuaries should use a solvency measure to value liabilities Funding advice should disclose the broad impact of priority rules Funding objectives should be well-defined Funding targets should be described unambiguously in terms of solvency Highlight if contributions are insufficient to maintain solvency Reserve fully for options Consider reliance to be placed on company covenant Full disclosure of amortisation methods Disclose projected solvency position at next valuation Advise on contributions only up to next valuationFunding Defined Benefit Pension SchemesCowling, Gordon, Speed (2004): Funding Defined Benefit Pension Schemes Cowling, Gordon, Speed (2004) Further reading Should Trustees be more like bankers? - Greenstreet (2005)Financial aspects of longevity risksRichards, Jones (2004): Financial aspects of longevity risks Richards, Jones (2004) Key lessons Greatest private-sector exposure to longevity risk is in companies with large DB schemes – big surprises in store? Some longevity assumptions are dangerously out of date Better disclosure of mortality assumptions Longevity now dominant risk for immediate annuities Uncertainty over projections of future mortality Financial impact of uncertainty Mortality differentials Asset backing implications Mortality projections and cohort effectsFinancial aspects of longevity risksRichards, Jones (2004): Financial aspects of longevity risks Richards, Jones (2004) Further reading CMIB Report No 17 – Continuous Mortality Investigation Bureau (1999) CMIB Working Paper No 1 – Continuous Mortality Investigation Bureau (2002) CMIB Working Paper No 3 – Continuous Mortality Investigation Bureau (2004) Longevity in the 21st Century – Willets, Gallop, Leandro, Lu, MacDonald, Miller, Richards, Robjohns, Ryan, Waters (2004) The Cohort effect: Insights and Explanations – Willets (2004) How long do people expect to live? Results and implications O’Brien, Fenn, Diacon (2005) Top 10 Papers? : Top 10 Papers? Actuaries, pension funds and investment – Arthur, Randall (1989) On the risks of stocks in the long run - Bodie (1995) The financial theory of defined benefit pension schemes - Exley, Mehta, Smith (1997) The price of actuarial values - Gordon (1999) Reinventing pension actuarial science– Bader, Gold (2002) Note on the relationship between pension assets and liabilities– Speed, Bowie, Exley, Jones, Mounce, Ralston, Spiers, Williams (2003) Essentials of corporate bonds for pensions actuaries– Forman, Freeman, Marshall, McKinlay (2003) Pension fund asset allocation– Bianco, Cooper (2003) Funding defined benefit pension schemes– Cowling, Gordon, Speed (2004) Financial aspects of longevity risks– Jones, Richards (2004) charles.cowling@mercer.com You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
Cowling Lucianna Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 49 Category: News & Reports.. License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: April 18, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript 2005 Pensions ConventionThe top 10 papers every scheme actuary should know about: abcd 2005 Pensions Convention The top 10 papers every scheme actuary should know about Charles Cowling 5 – 7 June Grand Hotel, Brighton Top 10 Papers?: Top 10 Papers? Actuaries, pension funds and investment– Arthur, Randall (1989) The financial theory of defined benefit pension schemes - Exley, Mehta, Smith (1997) Pensions, funding and risk - Chapman, Gordon, Speed (2001) Reinventing pension actuarial science– Bader, Gold (2002) Note on the relationship between pension assets and liabilities– Speed, Bowie, Exley, Jones, Mounce, Ralston, Spiers, Williams (2003) Principles of Corporate Finance– Brealey, Myers (2003) Essentials of corporate bonds for pensions actuaries– Forman, Freeman, Marshall, McKinlay (2003) Funding defined benefit pension schemes – Cowling, Gordon, Speed (2004) Longevity in the 21st Century– Willets, Gallop, Leandro, Lu, MacDonald, Miller, Richards, Robjohns, Ryan, Waters (2004) Financial aspects of longevity risks– Jones, Richards (2004) Top 10 Papers?: Top 10 Papers? Actuaries, pension funds and investment – Arthur, Randall (1989) On the risks of stocks in the long run - Bodie (1995) The financial theory of defined benefit pension schemes - Exley, Mehta, Smith (1997) The price of actuarial values - Gordon (1999) Reinventing pension actuarial science– Bader, Gold (2002) Note on the relationship between pension assets and liabilities– Speed, Bowie, Exley, Jones, Mounce, Ralston, Spiers, Williams (2003) Essentials of corporate bonds for pensions actuaries– Forman, Freeman, Marshall, McKinlay (2003) Pension fund asset allocation– Bianco, Cooper (2003) Funding defined benefit pension schemes– Cowling, Gordon, Speed (2004) Financial aspects of longevity risks– Jones, Richards (2004) Actuaries, pension funds and investmentArthur, Randall (1989): Actuaries, pension funds and investment Arthur, Randall (1989) Key lessons The importance of asset / liability matching The implications of mismatching Performance measurement The sponsoring employer Investment objectivesActuaries, pension funds and investmentArthur, Randall (1989): Actuaries, pension funds and investment Arthur, Randall (1989) Further Reading Objectives and methods of funding defined benefit pension schemes – McLeish, Stewart (1987) A realistic approach to pension funding - Thornton, Wilson (1992)On the risk of stocks in the long runBodie (1995): On the risk of stocks in the long run Bodie (1995) Key lessons Measure risk by the cost of insuring against that risk The cost of insuring against a fall in stock values increases with time Put-call parity The riskiness of equities (stocks) increases with time (as does the expected return) Investment implications for individualsOn the risk of stocks in the long runBodie (1995): On the risk of stocks in the long run Bodie (1995) Further reading Lifetime Portfolio Selection by Dynamic Stochastic Programming: The Continuous Time Case – Merton (1969) Principles of Corporate Finance – Brealey, Myers (2003) Financial Calculus An introduction to derivative pricing – Baxter, Rennie (1996) Derivatives The Theory and Practice of Financial Engineering – Wilmott (1998) The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities – Black, Scholes (1973) Theory of Rational Option Pricing – Merton (1973)The financial theory of defined benefit pension schemes Exley, Mehta, Smith (1997): The financial theory of defined benefit pension schemes Exley, Mehta, Smith (1997) Key lessons Pension schemes and corporate finance Measure assets (and liabilities) at market value A blueprint for pricing and hedging liabilities Bonds are the best match for pension liabilities Link between equity returns and salary growth is spurious Allocation of fund assets to bonds/equities has no material impact on economic cost of the liabilities Pension liabilities should be priced relative to bonds (term structure models of interest rates) View company and pension scheme as a single economic entity Shareholder value is enhanced by pension fund investment in bonds The financial theory of defined benefit pension schemes Exley, Mehta, Smith (1997): The financial theory of defined benefit pension schemes Exley, Mehta, Smith (1997) Further reading Risk and reward in corporate pension funds – Treynor (1972) Corporate pension funding policy – Sharpe (1976) Executive compensation, pension funding, signalling and taxation – Scholes (1979) The tax advantages of pension fund investment in bonds – Black (1980) Taxation and Corporate Pension Policy – Tepper (1981) Pension funding and corporate valuation – Miller, Merton, Scholes (1981) What are corporate pension liabilities? – Bulow (1982) Optimal funding and asset allocation rules for defined benefit pension plans – Harrison, Sharpe (1983)The price of actuarial values Gordon (1999): The price of actuarial values Gordon (1999) Key lessons Modern finance theory Application to UK pension schemes Actuarial myths “Modern finance theory is not practical” “Modern finance theory is invalid because it is based on unrealistic assumptions” “Investing the assets of a DB pension scheme in equities reduces company cost” “Equities are the best match for salary-related liabilities” “Risk premiums need to be allowed for when valuing long-term liabilities” “In the long term …” “Smoothed values are a good thing” Risk can be diversified over time” The pension scheme investment success story” Paying pensions with new money means we can ignore the short term”The price of actuarial values Gordon (1999): The price of actuarial values Gordon (1999) Further reading Pension fund asset valuation and investment – Dyson, Exley (1995) Actuaries and derivatives – Kemp (1997) Pensions, funding and risk - Chapman, Gordon, Speed (2001) Reinventing Pension Actuarial Science Bader, Gold (2002): Reinventing Pension Actuarial Science Bader, Gold (2002) Key lessons Corporate finance principles: $1million of bonds has the same value as $1million of equities A fair trade of a marketed security or portfolio must occur at a market price All parties to market transactions are entitled to full current information on the market prices of the relevant assets and liabilities A liability is valued at the price at which a reference security trades in a liquid and deep market. A reference security (or portfolio) has cash flows that natch the liability in amount, timing and probability of payment Risks are borne and rewards are earned by individuals not by institutions Actuarial violations of corporate finance principles Transferring risk to future generations Underpricing pensions in compensation decisions Actuarial / accounting processes biasing investment decisions Hypothetical actuarial gains concealing real economic losses Concealing risk by smoothing Extended amortization Reinventing Pension Actuarial Science Bader, Gold (2002): Reinventing Pension Actuarial Science Bader, Gold (2002) Further reading Is the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation the FSLIC of the nineties – Bodie (1992) On the management of financial guarantees – Bodie, Merton (1992) What the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation can learn from the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation – Bodie (1996) Pension deficits – an unnecessary evil – Bader (2004)Note on the relationship between pension assets and liabilities Speed, Bowie, Exley, Jones, Mounce, Ralston, Spiers, Williams (2003): Note on the relationship between pension assets and liabilities Speed, Bowie, Exley, Jones, Mounce, Ralston, Spiers, Williams (2003) Key lessons Response to Myners Greater transparency to trustees and sponsors on the relationship between assets and liabilities Liability Benchmark Portfolio (LBP) Monitor assets against LBP Measure risk against LBPEssentials of corporate bonds for pensions actuaries Forman, Freeman, Marshall, McKinlay (2003): Essentials of corporate bonds for pensions actuaries Forman, Freeman, Marshall, McKinlay (2003) Key lessons Sterling bonds are issued by a wide variety of issuers Corporate bonds offer higher expected returns than gilts but with various risks Risk profile is asymetric Swaps can provide longer durations than the physical market Investment grade corporate bonds are closely correlated with gilts Essentials of corporate bonds for pensions actuaries Forman, Freeman, Marshall, McKinlay (2003): Essentials of corporate bonds for pensions actuaries Forman, Freeman, Marshall, McKinlay (2003) Further reading Equity Gilt Study – Barclays Capital (2005)Pension fund asset allocationBianco, Cooper (2003): Pension fund asset allocation Bianco, Cooper (2003) Key lessons Analysts are beginning to look at the pension scheme assets and liabilities as assets and liabilities of the company Three key principles beginning to emerge: Treat pension deficits as corporate debt Fund pensions fully – through borrowings if necessary Investing pension fund assets in bonds maximises shareholder value Catalysts for change Analysis by equity analysts (as well as bond analysts and credit rating agencies) is getting a lot better Pension fund asset allocationBianco, Cooper (2003): Pension fund asset allocation Bianco, Cooper (2003) Further reading JP Morgan, ABN AMRO, Merrill Lynch, Moody’s, Standard & Poors Credit Rating Criteria – Standard & Poors (2004) Did pension plan accounting contribute to a stock market bubble? Coronado, Sharpe (2003) Do a firm’s equity returns reflect the risk of its pension plan? – Jin, Merton, Bodie (2004) Funding Defined Benefit Pension SchemesCowling, Gordon, Speed (2004): Funding Defined Benefit Pension Schemes Cowling, Gordon, Speed (2004) Key lessons Actuaries should use a solvency measure to value liabilities Funding advice should disclose the broad impact of priority rules Funding objectives should be well-defined Funding targets should be described unambiguously in terms of solvency Highlight if contributions are insufficient to maintain solvency Reserve fully for options Consider reliance to be placed on company covenant Full disclosure of amortisation methods Disclose projected solvency position at next valuation Advise on contributions only up to next valuationFunding Defined Benefit Pension SchemesCowling, Gordon, Speed (2004): Funding Defined Benefit Pension Schemes Cowling, Gordon, Speed (2004) Further reading Should Trustees be more like bankers? - Greenstreet (2005)Financial aspects of longevity risksRichards, Jones (2004): Financial aspects of longevity risks Richards, Jones (2004) Key lessons Greatest private-sector exposure to longevity risk is in companies with large DB schemes – big surprises in store? Some longevity assumptions are dangerously out of date Better disclosure of mortality assumptions Longevity now dominant risk for immediate annuities Uncertainty over projections of future mortality Financial impact of uncertainty Mortality differentials Asset backing implications Mortality projections and cohort effectsFinancial aspects of longevity risksRichards, Jones (2004): Financial aspects of longevity risks Richards, Jones (2004) Further reading CMIB Report No 17 – Continuous Mortality Investigation Bureau (1999) CMIB Working Paper No 1 – Continuous Mortality Investigation Bureau (2002) CMIB Working Paper No 3 – Continuous Mortality Investigation Bureau (2004) Longevity in the 21st Century – Willets, Gallop, Leandro, Lu, MacDonald, Miller, Richards, Robjohns, Ryan, Waters (2004) The Cohort effect: Insights and Explanations – Willets (2004) How long do people expect to live? Results and implications O’Brien, Fenn, Diacon (2005) Top 10 Papers? : Top 10 Papers? Actuaries, pension funds and investment – Arthur, Randall (1989) On the risks of stocks in the long run - Bodie (1995) The financial theory of defined benefit pension schemes - Exley, Mehta, Smith (1997) The price of actuarial values - Gordon (1999) Reinventing pension actuarial science– Bader, Gold (2002) Note on the relationship between pension assets and liabilities– Speed, Bowie, Exley, Jones, Mounce, Ralston, Spiers, Williams (2003) Essentials of corporate bonds for pensions actuaries– Forman, Freeman, Marshall, McKinlay (2003) Pension fund asset allocation– Bianco, Cooper (2003) Funding defined benefit pension schemes– Cowling, Gordon, Speed (2004) Financial aspects of longevity risks– Jones, Richards (2004) charles.cowling@mercer.com