logging in or signing up SPIE06 breaking the news on mobile TV Jolene Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 274 Category: News & Reports.. License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: October 08, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide1: Breaking the News on Mobile TV: User requirements of a popular mobile content Hendrik Knoche*, Angela Sasse University College London Motivation: Motivation Repurpose standard TV news “as is” How do different encoding bitrates of both audio and video affect the perceived video quality on mobile devices? Down to what resolutions? How big is the influence of text? Previous research: Previous research Based on viewing ratio e.g. (5H) Size: The bigger the better (up to life size) Larger picture -> more arousal Smaller picture -> ? Conflicting information: 2” vs 13” screen no difference in attention benefits from smaller picture in lie detection (Horn ‘02) Emotion detection at full body view less accurate at smaller size 256x256 vs. 128x128Slide4: Study 1 (N=20), 15 sec. Slide5: Study 1: Summary Encoding bitrate of at least 100kbps Resolution and size have little effect Limitations: Small sample, few votes across codecs/devices short clip legible text Study 2: Interface: Study 2: InterfaceStudy 2 (N=72) 4 clips, 2 audio: Study 2 (N=72) 4 clips, 2 audioStudy 2: Qualitative feedback: Study 2: Qualitative feedbackSlide9: Study 2: Summary Reducing image resolution biggest effect at enc. bitrates >100kbps Text legibility is biggest problem of recoded TV news content Better audio resulted in poorer video acceptability Limitations: employed text too small to be legible did not test participants visual acuity Study 3: Preparation: Study 3: PreparationStudy 3: Preparation: Study 3: PreparationReminder Study 2: Reminder Study 2Study 3: (N=20): Study 3: (N=20)Slide14: Study 3: Summary tremendous gains through separate text delivery With legible text: acceptability for all resolutions reached asymptote ≥160kbps 168x126 was feasible for recoded TV News on a mobile device. Slide15: Summary video (res, bitrate), text, and audio affect perceived video quality assure text legibility by re-layout or separate delivery - acceptability reached asymptote ≥160kbps for all resolutions 168x126 – 320x240 facial details are important Limitations: Assumption: perfect delivery Slide16: Thank you! Breaking the News on Mobile TV: User requirements of a popular mobile content Hendrik Knoche*, Angela Sasse University College London h.knoche@cs.ucl.ac.uk Q&A You do not have the permission to view this presentation. In order to view it, please contact the author of the presentation.
SPIE06 breaking the news on mobile TV Jolene Download Post to : URL : Related Presentations : Share Add to Flag Embed Email Send to Blogs and Networks Add to Channel Uploaded from authorPOINTLite Insert YouTube videos in PowerPont slides with aS Desktop Copy embed code: (To copy code, click on the text box) Embed: URL: Thumbnail: WordPress Embed Customize Embed The presentation is successfully added In Your Favorites. Views: 274 Category: News & Reports.. License: All Rights Reserved Like it (0) Dislike it (0) Added: October 08, 2007 This Presentation is Public Favorites: 0 Presentation Description No description available. Comments Posting comment... Premium member Presentation Transcript Slide1: Breaking the News on Mobile TV: User requirements of a popular mobile content Hendrik Knoche*, Angela Sasse University College London Motivation: Motivation Repurpose standard TV news “as is” How do different encoding bitrates of both audio and video affect the perceived video quality on mobile devices? Down to what resolutions? How big is the influence of text? Previous research: Previous research Based on viewing ratio e.g. (5H) Size: The bigger the better (up to life size) Larger picture -> more arousal Smaller picture -> ? Conflicting information: 2” vs 13” screen no difference in attention benefits from smaller picture in lie detection (Horn ‘02) Emotion detection at full body view less accurate at smaller size 256x256 vs. 128x128Slide4: Study 1 (N=20), 15 sec. Slide5: Study 1: Summary Encoding bitrate of at least 100kbps Resolution and size have little effect Limitations: Small sample, few votes across codecs/devices short clip legible text Study 2: Interface: Study 2: InterfaceStudy 2 (N=72) 4 clips, 2 audio: Study 2 (N=72) 4 clips, 2 audioStudy 2: Qualitative feedback: Study 2: Qualitative feedbackSlide9: Study 2: Summary Reducing image resolution biggest effect at enc. bitrates >100kbps Text legibility is biggest problem of recoded TV news content Better audio resulted in poorer video acceptability Limitations: employed text too small to be legible did not test participants visual acuity Study 3: Preparation: Study 3: PreparationStudy 3: Preparation: Study 3: PreparationReminder Study 2: Reminder Study 2Study 3: (N=20): Study 3: (N=20)Slide14: Study 3: Summary tremendous gains through separate text delivery With legible text: acceptability for all resolutions reached asymptote ≥160kbps 168x126 was feasible for recoded TV News on a mobile device. Slide15: Summary video (res, bitrate), text, and audio affect perceived video quality assure text legibility by re-layout or separate delivery - acceptability reached asymptote ≥160kbps for all resolutions 168x126 – 320x240 facial details are important Limitations: Assumption: perfect delivery Slide16: Thank you! Breaking the News on Mobile TV: User requirements of a popular mobile content Hendrik Knoche*, Angela Sasse University College London h.knoche@cs.ucl.ac.uk Q&A