logging in or signing up c8 CPM Lilly Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 156 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: September 28, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Mediation: A Tool for Promoting Permanency: Mediation: A Tool for Promoting Permanency NYS Unified Court System The New York Society For The Prevention of Cruelty To ChildrenChild Welfare in NY State: Child Welfare in NY State State supervised: NYS Office of Children and Family Services Locally administered: 58 Local Departments of Social Services (57 Counties + NYC Administration for Children’s Services) Approximately 27,000 Children in Care (NYS); 16,000 (NYC)—[2005 figures] Development of Permanency Mediation Pilots: Development of Permanency Mediation Pilots Long history of the use of mediation in child custody/access issues (CDRC Programs) Court Improvement Projects of the Permanent Judicial Commission on Justice for Children Model Courts Project of the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges OCFS Program Improvement Plan Development of Permanency Mediation Pilots: Development of Permanency Mediation Pilots PJC, ADR and OCFS decide to jointly fund several pilots (April 2003 – March 2005) Local stakeholder planning process Implementation Study conducted by the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges Outcome evaluation conducted by OCFSNew York City Program: New York City Program Stakeholder groups Partnership with NYC Family Court Phased program opening in each county Identifying program office space in Court Program Funding: Program Funding OCFS Contract New York Community Trust Other Foundation GrantsProgram Staffing: Program Staffing In-house Mediator Model Qualifications Family Court Mediators NYSPCC Mediators Program Coordinators SupervisionTraining: Training Basic Child Permanency Legal Topic Training Adolescent IssuesOutreach Activity: Outreach Activity Advisory Committees Program Presentations Meetings with Judges/Referees Court Case ConsultationsChild Protective (Dependency) Proceedings: Child Protective (Dependency) Proceedings New York State Family Court Act Article 10 Determine need for removal of child from home or supervision of home by protective services Fact-finding of abuse or neglect-sexual/physical abuse, excessive corporal punishment, drug/alcohol abuse, mental illness, ed. neglect, etc. Disposition upon adjudication of abuse or neglect-placement, release, supervision, etc. Permanency HearingsOther Proceedings: Other Proceedings Termination of Parental Rights Surrender/Conditional Surrender Post termination permanency hearings AdoptionParties to Proceedings: Parties to Proceedings Child Protective Service (Administration for Children’s Services ACS) Contracted Foster Care Agencies Parents/Other Persons Legally Responsible Attorneys ACS, Law Guardian, Parents, Foster Care Agencies, Foster ParentsWho Can Refer Cases?: Who Can Refer Cases? Judge Court Attorney Referee Attorneys PartiesMediated Issues: Mediated Issues Service Plans Permanency Goal Adolescent Issues Interpersonal Issues Between Parties Post TPR/Adoption Issues Case Postures at Referral: Case Postures at Referral Pre-fact-finding (includes: services, interpersonal issues, placement disputes etc.) Pre-disposition (includes: services, interpersonal issues, placement disputes etc.) Permanency TPR/Surrender Post-TPR Adoption Related Adolescents Custody Petitions (within an Article 10) Who Attends Mediation Sessions?: Who Attends Mediation Sessions? Co-Mediators Parents / foster parents Children (if appropriate) Foster care and ACS caseworkers Attorneys (for child, parents, ACS/agency and foster parents) Therapists and other service providers Observers Confidentiality: Confidentiality Mediation communications (including phone calls and notes taken during sessions) cannot be used as evidence in court or administrative proceeding Exceptions - new allegations of abuse/neglect, imminent risk of serious harm or consensus for disclosure Confidentiality encourages open, broad thinking dialogue between parties Opening Statement: Opening Statement Case development Mandatory vs. voluntary Reveal issues Brainstorm solutions Caucuses – meetings with a few parties Agreements Multiple mediation sessions Service Plans: Service Plans Individualized Realistic Meeting Timeframes Interconnected With Other Services or Systems Adolescent Issues: Adolescent Issues Disagreement Over Permanency Goal Treatment Plans School Attendance or Educational Needs Mental Health Needs Wanting To Be Heard at the Table Independent Living and Supportive Adults for the Youth/Teen Interpersonal Issues of Dispute: Interpersonal Issues of Dispute Trust/Distrust Among Parties Communication Break-downs Prior relationships damaged by an adversarial process and an overburdened system Role Expectations Empowerment Conditional Surrender/Post Adoption Contact Permanency Goal: Permanency Goal Permanency Plan Current Placement Concurrent Planning A.S.F.A (Adoption and Safe Families Act)Case Examples: Case ExamplesCompliance Impact: Compliance Impact “Mediation significantly impacts the overall compliance structure observed in parents at the conclusion of the child protection intervention process. …Parents who are offered mediation felt less coerced into going along with plans against their will, and were more likely to feel a commitment to the potential value of the intervention for them and their children.”Compliance Impact cont.: Compliance Impact cont. This meant that caseworkers and other interveners could focus more on relieving the stress on the family and intervening in family dynamics and less on dealing with parental resistance and alienation” Mayer, Bernard; Mediation in Child Protection Cases: The Impact of Third-Party Intervention on Parental Compliance Attitudes. Mediation Quarterly, no. 24 San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, Summer 1989 You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
