logging in or signing up GalHanlon Lassie Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 39 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: December 23, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide1: NATO OTAN US MILITARY REPRESENTATIVE TO NATO Information Exchange In Coalition Operations “From Guarding to Sharing” 1 June 2006 LtGen Ed Hanlon, USMC Slide2: EUROPE 1945 - 1990 ThreatCold War Comms: Cold War Comms Static Robust Redundant Oriented on territorial defense More military than civilian Heavy reliance on message traffic (TARE, AUTODIN, etc) Some data comms Survivable against extreme challenges (EMP, EW)Slide6: ARTICLE V 11 Sep 01 12 Sep 01Slide7: Kosovo OperationSlide9: Current ACE Operations2006: A Year of Transition Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) and The International Security Assistance Force (ISAF): 2006: A Year of Transition Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) and The International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) ISAF Stages 3 and 4 Increased role of NATO / ISAF in Afghanistan Increased need for communications and coordination between OEF and ISAFTechnical Result : Technical Result Need for Greater Integration of ISAF and OEF Communications Need for increased information exchange2 Aspects: 2 Aspects Technical Aspect Policy Aspect Policy is harder than technicsInformation Releasability: Information Releasability US to OEF Coalition OEF Coalition to ISAF NATO to ISAF ISAF to OEF CoalitionExamples: Examples Situational Awareness & Locations Intelligence Special OperationsPost Cold War NATO Comms: Post Cold War NATO Comms Still redundant and robust Covering greater distances Deployable More civilian, less military Reach back capacity More data, less voice Video Challenge: Will We Remain Ready? Will We Stay Ahead?: Challenge: Will We Remain Ready? Will We Stay Ahead? What will the world look like in 5, or 10, or 15 years? How can communications and technology help meet these challenges? How can AFCEA influence the technological developments demanded by future developments?NATO Future Comms Some Ideas: NATO Future Comms Some Ideas Light Mobile Quick to install Hand held More nodes—plug and play Voice, data, VTC—all in one small and light packageSlide22: US MILITARY REPRESENTATIVE TO NATO Information Exchange In Coalition Operations “From Guarding to Sharing” 1 June 2006 LtGen Ed Hanlon, USMC You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
GalHanlon Lassie Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 39 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: December 23, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide1: NATO OTAN US MILITARY REPRESENTATIVE TO NATO Information Exchange In Coalition Operations “From Guarding to Sharing” 1 June 2006 LtGen Ed Hanlon, USMC Slide2: EUROPE 1945 - 1990 ThreatCold War Comms: Cold War Comms Static Robust Redundant Oriented on territorial defense More military than civilian Heavy reliance on message traffic (TARE, AUTODIN, etc) Some data comms Survivable against extreme challenges (EMP, EW)Slide6: ARTICLE V 11 Sep 01 12 Sep 01Slide7: Kosovo OperationSlide9: Current ACE Operations2006: A Year of Transition Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) and The International Security Assistance Force (ISAF): 2006: A Year of Transition Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) and The International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) ISAF Stages 3 and 4 Increased role of NATO / ISAF in Afghanistan Increased need for communications and coordination between OEF and ISAFTechnical Result : Technical Result Need for Greater Integration of ISAF and OEF Communications Need for increased information exchange2 Aspects: 2 Aspects Technical Aspect Policy Aspect Policy is harder than technicsInformation Releasability: Information Releasability US to OEF Coalition OEF Coalition to ISAF NATO to ISAF ISAF to OEF CoalitionExamples: Examples Situational Awareness & Locations Intelligence Special OperationsPost Cold War NATO Comms: Post Cold War NATO Comms Still redundant and robust Covering greater distances Deployable More civilian, less military Reach back capacity More data, less voice Video Challenge: Will We Remain Ready? Will We Stay Ahead?: Challenge: Will We Remain Ready? Will We Stay Ahead? What will the world look like in 5, or 10, or 15 years? How can communications and technology help meet these challenges? How can AFCEA influence the technological developments demanded by future developments?NATO Future Comms Some Ideas: NATO Future Comms Some Ideas Light Mobile Quick to install Hand held More nodes—plug and play Voice, data, VTC—all in one small and light packageSlide22: US MILITARY REPRESENTATIVE TO NATO Information Exchange In Coalition Operations “From Guarding to Sharing” 1 June 2006 LtGen Ed Hanlon, USMC