Changing Practice for Changing Families: Changing Practice for Changing Families Thomas W. Blume, Ph.D., LMFT, LPC
GCSA/Chi Sigma Iota Conference 2007
I Matching our practices to client and community needs: I Matching our practices to client and community needs Premise: The field of marriage and family counseling has developed in response to particular social trends and family circumstances
Client and community needs…: Client and community needs… Social climate prior to 1950
Rural populations moved into the cities beginning in the 19th Century, and the resulting physical and social dislocation led to crime and delinquency
Individuals in “modern” society struggled against tradition, but they also suffered from loss of extended family and community support
Client and community needs… : Client and community needs… Mental Health/Psychiatry Before 1950
Contrasting positions (focusing on the individual):
Liberate the individual from constraints (psychotherapy, including the humanistic movement)
Control the behavior of deviant, “mentally ill” individuals (hospitalization)
Our practices … : Our practices … Family counseling before 1950 (not a mental health specialty)
Social workers visited homes, provided support for family life
Home economists taught classes on nutrition, parenting
Religious leaders provided guidance
Medical experts addressed sexual problems
Client and community needs… : Client and community needs… Social climate 1950-1970
The urban middle class moved from cities into suburbs
Middle class, educated, nuclear family norms gained dominance
Client and community needs… : Client and community needs… Mental Health/Psychiatry 1950-1970
The “Orthopsychiatric” movement focused on optimizing mental health
Family ideas caught on quickly:
The person who is “sick” is showing that the whole family has a problem
If the family “illness” gets fixed, everyone will benefit
Our practices …: Our practices … Family counseling in its formative years (1950s through 1970s)
Multiple perspectives coexisted in a search for ways to be helpful
In the marketplace of competing ideas, the liberation ideology generally lost out to the ideology of control
Our practices …: Our practices … The “Major Models”—What they were, what they were not…
Multidisciplinary sharing
Mixtures of ideas
Systems reflected the founder’s image, e.g. Bowen
Not always theories in a strict sense, but “institutionalization of ideas”—Berger and Luckmann
Our practices …: Our practices … Practices based on assumptions about nuclear family needs (submarine metaphor)
Preservation of hierarchy and order
Life cycle norms
Communication—speaking and listening, few letters
Emotion management
Discipline styles
Sexual functioning espec female low SD, male premature ejaculation
Our practices …: Our practices … Criticisms of “first order” approaches
Mechanistic, manipulative stance
Gender bias, stabilizing inequalities
Heteronormative bias
Ethnic and cultural insensitivity
Insensitivity to alternative family forms
II What’s changed since the 1970s: II What’s changed since the 1970s Premise: Families today are different from the ones that came to the training clinics of Satir, Minuchin, Haley, and Madanes in the 1970s.
What’s changed…: What’s changed… Postmodern family – Judith Stacey and others. Families are different AND we are more aware of differences.
Family forms
Family functions
Conditions
Resources
What’s changed…: What’s changed… Family politics
Sexual revolution US
Youth rebellion, drugs and activism
Gender revolution
Recognition of LGBTQ relationships
Declining numbers of children
Declining early marriage
Declining marriage
What’s changed…: What’s changed… Family economics
Decline of single-employer careers
Decline of single-income families
Increased educational demands
Increased service industry, low pay jobs
Delayed entry of youth into full workforce participation
Global mobility, migration with family
What’s changed… : What’s changed… Family technology
Problems: Less sharing of
entertainment activities (megaplexes, game consoles)
culture/information sources
transportation
Problem: Weakened family “boundary” (Springer Break example)
Improvements: More access
tracking/access by mobile phone, IM
long distance communication options (telegram example)
What’s changed… : What’s changed… Family health
Deinstitutionalization of health & MH care
Increased survival with care needs eg alzheimers
Longer life spans
Declining fertility
Increased fertility options
What’s changed…: What’s changed… Family structures
Increased divorce
Increased stepfamily formation
More intergenerational and single parent households
More multinational households
More same-gender households
More unmarried couples
Egalitarian couple relationships
III Counseling needs of contemporary families: III Counseling needs of contemporary families
Premise: These new families have special counseling needs that are not effectively met using models and techniques developed for a prior era.
Needs and issues: How do we make sense of the options?: Needs and issues: How do we make sense of the options? BONES taxonomy as a structure for needs assessment
Behavioral assumptions
Organizational assumptions
Emotional assumptions
Narrative assumptions
Spiritual assumptions
Changing issues and needs?: Changing issues and needs? Not everything has changed, e.g. we still need help with communication
Talking and listening skills (B, N, E)
Mobile phone rules and expectations (O, S)
Text skills—writing and reading/interpreting (B, N, E)
Text rules and expectations (O, S)
Changing issues : Changing issues Family politics
Sexual expectations and performance, including male ED and women’s body image
Sexual identity announcements and responses
Gender expectations
Intergenerational conflicts
Decisions abut having children
Decisions about commitment and/or marriage
Changing issues : Changing issues Family economics
Career choice, loss, re-choice in family context
Pressures of multiple jobs, conflicting schedules
Time and money for education
Lack of job satisfaction
Extended dependency of early adulthood
Relocation, financial and other responsibilities for relatives
Changing issues: Changing issues Family technology
Separation of family members’ entertainment, transportation, and information create isolation
Family boundaries require constant attention
Access by mobile phone, IM (Disney lets us track kids)
Long distance communication continues to improve, including video
Text may once again become peripheral in families?
