logging in or signing up PbG hisp2 Kliment Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 321 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (1) Dislike it (0) Added: November 14, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 1 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... By: neutronboy (34 month(s) ago) Can I download the ppt soon please? It;s important in our company. Thank you very much.. Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close Premium member Presentation Transcript Event-Related Brain Potentials in Cognitive Neuroscience: Event-Related Brain Potentials in Cognitive Neuroscience Helmholtz Summerschool 2005 Cognitive Neurophysics II Peter beim Graben Inst. for Linguistics / Physics Potsdam University 27. September 2005Contents: Contents Prologue: history of brain mapping and EEG Event-related brain potentials I: technique Event-related brain potentials II: data analysis Event-related brain potentials III: classification Language processingPhrenology: PhrenologyThe Discovery of the EEG: The Discovery of the EEG Hans Berger (1873 – 1941)Local Field Potentials: Local Field Potentials soma EPSP IPSP dendrite axon pyramidal cell influx of sodium: – pole outflux of potassium / influx of chloride: + pole EEG Generators: EEG Generators skull pyra- midal cell ● ● from / to thalamus ● star cell ● ● axon Axon dendrites ● ● ● ● ● ● ● dipole: open field closed field: dipole moments average to 0EEG Measurement: EEG Measurement to amplifierElectrode Placement: Electrode Placement 10–20-systemEEG Frequency Bands: EEG Frequency Bands frequency 0 – 4 Hz 4 – 8 Hz 8 – 14 Hz 14 – 30 Hz > 30 Hz δ-band θ-band α-band β-band γ-bandEvent-Related Potentials: Event-Related Potentials SetupCustomary Data Analysis: Customary Data Analysis artifact rejection filtering (optional) epoching: cut data stream into intervals (“epochs”) build epoch ensembles per condition baseline alignment ensemble averaging statisticsCustomary Data Analysis: Customary Data Analysis epoch 1 epoch 2 epoch N epoch 1 epoch 2 epoch N stim stim stimEvent-Related Potentials: Event-Related Potentials ERP components are distinguished peaks in the averaged EEG that vary with experimental manipulations. definition of ERP componentsNomenclature: Nomenclature early components: roman letters (I, II, III, IV) middle latency components: polarity + letter (Pa, Pb, Na) late component: polarity + latency (N100, P300, N400) or: polarity + ordinal number (P1, N1, P2)Requirements of Customary ERP Analysis: Requirements of Customary ERP Analysis EEG epoch = ERP signal + noise ERP is invariant across trials and time-locked noise is stationary and ergodic ERP and noise are uncorrelated noise-realizations are uncorrelated across trialsEpoching: Epoching epoch #7 of two conditions at FZ epochs #1-4 for critical condition at FZBaseline Alignment: Baseline Alignment epochs #1-4 for critical condition raw EEG at FZEpoch Ensembles: Epoch Ensembles all epochs of the same subject for critical condition at FZ all epochs of one subject for control condition at FZ μV μVEnsemble Averaging: Ensemble Averaging ERP – average over 2 epochs at FZEnsemble Averaging: Ensemble Averaging ERP – average over 4 epochs at FZEnsemble Averaging: Ensemble Averaging ERP – average over 8 epochs at FZEnsemble Averaging: Ensemble Averaging ERP – average over 16 epochs at FZEnsemble Averaging: Ensemble Averaging P600 ERP – average over all epochs at FZERP Maps: ERP Maps μVEvent-Related Spectra: Event-Related Spectra θ-band α-bandEvent-Related Spectra: Event-Related Spectra power difference in θ-band power difference in α-band μV2 μV2Time Frequency Analysis: Time Frequency Analysis Gabor wavelet transform Roehm (2004)Amplitude Frequency Characteristics: Amplitude Frequency Characteristics Combined Analysis Procedure: Combined Analysis Procedure Başar (1980, 1983) Yordanova & Kolev (1998) ERPEvoked Activity: Evoked Activity Gruber et al. (2005)Induced