c8 CPM Lilly Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 156 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: September 28, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Mediation: A Tool for Promoting Permanency: Mediation: A Tool for Promoting Permanency NYS Unified Court System The New York Society For The Prevention of Cruelty To ChildrenChild Welfare in NY State: Child Welfare in NY State State supervised: NYS Office of Children and Family Services Locally administered: 58 Local Departments of Social Services (57 Counties + NYC Administration for Children’s Services) Approximately 27,000 Children in Care (NYS); 16,000 (NYC)—[2005 figures] Development of Permanency Mediation Pilots: Development of Permanency Mediation Pilots Long history of the use of mediation in child custody/access issues (CDRC Programs) Court Improvement Projects of the Permanent Judicial Commission on Justice for Children Model Courts Project of the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges OCFS Program Improvement Plan Development of Permanency Mediation Pilots: Development of Permanency Mediation Pilots PJC, ADR and OCFS decide to jointly fund several pilots (April 2003 – March 2005) Local stakeholder planning process Implementation Study conducted by the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges Outcome evaluation conducted by OCFSNew York City Program: New York City Program Stakeholder groups Partnership with NYC Family Court Phased program opening in each county Identifying program office space in Court Program Funding: Program Funding OCFS Contract New York Community Trust Other Foundation GrantsProgram Staffing: Program Staffing In-house Mediator Model Qualifications Family Court Mediators NYSPCC Mediators Program Coordinators SupervisionTraining: Training Basic Child Permanency Legal Topic Training Adolescent IssuesOutreach Activity: Outreach Activity Advisory Committees Program Presentations Meetings with Judges/Referees Court Case ConsultationsChild Protective (Dependency) Proceedings: Child Protective (Dependency) Proceedings New York State Family Court Act Article 10 Determine need for removal of child from home or supervision of home by protective services Fact-finding of abuse or neglect-sexual/physical abuse, excessive corporal punishment, drug/alcohol abuse, mental illness, ed. neglect, etc. Disposition upon adjudication of abuse or neglect-placement, release, supervision, etc. Permanency HearingsOther Proceedings: Other Proceedings Termination of Parental Rights Surrender/Conditional Surrender Post termination permanency hearings AdoptionParties to Proceedings: Parties to Proceedings Child Protective Service (Administration for Children’s Services ACS) Contracted Foster Care Agencies Parents/Other Persons Legally Responsible Attorneys ACS, Law Guardian, Parents, Foster Care Agencies, Foster ParentsWho Can Refer Cases?: Who Can Refer Cases? Judge Court Attorney Referee Attorneys PartiesMediated Issues: Mediated Issues Service Plans Permanency Goal Adolescent Issues Interpersonal Issues Between Parties Post TPR/Adoption Issues Case Postures at Referral: Case Postures at Referral Pre-fact-finding (includes: services, interpersonal issues, placement disputes etc.) Pre-disposition (includes: services, interpersonal issues, placement disputes etc.) Permanency TPR/Surrender Post-TPR Adoption Related Adolescents Custody Petitions (within an Article 10) Who Attends Mediation Sessions?: Who Attends Mediation Sessions? Co-Mediators Parents / foster parents Children (if appropriate) Foster care and ACS caseworkers Attorneys (for child, parents, ACS/agency and foster parents) Therapists and other service providers Observers Confidentiality: Confidentiality Mediation communications (including phone calls and notes taken during sessions) cannot be used as evidence in court or administrative proceeding Exceptions - new allegations of abuse/neglect, imminent risk of serious harm or consensus for disclosure Confidentiality encourages open, broad thinking dialogue between parties Opening Statement: Opening Statement Case development Mandatory vs. voluntary Reveal issues Brainstorm solutions Caucuses – meetings with a few parties Agreements Multiple mediation sessions Service Plans: Service Plans Individualized Realistic Meeting Timeframes Interconnected With Other Services or Systems Adolescent Issues: Adolescent Issues Disagreement Over Permanency Goal Treatment Plans School Attendance or Educational Needs Mental Health Needs Wanting To Be Heard at the Table Independent Living and Supportive Adults for the Youth/Teen Interpersonal Issues of Dispute: Interpersonal Issues of Dispute Trust/Distrust Among Parties Communication Break-downs Prior relationships damaged by an adversarial process and an overburdened system Role Expectations Empowerment Conditional Surrender/Post Adoption Contact Permanency Goal: Permanency Goal Permanency Plan Current Placement Concurrent Planning A.S.F.A (Adoption and Safe Families Act)Case Examples: Case ExamplesCompliance Impact: Compliance Impact “Mediation significantly impacts the overall compliance structure observed in parents at the conclusion of the child protection intervention process. …Parents who are offered mediation felt less coerced into going along with plans against their will, and were more likely to feel a commitment to the potential value of the intervention for them and their children.”Compliance Impact cont.: Compliance Impact cont. This meant that caseworkers and other interveners could focus more on relieving the stress on the family and intervening in family dynamics and less on dealing with parental resistance and alienation” Mayer, Bernard; Mediation in Child Protection Cases: The Impact of Third-Party Intervention on Parental Compliance Attitudes. Mediation Quarterly, no. 24 San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, Summer 1989