Changing issues and needs?: Changing issues and needs? Family health
HIV/AIDS affects survivors and those infected—and creates prevention needs
Home/community health & MH care options continue to grow
Aging family members increase in number, along with care needs
Fertility problems and treatments are increasingly common
Changing issues and needs?: Changing issues and needs? Family structure
Divorce (common but no longer growing)
Stepfamilies (now the dominant family form)
Intergenerational and single-parent households
Same-gender parent households
Multiple-worker households with no full-time caregivers
Unmarried couples with children
Grandparents caring for children
Changing needs—the Postmodern World: Changing needs—the Postmodern World Intimacy
Mediated world, real vs. virtual connections
Information flood, getting lost in the noise
Skepticism vs. commitment--guardedness
Rapid change, loss of empathic connection
Consumerist values—“I can offer you a better deal”
Changing needs—the Postmodern World: Changing needs—the Postmodern World Identity
Mediated world, “Saturated self” – Gergen
Information flood, intersecting and conflicting discourses
Skepticism vs. commitment—rejection of influence
Rapid change, danger of stagnation and irrelevance
Consumerist values—“How would you like that prepared?”
Changing needs—the Postmodern World: Changing needs—the Postmodern World Diversity
Mediated world, increasing visibility of marginalized realities
Information flood, pathologizing discourses
Skepticism vs. commitment—distrust of consensus
Rapid change, difficulty understanding symbols & meanings
Consumerist values—“You can leave your unfortunate family history behind you”
IV Structures and systems for delivering services: IV Structures and systems for delivering services Premise: Serving contemporary families may require working in new ways—in different places, with professionals who are not conducting “medical consultations” or “psychotherapy”
Structures and systems…: Structures and systems… In-home and integrated teams
In school and/or after school
Offices in health facilities
Walk-in, single session
Adventure/activity centers
Structured visitation centers
Online text chat, email, video chat, multifamily chat
Structures and systems…: Structures and systems… Creativity needed—
Couple counseling cruises?
Couple crisis centers at resorts?
Family counseling summer camps?
Relationship World Theme Parks?
Offices in Meijer Stores?
Mobile family counseling offices?
Cell phone video sessions?
V Theories and models for contemporary issues: V Theories and models for contemporary issues Premise: We may need new theories and models that address contemporary issues.
Theories and models….: Theories and models…. EFT (Susan Johnson et al)
People need each other
Relational behavior is driven by emotional needs and reactions
People who feel weak and dependent often compensate by acting tough and aggressive
Emotional skills and responses can be modified
Theories and models….: Theories and models…. Feminist approaches (Bird, Hare-Mustin, Jordan, Knudson-Martin)
Power is a major factor in relationships
Unspoken power differences may be interpreted in emotional, personality, and relational quality terms
Human relationships are personal and unique
Theories and models….: Theories and models…. Narrative (Zimmerman & Dickerson, etc.)
Personalities, family structures, and mental disorders are all “stories”—different ways of describing events
Changing people’s stories changes their lives
It is hard to change stories all by one’s self, and loved ones can help with the “re-telling”
Theories and models….: Theories and models…. Social constructionist (Weingarten, Winslade, et al)
The words we use have power to help us connect or to complicate our connections
Careful listening—”witnessing”—is something people can learn to do for each other
Theories and models….: Theories and models…. Multicultural (Hardy, et al)
Unique “cultural locations” have their own realities
People with different realities often have trouble sharing their experiences
Before people can connect with others, it is helpful to spend time on exploring their own biases and expecations
Theories and models….: Theories and models…. IRC (Blume, et al)
Identities are not inside our heads, they are in interpersonal “space”
People seek positive validation from others
When identities become negative, they can be altered by working with others to change relationship stories
Identity Renegotiation Counseling: Identity Renegotiation Counseling T.W. Blume
The Process: The Process There are many ways to conduct counseling that fit with the general idea of Identity Renegotiation. I summarize those options into four clusters of related understandings, goals, and counseling techniques.
These clusters of conversations and activities have a circular, sequential quality. A counselor may step into a client's life at any point in the process.
Observing Selves in Relationship (Identities): Observing Selves in Relationship (Identities) An IRC process begins with relational identity: learning to see and hear identity demonstrations and statements.
With an individual client, this awareness comes from
observing interactions with the counselor, and
reviewing stories about interactions with others. (This violates the “We’re here to talk about YOU” rule).
With couples, groups, and families, the IRC counselor attends to the verbal and nonverbal communications of identities.
Observing Coalitions, Discourses, and Negotiations: Observing Coalitions, Discourses, and Negotiations As people become more aware of identities in interaction, an IRC process moves to a focus on interpersonal influence.
The counselor helps to identify coalitions and discourses in which interacting identities are shaped by expectations, labels, and selective approval.
The counselor also helps to identify more direct identity negotiations, as in the following common messages:
“Why can’t you get better grades? Your sisters were A students”
“I want you to be more loving”
Teaching and Practicing New Negotiation Strategies: Teaching and Practicing New Negotiation Strategies The actual process of Identity Renegotiation requires effective, collaborative negotiation strategies.
The IRC Counselor teaches collaborative problem-solving approaches that are broadly applicable in relationships.
With couples, families, and groups, clients can begin to practice these higher-level negotiation strategies in the counseling office.
Renegotiating Identities: Renegotiating Identities Identities are renegotiated through identity bargaining (verbal and nonverbal “bids”) and working toward consensus.
The IRC counselor acts a coach, helping to strategize about the changes people want in their lives and how (with whom) they will negotiate those changes.
As appropriate, the IRC counselor may act as facilitator for these negotiations or refers couples and families to trusted colleagues for this support.