Activity: Induced Activity Gabor wavelet transform Roehm (2004)Evoked vs. Induced Power: Evoked vs. Induced Power Roehm (2004) evoked inducedPhase Locking Value: Phase Locking Value Roehm (2004) N400Requirements of Customary ERP Analysis: Requirements of Customary ERP Analysis EEG epoch = ERP signal + noise ERP is invariant across trials and time-locked noise is stationary and ergodic ERP and noise are uncorrelated noise-realizations are uncorrelated across trialsThe Dynamical Approach: The Dynamical Approach Başar (1980, 1983) beim Graben et al. (2000) experimental manipulations are control parameters ERP time series are images of trajectories of a dynamical system exploring the neural phase space under the EEG observable ensembles of ERP epochs correspond to ensembles of trajectories starting from randomly distributed initial conditions ERPs are order parametersPhase Space Portrait: control condition Başar (1980, 1983) Phase Space PortraitCoarse-Graining: control condition Coarse-GrainingSymbolic Dynamics of ERP: Symbolic Dynamics of ERP EEG time series symbolic sequence 010011011010111011Symbolic Dynamics of ERP: Symbolic Dynamics of ERP beim Graben et al. (2000) critical condition at FZ potential polaritityCylinder Sets of ERP: Cylinder Sets of ERP [10]t2 = {a, b, d} cylinder set := set of all sequences agreeing in some affix.Measures of Complexity: Measures of ComplexityWord Statistics: Word StatisticsEntropy: Entropy measure for disorder and unpredictabilityEvent-Related Entropies: Event-Related EntropiesEntropy Maps: Entropy MapsTime Frequency Symbolic Dynamics: Time Frequency Symbolic Dynamics entropy differences of critical and control condition N400 P600 analogue to plvTwo-Threshold Encoding: Two-Threshold Encoding noisy signal upper encoding threshold lower encoding thresholdSymbolic Resonance Analysis: Symbolic Resonance Analysis beim Graben & Kurths (2003) Frisch & beim Graben (2005) threshold 1 threshold 2 threshold 3 3-symbol encoding Bessel function + noise 0101211101212121101012010Symbolic Resonance Analysis: 3-symbol encoding word statistics = 0.5, = 0.5 Symbolic Resonance AnalysisMean-Field Transformation: Mean-Field Transformation (1+1)-dim 3-Potts spin lattice magnetizations spin flip transform Mean-Field Transformation: Mean-Field Transformation (1+1)-dim 3-Potts spin lattice magnetizations spin flip transform Mean-Field Transformation: Mean-Field Transformation (1+1)-dim 3-Potts spin lattice magnetizations spin flip transform Mean-Field Transformation: Mean-Field Transformation (1+1)-dim 3-Potts spin lattice magnetizations spin flip transform Mean-Field Transformation: Mean-Field Transformation (1+1)-dim 3-Potts spin lattice magnetizations spin flip transform Mean-Field Transformation: Mean-Field Transformation (1+1)-dim 3-Potts spin lattice magnetizations spin flip transform Mean-Field Transformation: Mean-Field Transformation (1+1)-dim 3-Potts spin lattice magnetizations spin flip transform Mean-Field Transformation: Mean-Field Transformation (1+1)-dim 3-Potts spin lattice magnetizations spin flip transform Mean-Field Transformation: Mean-Field Transformation (1+1)-dim 3-Potts spin lattice magnetizations spin flip transform kind of “Reversi”Mean-Field Transformation: Mean-Field Transformation 3-symbols word statistics 2-symbols word statisticsMean-Field Transformation: Mean-Field Transformation 3-symbol encoding 2-symbol encodingStochastic Resonance: Stochastic Resonance SNR of mean-field transformed 3-symbol distributions against encoding threshold θ. Symbolic Resonance Analysis (SRA) Frisch & beim Graben (2005) N4001 N4002 controlERP Classification: ERP Classification polarity: positive (P); negative (N) latency: 100; 300; 400; 600 ms morphology: phasic; tonic topography: anterior; parietal; symmetryERP Classification: ERP Classification exogenous components endogenous components varying with physical parameters (intensity, pitch, size, duration) no variation with psychological