logging in or signing up Howard Wood Keynote Presentation Joshua Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 108 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: February 26, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Upper Midwest Freight Corridor Study: Upper Midwest Freight Corridor Study Welcome to Ohio! Howard Wood Deputy Director of Planning Ohio Department of TransportationOverview: Overview Short Ohio Freight Profile Ohio Freight Planning Elements of Ohio Freight Policy Ohio Freight Program Examples Ohio Freight ProjectsOhio Freight Profile: Ohio Freight ProfileSlide4: 4th largest interstate network 5th highest volume of truck traffic 3rd highest in value of truck freight 5.5% of all US freight (tons) is carried by Ohio’s transport system 13% by value of all freight traveling in the United States has touched Ohio’s transportation system State of Ohio Ohio Economic and Travel IndicesRelative Growth, 1990 – 2000: Ohio Economic and Travel Indices Relative Growth, 1990 – 2000Slide7: Ohio Economic and Travel Indices Relative Growth, 1990 – 2000Slide8: Ohio Economic and Travel Indices Relative Growth, 1990 – 2000Slide9: Ohio Economic and Travel Indices Relative Growth, 1990 – 2000Highway Freight Density: Highway Freight DensitySlide11: Railway Freight DensityInterstate Average Daily Truck Traffic: Interstate Average Daily Truck TrafficOhio Freight Planning Activities: Ohio Freight Planning ActivitiesFreight Planning in Ohio: Freight Planning in Ohio 1972: creation of “ODOT” instead of “ODOH” Traficant’s Trench Columbiana County Port Authority 1980s: modal divisions of Rail, Water (ports and inland waterways), Aviation 1990’s: modal divisions unravel, but significant freight projects advance: Cincinnati 3rd Rail Main; Stark County Intermodal; Panhandle rail line acquisitionOhio Freight Planning Today: Ohio Freight Planning Today 1990s-era freight policies are still evident today Macro Corridor designations Project selection policies of the Transportation Review and Advisory Council Maintain “scanning” and studies of freight (barometric analogy) Freight Planning Activities: Freight Planning Activities 2002 Ohio Freight Report Highway Freight Bottleneck Study Rail Freight Bottleneck Study Statewide Travel Demand Model Includes truck cost in route choice, and modal diversion analysis Review of Reebie freight data; truck traffic counts; MPO planning elementsElements of Ohio Freight Policy: Elements of Ohio Freight PolicyOhio Transportation Policy: Ohio Transportation Policy Very conducive to intermodal projects Embodied by macro corridor designation Reflected in funding policies of the TRACMacro Corridors: Macro Corridors All Interstate Routes, PLUS roads that: Carried 15,000 passenger car equivalents Carry trips greater than 30 miles long Links population centers of more than 50k Links FHWA Intermodal connectors Links Strahnet routes Links major metropolitan areas in other states Appalachian Highway SystemMacro Corridor Update: Macro Corridor Update 2004 state transportation plan reviewed and confirmed original macro corridor analysis In addition, routes were added: Freight Relievers High Freight Growth RoutesMacro-Corridor Highway System : Macro-Corridor Highway System TRAC Investment Policy: TRAC Investment PolicyTRAC Investment Policy (cont’d): TRAC Investment Policy (cont’d) Accommodates freight/multi-modal project investment “It must be noted that although this scoring system is primarily intended for highway projects, the TRAC will consider funding other modes.”Ohio Freight Programs: Ohio Freight ProgramsOhio Freight Programs: Ohio Freight Programs TRAC/ Major New program for transportation system capacity expansion $500 million per year Rail Grade Separation Program 10 year, $200 million Approximately 30 to 40 projects Ohio Rail Development Commission Grant and Loan Program for rail projects State Infrastructure Bank: $184m capitalization Approximately one-fifth of the projects are freight/intermodalOhio Freight Projects: Ohio Freight ProjectsOhio Freight Projects: Ohio Freight Projects TRAC Projects Rail Grade Separation as subset Northern Ohio Freight Strategy TRAC-funded Projects: TRAC-funded Projects Approximately 30 rail grade sep projects Wilmington Bypass (air freight) US 24 “Fort-to-Port” (truck freight) US 30 (truck freight) Rickenbacker Intermodal (air freight) Cuyahoga River Valley Intermodal (water freight) Also, urban and rural corridor projectsMajor Projects 2004 – 2015: Major Projects 2004 – 2015Northern Ohio Freight Strategy: Northern Ohio Freight StrategyNorthern Ohio Freight Problem Statement: Northern Ohio Freight Problem Statement 82 percent toll increases in the 1990s Turnpike truck volume static Two-lane truck volume in northern Ohio increases by up to 1,000 trucks per day Truck Growth: Turnpike and Other Ohio Roads: Truck Growth: Turnpike and Other Ohio RoadsNorthern Ohio Freight Strategy: Northern Ohio Freight Strategy Increase Truck Speed Limit to 65mph More strict weight enforcement Pilot Truck Toll Rate Reduction/ RebateModel of Toll Elasticity: Model of Toll ElasticityResults: Truck Traffic: Results: Truck Traffic Ohio Turnpike 2005 truck traffic increased 20.3% Class 8 (80,000lb.) increased 25% Parallel State Routes Truck traffic reductions of 10% to 67% Reductions of 100 to 2,500 AADTT (Ottawa SR 2 example: 3,380 to 1,110 trucks per day)Truck Traffic Changes: Before: Truck Traffic Changes: BeforeTruck Traffic Changes: After: Truck Traffic Changes: AfterQuestions?: Questions? You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