parameters latency < 100 ms “evoked potentials” (EP) no variation with physical parameters varying with psychological parameters (attention, task, instruction, meaning) latency > 100 ms event-related potentialsAEP: AEP acoustically evoked potentialsVEP: VEP visually evoked potentialsSEP: SEP somato-sensorically evoked potentialsBereitschaftspotential: Bereitschaftspotential lateralized readiness potential Kornhuber & Deeke (1965) movement of left handCNV: CNV contingent negative variation Walter et al. (1964) AEP VEP AEP VEP AEP CNVN100 / Nd: N100 / Nd attention Hillyard et al. (1973)MMN: MMN mismatch negativity Kallio et al. (1999) passive auditory oddballP300: P300 surprise, surprise! active auditory oddballP300: P300 context updatingP300: P300 a posteriori probability, relevance, valueAmbiguity: Ambiguity The spy observed the politician with binoculars. Necker cubeVisual Ambiguity: Visual Ambiguity Kornmeier et al. (2004)Reversal Negativity: Reversal Negativity no reversal reversalLanguage Processing ERP Experiments: Language Processing ERP Experiments fell the barn past raced The horse + garden-path sentenceN400: N400 lexical-semantic access Kutas & Hillyard (1980)N400: N400 semantic coherence The knight in shining armour drew hisN400: N400 semantic priming Holcomb (1988)Hippocampus: HippocampusNMDA Receptor: NMDA Receptor agonists: e.g. NMDA antagonists: e.g. Zinc, Angel-Dust (PCP), KetamineHippocampus N400: Hippocampus N400 short term memory, lexical access Grunwald et al. (1999)ELAN: ELAN early left-anterior negativity The goose was in fed The goose was fed in.LAN: LAN left-anterior negativity Hoen & Dominey (2000) ABCXCBAX ABCZDEFZP600: P600 syntactic positivity shift sell the stock. Osterhout & Holcomb (1992) Diagnosis and Repair: voltage averages Diagnosis and Repair No man who had a beard was ever happy. A man who had a beard was ever happy. A man who had no beard was ever happy. Drenhaus et al. (2005) N400 P600 You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
PbG hisp2 Kliment Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 321 Category: Entertainment License: All Rights Reserved Like it (1) Dislike it (0) Added: November 14, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 1 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... By: neutronboy (34 month(s) ago) Can I download the ppt soon please? It;s important in our company. Thank you very much.. Saving..... Post Reply Close Saving..... Edit Comment Close Premium member Presentation Transcript Event-Related Brain Potentials in Cognitive Neuroscience: Event-Related Brain Potentials in Cognitive Neuroscience Helmholtz Summerschool 2005 Cognitive Neurophysics II Peter beim Graben Inst. for Linguistics / Physics Potsdam University 27. September 2005Contents: Contents Prologue: history of brain mapping and EEG Event-related brain potentials I: technique Event-related brain potentials II: data analysis Event-related brain potentials III: classification Language processingPhrenology: PhrenologyThe Discovery of the EEG: The Discovery of the EEG Hans Berger (1873 – 1941)Local Field Potentials: Local Field Potentials soma EPSP IPSP dendrite axon pyramidal cell influx of sodium: – pole outflux of potassium / influx of chloride: + pole EEG Generators: EEG Generators skull pyra- midal cell ● ● from / to thalamus ● star cell ● ● axon Axon dendrites ● ● ● ● ● ● ● dipole: open field closed field: dipole moments average to 0EEG Measurement: EEG Measurement to amplifierElectrode Placement: Electrode Placement 10–20-systemEEG Frequency Bands: EEG Frequency Bands frequency 0 – 4 Hz 4 – 8 Hz 8 – 14 Hz 14 – 30 Hz > 30 Hz δ-band θ-band α-band β-band γ-bandEvent-Related Potentials: Event-Related Potentials SetupCustomary Data Analysis: Customary Data Analysis artifact rejection filtering (optional) epoching: cut data stream into intervals (“epochs”) build epoch ensembles per condition baseline alignment ensemble averaging statisticsCustomary Data Analysis: Customary Data Analysis epoch 1 epoch 2 epoch N epoch 1 epoch 2 epoch N stim stim stimEvent-Related Potentials: Event-Related Potentials ERP components are distinguished peaks in the averaged EEG that vary with experimental manipulations. definition of ERP componentsNomenclature: Nomenclature early components: roman letters (I, II, III, IV) middle latency components: polarity + letter (Pa, Pb, Na) late component: polarity + latency (N100, P300, N400) or: polarity + ordinal number (P1, N1, P2)Requirements of Customary ERP Analysis: Requirements of Customary ERP Analysis EEG epoch = ERP signal + noise ERP is invariant across trials and time-locked noise is stationary and ergodic ERP and noise are uncorrelated noise-realizations are uncorrelated across trialsEpoching: Epoching epoch #7 of two conditions at FZ epochs #1-4 for critical condition at FZBaseline Alignment: Baseline Alignment epochs #1-4 for critical condition raw EEG at FZEpoch Ensembles: Epoch Ensembles all epochs of the same subject for critical condition at FZ all epochs of one subject for control condition at FZ μV μVEnsemble Averaging: Ensemble Averaging ERP – average over 2 epochs at FZEnsemble Averaging: Ensemble Averaging ERP – average over 4 epochs at FZEnsemble Averaging: Ensemble Averaging ERP – average over 8 epochs at FZEnsemble Averaging: Ensemble Averaging ERP – average over 16 epochs at FZEnsemble Averaging: Ensemble Averaging P600 ERP – average over all epochs at FZERP Maps: ERP Maps μVEvent-Related Spectra: Event-Related Spectra θ-band α-bandEvent-Related Spectra: Event-Related Spectra power difference in θ-band power difference in α-band μV2 μV2Time Frequency Analysis: Time Frequency Analysis Gabor wavelet transform Roehm (2004)Amplitude Frequency Characteristics: Amplitude Frequency Characteristics Combined Analysis Procedure: Combined Analysis Procedure Başar (1980, 1983) Yordanova & Kolev (1998) ERPEvoked Activity: Evoked Activity Gruber et al. (2005)Induced Activity: Induced Activity Gabor wavelet transform Roehm (2004)Evoked vs. Induced Power: Evoked vs. Induced Power Roehm (2004) evoked inducedPhase Locking Value: Phase Locking Value Roehm (2004) N400Requirements of Customary ERP Analysis: Requirements of Customary ERP Analysis EEG epoch = ERP signal + noise ERP is invariant across trials and time-locked noise is stationary and ergodic ERP and noise are uncorrelated noise-realizations are uncorrelated across trialsThe Dynamical Approach: The Dynamical Approach Başar (1980, 1983) beim Graben et al. (2000) experimental manipulations are control parameters ERP time series are images of trajectories of a dynamical system exploring the neural phase space under the EEG observable ensembles of ERP epochs correspond to ensembles of trajectories starting from randomly distributed initial conditions ERPs are order parametersPhase Space Portrait: control condition Başar (1980, 1983) Phase Space PortraitCoarse-Graining: control condition Coarse-GrainingSymbolic Dynamics of ERP: Symbolic Dynamics of ERP EEG time series symbolic sequence 010011011010111011Symbolic Dynamics of ERP: Symbolic Dynamics of ERP beim Graben et al. (2000) critical condition at FZ potential polaritityCylinder Sets of ERP: Cylinder Sets of ERP [10]t2 = {a, b, d} cylinder set := set of all sequences agreeing in some affix.Measures of Complexity: Measures of ComplexityWord Statistics: Word StatisticsEntropy: Entropy measure for disorder and unpredictabilityEvent-Related Entropies: Event-Related EntropiesEntropy Maps: Entropy MapsTime Frequency Symbolic Dynamics: Time Frequency Symbolic Dynamics entropy differences of critical and control condition N400 P600 analogue to plvTwo-Threshold Encoding: Two-Threshold Encoding noisy signal upper encoding threshold lower encoding thresholdSymbolic Resonance Analysis: Symbolic Resonance Analysis beim Graben & Kurths (2003) Frisch & beim Graben (2005) threshold 1 threshold 2 threshold 3 