Howard Wood Keynote Presentation Joshua Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 108 Category: Education License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: February 26, 2008 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Upper Midwest Freight Corridor Study: Upper Midwest Freight Corridor Study Welcome to Ohio! Howard Wood Deputy Director of Planning Ohio Department of TransportationOverview: Overview Short Ohio Freight Profile Ohio Freight Planning Elements of Ohio Freight Policy Ohio Freight Program Examples Ohio Freight ProjectsOhio Freight Profile: Ohio Freight ProfileSlide4: 4th largest interstate network 5th highest volume of truck traffic 3rd highest in value of truck freight 5.5% of all US freight (tons) is carried by Ohio’s transport system 13% by value of all freight traveling in the United States has touched Ohio’s transportation system State of Ohio Ohio Economic and Travel IndicesRelative Growth, 1990 – 2000: Ohio Economic and Travel Indices Relative Growth, 1990 – 2000Slide7: Ohio Economic and Travel Indices Relative Growth, 1990 – 2000Slide8: Ohio Economic and Travel Indices Relative Growth, 1990 – 2000Slide9: Ohio Economic and Travel Indices Relative Growth, 1990 – 2000Highway Freight Density: Highway Freight DensitySlide11: Railway Freight DensityInterstate Average Daily Truck Traffic: Interstate Average Daily Truck TrafficOhio Freight Planning Activities: Ohio Freight Planning ActivitiesFreight Planning in Ohio: Freight Planning in Ohio 1972: creation of “ODOT” instead of “ODOH” Traficant’s Trench Columbiana County Port Authority 1980s: modal divisions of Rail, Water (ports and inland waterways), Aviation 1990’s: modal divisions unravel, but significant freight projects advance: Cincinnati 3rd Rail Main; Stark County Intermodal; Panhandle rail line acquisitionOhio Freight Planning Today: Ohio Freight Planning Today 1990s-era freight policies are still evident today Macro Corridor designations Project selection policies of the Transportation Review and Advisory Council Maintain “scanning” and studies of freight (barometric analogy) Freight Planning Activities: Freight Planning Activities 2002 Ohio Freight Report Highway Freight Bottleneck Study Rail Freight Bottleneck Study Statewide Travel Demand Model Includes truck cost in route choice, and modal diversion analysis Review of Reebie freight data; truck traffic counts; MPO planning elementsElements of Ohio Freight Policy: Elements of Ohio Freight PolicyOhio Transportation Policy: Ohio Transportation Policy Very conducive to intermodal projects Embodied by macro corridor designation Reflected in funding policies of the TRACMacro Corridors: Macro Corridors All Interstate Routes, PLUS roads that: Carried 15,000 passenger car equivalents Carry trips greater than 30 miles long Links population centers of more than 50k Links FHWA Intermodal connectors Links Strahnet routes Links major metropolitan areas in other states Appalachian Highway SystemMacro Corridor Update: Macro Corridor Update 2004 state transportation plan reviewed and confirmed original macro corridor analysis In addition, routes were added: Freight Relievers High Freight Growth RoutesMacro-Corridor Highway System : Macro-Corridor Highway System TRAC Investment Policy: TRAC Investment PolicyTRAC Investment Policy (cont’d): TRAC Investment Policy (cont’d) Accommodates freight/multi-modal project investment “It must be noted that although this scoring system is primarily intended for highway projects, the TRAC will consider funding other modes.”Ohio Freight Programs: Ohio Freight ProgramsOhio Freight Programs: Ohio Freight Programs TRAC/ Major New program for transportation system capacity expansion $500 million per year Rail Grade Separation Program 10 year, $200 million Approximately 30 to 40 projects Ohio Rail Development Commission Grant and Loan Program for rail projects State Infrastructure Bank: $184m capitalization Approximately one-fifth of the projects are freight/intermodalOhio Freight Projects: Ohio Freight ProjectsOhio Freight Projects: Ohio Freight Projects TRAC Projects Rail Grade Separation as subset Northern Ohio Freight Strategy TRAC-funded Projects: TRAC-funded Projects Approximately 30 rail grade sep projects Wilmington Bypass (air freight) US 24 “Fort-to-Port” (truck freight) US 30 (truck freight) Rickenbacker Intermodal (air freight) Cuyahoga River Valley Intermodal (water freight) Also, urban and rural corridor projectsMajor Projects 2004 – 2015: Major Projects 2004 – 2015Northern Ohio Freight Strategy: Northern Ohio Freight StrategyNorthern Ohio Freight Problem Statement: Northern Ohio Freight Problem Statement 82 percent toll increases in the 1990s Turnpike truck volume static Two-lane truck volume in northern Ohio increases by up to 1,000 trucks per day Truck Growth: Turnpike and Other Ohio Roads: Truck Growth: Turnpike and Other Ohio RoadsNorthern Ohio Freight Strategy: Northern Ohio Freight Strategy Increase Truck Speed Limit to 65mph More strict weight enforcement Pilot Truck Toll Rate Reduction/ RebateModel of Toll Elasticity: Model of Toll ElasticityResults: Truck Traffic: Results: Truck Traffic Ohio Turnpike 2005 truck traffic increased 20.3% Class 8 (80,000lb.) increased 25% Parallel State Routes Truck traffic reductions of 10% to 67% Reductions of 100 to 2,500 AADTT (Ottawa SR 2 example: 3,380 to 1,110 trucks per day)Truck Traffic Changes: Before: Truck Traffic Changes: BeforeTruck Traffic Changes: After: Truck Traffic Changes: AfterQuestions?: Questions?