3-symbol encoding Bessel function + noise 0101211101212121101012010Symbolic Resonance Analysis: 3-symbol encoding word statistics = 0.5, = 0.5 Symbolic Resonance AnalysisMean-Field Transformation: Mean-Field Transformation (1+1)-dim 3-Potts spin lattice magnetizations spin flip transform Mean-Field Transformation: Mean-Field Transformation (1+1)-dim 3-Potts spin lattice magnetizations spin flip transform Mean-Field Transformation: Mean-Field Transformation (1+1)-dim 3-Potts spin lattice magnetizations spin flip transform Mean-Field Transformation: Mean-Field Transformation (1+1)-dim 3-Potts spin lattice magnetizations spin flip transform Mean-Field Transformation: Mean-Field Transformation (1+1)-dim 3-Potts spin lattice magnetizations spin flip transform Mean-Field Transformation: Mean-Field Transformation (1+1)-dim 3-Potts spin lattice magnetizations spin flip transform Mean-Field Transformation: Mean-Field Transformation (1+1)-dim 3-Potts spin lattice magnetizations spin flip transform Mean-Field Transformation: Mean-Field Transformation (1+1)-dim 3-Potts spin lattice magnetizations spin flip transform Mean-Field Transformation: Mean-Field Transformation (1+1)-dim 3-Potts spin lattice magnetizations spin flip transform kind of “Reversi”Mean-Field Transformation: Mean-Field Transformation 3-symbols word statistics 2-symbols word statisticsMean-Field Transformation: Mean-Field Transformation 3-symbol encoding 2-symbol encodingStochastic Resonance: Stochastic Resonance SNR of mean-field transformed 3-symbol distributions against encoding threshold θ. Symbolic Resonance Analysis (SRA) Frisch & beim Graben (2005) N4001 N4002 controlERP Classification: ERP Classification polarity: positive (P); negative (N) latency: 100; 300; 400; 600 ms morphology: phasic; tonic topography: anterior; parietal; symmetryERP Classification: ERP Classification exogenous components endogenous components varying with physical parameters (intensity, pitch, size, duration) no variation with psychological parameters latency < 100 ms “evoked potentials” (EP) no variation with physical parameters varying with psychological parameters (attention, task, instruction, meaning) latency > 100 ms event-related potentialsAEP: AEP acoustically evoked potentialsVEP: VEP visually evoked potentialsSEP: SEP somato-sensorically evoked potentialsBereitschaftspotential: Bereitschaftspotential lateralized readiness potential Kornhuber & Deeke (1965) movement of left handCNV: CNV contingent negative variation Walter et al. (1964) AEP VEP AEP VEP AEP CNVN100 / Nd: N100 / Nd attention Hillyard et al. (1973)MMN: MMN mismatch negativity Kallio et al. (1999) passive auditory oddballP300: P300 surprise, surprise! active auditory oddballP300: P300 context updatingP300: P300 a posteriori probability, relevance, valueAmbiguity: Ambiguity The spy observed the politician with binoculars. Necker cubeVisual Ambiguity: Visual Ambiguity Kornmeier et al. (2004)Reversal Negativity: Reversal Negativity no reversal reversalLanguage Processing ERP Experiments: Language Processing ERP Experiments fell the barn past raced The horse + garden-path sentenceN400: N400 lexical-semantic access Kutas & Hillyard (1980)N400: N400 semantic coherence The knight in shining armour drew hisN400: N400 semantic priming Holcomb (1988)Hippocampus: HippocampusNMDA Receptor: NMDA Receptor agonists: e.g. NMDA antagonists: e.g. Zinc, Angel-Dust (PCP), KetamineHippocampus N400: Hippocampus N400 short term memory, lexical access Grunwald et al. (1999)ELAN: ELAN early left-anterior negativity The goose was in fed The goose was fed in.LAN: LAN left-anterior negativity Hoen & Dominey (2000) ABCXCBAX ABCZDEFZP600: P600 syntactic positivity shift sell the stock. Osterhout & Holcomb (1992) Diagnosis and Repair: voltage averages Diagnosis and Repair No man who had a beard was ever happy. A man who had a beard was ever happy. A man who had no beard was ever happy. Drenhaus et al. (2005) N400 P600